Go Back   Let's Roll Forums > Blogs
Connect with Facebook

  1. Old Comment
    St Jimmy's Avatar

    Miscellaneous (1986 - 2016)

    Last January 20 - again - I bought a new rear wheel for my bike (my 6th since I bought this bike in 2008).
    Yesterday (January 22) my saddle was – again – sabotaged, which almost caused me to fall off my bike. While a broken saddle is more dangerous than a sabotaged rear wheel, it’s fortunately easier and cheaper to replace; today I got a new one.
    Posted Yesterday at 11:39 AM by St Jimmy St Jimmy is offline
  2. Old Comment
    Truthissweet's Avatar

    UNINTELLIGIBLE ~ FBI TRANSCRIPTS of BETTY ONG'S PHONECALL

    Ruby,

    Per your request from your post.










    Posted 18 Jan 2017 at 12:17 PM by Truthissweet Truthissweet is online now
  3. Old Comment
    St Jimmy's Avatar

    Targeted Individuals – voices in head and radiation

    Rainbow and 3D

    One of the strangest things about the human brain is that it can be used as an antenna for radiosignals.
    Besides voices in head, it can also make you “see” things. Here’s a report from 1968 about an experiment where pigeons got visual input in their eye - Siegel “A Device for Chronically Controlled Visual Input”: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...00153-0059.pdf

    One of the known visual illusions is (seeing) a “rainbow”, which is already described in the Tenach (Old Testament) - Ezekiel 1, 28:
    As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the LORD. And when I saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one that spake.

    I do not know what “bow” in the clouds when it rains this is supposed to be. This description is obviously not the rainbow we are made to believe in. There is no mentioning of the sun (at the time of the rain) or the diffracted colours and the rainbow I have “seen” is not “in the cloud”, but is more like a coloured arch on the ground at a distance of less than a mile.
    There are a number of paintings of a rainbow from the 19th century, by artists influenced by Christianity. Where are the paintings of the old Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Chinese, Indians and Native Americans of the rainbow?
    These paintings are obviously not the same as the rainbow we “see”, but fantasy. See for example Koch - Noah's Thank Offering (c. 1803) where the rainbow is in the cloud, where we “see” a rainbow on the ground


    When light travels from one medium (like air) to another medium (like glass or water), the direction is changed (refraction). Light of different colours (wavelengths) are refracted in a different direction, leading to diffraction. You can see this effect for example with a prism, where at the edges of the seen object the diffracted colours (of the rainbow) appear. Millions of raindrops do not diffract the light of the sun, but only dim the sunlight. Even if rain would cause diffraction, this would not be seen as the rainbow we are made to believe in. If this could be the result of the rain, we would see the diffracted colours at the edge of the sun. Theoretically this could lead to a (rainbow) coloured ring around the sun, but NOT the rainbow we “see” as a coloured arch on the ground.

    I have still never seen a “shooting star”.
    I never “saw” a rainbow before I was in my mid-twenties in the 1990s.
    The first time I saw a 3D-movie when was something like 10 years old, maybe this was in 1984. I put on a stupid pair of coloured glasses and saw a flat screen with part of the same image in red and the other in a green colour – no 3D-effect.
    The next time I saw a 3D-movie was in 1998 in Disneyworld California. This time I definitely got the 3D-effect. After the 30 miniute movie my eyes felt worse than after staring at a computerscreen for 9 hours (that was actually my working time at the time).
    This 3D-effect was not caused by the movie on the screen but by vision-2-skull technology.

    The following quote is from the Nineteen eighty-four of George Orwell:
    'But the whole universe is outside us. Look at the stars! Some of them are a million light-years away. They are out of our reach for ever.'
    'What are the stars?' said O'Brien indifferently. 'They are bits of fire a few kilometres away. We could reach them if we wanted to. Or we could blot them out. The earth is the centre of the universe. The sun and the stars go round it.'
    Winston made another convulsive movement. This time he did not say anything. O'Brien continued as though answering a spoken objection:
    'For certain purposes, of course, that is not true. When we navigate the ocean, or when we predict an eclipse, we often find it convenient to assume that the earth goes round the sun and that the stars are millions upon millions of kilometres away. But what of it? Do you suppose it is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy? The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that? Have you forgotten doublethink?'


    When they control what we see and hear, they can make us see things that aren’t there.
    Maybe some of the witnesses of 9/11 really did “see” and “hear” planes.
    Posted 17 Jan 2017 at 11:50 AM by St Jimmy St Jimmy is offline
  4. Old Comment

    How 9/11 cell phone calls were made

    I would love to hear more from you about the phony phone calls!
    Posted 11 Jan 2017 at 02:11 AM by Ruby Gray Ruby Gray is offline
  5. Old Comment
    St Jimmy's Avatar

    Miscellaneous (1986 - 2016)

    Yesterday, December 29, again a spoke in my wheel was broken.
    Posted 30 Dec 2016 at 10:12 AM by St Jimmy St Jimmy is offline

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger