CARMEN TAYLOR & MEDIA COMPLICITY on 9/11

Phil Jayhan · 7 Jul 2010 , 00:01 AM

A guy named Thomas Potter sent this to me via email and it is a very good find and piece of research. Not sure if it is his, or who's work it is. But FYI, Carmen Taylors photographs were the #1 viewed Yahoo Images for a few years straight. Yet this shows there are some remarkably unbelievable things about Carmen Taylors photographs as well as the claims she has made. Carmen Taylor appears to be nothing more then another 9/11 actor, partisan of crime. Read the story and judge for yourselves.

Cheers-
Phil

Original link:

CARMEN TAYLOR & MEDIA COMPLICITY

CARMEN TAYLOR & MEDIA COMPLICITY

2010 April 1

Tags: 9/11 Truth, Amandareconwith, Carmen Taylor, World Trade Center, WTC

Posted by rabbi_emmanuel_goldstein

“Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.”

-Sir Walter Scott

http://web.archive.org/web/200109240...s_sep2001.html

One of the most highly published images of 9/11 was a photograph attributed to Carmen Taylor. The screen capture above is from Steve Sanders’ Digicams website (sold to Internet Brands on 2/24/09) and archived on 9/24/01. The article about Carmen Taylor was posted in their news section on 9/13/01. Look closely at the image in her “borrowed” Sony Mavica MVC-FD73 digital camera. The digital display is showing a perspective from Hoboken, New Jersey, with the smoking towers still standing. The image should have been United flight 175 frozen in time as it approached World Trade Center Two. Why the discrepancy? To answer that question I contacted Jeff Hill of Sault Ste Marie, Ontario, Canada, and told him what I had discovered. On 11/01/07 Mr. Hill telephoned Robert Bukaty, the Associated Press photographer who took Carmen Taylor’s photograph, and he CLEARLY stated that the image in the camera she was holding at that time had a perspective from Hoboken and not Battery Park. The same uncredited image is being used by the University of Sydney School of Civil Engineering. (I have repeatedly contacted the school to ask who is credited with taking the photograph and they have yet to answer my question.) Also, Robert Bukaty CLEARLY stated that the Associated Press EDITED that image. However, the OFFICIAL AP photograph released to the public contains the ALTERED image of what we were told was United flight 175 about to strike World Trade Center Two.

University of Sydney School of Civil Engineering

http://web.archive.org/web/200511060...u.au/wtc.shtml
Robert Bukaty/Jeff Hill November 1, 2007
Duration 0:03:00

How could Carmen Taylor be holding a camera that displays an image of the smoking towers still standing?

According to statements made by Doug Haluza to Jeff Hill on 11/1/07, he took Carmen Taylor to his office where she sent the images to Arkansas news station KHBS/KHOG and while they were in his office the towers fell.

Doug Haluza/Jeff Hill November 1, 2007
Duration 0:02:25

Besides discovering an unaltered image of Carmen Taylor which conflicts with the official 9/11 storyline, Carmen also slipped up and forgot her line about where she transmitted her images from. In a 9/8/06 Northwest Arkansas Times article, “Now and then: Photo exhibit focuses on Sept. 11, 2001, through the lenses of ground zero photographers”, by Kevin Kinder she stated,“Before power went out at her hotel, she was able to send the images to a television station in Arkansas.” This was confirmed by Kevin Kinder in a telephone conversation with Jeff Hill on 11/1/07.

Kevin Kinder/Jeff Hill November 1, 2007
Duration 0:04:39

Carmen Taylor admits to the difficulty of using the Sony Mavica

MVC-FD73 digital display but managed to take a pristine photo of UA 175 traveling at 800 feet per second from a bobbing ferry in bright sunlight. (The length of two football fields is 720 feet.) She also admits that the camera took a long time to record. How was she able to capture two successive photos moments apart?

TERRORISTS ATTACK NEW YORK, PENTAGON

Thousands Dead, Injured as Hijacked U.S. Airliners
Ram Targets;World Trade Center Is Destroyed
Los Angeles Times 9/12/01 – AP photos / CARMEN TAYLOR via KHBS/KHOG-TV

http://www.poynterextra.org/extra/ga...elesTimesW.pdf

Carmen Taylor/Jeff Hill October 14, 2007
Duration 0:17:20

Carmen Taylor/Jeff Hill October 30, 2007
Duration 0:26:50

Sony Mavica MVC-FD73 Thumbs Down:

1.) Poor “print-out” resolution: Though Mavica-taken images look great on the web or through email, they leave much to be desired when printing them out to an inkjet printer. There’s a shot that you could get a good print out using a hi-tech color laser printer, but those suckers go for over $5,000 a piece.

2.) Auto focus: Everyone loves this feature and (as stated above) it has its merits…but not all of the time. When shooting THROUGH something (like a fence) it is very hard to focus on the subject in the background. (IE at Zoos, it is hard to focus through the bars to take a nice picture of an animal.)

3.) Limited storage capacity. Though floppies are a convenient media for storage, the down side is that just 15-22 pictures can be stored per disk. This makes for much shifting and digging through bags looking for fresh disks. I missed a few good shots because of this.

4.) “Write to Disk” time. After you snap a picture, the Mavica takes several seconds (up to 7 seconds) to save it to disk. Unlike a standard camera, you can’t just keep clicking away. This is a bummer when it comes to capturing sports or any other action where you’d like a close sequence of shots.

5.) Carrying case (not included) looks like…a purse! Sorry, but I just feel a little awkward carrying this thing around.

6.) Size: Compared to the 35mm cameras that most Americans are used to, this one is pretty big. They just don’t make pockets big enough for these things.

7.) Outdoors: When it’s too sunny out, it can be hard to see what you’re taking a picture of. Since it’s designed with the perspective of a Sharp ViewCam, and not a typical camcorder (w/ viewfinder) the sun interferes with the little LCD monitor. Unless you shade it thoroughly, you’re getting pot luck for pictures.

http://www.epinions.com/review/elec_...38DFDB3D-prod3

Share and Enjoy:

9/11 LINKS INDEX - Victim Fraud, Media Fraud

Radio Shows - Jim Fetzer & The Real Deal:

Death Certificate #0001:

The Strange Story of Father Mychal Judge: Death Certificate # 0001 on 9/11

The Hollow Towers & Pre-Demolition of WTC:

Flight 11 Frauds:

Flight 175 Frauds:

Flight 77 Frauds:

BARBARA OLSON - 9/11 FRAUD? Is Lady Booth Really Barbara Olson with Plastic Surgery?

Flight 93 Frauds:

Mark Bingham - Exif/IPTC Data 8/30/2001 - 13 Days before 9/11!

The 911 Jumper Frauds:

North Tower Frauds:

Media Complicity and Fraud:

Media 9/11 Memorial Frauds:

The 9/11 Memorial Wall:

The 9/11 Victims Memorial Wall in New York City - Was it a Ruse?

9/11 & WTC Corporate Fraud:

Pending Research Requests from Lets Roll Members:

MISC: Great Research Links on this Material above:

Former Stickies for the Hussled Masses:

Pictures of Extra Equipment on Look-A-Like Flight 175 (109,720 Views)
911 For Dummies Thread. Video, Picture Archive of 911 (7,513,922 Views)
Targeting Laser Light Spot at the World Trade Center! (121,515 Views)
"Flight 175" WAS a Cargo/FUEL TANKER (159,126 Views)
New Photo of 767 Showing 2nd Piece of Equip / Port Engine (233,137 Views)
9/11 LINKS INDEX - Victim Fraud, Media Fraud, WTC Fraud

|

**2getherwestand** · 7 Jul 2010 , 02:20 AM

Ya,i don't think you would have to waterboard this broad to get the truth out.She's lying and she would sing like a canary just with a threat alone of being tortured.

**do2read** · 9 Jul 2010 , 12:29 PM

Thanks to Phil and Mr. Potter.

This is another example of photos prepared in advance, with actors in place to present the "official lie" in the immediate wake of emotional vulnerability.

2GetherWeStand is absolutely right, if anyone were to talk to Carmen, they could probably get the truth in short order.

A little searching says although she is said to live in Ft. Smith, I think she lives in Lavaca, Arkansas. If she ever existed or still does.

l

**Rings of Saturn** · 22 Jul 2010 , 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by do2read

Thanks to Phil and Mr. Potter.

This is another example of photos prepared in advance, with actors in place to present the "official lie" in the immediate wake of emotional vulnerability.

2GetherWeStand is absolutely right, if anyone were to talk to Carmen, they could probably get the truth in short order.

A little searching says although she is said to live in Ft. Smith, I think she lives in Lavaca, Arkansas. If she ever existed or still does.

l

Not buy that theory Do2....again, you're assuming people can keep their traps shut. Not sure about the inconsistencies...but not buying that she was in on anything...

**do2read** · 22 Jul 2010 , 11:51 AM

She is in on it because her camera can not take 2 pictures that fast, so she knows she did not take those pictures with that camera. Period. The camera simply won't store and focus again in that period of time. I have a different model Sony Mavica and it is a little worse, and when you're trying to capture action you get only one try.

The other alternative is that they found a tourist with exactly the same camera, and switched it for the one with the pictures already in it. That's the only wasy she could NOT know. That scenario is very unlikely.

l

**Rings of Saturn** · 22 Jul 2010 , 18:01 PM

4.) “Write to Disk” time. After you snap a picture, the Mavica takes several seconds (up to 7 seconds) to save it to disk. Unlike a standard camera, you can’t just keep clicking away. This is a bummer when it comes to capturing sports or any other action where you’d like a close sequence of shots.

Playing devil's advocate here...I know a few people who have high end digiatl cameras and hey will take back to back pics fast....it stalls but they still take them...

**do2read** · 22 Jul 2010 , 18:25 PM

This was in 2001, when the storage choices were far more limited.

l

**Rings of Saturn** · 23 Jul 2010 , 10:16 AM

yeh a buddy of mine last night told me that his camera..whic his a mid level pro camera-- 1500.00 can take 1 pic every 1/2 second until his chip is full...holding down the button. Not sure about how they were in 2001 though....

**The Surgeon** · 23 Jul 2010 , 18:14 PM

A quick search of Sony Mavica MVC-FD71 specifications reveals that the max resolution is 640 x 480 with 0.3 megapixels.

These photos are more than 640 x 480 and 0.3 megapixels resolution.

This story is BOGUS

Great work Phil -- defender of Truth & Justice

**Rings of Saturn** · 23 Jul 2010 , 22:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Surgeon

A quick search of Sony Mavica MVC-FD71 specifications reveals that the max resolution is 640 x 480 with 0.3 megapixels.

These photos are more than 640 x 480 and 0.3 megapixels resolution.

This story is BOGUS

Great work Phil -- defender of Truth & Justice

..how do we know they're more than the pixels you mentioned?

7 Jul 2010 , 02:20 AM	#2
2getherwestand Moderator Join Date: 20 Apr 2007 Location: no.california Posts: 3,272 Threads: 1466 Thanked 3,898 Times in 1,508 Posts	Ya,i don't think you would have to waterboard this broad to get the truth out.She's lying and she would sing like a canary just with a threat alone of being tortured. __________________ Strong and peaceful, wise and brave Fighting the fight for the whole world to save.We the People will ceaselessly strive To keep our great Revolution alive. Defeat the one world order 2getherwestand

9 Jul 2010 , 12:29 PM	#3
do2read Moderator Join Date: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 1,912 Threads: 92 Thanked 4,769 Times in 1,315 Posts	Thanks to Phil and Mr. Potter. This is another example of photos prepared in advance, with actors in place to present the "official lie" in the immediate wake of emotional vulnerability. 2GetherWeStand is absolutely right, if anyone were to talk to Carmen, they could probably get the truth in short order. A little searching says although she is said to live in Ft. Smith, I think she lives in Lavaca, Arkansas. If she ever existed or still does. l __________________ "Don't worry about it - Americans don't read." Allan Dulles ...

22 Jul 2010 , 11:51 AM	#5
do2read Moderator Join Date: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 1,912 Threads: 92 Thanked 4,769 Times in 1,315 Posts	She is in on it because her camera can not take 2 pictures that fast, so she knows she did not take those pictures with that camera. Period. The camera simply won't store and focus again in that period of time. I have a different model Sony Mavica and it is a little worse, and when you're trying to capture action you get only one try. The other alternative is that they found a tourist with exactly the same camera, and switched it for the one with the pictures already in it. That's the only wasy she could NOT know. That scenario is very unlikely. l __________________ "Don't worry about it - Americans don't read." Allan Dulles ...

22 Jul 2010 , 18:25 PM	#7
do2read Moderator Join Date: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 1,912 Threads: 92 Thanked 4,769 Times in 1,315 Posts	This was in 2001, when the storage choices were far more limited. l __________________ "Don't worry about it - Americans don't read." Allan Dulles ...

23 Jul 2010 , 18:14 PM	#9
The Surgeon Moderator Join Date: 8 Sep 2004 Location: The Cancer Ward Posts: 1,291 Threads: 165 Thanked 1,669 Times in 464 Posts	A quick search of Sony Mavica MVC-FD71 specifications reveals that the max resolution is 640 x 480 with 0.3 megapixels. These photos are more than 640 x 480 and 0.3 megapixels resolution. This story is BOGUS Great work Phil -- defender of Truth & Justice __________________ "...it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority to set bush fires in people's minds" Samuel Adams

22 Jul 2010 , 18:01 PM	#6
Rings of Saturn Academic Join Date: 9 Oct 2007 Posts: 900 Threads: 104 Thanked 221 Times in 114 Posts	4.) “Write to Disk” time. After you snap a picture, the Mavica takes several seconds (up to 7 seconds) to save it to disk. Unlike a standard camera, you can’t just keep clicking away. This is a bummer when it comes to capturing sports or any other action where you’d like a close sequence of shots. Playing devil's advocate here...I know a few people who have high end digiatl cameras and hey will take back to back pics fast....it stalls but they still take them...

23 Jul 2010 , 10:16 AM	#8
Rings of Saturn Academic Join Date: 9 Oct 2007 Posts: 900 Threads: 104 Thanked 221 Times in 114 Posts	yeh a buddy of mine last night told me that his camera..whic his a mid level pro camera-- 1500.00 can take 1 pic every 1/2 second until his chip is full...holding down the button. Not sure about how they were in 2001 though....