Go Back   Let's Roll Forums > Blogs > The Last American
Connect with Facebook

Rate this Entry

No Friend of Democracy (1941) by EDITH MOORE

Posted 29 Nov 2009 at 04:48 AM by Phil Jayhan

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Jayhan View Post
I started reading this book and was refreshed at the scholarly approach and pragmatic writing style. I think you guys will enjoy this and am sure for whoever reads it, will have a deeper understanding of the present perils to our world. As all of our present danger and distress goes back to Rome and the Vatican.

Enjoy!
Phil

The Last American

Phil Jayhan






EDITH MOORE


Eugenio Pacelli, later Pius XII, signing a Concordat with Hitler's Germany (1933)
A study of Roman Catholic politics --
their influence on the course of the present War
and the growth of Fascism

With a Preface by
JOSEPH McCABE





Price One Shilling:

INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING COMPANY
LONDON



This site is a production of the Clero-Fascist Studies Project, an on-going research and public information project
exploring the convergence between certain strains of Christianity and fascism in the 20th century. In part, this
project is a response to attempts by some of the parties responsible to cover up, erase, or cleanse their history.
Our goal is the preservation, not the purification of history.


PREFACE


TO the student of History the struggle which now wraps the globe in the flames of war and hatred is
not a tragic and mysterious revelation of new forces or new diseases. It is the inevitable further, perhaps
final, phase of a struggle that has reddened Europe since it awoke from the slumbers of the Dark Age.
First, the rights of man against the privileges of priests had to be vindicated, and freedom of conscience
was at last born amidst the ruins of the Thirty Years' War. Then the rights of man against the usurped
privileges of corrupt rulers and their hireling politicians had to be won; and from I789 to the recent
days, when we allowed or encouraged alien Powers to force despotism for the sixth time upon the
people of Spain, more than a million men, women, and even children died to secure them. But the
struggle was inconclusive. All privileges based upon the exploitation of others -- the privileges of
wealth, of nobility, of royal or bureaucratic power -- must sooner or later be challenged.


The tragic irony of this phase of the struggle is that it was inaugurated by a group of rogues who, to
their own amazement, successfully perpetrated the most colossal swindle that is recorded in history.
The Hitlers and Mussolinis, meeting over slopping tables, had at first a hope that was modest in
comparison with that of the Tammany politicians who once captured New York. They were astonished
when representatives of industrial wealth, of noble landowners, of high military commands, of palaces
and churches, came whispering to them. They were to be the White Knights of Privilege: to be suitably
rewarded and disbanded when " Bolshevism " was extinct. The crooks enlarged their plans until they
had behind them an organised greed, a massive brain trust devising plans to restore half the world to
serfdom and profitable service to themselves. England, France and America looked on for years,
applauding their " efficiency," their " order and discipline "; and particularly their promise to make a
final end of the churlish folk who talk about the rights of the people.


Now . . .


What part had the Roman Church in this conspiracy? And how has it adjusted itself to wrest an increase
of its power from the new form which the struggle has taken? We teach history in so emasculated a
version in our schools today that now not one man in a hundred knows the ghastly part which it played
in the bludgeoning of democracy in the last century, to say nothing of earlier centuries. We teach
children that the Inquisition was a gentle tribunal demanded by "princes and peoples" for their own
protection. We say that the Reformation and the Thirty Years' War were symptoms of social conditions
which have passed away. We do not tell them one word about the savagery which the Church blessed in
Italy, Spain and Portugal from 1794 to -- in the case of Spain --1941, though we tell them a hundred
lies about the French and Russian Revolutions. And our organs of public instruction are so cajoled and
intimidated by secretly working Catholic societies that we are honestly puzzled. Leopold, Petain and
Weygand are fanatical Catholics, we learn. Strange that the worst traitors to civilization should be the
most docile subjects of the Vatican. The Pope has forbidden the German bishops to publish the
congratulations they have prepared for the wicked Hitler at his triumph. The Italian hierarchy talk about
England in the language of Gayda. The Catholic weeklies in England admit sadly that one of the
strongest elements of isolationism and Anglophobia in America is the Catholic Church. And soon . . .
Read this book. It is not a rhetorical outburst. It is not even an attempt to discover what is behind the
veil. It is a cold statement of facts, mainly on Catholic Authority. Miss Moore has diligently,
sagaciously, temperately brought together the scattered admissions which circumstances and events
have at times elicited. You may draw your own conclusions.


Joseph McCabe.


INTRODUCTORY

IT is little more than half a decade ago that the Roman Catholic Church was closely collaborating with the
Fascist forces of Italy and Spain, at a time when these systems had wantonly plunged their peoples

into war. Prior to this, everywhere where Fascist States have emerged Catholicism had come forward as
Fascism's ally. The knowledge that Catholicism could at the same time lay claim to supreme moral
leadership and yet assist actively forces in the world whose aim was the destruction of all those values
which make life tolerable, let alone just, brought the Church into disrepute in this country. Today, all
that is apparently forgotten. Roman Catholic dignitaries and lay members occupy prominent positions
in the ranks of those who have a principled objection to the regimes of Hitler and Mussolini. We are
told that even as fire and water cannot mix, so also Catholicism and Nazism cannot exist together.
Christians who could not find terms odious enough to express their disgust at the pro-Fascist role of the
Catholic Church in 1936 are now making common cause with Catholicism and planning forms of
cooperation which will extend into years of peace.



Obviously, from the point of view of immediate national unity, this policy of letting bygones be
bygones has is advantages. But it has its dangers too. The Church has in many countries operated as the
ally of Fascism. Catholics have figured prominently among the defeatists of France. They have
constituted the backbone of Isolationism in America. The Church has within her ranks today large
numbers who, on the basis of their understanding of religion, are not on the side of Britain in this war.
Surely, then, we have an obligation, and not merely a right, to know exactly where Catholics in this and
other countries stand in relation to Fascism and the present war.


This booklet aims at helping to explain how Roman Catholicism as Church, Creed and Conscience has
operated in relation to this war and the Fascist forces that brought it about. It provides a selection of
material showing how Fascism and Nazism uprooted the free movements of civilisation and established
their own authoritarian power with the Church at their side as ally. It tells how with the blessing of
Catholicism dictators launched campaigns of aggression which so swelled the ambitions and inflated
the self-confidence of the Axis Powers that their vision of world domination could be conceived in
terms of practical politics. It alleges that the failure of the League and of non-Fascist statesmen to
demonstrate the will to peace of the world can partly be explained by a reference to Catholic policy. It
shows how in one country after another the Church bred Defeatism because she aspired to woo Fascism
for the sake of State favours. It asserts that the concepts of Catholic Christianity are in large measure
akin to Fascist ideology, and alien to the ideals which inspire Fascism's most fervent opponents.
This booklet is offered to all people, Christians and non-Christians alike, who are opposing Nazism
because they want Freedom to live on and become a real force in the world. It is published as a
warning, and in the hope that they will treat with due caution the overtures of Catholic representatives
during the war. Otherwise they may discover that by their work they have strengthened a Church that
will march under the banner of Freedom only to secure freedom for herself, and in order later to
eradicate freedom of word, deed and conscience from the face of the earth.

Continue reading and download the full pdf file here:

AUTHOR

May, 1941

For more general information on Pope Pius XII click the spoiler button below;

Spoiler:


Categories: 1876 births | 1958 deaths | Popes | Natives of Rome

Pope Pius XII


The Venerable Pope Pius XII, born Maria Giuseppe Giovanni Eugenio Pacelli (March 2, 1876October 9, 1958 in Rome, Italy) served as the Pope from March 2, 1939 to 1958. He was the only pope to exercise his Extraordinary (Solemn) Magisterium (that is, to claim Papal Infallibility) in the 20th century when he formally defined the dogma of the Assumption of Mary in his 1950 encyclical Munificentissimus Deus. Pius's actions and inactions during World War II have become a matter of major dispute. He was proclaimed Venerable, a step on the road to sainthood, by Pope John Paul II in the 1990s.

Contents [showhide] 1 Birth and early church career

2 Pacelli and the Concordat with Germany

3 Becoming Pope Pius XII

4 World War II

4.1 Pope Pius XII's critics' views
4.2 Counter-point to Pope Pius XII's critics
4.3 Hitler's views


5 Pope Pius' encyclicals

6 Beatifications, canonisations, and teachings

7 Pope Pius and the College of Cardinals

8 Pope Pius in later life and after his death

9 Footnotes

10 Additional reading

11 External links

Birth and early church career

Pacelli, who was of noble birth, was a grandson of Marcantonio Pacelli, founder of the Vatican's newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano, a nephew of Ernesto Pacelli, a key financial advisor to Pope Leo XII, and a son of Filippo Pacelli, dean of the Vatican lawyers. His brother, Francesco Pacelli, became a highly regarded attorney, and was created a marchese by Pius XII.
Pacelli became a Roman Catholic priest in April, 1899. From 1904 until 1916 Fr. Pacelli assisted Cardinal Gasparri in his codification of canon law. Fr. Pacelli was appointed Apostolic Nuncio in Bavaria by Pope Benedict XV in 1917, and Apostolic Nuncio to the German Weimar Republic in June, 1920. Pacelli was created a cardinal on 16 December 1929 by Pope Pius XI. Within a few months, on 7 February 1930 Pope Pius appointed Pacelli Papal Secretary of State. During the 1930s Cardinal Pacelli arranged concordats with Bavaria, Prussia, Austria and Germany. He also made many diplomatic visits throughout Europe and the Americas, including an extensive visit to the United States in 1936.

Pacelli and the Concordat with Germany

In June 1933 Adolf Hitler had signed a peace agreement with most of Europe, called the Four-Power Pact . Hitler later wrote to Rome to negotiate a statewide concordat with Rome[Disputed-see below}. As Papal Secretary of State to Pius XI, Pacelli signed a concordat with Germany (see image). This was shortly after Germany had signed similar agreements with all Protestant churches in Germany.

The signing of the actual Concordat has always been controversial, described by some historians, and by critics of the Roman Catholic Church, as giving acceptance to Hitler's regime . The Church argues that Pius XI had no choice but to agree to such a concordat, or face immediate and cruel reprisals on the lives of Catholics in Germany.
The strongest criticism in the still remaining dispute about the Concordat rests on the terms which enabled the concordat and with Cardinal Pacelli's negotiations with the Nazi party through the Catholic Centre Party Germany or Zentrum. A series of meetings for negotiation are on record which defined the Concordat, the self-dissolution of the Centre Party, and the passing of the German Enabling Act that finally gave Adolf Hitler dictatorial power. The accusation of complicity is that this was a quid-pro-quo, and that Hitler would not have achieved his legally instituted dictatorship without the Zentrum's votes in his aquiring the vital two-thirds parliamentary majority required. The Catholic Church has yet to release documents for the relevant period, but accusation is that the Zentrum vote elevated Hitler to power much more quickly than Hitler's preferred legal entry to power might have otherwise required .



The Holy See signs a concordat with Germany. Cardinal Pacelli, representing the Vatican and Pope Pius XI, signs the "Reichskonkordat" with German Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen, representing Germany and Chancellor Adolf Hitler, on July 20, 1933 in Rome. From left to right: Franz von Papen, Giuseppe Pizzardo, Pacelli, Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani , Rudolf Buttmann

Cardinal Pacelli allegedly(Disputed) played a large part in the internal affairs of Germany all his life. He was the Papal Nuncio in Bavaria from 1917 before becoming Secretary of State. As Nuncio, in a letter dated November 14, 1923, to Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Gasparri, Pacelli denounced the National Socialist movement as an anti-Catholic and anti-Hebrew threat and remarks that Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich had condemned acts of persecution against Bavaria's Jews. However, in 1933 during Mar 20-23 the Enabling act negotiations were undertaken for Cardinal Pacelli by his close friend and lifelong associate Monsignor Ludwig Kaas , leader of the Zentrum party. Kaas followed this by immediately reporting to Cardinal Pacelli in the Vatican before then returning by April 2 for a private meeting with Adolf Hitler. Faulhaber was also prevailed upon to accede by public recomendation of the Fuhrer preceding the plebiscite for the withdrawal of Germany from the League of Nations.

Some weaker critics regard the Church relationship towards the Nazi regime as not substantially different to that it established with other non-communist states, regimes and governments. Dr Eamon Duffy, a historian of the papacy, observed that the Church under Pius XI followed a normal policy of establishing concordats with individual states during the 1920's and the 1930's. This included concordats with Latvia (1922), Bavaria (1924), Poland (1925), Romania (1927), Lithuania (1927), Italy (1929), Prussia (1929), Baden (1932), Austria (1933), Germany (1933), Yugoslavia (1935) and Portugal (1940). These concordats were aimed at regularising relationships between the Holy See and the states, and at protecting Roman Catholic-run schools, hospitals, charities and third level institutions (all often run with public funds, including in Germany) from state seizure or persecution.

In particular the concordats were aimed at ensuring the Church's canon law had some status and recognition within its own spheres of concern (e.g., church decrees of nullity in the area of marriage) among new or emerging states with new legal systems. Duffy suggests that the concordats provided technical procedures through which formal complaints to the states could be made by the Holy See.

There have been accusations that the German Concordat - a concordat which remains in force to this day - allowed for the induction of Catholic priests into the armed forces during hostilities. However, as Article 27 of the concordat states, in part, "The Church will accord provision to the German army for the spiritual guidance of its Catholic officers, personnel and other officials, as well as for the families of the same...The ecclesiastical appointment of military chaplains and other military clergy will be made after previous consultations with the appropriate authorities of the Reich by the army bishop." The clear reference here is the drafting of priests not as soldiers, but as chaplins. Furthermore, since priests were forbidden by the Concordat to join the Nazi party, they could not serve as soldiers, since all solders were required to join the Nazi party.

Between the German Concordat's signing in 1933 and 1939, Pope Pius XI made three dozen formal complaints to the Nazi government, which were drafted by Pacelli but which show only a gradual realisation of the gravity of the Nazi situation and mis-use of the Concordat. The strongest condemnation of Hitler's ideology and ecclesiastical policy was the Encyclical Mit Brennender Sorge, issued in 1937.

Both Hitler and Pacelli saw the Reichskonkordat as a victory for their respective sides. Hitler told his cabinet on 14 July "An opportunity has been given to Germany in the Reichskonkordat and a sphere of influence has been created that will be especially significant in the urgent struggle against international Jewry." Pacelli in a two page article in L'Osservatore Romano on 26 July and 27 July dismissed Hitler's assertion that the concordat in any way represented or implied approval for national socialism, much less moral approval of it. He argued that its true purpose had been "not only the official recognition (by the Reich) of the legislation of the Church (its Code of Canon Law), but the adoption of many provisions of this legislation and the protection of all Church legislation." However within Germany it was reported that Rome saw no difficulty in relation to a christian dictatorship . On the other hand, the Concordat prohibited clerics from engaging in any political activity whatsoever, a standard prohibition in a period where church leaders had their attitudes on democratic participation influenced by attudes of Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors and Pope Pius X's hostility to Catholic democrat participation, but which complicated Catholic resistance to the Nazi regime, as it has in the past Catholic participation in the French Third Republic, Italian democracy, and later Catholic resistance from the 1920s to the Mussolini regime.

The questions arising from the Concordat have re-surfaced of late because of the moves toward canonisation for Pope Pius XII, and recent reference to the Enabling act in the book Memoria e Identidad by Pope John Paul II, who cites it as an example of the dangers associated with Liberal Parliamentary Democracy. However the Concordat represents most clearly the opposite dangers to a Democracy from a Church .

Becoming Pope Pius XII

On 2 March 1939, Pacelli became the first Secretary of State since 1667 to become pope; he took the name Pius XII.
World War II

Pope Pius' Coat of Arms


During the Second World War, the Vatican State officially remained neutral. However, as Cardinal Pacelli, he was against the Nazi's increasing political power in Germany and in August 1933 wrote to the British representative to the Holy See his disgust with the Nazis and "their persecution of the Jews, their proceedings against political opponents, the reign of terror to which the whole nation was subjected."

When he was told Hitler was a strong leader to deal with the communists, Archbishop Pacelli responded that Hitler and his Nazis were infinitely worse. [ref]

Pius XII established diplomatic relations with the Japanese Empire in March 1942. As the war was approaching its end in 1945, Pius XII advocated a lenient policy by the Allied leaders for the vanquished in an effort to prevent the mistakes made at the end of World War I. He attempted to negotiate an early German and Japanese surrender, but his initiatives failed.

Pius XII's role during World War II has been a source of controversy. Pope Pius XII followed a policy of public neutrality during the Second World War mirroring that of Pope Benedict XV during the First World War. Pius's main argument for that policy was twofold. That public condemnation of Hitler and Nazism would have achieved little of practical benefit, given that his condemnation could effectively be censored and so unknown to German Catholics (who in any case had been told as early as the early 1930s by the German Roman Catholic hierarchy that Nazism and Catholicism were incompatible). Secondly, Pius argued that had he condemned Nazism more aggressively, the result would have been repression of Roman Catholicism within Nazi Germany, making the Church's efforts against Nazi policies at the parish level difficult. An "underground railroad" of secret escape routes had been set up by prominent Catholics such as Monsignor Hugh O'Flaherty who operated under the tacit, if not implicit, approval of Pope Pius XII (as portrayed in the 1983 TV-movie "The Scarlet And The Black").

According to the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, "Preserving Vatican neutrality, and the capability of the Church to continue to function where possible in occupied Europe and Nazi-allied states, was a far better strategy to save lives than Church sanctions on a regime that would have merely laughed at them."

Pope Pius XII's critics' views

Critics suggest that if Pius had spoken out publicly in strong enough terms against Nazism, an explicit condemnation by the Pope could have seriously undermined Hitler and Nazism among Germany's many Catholics. While the world was divided politically and geographically, many Catholics are united behind their Pope. Had Pope Pius XII denounced Nazism in the strongest possible terms, it is possible that it could have not only caused unrest amongst Catholics in the German army, but it could have also caused Catholics working in German war factories to undermine German army support and logistics systems. This would have dealt a serious blow to the German war effort. Conversely, such action probably would have caused heavy surpression of Catholics given Nazism was more focussed on Protestantism in the first place.

Rolf Hochhuth's 1963 little known play Der Stellvertreter. Ein christliches Trauerspiel (The Deputy, a Christian tragedy) fiercely criticized Pope Pius XII's behaviour during the Nazi regime in Germany. Warren Hinckle , editor of the liberal Catholic quarterly Ramparts called the play "dramaturgically flawed", but formed a committee to defend the play as a matter of free speech.

Counter-point to Pope Pius XII's critics

The counter-point to the critics' argument is that these critics base their opinion upon a Catholic stereotype hundreds of years out of date by vastly overrating the influence of a Papal speech on the opinions of modern Catholics. Much like today, Catholics are often not swayed morally by statements coming from the Vatican, or politically by Vatican policy. Indeed, it is not unusual for Catholics to take contradictory stances while maintaining other Catholic beliefs. For example, some Catholics oppose the Church's stance on birth control, the First Gulf War, and the necessity of Sunday Mass.

Hitler's views

Adolf Hitler said "[Pius] is the only human being who has always contradicted me and who has never obeyed me." Historians in general differ as to whether or not Pope Pius XII did enough to prevent the Holocaust and save lives, and indeed whether any intervention by him would have any impact on the number of deaths caused by Nazi policies.
Joseph Goebbels was clear about the Reich's attitudes toward the Roman Catholic Church. His 26 March 1942 entry into his diary reads, "It's a dirty, low thing to do for the Catholic Church to continue its subversive activity in every way possible and now even to extend its propaganda to Protestant children evacuated from the regions threatened by air raids. Next to the Jews these politico-divines are about the most loathsome riffraff that we are still sheltering in the Reich. The time will come after the war for an over-all solution of this problem." (Lochner, The Goebbels Diaries, 1948, p. 146)

A recent report in the Italian newspaper Avvenire suggested that Hitler ordered SS General Karl Wolff, a senior occupation officer in Italy, to kidnap Pius, but he refused. [1]

Pope Pius' encyclicals

Among his most prominent encyclicals were:
  • Mystici Corporis Christi: On the Mystical Body, 29 June 1943
  • Communium Interpretes Doloraum: An Appeal for Prayers for Peace, 15 April 1945
  • Fulgens Radiatur: Encyclical on Saint Benedict, 21 March 1947
  • Mediator Dei: On the Sacred Liturgy, 20 November 1947
  • Auspicia Quaedam: On Public Prayers For World Peace And Solution Of The Problem Of Palestine, 1 May 1948
  • In Multiplicibus Curis: On Prayers for Peace in Palestine, 24 October 1948
  • Redemptoris Nostri Cruciatus: On the Holy Places in Palestine, 15 April 1949
  • Anni Sacri: On A Program For Combating Atheistic Propaganda Throughout The World, 12 March 1950
  • Humani Generis: Concerning Some False Opinions Threatening to Undermine the Foundations of Catholic Doctrine, 12 August 1950
  • Munificentissimus Deus, 1 November 1950 (on the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary into heaven) This particular encyclical is considered infallible. Perhaps contrary to popular conceptions, it is very rare for a pope to invoke papal infallibility. This was one of those rare occasions—the only one in the 20th century.
  • Ingruentium Malorum: On Reciting the Rosary: Encyclical promulgated on 15 September 1951
  • Fulgens Corona: Proclaiming a Marian year to Commemorate the Centenary of the Definition of the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception, 8 September 1953
  • Ad Caeli Reginam: On Proclaiming the Queenship of Mary, Encyclical promulgated on 11 October 1954
  • Datis Nuperrime: Lamenting the Sorrowful Events in Hungary, and Condemning the Ruthless Use of Force, 5 November 1956
  • Miranda Prorsus: On the Communications Field: Motion Pictures, Radio, Television, 8 September 1957
Beatifications, canonisations, and teachings

During his reign, Pius XII canonized eight saints, including Pope Pius X, and beatified five people. He consecrated the world to the Immaculate Heart of Mary in 1942.

In 1950, Pius XII infallibly defined the dogma of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary into heaven. This doctrine teaches that Mary, the mother of Jesus, was taken into heaven body and soul after the end of her earthly life. This belief had been held by Catholic and Orthodox Christians since the early centuries of the church (for example, by St. Gregory of Tours), but it had never been formally defined as a dogma until 1950.

Pope Pius and the College of Cardinals

Only twice in his pontificate did Pius XII hold a consistory to create new Cardinals, a decided contrast to Pius XI, who had done so seventeen times in seventeen years on the papal throne. The first occasion has been known as the "Great Consistory", of February 1946; it was the largest in the history of the Church up to that time, and brought an end to over five hundred years of Italians constituting a majority of the College. By his appointments then and in 1953 he substantially reduced the proportion of Cardinals who belonged to the Roman Curia.

Pope Pius in later life and after his death

Pius was dogged with ill health later in life, largely due to a charlatan, Riccardo Galeazzi-Lisi, who posed as a medical doctor and won Pius's trust. His treatments for Pius gave the Holy Father chronic hiccups and rotting teeth. Though eventually dismissed from the Papal Household, this man gained admittance as the pope lay dying and took photographs of Pius which he tried, unsuccessfully, to sell to magazines.

When Pius died, then Galeazzi-Lisi turned embalmer. Rather than slow the process of decay, the doctor-mortician's self-made technique sped it up, leading the Holy Father's corpse to disintegrate rapidly, turning purple, with the corpse's nose falling off. The stench caused by the decay was such that guards had to be rotated every 15 minutes, otherwise they would collapse. The condition of the body became so bad that the remains were secretly removed at one point for further treatments before being returned in the morning.

The farce over the Pope's health and treatment in death caused considerable embarrassment to the Vatican, but in the 1950s was not reported, though widely rumoured among those in Rome who had witnessed the body's decay as it lay in state, as well as being captured in photographs. (See Catholic website below.) One of the first acts of Pius' successor, Pope John XXIII, was to ban the charlatan from Vatican City for life.

Pope Pius XII became a candidate for sainthood under Pope John Paul II in the 1990s. He has been raised to Venerable, an early step through the process of sainthood.

Footnotes

  • Eamon Duffy, Saints and Sinners: A History of the Popes p.341.
  • Note 2: John Cornwell, Hitler's Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII pp.130-131.
  • Note 3: On the question of Pius XII's attitude toward the Nazi persecutions, see also the New York Times editorial page for Christmas Day of 1941 and 1942.
Additional reading

  • Ronald J. Rychlak, Hitler, the War, and the Pope (Our Sunday Visitor; 2000). ISBN 0879732172
  • Anonymous, Persecution of the Catholic Church in the Third Reich (Publisher: Pelican Pub Co; February 2003). ISBN 1589801377 (originally published in 1941)
  • Eugenio Zolli, Before the Dawn (Roman Catholic Books; Reprint edition, February 1997). ISBN 0912141468 (author is the former wartime chief rabbi of Rome who took the name "Eugenio" at his Baptism in honor of Pope Pius XII)
  • John Cornwell, Hitler's Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII (Viking, 1999) ISBN 0670876208
  • Sr. Margherita Marchione, Pope Pius XII: Architect for Peace (Paulist Press, 2000). ISBN 080913912X
  • Karl Scholder, The Churches and the Third Reich (London, 1987)
  • Susan Zuccotti,Under his very Windows, The Vatican and the Holocaust in Italy (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2000). ISBN 0300084870
External links




Categories: 1876 births | 1958 deaths | Popes | Natives of Rome





Posted in Vatican Crimes
Views 12788 Comments 0
« Prev     Main     Next »
Total Comments 0

Comments

 

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger