9/11 Witness can't remember where he works, another thinks its all a huge joke!

~~lynx_land~~ · 10 Nov 2010 , 21:42 PM

I am absolutely dumbfounded by the number of obvious actors that were used on 9/11 that I am coming across in reserarch every day without even looking for.

This former "WTC employee" is telling his narritive, except he forgets the name of the company he has obviously worked for for a long time! This is a must see! He actually clearly starts reading the names of his company or companies off of a list of paper that is off screen! I mean this dude is clearly an actor, if he really knew all these people up there, dont you think there would be some hint of concern in his voice? On any of their voices really? He looks more like hes trying not to laugh.

YouTube - i saw it with my own eyeswww savevid com 1

Another guy in this bizarre scene is looking up at the smoking towers, and I guess his shocked girlfriend must have whispered some inuendo in his ear, because he completely cracks up before the camera cuts away.

This fellow could not try harder to look more dis interested, and is staring at the ground whilst everyone else is looking up.

I am now convinced they payed some nobody actors a fee to shoot these scenes sometime after the fact, saying they might be used in some later film or something. Then these smaller conglomerates release these films, and if in the unlikely event the actors recognise themselves later on, the powers that be can just use the excuse that it was footage shot and people unauthorisingly released it. Or something like that. I mean why does this footage always turn up years later. The day looks generally a bit more overcast than what Tuesday September 11 2001 appeared to be. The footage looks a bit crisper than what most people would expect from an average camera from 2001. The actor seems to be having his conversation de facto with another person who is not the cameraman, so there is another person there documenting it and getting viewpoints.

All footage taken from this master clip.

YouTube - "i saw it with my own eyes"

Also odd in this clip is that guy that shows up twice saying "If this is happening we gotta get outta here". He just seems..odd. Out of place. Not entirely sinscere.

ATTENTION: With an advertising budget of zero dollars we ask everyone who has websites and blogs to copy and paste these links into them as a directory, to help spread the word! Thanks!

9/11 LINKS INDEX - Victim Fraud, Media Fraud

Radio Shows - Jim Fetzer. Deanna Spingola, Debbie Lewis:

*** IMPORTANT: Please use this link below for visual aids while listening to the interviews;

The WTC Towers - Visual Aids - Radio Interviews:

The 9/11 FraudulentTruth Movement: A Conspiracy 30+ Years in the Making

Fraudulent Hero's of 9/11

9/11 World Trade Center Props

World Trade Center Publicity Stunts:

What does Phillipe Petit know about the hollow WTC towers?

Exif/IPTC Metadata:

EXIF Data Similarities - VERY REVEALING INFORMATION

Video: Fraudulence on 9/11

Death Certificate #0001:

Social Security Death Payments & Other SSDI Related Evidence

Social Security Death Payments for 9/11 Victims

The Hollow Towers & Pre-Demolition of WTC:

The World Trade Center Lighting & Picture History:

The Elevators at WTC on 9/11 and the Trapped People:

Revisiting the World Trade Center Phone Calls:

Revisiting the WTC 911 calls

Fireman Actors on 9/11:

New York City Fire Department 9/11 Fraudulent Victims

Stand In Actors on 9/11:

Flight 11 Frauds:

Flight 175 Frauds:

Triplets Separated at Birth - Edward H. Luckett, Carlton Bartels, Michael Tarrou

Flight 77 Frauds:

Flight 93 Frauds:

The 911 Jumper Frauds:

North Tower Frauds:

Pentagon Stage Props - Pentagon TV Fakery:

Pentagon Fraudulent Victims on 9/11:

Media Complicity and Fraud:

Media 9/11 Memorial Frauds:

The 9/11 Memorial Wall:

The 9/11 Victims Memorial Wall in New York City - Was it a Ruse?

9/11 & WTC Corporate Fraud:

Gatekeepers of the Alternate Media:

Jason Burmas On Fake 9/11 Victims (gatekeeper)!

Pending Research Requests from Lets Roll Members:

MISC: Great Research Links on this Material above:

Former Stickies for the Hussled Masses:

Pictures of Extra Equipment on Look-A-Like Flight 175 (109,720 Views)
911 For Dummies Thread. Video, Picture Archive of 911 (7,513,922 Views)
Targeting Laser Light Spot at the World Trade Center! (121,515 Views)
"Flight 175" WAS a Cargo/FUEL TANKER (159,126 Views)
New Photo of 767 Showing 2nd Piece of Equip / Port Engine (233,137 Views)
9/11 LINKS INDEX - Victim Fraud, Media Fraud, WTC Fraud

9/11 Related Murders:

New 9/11 Murder? Was John P. (Jack) Wheeler III About to Blow a Whistle?

Directory of Organized Crime Links & 9/11 Ties

Osama Bin Laden Forum directory:

|

**do2read** · 10 Nov 2010 , 23:12 PM

Quote:

This former "WTC employee" is telling his narritive, except he forgets the name of the company he has obviously worked for for a long time! This is a must see! He actually clearly starts reading the names of his company or companies off of a list of paper that is off screen! I mean this dude is clearly an actor, if he really knew all these people up there, dont you think there would be some hint of concern in his voice? On any of their voices really? He looks more like hes trying not to laugh.

He stumbles, stammers. looks down, then obviously reads the list rapid fire. Like he didn't even rehearse his lines at all.

Maybe through the eyes of our own shock, we saw these things as the behavior of people who were in shock themselves.

Now we can see they are obviously just really bad actors.

l

wntthetrth · 11 Nov 2010 , 00:37 AM

Assuming for the moment that these were all legit candid shots of people looking at the towers burning, I find myself wondering how close the person with the camera had to be to them. All but a couple of the people seem totally oblivious to the fact that someone is filming them. Wouldn't the normal reaction be curiosity? Wouldn't their eyes at least briefly glance toward the camera, and perhaps follow the camera person as he/she moved away? Surely, in spite of the shock of the towers on fire, many would be wondering what news station they might possibly show up on.

Phil Jayhan · 11 Nov 2010 , 04:37 AM

This is an absolutely incredible find lynx. It cannot be missed once pointed out. He didn't even know the name of the damned company he worked for until he looked down and read it off his paper, and didn't know the other companies around him without checking his crib notes as well. What an idiot if you think about it. He cant remember "Marsh USA?"

The guys a retard. Then he visibly goes and looks down to his notes while on camera to "remember" the names of the other companies. If I was the one who hired him I would not have paid him whatever portion he had coming to him because the guy is such a dumbass.

Go to 2:06 in this video;

YouTube - "i saw it with my own eyes"

This article is a gem lynx!

Cheers-
Phil

**Sandero** · 11 Nov 2010 , 05:08 AM

You guys are making a bunch of assumptions. They may be tru, but maybe you are reading something which isn't there. The guys who looks down at a paper and reads the name of companies seems odd. But suppose he was a salesmen who was to call on a bunch of financial services companies that day and didn't actually work for them, but was to go there to sell something and looked at his list and saw which companies were on what floors. I am not saying this is what happened but it could be. As an employee of Marsh this would not be credible.

As for the presence of the camera one might think that a few things were at play. This camera person was there in Times Square and people walked into the area to look at the jumbotron and saw the camera but couldn't avoid and and per pre occupied with seeing what was a major horror unfolding downtown. At least some of the people captured looked genuinely concerned and perplexed... and rightfully frightened.

I was in NYC and driving to work when the WTC 1 was hit and by the time I arrived WTC 2 was hit and I was rather frightened as I assumed it was some sort of attack and had no idea what was coming next and I got in my car and drove down to the Bronx to get my wife and head out of town.

It was pretty chaotic and people were drawn to see what happened, frightened by it and wanted to know what was going on and to be assured that everything was under control.

The latter never happened. Most of the day we had the feeling that we were "abandoned" by the people who were to protect us from attacks. We were vulnerable and when the Pentagon was attacked it seemed as if the military was completely useless and our worst fears were confirmed. It was only after it stopped that people calmed down a bit, but still were thinking we were obviously very vulnerable and it could continue at any moment.

People were very freaked out. For some it was so unreal they didn't know what to do. And what were we to do?

I wouldn't assume these were all actors. You can fall into a logical trap of having an idea and then seeing everything as supporting the idea. That is not the best way to approach observations. Yes consider alternatives... but keep an open mind.

Phil Jayhan · 11 Nov 2010 , 05:17 AM

Marsh USA allegedly occupied an area of the world trade center which was hollow and didn't have one single floor. Not one. Completely hollow section of the North Tower;

So I would have to say the guy is lying through his teeth.

Cheers-
Phil

And lets not forget that Marsh USA is a CIA owned asset which has laundered money for the agency since it's inception.

**Sandero** · 11 Nov 2010 , 05:37 AM

Phil,

When you use the term hollow do you mean there were no floors in those sections.. or that there were empty floors - concrete slabs with no build out or ceilings, lighting etc?

What exactly do you mean and how many "floors" were like this?

That photo is from the early 70s when the south tower was clearly under construction as you can see one crane up top.

Watarush · 11 Nov 2010 , 08:37 AM

In the video the only thing the guy is holding is his cell phone, the other hand is empty. So whatever he is obviously reading off of is either on the ground or being held by someone off-camera. Like cue cards. Good eye catching that one lynx.

Phil Jayhan · 11 Nov 2010 , 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandero

Phil,

When you use the term hollow do you mean there were no floors in those sections.. or that there were empty floors - concrete slabs with no build out or ceilings, lighting etc?

What exactly do you mean and how many "floors" were like this?

That photo is from the early 70s when the south tower was clearly under construction as you can see one crane up top.

Hollow, look at the pictures. You can tell that. No floors. No cement. No floor pans. And when the picture was taken is irrelevant. Why? Because they told us they built those Towers floor by floor all the way to the top. There was no provision to pour the floors later or have any unfinished floors.

Not only that but they hired helicopters to film the construction. And we can see clearly they poured no concrete on most floors. Every shot we see in construction shows the floor pans at least 4 floors down, with none of them having any concrete poured. Any!

They played musical floor pans all the way to the top of the world trade center. Each and every helicopter shot is like this, floor pans 3-4-5 floors deep and down, none of which have any concrete poured in them. None!

Can you please show me pictures which show the cranes raising huge buckets of concrete? I doubt it because I have been looking for a single one for months now, and they don't seem to exist. Why? Because they never poured most floors.

And the fact that they are 4 floors down with no concrete also makes it an impossibility to pour the concrete later as there isn't any way to get it there or pour it. You cannot use the elevators. I cannot find even one single shot of any concrete buckets being brought up by crane. And pouring concrete on floor pans 4 floors down is also an impossibility. It cannot be pumped. So, in summary, it can be proven that the floors, nearly all of them, were never poured to begin with.

Face it Sandero. They totally deceived us about the construction of the WTC. The Towers were built hollow and empty. Floor by floor.

Plain and simple. Pictures don't lie.

Cheers-
Phil

**2getherwestand** · 11 Nov 2010 , 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandero

You guys are making a bunch of assumptions. They may be tru, but maybe you are reading something which isn't there. The guys who looks down at a paper and reads the name of companies seems odd. But suppose he was a salesmen who was to call on a bunch of financial services companies that day and didn't actually work for them, but was to go there to sell something and looked at his list and saw which companies were on what floors. I am not saying this is what happened but it could be. As an employee of Marsh this would not be credible.

As for the presence of the camera one might think that a few things were at play. This camera person was there in Times Square and people walked into the area to look at the jumbotron and saw the camera but couldn't avoid and and per pre occupied with seeing what was a major horror unfolding downtown. At least some of the people captured looked genuinely concerned and perplexed... and rightfully frightened.

I was in NYC and driving to work when the WTC 1 was hit and by the time I arrived WTC 2 was hit and I was rather frightened as I assumed it was some sort of attack and had no idea what was coming next and I got in my car and drove down to the Bronx to get my wife and head out of town.

It was pretty chaotic and people were drawn to see what happened, frightened by it and wanted to know what was going on and to be assured that everything was under control.

The latter never happened. Most of the day we had the feeling that we were "abandoned" by the people who were to protect us from attacks. We were vulnerable and when the Pentagon was attacked it seemed as if the military was completely useless and our worst fears were confirmed. It was only after it stopped that people calmed down a bit, but still were thinking we were obviously very vulnerable and it could continue at any moment.

People were very freaked out. For some it was so unreal they didn't know what to do. And what were we to do?

I wouldn't assume these were all actors. You can fall into a logical trap of having an idea and then seeing everything as supporting the idea. That is not the best way to approach observations. Yes consider alternatives... but keep an open mind.

Yes,be afraid,very afraid,that way they can continue spoon feeding you whatever bullshit they think you will swallow.Obviously they got the perfect effect they wanted.Still got your head in the wrong place sandero.

11 Nov 2010 , 00:37 AM	#3
wntthetrth Privileged Join Date: 3 Feb 2006 Posts: 1,182 Threads: 176 Blog Entries: 1 Thanked 216 Times in 92 Posts	Re: 9/11 witness cant remember where he works, another thinks its all a huge joke! Assuming for the moment that these were all legit candid shots of people looking at the towers burning, I find myself wondering how close the person with the camera had to be to them. All but a couple of the people seem totally oblivious to the fact that someone is filming them. Wouldn't the normal reaction be curiosity? Wouldn't their eyes at least briefly glance toward the camera, and perhaps follow the camera person as he/she moved away? Surely, in spite of the shock of the towers on fire, many would be wondering what news station they might possibly show up on. __________________ ... God, as truth incarnate, will not long let stand a world devoted to such evil. Therefore, let us have the truth and freedom our spirits require... or let us die seeking these things, for without them, we shall surely and justly perish in an evil world." Michael Sweeney

11 Nov 2010 , 05:08 AM	#5
Sandero Thinker Join Date: 20 Oct 2010 Location: nyc Posts: 243 Threads: 0 Thanked 311 Times in 139 Posts	Re: 9/11 witness cant remember where he works, another thinks its all a huge joke! You guys are making a bunch of assumptions. They may be tru, but maybe you are reading something which isn't there. The guys who looks down at a paper and reads the name of companies seems odd. But suppose he was a salesmen who was to call on a bunch of financial services companies that day and didn't actually work for them, but was to go there to sell something and looked at his list and saw which companies were on what floors. I am not saying this is what happened but it could be. As an employee of Marsh this would not be credible. As for the presence of the camera one might think that a few things were at play. This camera person was there in Times Square and people walked into the area to look at the jumbotron and saw the camera but couldn't avoid and and per pre occupied with seeing what was a major horror unfolding downtown. At least some of the people captured looked genuinely concerned and perplexed... and rightfully frightened. I was in NYC and driving to work when the WTC 1 was hit and by the time I arrived WTC 2 was hit and I was rather frightened as I assumed it was some sort of attack and had no idea what was coming next and I got in my car and drove down to the Bronx to get my wife and head out of town. It was pretty chaotic and people were drawn to see what happened, frightened by it and wanted to know what was going on and to be assured that everything was under control. The latter never happened. Most of the day we had the feeling that we were "abandoned" by the people who were to protect us from attacks. We were vulnerable and when the Pentagon was attacked it seemed as if the military was completely useless and our worst fears were confirmed. It was only after it stopped that people calmed down a bit, but still were thinking we were obviously very vulnerable and it could continue at any moment. People were very freaked out. For some it was so unreal they didn't know what to do. And what were we to do? I wouldn't assume these were all actors. You can fall into a logical trap of having an idea and then seeing everything as supporting the idea. That is not the best way to approach observations. Yes consider alternatives... but keep an open mind.

11 Nov 2010 , 05:17 AM	#6
Phil Jayhan Admin Join Date: 23 Feb 2004 Location: Middle Earth Posts: 22,824 Threads: 2784 Blog Entries: 28 Thanked 7,881 Times in 2,899 Posts	Marsh USA occupied floors at WTC which were never built Marsh USA allegedly occupied an area of the world trade center which was hollow and didn't have one single floor. Not one. Completely hollow section of the North Tower; So I would have to say the guy is lying through his teeth. Cheers- Phil And lets not forget that Marsh USA is a CIA owned asset which has laundered money for the agency since it's inception. __________________ Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog \| Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host \| Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

11 Nov 2010 , 05:37 AM	#7
Sandero Thinker Join Date: 20 Oct 2010 Location: nyc Posts: 243 Threads: 0 Thanked 311 Times in 139 Posts	Re: 9/11 witness cant remember where he works, another thinks its all a huge joke! Phil, When you use the term hollow do you mean there were no floors in those sections.. or that there were empty floors - concrete slabs with no build out or ceilings, lighting etc? What exactly do you mean and how many "floors" were like this? That photo is from the early 70s when the south tower was clearly under construction as you can see one crane up top.

11 Nov 2010 , 08:37 AM	#8
Watarush Privileged Join Date: 5 Mar 2010 Location: New York NY Posts: 44 Threads: 4 Thanked 114 Times in 36 Posts	Re: 9/11 witness cant remember where he works, another thinks its all a huge joke! In the video the only thing the guy is holding is his cell phone, the other hand is empty. So whatever he is obviously reading off of is either on the ground or being held by someone off-camera. Like cue cards. Good eye catching that one lynx.