|
|
#11 |
|
Admin
Join Date: 23 Feb 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 20,437
Threads: 2502
Blog Entries: 25
Thanked 779 Times in 433 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Pope Calls for a New World Order
This is a great story. The Pope calls for a new world order.
Hmmm, phil ![]() [hr:555685c0e2] Original link: http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0102-03.htm Published on Friday, January 2, 2004 by the Guardian/UK Pope Calls for a New World Order UN's failure to halt US war on Iraq leads to new initiative by John Hooper in Rome Pope John Paul II launched one of the most important diplomatic initiatives of his long papacy yesterday when he called for a new international order to replace the one that emerged from the second world war. Though he did not offer a detailed plan, his words appeared to show he wanted the UN replaced in light of its failure to block the use of force by America in Iraq. The Pope called last month for the reform of world institutions and deplored any failure to respect international law. But in a sermon during a mass at St Peter's in Rome yesterday, he went much further, referring to the UN as if it were already a part of the past. "More than ever, we need a new international order that draws on the experience and results achieved in these years by the United Nations," he declared during a service to mark the Roman Catholic Church's World Day of Peace, celebrated on January 1. He was flanked at the altar by two of his most senior international representatives: the secretary of state, Cardinal Angelo Sodano, and the president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Cardinal Renato Martino, who outraged many Americans last month by expressing "pity" and "compassion" for the captured Saddam Hussein. The congregation included the heads of all the diplomatic missions accredited to the Holy See. In his homily, the Pope said the new world order he wanted "would be able to provide solutions to the problems of today ... based on the dignity of human beings, an integrated development of society, solidarity between rich and poor nations, and on the sharing of resources and the extraordinary results of scientific and technological progress." The Pope believes that not enough of these goals are being achieved with the present system of international organizations that emerged in the late 40s, including the UN, the IMF and the World Bank. But the central issue, seen from the Vatican's point of view, is the growing irrelevance of a painstakingly constructed body of international law which is being ignored by the US administration during its "war on terror". Cardinal Martino first signaled the Pope's disquiet last month when he presented a document written by the pontiff to mark the World Day of Peace. Without naming the US, the Pope warned: "Peace and international law are closely linked to each other: law favors peace". He also pointedly observed that "democratic governments know well that the use of force against terrorists cannot justify a renunciation of the principles of the rule of law". The Pope acknowledged that current international law was ill-suited to dealing with rebels or terrorists and called for new treaties and reform of the UN. But yesterday's appeal was for an altogether more sweeping change. With observer status at the UN and a network of diplomats covering 174 countries, the Holy See is in a strong position to lobby for its goals. Its concerns over US attitudes are unlikely to be assuaged by the latest statement of policy from President George Bush's secretary of state, Colin Powell. In an article for the New York Times yesterday, Mr Powell said: "President Bush's vision is clear and right: America's formidable power must continue to be deployed on behalf of principles that are simultaneously American, but that are also beyond and greater than ourselves." Senior members of the Catholic Church of England and Wales endorsed the Pope's comments. "We welcome the words of the Vatican and fully support what the Holy See says in this," said Ollie Wilson, a spokesman for the Catholic media office. They cast doubt however on whether he had meant to imply that the UN had had its day and should be replaced. Peter Jennings, press secretary to the Most Reverend Vincent Nichols, Archbishop of Birmingham, said: "The Pope is a great advocate of the UN." © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004 __________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan v666 Blog | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law" "In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton |
| |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: 9 Feb 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4,084
Threads: 117
Blog Entries: 3
Thanked 111 Times in 74 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Phil, that post brings up what, for me anyway, is the real purpose behind all that has happened since 911. The INSANE actions of our leaders are not just for reaping trillions in war loot, or taking away our civil liberties, but to force the world to SCREAM, ENOUGH!!!!! to make the good people of Earth welcome a benign global dictatorship. (of course, it will look like a democracy)
Wonder why all our elected officials go along with the madness? It's not only that they're greedy (which they are!) but nearly all of them believe sincerely in the NEW WORLD ORDER, Huxley's Brave New World, H.G. Wells' Utopia!!! It's the Hegelian dialect (problem, action, solution) scenario played out on a global scale! I understand that people can't grasp a conspiracy of this magnitude, without understanding all the pieces that have been lined up in place over the centuries. Looking into it from this angle, ALL the pieces have a representative of the Vatican hidden in there somewhere! And here, the Vatican is not in the background as usual, but right out front! __________________
A LIE BELIEVED BY EVERYBODY IS NOT THE TRUTH |
| |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Admin
Join Date: 23 Feb 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 20,437
Threads: 2502
Blog Entries: 25
Thanked 779 Times in 433 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
TB, Ya true in so many ways. People should check out this video of Tom Richards from Spiritually Smart. No production quality here, except for the total honesty and from the heart talking he presents. And everything he says about Alex Jones is true, and am willing to consider what he says about John Decamp and Ted Gunderson as well, because the points he makes about them, regardless of what they "exposed" are valid points which need to be considered. This is only 20 minutes long. But is a good listen.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq8S7vS2kz0[/youtube] Cheers- phil __________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan v666 Blog | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law" "In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton |
| |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: 9 Feb 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4,084
Threads: 117
Blog Entries: 3
Thanked 111 Times in 74 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
AlexJones/ Martin Sheen
Right on the heels of what we've been talking about!
Quote:
He's just now figuring it out? __________________
A LIE BELIEVED BY EVERYBODY IS NOT THE TRUTH |
|
| |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Free Mind
Join Date: 6 Oct 2004
Posts: 3,331
Threads: 148
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
I agree - it's time to call Alex Jones' bluff.
Why doesn't he yell and scream about the Hanoverians? Why doesn't he yell and scream about the Hapsburgs? Why doesn't he yell and scream about the Rothschilds? Why doesn't he yell and scream about the Rockerfellers? Why doesn't he yell and scream about the Du Ponts? Why doesn't he yell and scream about the Carnegies? Why doesn't he yell and scream about the Windsors? Why doesn't he yell and scream about the survivor accounts of Vatican ritual abuse? Why doesn't he yell and scream about the missing trillions spent on psy-ops projects? You know - maybe he is scared? I dunno...but ther evidence is clear - the rest of the truth movement has learnt much during the last few years and instead of wondering what is going on, has now moved on to wondering what these families are doing with all this power and wealth. Some are even as advanced in their research to also wonder what these families are doing with archaic occult rituals and systems of belief and their abuse of the human. Wondering how they can exist whilst having slave-baby making women from which they take babies and either murder or mould into agents of "the organisation". So...why is Alex Jones so far behind the 8-ball? It's looking extremely susupicious to me. Alex - start talking about the real issues and save yourself! __________________
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...vali_index.htm |
| |
|
|
|
#16 | |||
|
Admin
Join Date: 23 Feb 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 20,437
Threads: 2502
Blog Entries: 25
Thanked 779 Times in 433 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think we can sum it all up succinctly by saying why doesn't Alex Jones see the Vatican is obviously in control of all the secret societies, bloodlines, and corporations through the various Federal Reserve Corporations she has set up in various nations. and here is a copy and paste from an article by Chris Bollyn in the huddled masses that I thought would be more than relevant to this discussion as it touches on these selfsame points.
[hr:8f0a161f0d] Quote:
Yet each and every person in this thread has a common denominator and a scarlet thread which ties them all together. They are all playing the Ancient "Blame the Jew" harp, and this harp ain't from God. This goes for Wing TV, Hufschmid, Darrel Bradford Smith, Alex Jones and Chris Bollyn. And each and every one of these people attacked me or this website first. I sure do hope each person will consider this. As if they consider this infighting, which it is not, that they will at least lay the blame where it started. Witht he people just mentioned above. Let me give you an example of the devious ways in which Darrel Bradford Smith, Hufschmid and Bollyn use; first they speak from forked tongue. "Tweeners" as Star has called them, but they are worse than "tweeners." They are outright liars. And they feed off of peoples ignorance. Let me show an example of this, where when all else fails, they simply lie through their teeth. Read the quote below, and see if you can spot the lie. Shouldn't be too terribly tough as nearly everyone here is well aquainted with 911: In Plane Sight, as well as the Directors cut. Quote:
Quote:
And all of these people also have something else in common besides the old "Blame the Jew" game. They trash and speak ill of anyone daring to mention the Vatican and how it is they have subverted our once great nation. Darrel Bradford Smith and Eric Hufschmid both issued cryptic and not so cryptic threats to me on this very subject when speaking to them on the phone. Alex Jones claimed we are all mentally Ill and that he wants to [i]sue us into oblivion ...[i] (But claims he doesn't have the time to do this) And yet just a few days after Alex Jones tirades against those of us speaking the truth about the Vatican, how we are all mentally ill, and liars, and how he wants to "sue us", he has on his program someone saying these very things. And more confusing still, he agreed with everything said by his guest. Alex Jones speaks with a forked tongue. Bollyn, a strong Roman Catholic, goes as far as saying in his article which started this thread that the Vatican "played no part" in 911 or the subversion of America! So which side of Alex Jones mouth do we believe? The wrong side or the right side? There is an old Philmanian saying, which goes something like this; He who rides both side of picket fence, end up with sore balls... Does Alex Jones now consider himself "mentally ill?" A "liar?" Will he now "sue himself into oblivion?" Will he seek counseling for his newly discovered disorder whereby people are saying the Vatican is the source of all evil? And proponents and masters of the new world order? Enquiring minds want to know! My best guess why Alex Jones, master of the forked tongue, had someone on his Radio show telling the truth about the Vatican is simple. Now he can say to those who point out his complicity and gate-keeping for the Vatican; "See, look here, back in late 2007 I had a person on my show speaking of these very things and I agreed with them when I was then speaking out of the right side of my mouth..." He did it to insulate himself from criticism. From just criticism. From the growing awareness of millions of people on the internet that are now strongly suspecting Alex Jones might not be the Super Patriot which he claims to be, because of his gate-keeping and suppression of the truth about the Vatican, and her myriad secret societies which this great whore controls, and subverts nations through. He didn't have this guy on his radio show, speaking the truth about the Vatican, simply because he is "now just catching on." And seeing the truth of it. I can ssure you this is not the case. Eric Hufschmid pulled a similar tactic when he published a story on his website, when none were even raising any allegations about this subject, that he; May or may not be the Nephew of Rupert Murdoch... Which is an awfully odd story to put up, when the accusation had never once reared its ugly head, is it not? Eric Hufschmid did this because he knew the truth about his relationship to Murdoch, and was rightfully paranoid if it ever got to be common knowledge, that it would sink his credibility, faster than the Titanic sinking in icy waters. And if and when it ever reared its ugly head, he would simply point back to the article and say; See, I knew this might have been true, and even published an article about it, saying as much...See how honest I am??? And yet all of these people play with that double edged sword, and are playing the game of "Pin the Tail on the Jew" while on the other hand denying any truth of the Vatican being the supreme power group behind the subversion of this nation. It should be coming more and more obvious to people now, as it isn't all that hard to see. As all of these people have basically "outed themselves." They have burned their own covers. Wing TV did in such a magnaminous way that they actually had to leave the "truth movement." Because all people everywhere saw them as they were, bad comic book characters, in the third act of a badly scripted play. Cheers- phil __________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan v666 Blog | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law" "In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton |
|||
| |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Reader
Join Date: 4 Nov 2007
Location: Lateran Palace, Vatican City
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
You guys are acting like I am the Anti-Christ or something.
With Much Love, Pope Benedict __________________
One day you shall all bow before me or Die!! |
| |
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: 9 Feb 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4,084
Threads: 117
Blog Entries: 3
Thanked 111 Times in 74 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Pope Benny said;
Quote:
__________________
A LIE BELIEVED BY EVERYBODY IS NOT THE TRUTH |
|
| |
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Free Mind
Join Date: 6 Oct 2004
Posts: 3,331
Threads: 148
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...vali_index.htm |
|
| |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|