Go Back   Let's Roll Forums > Blogs > St Jimmy
Connect with Facebook

Rate this Entry

Targeted Individuals – voices in head and radiation

Posted 10 Oct 2016 at 09:45 AM by St Jimmy

Since the 1950s the methods of harassment have become much more efficient thanks to computer technology. What’s missing from Glick’s book is the new technology since 1971. Most of the internet sites on Targeted Individuals focus on: Electronic stalking, mind control (ESMC), Street theatre and high energy microwave weapons.
The best current overview on “Organized stalking” I found are these 50 pages from Eleanor White (2010): [url]http://www.netti.fi/~makako/mind/bitsandpieces/Organized_Stalking.pdf[/url]
The Street theatre (were Targeted Individuals are stalked by a group) is very labour-intensive, so can only be performed on a few people. Of course there’s no need to keep this up for more than a few weeks. The Targeted Individuals get so paranoid that they think everybody is out to get them.
There are literally hundreds of websites on this topic. Here’s an interesting story from a Cuban political refugee that experienced that the American “democracy” is even worse than “communism” in Cuba: [url]http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/01/targeted-individuals-us-01-must-avoid-arrests-obvious-crimes-centering-war-money-lies.html[/url]
Another interesting story is from Jesus Mendoza that's the victim of radiation since the 1990s (and also his family), although it's not clear what type (frequency) of radiation is used against him. From February 1999 on, Mendoza (that has studied law) started 3 court cases: [url]http://jesusmendoza1.blogspot.nl/[/url]
On the following website is a list of died Targeted Individuals, with (official) causes of death 10 times suicide, 6 cancer, 3 heart attacks, 2 Car accidents and 1 Gunshot: [url]http://wiseti.blogspot.nl/2009/11/rest-in-peace-tis-remember-these-tis-in.html[/url]

VOICES IN HEAD
A well-known symptom of schizophrenia is hearing voices in your head.
Here’s overview on sending sounds into a brain by radio signals (RF hearing) by Motorola (a manufacturer of cell phones) - Auditory Perception of RF Pulses: [url]http://www.stopthecrime.net/Human%20Perception%20FINAL.pdf[/url]
See also the following patents that can be used to send sound to your brain:
US patent 3647970 (1972): [url]http://www.google.com/patents/US3647970[/url]
US patent 4877027 (1989): [url]http://www.google.com/patents/US4877027[/url]
US patent 4858612 (1989): [url]http://www.google.com/patents/US4858612[/url]
US patent 6052336 (2000): [url]http://www.google.com/patents/US6052336[/url]
US Patent 6587729 (2003): [url]http://www.google.com/patents/US6587729[/url]
This means that your brain can be used as an antenna for microwaves and radio waves. Besides voices to skull, there’s also vision to skull. If the victims of these induced voices ask the psychiatry for help, they are sentenced to schizophrenia. If the CIA at the time they start taking antipsychotics stop the radio signal, the person can actually think the drugs are working.

MICROWAVE WEAPONS
When I investigated Targeted Individuals, I found a lot of information on high energy microwave weapons. If the US army would really have such a weapon they would keep it secret, wouldn’t they? Here’s a story from 2012 about the Active Denial System that describes the feeling on a cold rainy day as pleasant, while it cannot be used effectively: [url]http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/high-power-microwave-weapons-start-to-look-like-dead-end/[/url]
The real evidence that high energy microwave weapons cannot be used, I found by simply investigating microwave ovens. Here’s a good story about microwave ovens: [url]http://www.explainthatstuff.com/microwaveovens.html[/url]
Because these microwaves only penetrate the food for a centimetre or two (an inch or so), this means microwave weapons are effectively blocked by a wall (you must’ve seen that the door of a microwave oven is very thin. Another reason a microwave is not effective for an energy weapon is that it loses its power very fast over a distance (so it could only be used within 50 cm).
On the other hand Electromagnetic waves with shorter wavelengths, X-rays and gamma rays, are known to cause serious health problems and even death. The symptoms I’ve experienced from radiation are very similar to the adverse effects of radiation that cancer-victims describe.
[IMG]http://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/download/file.php?id=345[/IMG]
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 4060 Comments 2
« Prev     Main     Next »
Total Comments 2

Comments

  1. Old Comment

    Astroturfers

    Some Targeted Individuals put information about their misfortune on the internet.
    Astroturfers are specialised companies to divert the attention from criticism on the government and large corporations and spread information to make the establishment look better. Astroturfers continue the harassment of TIs on the internet.
    Astroturfers never provide any interesting information, but mostly spread false rumours. By using several nicknames, they can even have discussions between astroturfers. By using computers to help them write messages they are able to react very fast.
    The best story on astroturfers I’ve found is the following: [url]https://sharylattkisson.com/top-10-astroturfers/[/url]

    One strategy of the astroturfers is to discredit the person behind the “dangerous” information (the Ad hominem attack): [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem[/url]
    When astroturfers succeed in having the members of an internetforum attack each other “ad hominem”, they have won. The result is that some members of the forum are afraid to speak their mind because they will be attacked, while others main purpose becomes to push others down…
    Posted 5 Dec 2016 at 11:19 AM by St Jimmy St Jimmy is offline
  2. Old Comment

    Rainbow and 3D

    One of the strangest things about the human brain is that it can be used as an antenna for radiosignals.
    Besides voices in head, it can also make you “see” things. Here’s a report from 1968 about an experiment where pigeons got visual input in their eye - Siegel “A Device for Chronically Controlled Visual Input”: [url]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1338526/pdf/jeabehav00153-0059.pdf[/url]

    One of the known visual illusions is (seeing) a “rainbow”, which is already described in the Tenach (Old Testament) - Ezekiel 1, 28:
    “[I]As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the LORD. And when I saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one that spake.[/I]”

    I do not know what “bow” in the clouds when it rains this is supposed to be. This description is obviously not the rainbow we are made to believe in. There is no mentioning of the sun (at the time of the rain) or the diffracted colours and the rainbow I have “seen” is not “in the cloud”, but is more like a coloured arch on the ground at a distance of less than a mile.
    There are a number of paintings of a rainbow from the 19th century, by artists influenced by Christianity. Where are the paintings of the old Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Chinese, Indians and Native Americans of the rainbow?
    These paintings are obviously not the same as the rainbow we “see”, but fantasy. See for example Koch - Noah's Thank Offering (c. 1803) where the rainbow is in the cloud, where we “see” a rainbow on the ground
    [IMG]http://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/download/file.php?id=314[/IMG]

    When light travels from one medium (like air) to another medium (like glass or water), the direction is changed (refraction). Light of different colours (wavelengths) are refracted in a different direction, leading to diffraction. You can see this effect for example with a prism, where at the edges of the seen object the diffracted colours (of the rainbow) appear. Millions of raindrops do not diffract the light of the sun, but only dim the sunlight. Even if rain would cause diffraction, this would not be seen as the rainbow we are made to believe in. If this could be the result of the rain, we would see the diffracted colours at the edge of the sun. Theoretically this could lead to a (rainbow) coloured ring around the sun, but NOT the rainbow we “see” as a coloured arch on the ground.

    I have still never seen a “shooting star”.
    I never “saw” a rainbow before I was in my mid-twenties in the 1990s.
    The first time I saw a 3D-movie when was something like 10 years old, maybe this was in 1984. I put on a stupid pair of coloured glasses and saw a flat screen with part of the same image in red and the other in a green colour – no 3D-effect.
    The next time I saw a 3D-movie was in 1998 in Disneyworld California. This time I definitely got the 3D-effect. After the 30 miniute movie my eyes felt worse than after staring at a computerscreen for 9 hours (that was actually my working time at the time).
    This 3D-effect was not caused by the movie on the screen but by vision-2-skull technology.

    The following quote is from the Nineteen eighty-four of George Orwell:
    “[I]'But the whole universe is outside us. Look at the stars! Some of them are a million light-years away. They are out of our reach for ever.'
    'What are the stars?' said O'Brien indifferently. 'They are bits of fire a few kilometres away. We could reach them if we wanted to. Or we could blot them out. The earth is the centre of the universe. The sun and the stars go round it.'
    Winston made another convulsive movement. This time he did not say anything. O'Brien continued as though answering a spoken objection:
    'For certain purposes, of course, that is not true. When we navigate the ocean, or when we predict an eclipse, we often find it convenient to assume that the earth goes round the sun and that the stars are millions upon millions of kilometres away. But what of it? Do you suppose it is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy? The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that? Have you forgotten doublethink?'[/I]”

    When they control what we see and hear, they can make us see things that aren’t there.
    Maybe some of the witnesses of 9/11 really did “see” and “hear” planes.
    Posted 17 Jan 2017 at 11:50 AM by St Jimmy St Jimmy is offline
 

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger