Terral

Greetings to All:

April Gallop and her son (Rawstory.com) were injured during the initial Pentagon explosion from the Missile Strike that took place at the Column Line (CL) 14 location (pic) at exactly 9:31:39 AM (my blog). We know for a fact that April Gallop was injured by a DoD Missile, because the Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) video camera recordings clearly show the missile on final approach and about to strike the Pentagon. The DoD released security camera footage from two security cameras presented in two columns on this 911research website (link), because the Pentagon officials failed to realize that we have the technology available to determine the size of their missile proving beyond all doubt that this Missile Strike is just one component of the larger 9/11 Inside Job. Not only will the evidence prove that the flying object has a 20-inch diameter, but these CCTV frames also reveal the truth that only ‘inside-the-building fires’ (Barbara Honegger’s paper) were created during this initial Missile Strike.

The process for determining the size of our DoD Missile begins by opening up the first two frames for Camera #1 (left) and Camera #2 (right) here. We can see the nose section of our DoD Missile in the top right-hand picture and entering frame from our right. However, the initial Observational portion of our exercise requires us to place full attention on the Camera #1 frame (left) where the Missile has yet to enter the frame. We are looking through the lens of a security camera using a wide-angle lens, which accounts for the slopping roofline and the two columns having the appearance of leaning away from the centerline of the picture. The DoD bad guys errantly thought that this wide-angle lens created insurmountable hurdles for our 911Truth investigation, because the sizes of the objects are skewed; but that is just another 9/11 MYTH that you are about to see debunked once and for all.

Camera 1 is positioned five feet above the ground, which matches the five feet elevation of the right-hand column ‘and’ a reference point five feet above the horizon in the distance. We have a straight line running through our security camera lens ‘and’ the top of that right-hand column ‘and’ our reference point just five feet above the horizon, which means all three of these points are on the same 5-feet X-axis plane.



Follow our “Camera Height Is Also 5 Feet” line across the frame to realize the top of the right-hand column ‘and’ the nose of our missile ‘and’ that reference point five feet above the horizon are all on the same horizontal X-axis plane. We cannot actually see the missile nose in this Camera #1 frame, but we are able to locate the elevation of the missile nose by identifying the elevation of the center of the “Vapor Trail Exhaust Behind The Missile.” The “Magic Spot” marks the X-Y Axis Intersection Point location running from our security camera lens through the cap of the right-hand column through the centerline of the flying object and through to that reference point just five feet above the horizon that places ‘all’ of these points on the same 5-feet Elevation Plane from this diagram (pic). Once you have examined all the evidence in both diagrams, to conclude that our missile nose is definitely five feet above the ground, then we are ready to begin the second portion of our Observational Exercise.

Now concentrate all of your focus on the first Camera #2 image (on right) and make the connection that this flying object is flying just five feet off the ground. I superimposed a clip from the Camera 2 image onto the chalkboard (left above), so you can begin making the determination about the ‘size’ of the flying object in relation and proportion to the ‘clearance underneath.’ Run your eyes to the only white arrow where you see “Clearance is Over Twice The Diameter,” because this is your key to accurately determining the diameter of our flying object. Once we have the correct ‘proportions’ for establishing the values of our two coefficients (.5 and 2.5), then we are able solve the algebraic equation to find X.

The clearance under our Missile is clearly over twice the diameter, which I have assigned the measurement of 2.5X. We are looking at .5X added to the clearance, because our 5 feet dimension only includes the ground distance to the ‘nose’ of the Missile; or measuring from the ground to the center of the flying object where “X” is the size of our missile in feet. Referring to the chalkboard:

.5X plus 2.5X equals 5 feet.

We then multiply both sides of the equation by 2 to obtain:

X plus 5X equals 10 feet.

We then divide both sides of the equation by 6 to obtain:

X equals 10/6 or 1.6666667 feet, or,

X equals 20 inches.

The math says that an object flying just five feet off the ground with two and a half times the clearance underneath has a diameter of 20 inches, which is obviously not the diameter of any 100-Ton Jetliner. Skim through all the frames from the two security videos (here again) to realize 'no' outside-the-Pentagon building fires are present!! This is a very important observation, because a picture taken just five minutes later looks something like this:



By this time (9:36:27+), the retrofitted A-3 Jet circled north to attack the Pentagon a second time by exploding against the E-Ring wall. The security camera timestamp data has been purposely altered to hide the fact that the initial Missile Strike that injured April Gallop took place at 9:31:39 AM and 'not' the 9:38 AM time offered up in the bogus Arlington County After-Action Report (Page 200).

A much deeper mystery exists for this Pentagon Case, when you realize that “U.S. Air Force defense contractors brought in A-3 Sky Warrior aircraft under the cover of darkness to be completely refitted and modified at the small civilian airport in Colorado” (link). Add to this fact that we have five Raytheon employees killed on 9/11 (story) and four of those victims were assigned seats on AA11 and AA77 flights that were canceled. (story). Then wade through the evidence of this Portland.IndyMedia.org article (here) to realize that the A-3 Jet to initiate the Pentagon Missile Strike included the ‘missile testing platform . . . for Hughes-Raytheon’ missiles where Raytheon/TRW is owned by Blackstone, a private financial corporation, CEO, Peter Peterson (of NYC FED Reserve); Blackstone buys full WTC7 mortgage through in-house military contractor Raytheon/TRW mere months before 9-11 while other Raytheonites refit Sky Warriors . . .”.

The evidence not only says that April Gallop and her son were almost murdered during the 9:31:39 AM Missile Strike, but that the missile itself was built by Raytheon Employees with the loose ends eliminated to remove the paper trail linking this Pentagon attack with the Inside-job WTC-7 Controlled Demolition. We know this initial Missile Strike took place at precisely 9:31:39 AM, because that marks the time that April Gallop’s watch stopped (around 9:30) and the time that the Quartermaster-calibrated Navy Clock (on right) also stopped with the first explosion at CL-14.

The idea that the inside-job bad guys planted a series of ‘bombs’ is ridiculous, because of all the evidence of all the destruction taking place on the same 45-degree trajectory heading (pic) of OUR MISSILE from the rear C-Ring exit hole (pic) out to the Route 27 cloverleaf (Pole #1) and our five downed light poles (pic) taking place in mere seconds.

GL,

Terral

Terral

Greetings to All:

Anyone looking for evidence of the 9:31:39 AM Missile Strike at the Pentagon should begin by reading the Opening Post of this Topic.

GL,

Terral

do2read

April Gallop's story is hilarious.

A mother with a two month old rescues a co-worker then rescues her baby. She the drags him out to the lawn?



Then she files a lawsuit, which hasn't been heard from since, and never will be.

The lawsuit leaves the part about the co-worker out completely.


Spc. Gallop is full of it, and we'll never see another report about her lawsuit, filed in lower new york circuit court, for an event which occurred on Federal territory and on a Military installation.

WTF is right.


l

__________________
"Don't worry about it - Americans don't read." Allan Dulles ...

Terral

Hi Do:

The part you are leaving out is the three-part Observational/Geometric/Algebraic exercise proving that the flying object approaching the Pentagon has a 20-inch diameter, which equates to a Peter G. Peterson/Blackstone Hughes-Raytheon Hypersonic Missile and no 100-ton Jetliner.

Please 'do read' the Opening Post for real this time and try to poke holes in my math and interpretations of the evidence.

GL,

Terral

do2read

The title of the thread begins, " April Gallop Was Injured", and no math or geometry is necessary to know that that is not true.

Her story, like most other "survivor stories" is a fiction.

That being said, arguing about how she didn't get injured sounds moot to me.

But by all means, chase your tail.

Produce complicated charts and mathematics about how it didn't happen.


Do the math on --she tells different stories, and she got her baby next---.

And those observations were found only within the links you provided! Perhaps a litttle diggin on April would make your mathematics even more irrelevant.



l

__________________
"Don't worry about it - Americans don't read." Allan Dulles ...

Terral

Hi Do2:

I have interviewed April Gallop personally. Have you? I have also interviewed Lloyde England and many other Pentagon witnesses/survivors and I see much more 911Truth in their testimony than anything coming from you. The fact that you do not understand the substance of my OP photographic presentation and analysis means that Do2 should be reading and not writing on this topic IMHO; but please 'quote >>' anything that appears off and correct me on any point using whatever you consider credible evidence.

Thank you,

Terral

do2read

You personally interviewed her and didn't ask her why she didn't get her baby first?

You interviewed her, and didn't notice a different story in her lawsuit?


I guess your investigation was limited to your initial supposition, which she was of course happy to go along with.




I would dearly love to talk to April, pm me her number, but my guess is that would not be possible.


We would be done after just one question.


I also noticed you haven't updated us on the three year old lawsuit, how's that going?




l

__________________
"Don't worry about it - Americans don't read." Allan Dulles ...

vert

Do2,
You ever heard the interview with Sepulveda? There are some interesting overlaps with April...after he got knocked out he ran into the Pentagon to save a baby, and then returned to positively identify the hijackers that were in the still intact cockpit sitting in the A&E drive...lol. Check it out:

http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/3340388/1/

You got a good link where I could catch up on April Gallup by any chance?

do2read

Sounds like there were a lot of babies working there that day.

Maybe Saddam's troops were throwing them out of incubators again at the pentagon. Turns out that story from Kuwait was staged completely, like April and the other survivors.


Out of all of the thousands of survivors, none have made it here. If April is interested in the truth, why isn't she here to tell us about it?

Where are they? Surely one could represent, instead of sending someone who talked to them once.

April would have plenty of excuses not to talk to me, her lawsuit that never moves, plus it's probably too painful to discuss (with anyone who might ask a question she cannot answer).

So there, I'm saying April is a fake. An actress or liar or agent. Like the many we have named. Not one has come to say anything in their own defense. Not one.


If you believe a new mother would retrieve her baby second, then you'll believe anything.

You'll have to continue the charade by yourself, I"m out.




l

__________________
"Don't worry about it - Americans don't read." Allan Dulles ...

ricochet

I had at first not even believed that A.G. was a real person. The story was obviously contrived. Her child's middle name is "Zion" give me a fucking break. Now here's how I see it working, she initiates a "law suit". Put's forth in a real deposition unsubstantiated "missile theories" only "feelings" that it was a missile. Sues the USG, makes sure there is nothing concrete. Law suit gets tossed and now the door closes to further action against the Pentagon. This was planned to accomplish just that, any further investigation into something other than a plane. Rendering an investigation impotent. She claims to have crawled out the flaming entrance hole? Right.

__________________
In a dictatorship no one can hear you scream...