Go Back   Let's Roll Forums > Blogs
Connect with Facebook


Apollo 11 - the supposedly faked cabin video.

Posted 31 Jul 2013 at 15:31 PM by Futtock
Tags apollo, sibrel

Ahhh, the Bart Sibrel "hoax" film and its made up nonsense. For those who don't wish to corroborate what he says, it can be quite convincing. Unfortunately, it is easily shown as rubbish.

TOTALLY debunked here:-

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T9ZM50n0z4"]Lunar Legacy 2/5 - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDo9Gyy_W6Q"]Lunar Legacy 3/5 - YouTube[/ame]

Posted in Uncategorized
Views 5583 Comments 0 Futtock is offline

In response to the supposed Dutch Moon rock claim.

Posted 31 Jul 2013 at 15:29 PM by Futtock

[B]Why would NASA hand out a valuable rock from Apollo 11 to a complete nobody (ex prime minister of the Netherlands), when even the Queen only got a tiny fragment encased in plastic?[/B]

I suggest you watch these videos.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHALUGcEEiQ"]The Moonstone of The Netherlands - Part 1 - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGQhArtFqIM"]The Moonstone of The Netherlands - Part 2 - YouTube[/ame]...
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 5001 Comments 0 Futtock is offline

When asked to prove the various differences between meteorites and Apollo rocks.

Posted 31 Jul 2013 at 15:28 PM by Futtock

Really? That's your response to totally obvious and easily looked up geology effects on meteorites?

Fusion crusts and the effect on helium-3/zap pits and the totally obvious signs they show to a geologist:-


"[B]Meteoroids* enter the atmosphere at speeds of many miles per second. At those tremendous speeds, the air in the path of the meteorite is severely compressed. When air is compressed...
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 4845 Comments 0 Futtock is offline

Why Lunar meteorites could not have been used to fake Apollo rocks.

Posted 31 Jul 2013 at 15:26 PM by Futtock

[B]Lunar meteorites[/B]
1. Have fusion crusts from entry through atmosphere.
2. Contamination from atmosphere causing nitrates and oxides.
3. Water contamination.
4. [B]Nowhere near[/B] the total ever found is close to the 842lbs of Apollo.
5. There is a thin stronger layer of Helium 3 found on the edges of Apollo samples caused by the shallow penetrating solar wind. Such a layer is blasted off by entry through the atmosphere.
6. There are no micro meteorite craters...
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 3944 Comments 0 Futtock is offline

Concerning supposed duplicate backdrops.

Posted 31 Jul 2013 at 15:24 PM by Futtock

Because the mountains are very big, there is no atmospheric distortion and they haven't moved that far away from them considering they are up to 10 miles away from either location.

This is a short video showing the same thing on Earth:-

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHUWaA19iDc"]Distant Mountains on Apollo Photos - YouTube[/ame]

Here is another one showing two different points with the same mountains many miles from both:-
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 3416 Comments 0 Futtock is offline

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger