Another Very Fake & Staged 911 Photograph

**do2read** · 30 Nov 2010 , 22:24 PM

Another gem hidden among 10,000 Photographs obtained directly from NIST by way of FOIA Request, thanks to Kawika.

First of all, the car was a convertible, There is another picture of it I will have to find and post.

This car is completely burned out, presumably before the collapses, as the paper which has accumulated in the car are not burned.

What is obviously wrong with this picture?

There are plenty of papers and no dust.

The only possibility is that the car was totally burned out before the first plane strike, and that the plane strike spread enough paper out of the impact zone to cover this part of Lower Manhattan.

That being said, this is either proof of a totally staged scene, or more evidence of the plane strike "paper bomb".

Per The Surgeon's challenge in that thread, how would the paper get ejected by the fireball plane crash, and not be at all burned?

More Fakery that doesn't stand up to the least bit of scrutiny.

Is there another reasonable explanation?

l

9/11 LINKS INDEX - Victim Fraud, Media Fraud

Radio Shows - Jim Fetzer & The Real Deal:

9/11 World Trade Center Props

World Trade Center Publicity Stunts:

What does Phillipe Petit know about the hollow WTC towers?

Exif/IPTC Metadata:

EXIF Data Similarities - VERY REVEALING INFORMATION

Video: Fraudulence on 9/11

Death Certificate #0001:

Social Security Death Payments & Other SSDI Related Evidence

Social Security Death Payments for 9/11 Victims

The Hollow Towers & Pre-Demolition of WTC:

The World Trade Center Lighting & Picture History

The Elevators at WTC on 9/11 and the Trapped People:

Outrageous WTC 9/11 elevator stories exposed

Revisiting the World Trade Center Phone Calls:

Revisiting the WTC 911 calls

Fireman Actors on 9/11:

Stand In Actors on 9/11:

Flight 11 Frauds:

Flight 175 Frauds:

Triplets Separated at Birth - Edward H. Luckett, Carlton Bartels, Michael Tarrou

Flight 77 Frauds:

Flight 93 Frauds:

The 911 Jumper Frauds:

North Tower Frauds:

Pentagon Stage Props - Pentagon TV Fakery:

Pentagon Fraudulent Victims on 9/11:

Media Complicity and Fraud:

Media 9/11 Memorial Frauds:

The 9/11 Memorial Wall:

The 9/11 Victims Memorial Wall in New York City - Was it a Ruse?

9/11 & WTC Corporate Fraud:

Gatekeepers of the Alternate Media:

Jason Burmas On Fake 9/11 Victims (gatekeeper)!

Pending Research Requests from Lets Roll Members:

MISC: Great Research Links on this Material above:

Former Stickies for the Hussled Masses:

Pictures of Extra Equipment on Look-A-Like Flight 175 (109,720 Views)
911 For Dummies Thread. Video, Picture Archive of 911 (7,513,922 Views)
Targeting Laser Light Spot at the World Trade Center! (121,515 Views)
"Flight 175" WAS a Cargo/FUEL TANKER (159,126 Views)
New Photo of 767 Showing 2nd Piece of Equip / Port Engine (233,137 Views)
9/11 LINKS INDEX - Victim Fraud, Media Fraud, WTC Fraud

|

**stannrodd** · 30 Nov 2010 , 23:05 PM

Quote:

First of all, the car was a convertible, There is another picture of it I will have to find and post.

This car is completely burned out, presumably before the collapses, as the paper which has accumulated in the car are not burned.

What is obviously wrong with this picture?

There are plenty of papers and no dust.

The only possibility is that the car was totally burned out before the first plane strike, and that the plane strike spread enough paper out of the impact zone to cover this part of Lower Manhattan.

That being said, this is either proof of a totally staged scene, or more evidence of the plane strike "paper bomb".

Per The Surgeon's challenge in that thread, how would the paper get ejected by the fireball plane crash, and not be at all burned?

More Fakery that doesn't stand up to the least bit of scrutiny.

Is there another reasonable explanation?

My question is .. why would anyone with half a brain or less, contrive a fake photo with such anomalies in it..

I don't offer this as being an alternative explanation.

Can I say though, that there are a number of speculative assumptions being made on the basis of this still photo...

The problem with speculation is, that .. it is what it is .. if it cannot be reinforced with other evidence to support the speculation then you are back to square one.

I could for example say .. that someone decided to do a bit of street cleaning and just put all that stuff into the car in the speculative knowledge that it would get taken away with all the other garbage littering the streets.

I always look outside of the square .. do you .. or are you cherry picking for other reasons.

Please don't take offence at this comment .. just come back with your view, thanks.

Stann