WTC 9/11 - Construction Questions on Mysterious Observations (Hollow Towers Perspective)

After having watched the linked video of construction footage, I have a few observations and theories on it - when considering the hollow towers hypothesis.

It's seems to me that most of the floors had no concrete floor, because if they did we'd have a debris pile 10 stories high - of just concrete. And let's face facts, that concrete did not turn to dust.

So allow me to propose a theory and please feel free to offer your own thoughts and observations.

Screenshot_20240212_193830_YouTube.jpg
In this aerial shot, I see what appears to be three workers standing on corrugated iron installed as temporary flooring and/or substrate to pour the slab on. Notice some of that level is still exposed trusses same as the next level up. I have framed what I believe to be the corrugated sheeting (roofing iron) used to construct the temporary floor.

Screenshot_20240212_194154_YouTube.jpg
Screenshot_20240212_195546_YouTube.jpg
Screenshot_20240212_194039_YouTube.jpg
Here are a few more examples for good measure.

Screenshot_20240212_194419_YouTube.jpg
Screenshot_20240212_194501_YouTube.jpg
Here are a couple of shots taken standing directly on the substrate. one you can clearly see corrugation and one you can't which I don't quite understand but whatever.

Screenshot_20240212_200028_YouTube.jpg
In this shot, you can see the substrate through the exterior window cavity on what appears to be every level.

Screenshot_20240212_200114_YouTube.jpg
But as the camera tilts upward, the highlighted expanse seems to get darker each level that goes up, appearing as though there is only one substrate over about 5 floors. Could this show that not every floor had even the basic corrugated iron substrate? ie no intention of being developed? Is that something that would be done at a later date during the course of a high rise construction? I'm interested to hear thoughts on this..

Screenshot_20240212_195649_YouTube.jpg
What I'm about to point out in this shot is easier to see in the moving footage so I recommend having a look for yourself, but as you can tell by this still shot, you can see through the building for a good 9 or 10 stories. The size or aperture of each 'hole' remains the same from top to bottom. I would have expected the openings to decrease in size the further the openings move away from the viewers eye level (horizon - focal point) - due to the floors above and below obscuring the view through the openings - the higher and lower they are from the horizon. As they are all the same size, it us as though there is no floor to obscure the openings - meaning a cavity of 10 levels?

I know that's hard to understand, but notice what a level of floor does to obscure ones vision as in the below picture, and hopefully you get the idea of what I'm trying to say ..
Screenshot_20240212_200314_YouTube.jpg
See how the floor goes off on quite a steep angle toward the focal point? It's quite profound this close up, and I would have thought it would be even more profound at the distance of the log range shot, but it's not happening.. thoughts?

Again, It gives me the impression that a vast expanse (10 stories or more) has no floor in that one shot. And it makes me wonder how much of the building may have ended up like that..


Screenshot_20240212_194653_YouTube.jpg
Screenshot_20240212_194829_YouTube.jpg
These two shots are of the same area close to ground level and seem to show concrete over the corrugated iron but I'm not 100%. Perhaps this was a floor that they intended to actually use so couldn't avoid putting a slab in? This is what I would have expected every single floor to look like, as it went up..

Screenshot_20240212_200653_YouTube.jpg
In this last one, the outer facade is basically finished, and you can see what appears to be lights on in the lower levels. but what about the levels highlighted? No illumination.. Were all those floors not being worked on? looks weird..or maybe they are HOLLOW 😱 you tell me ..

How good would it be to get a hold of someone who worked for the Tishman Realty & Construction Company or any of their sub contractors who worked on the project to get their input!

original video here:

Cheers,
Jamie
 

Phil Jayhan

Administrator
Staff member
Good post and a ton of material to look through and ponder. I'm going to need a few days at least to respond. For now though, I think this video here might help things along a little bit. From the 1973 movie "Sylvie" - Let's see what your keen eye for detail does with this little gem of a helicopter video shot of the WTC under construction;

 
cheers Phil,

re the Sylvie footage, I notice that the 'see through' part of the building is evident where the corner cladding is missing.

In the area below the see through section, the corner cladding has been installed. I am wondering if the section is see through because no glass has been installed, as I would assume that the corner cladding would need to be installed before glass goes in - in order to install the corner cladding from inside the building.

ie Assuming that if the glass is installed, the corner cladding installation would no longer be able to be carried out from inside..

I expect that once glass goes in that the building would appear solid unless viewed from the right angle - and back lit, as seen in the classic orange pic where only the elevator shafts can be seen as the sun is backlighting the building ..

Screenshot_20240213_113805_Brave.jpg
Screenshot_20240213_113854_Brave.jpg
1707746691525.png
 
After having watched the linked video of construction footage, I have a few observations and theories on it - when considering the hollow towers hypothesis.

It's seems to me that most of the floors had no concrete floor, because if they did we'd have a debris pile 10 stories high - of just concrete. And let's face facts, that concrete did not turn to dust.

So allow me to propose a theory and please feel free to offer your own thoughts and observations.

View attachment 3415
In this aerial shot, I see what appears to be three workers standing on corrugated iron installed as temporary flooring and/or substrate to pour the slab on. Notice some of that level is still exposed trusses same as the next level up. I have framed what I believe to be the corrugated sheeting (roofing iron) used to construct the temporary floor.

View attachment 3416
View attachment 3417
View attachment 3418
Here are a few more examples for good measure.

View attachment 3419
View attachment 3420
Here are a couple of shots taken standing directly on the substrate. one you can clearly see corrugation and one you can't which I don't quite understand but whatever.

View attachment 3421
In this shot, you can see the substrate through the exterior window cavity on what appears to be every level.

View attachment 3422
But as the camera tilts upward, the highlighted expanse seems to get darker each level that goes up, appearing as though there is only one substrate over about 5 floors. Could this show that not every floor had even the basic corrugated iron substrate? ie no intention of being developed? Is that something that would be done at a later date during the course of a high rise construction? I'm interested to hear thoughts on this..

View attachment 3423
What I'm about to point out in this shot is easier to see in the moving footage so I recommend having a look for yourself, but as you can tell by this still shot, you can see through the building for a good 9 or 10 stories. The size or aperture of each 'hole' remains the same from top to bottom. I would have expected the openings to decrease in size the further the openings move away from the viewers eye level (horizon - focal point) - due to the floors above and below obscuring the view through the openings - the higher and lower they are from the horizon. As they are all the same size, it us as though there is no floor to obscure the openings - meaning a cavity of 10 levels?

I know that's hard to understand, but notice what a level of floor does to obscure ones vision as in the below picture, and hopefully you get the idea of what I'm trying to say ..
View attachment 3424
See how the floor goes off on quite a steep angle toward the focal point? It's quite profound this close up, and I would have thought it would be even more profound at the distance of the log range shot, but it's not happening.. thoughts?

Again, It gives me the impression that a vast expanse (10 stories or more) has no floor in that one shot. And it makes me wonder how much of the building may have ended up like that..


View attachment 3425
View attachment 3426
These two shots are of the same area close to ground level and seem to show concrete over the corrugated iron but I'm not 100%. Perhaps this was a floor that they intended to actually use so couldn't avoid putting a slab in? This is what I would have expected every single floor to look like, as it went up..

View attachment 3427
In this last one, the outer facade is basically finished, and you can see what appears to be lights on in the lower levels. but what about the levels highlighted? No illumination.. Were all those floors not being worked on? looks weird..or maybe they are HOLLOW 😱 you tell me ..

How good would it be to get a hold of someone who worked for the Tishman Realty & Construction Company or any of their sub contractors who worked on the project to get their input!

original video here:

Cheers,
Jamie
Here is a screenshot from an interview conducted at trade center 7 showing a worker carrying a sheet of iron not too dissimilar to the sheets I propose may have been used in 1&2 to construct temporary flooring on levels where the "joists" may not (I suspect) have been installed .. same construction company and workforce involved with the twin towers so it stands to reason that similar materials and methods of construction were used ..
Screenshot_20240213_120903_YouTube.jpg

and here is a pic better illustrating the type of obscuring effect (toward a focal point) on window cavities by floor levels that I would expect, which seems absent in the above screenshots- and the orange pic for that matter .. happy to be corrected of course ..
Screenshot_20240213_123913_YouTube.jpg
 
Top