|
|
#1 | |
|
Reader
Join Date: 28 Jan 2012
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 16
Threads: 4
Thanked 45 Times in 13 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Investigators have identified the signal from one of the black boxes in the WTC
The official story is that none of the black boxes of the flights that hit WTC 1 and WTC 2 were recovered. And there is of course the story of DeMasi and Belone that 3 of the 4 boxes WERE recovered: Quote:
Whatever either DeMasi or Belone may or may not have done wright or wrong in the aftermath of 9/11 (there is some discussion whether there was a matter of personal benefit or misuse of uniforms etc), today I stumbled upon one of the most import discoveries in my personal investigation of 9/11. When sifting through thousands of FOIA requested i downloaded up to now, I stumbled upon this letter of the New York Mayers Emergercy Office to governor Pataki. In the letter of September 18th (2001) director Edward F. Jacoby jr wrote to governor Pataki: "Investigators have identified the signal from one of the black boxes in the WTC debris" Impossible and hoax you would say. No.. here's it in plain text. (red box added by me) Old picture url; http://cavynl.home.xs4all.nl/911/NYS...r%20Paraki.png ![]() You can find the original set from FOIA's this one came from at: LINK This information has not surfaced in years. How can investigators have been able to identify the signal of the black boxes, and still there is the official statement that none of the boxes were recovered? Of course.. having the beacon of the black box operational does not say anything of the contents or usability of the tapes or info of the blackboxes themselves, but here is - in my humble opinion - another smoking gun the we were not told the whole truth about these black boxes not being found at all! Someone has some explaining to do! One thought in addition. The letter to governor Pataki is dated September 18, 2001. It is a very strange 'coindicence' that the FOIA request for releasing the situation reports for the NYC Office of Emergency Management (OEM), started with releasing from upon "Situation Report #12" (which is made as of September 17, 15.00 hours local time). Situation Reports 1 till 11 have NOT been released. Is it clear that the director Jacoby is basing his letter on Reports 1 till 11, and it raises the red flag on the question why these 11 reports are still not being released, or did we finally catch a glimpse on the reason why nobody is allowed to see these 11 reports? It is clear there WERE black boxes and at least one of the beacons was active ![]() Caveman Last edited by Phil Jayhan; 23 Aug 2012 at 23:52 PM. Reason: adding additional background info on FOIA status of situation reports. paragraph bleed, typos, replace picture with LRF hosting; Fixed truncated link http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/229899-oem- |
|
| |
|
| The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to caveman For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 |
|
Privileged
Join Date: 3 Jul 2010
Location: Down Under Land
Posts: 2,675
Threads: 207
Blog Entries: 153
Thanked 5,594 Times in 2,062 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Investigators have identified the signal from one of the black boxes in the WTC
Great find caveman.
__________________
Any man can overcome adversity. If you truly want to test a man's character, give him power." — Abraham Lincoln |
| |
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to clive For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#3 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: 14 Feb 2011
Posts: 160
Threads: 0
Thanked 279 Times in 103 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Investigators have identified the signal from one of the black boxes in the WTC
Keep in mind the strong possibility that at least one (and probably several) of the various, overlapping "hijacking and plane-crashing war games" being conducted on the morning of 9/11 involved the hunt for, and discovery of, black boxes. This very interesting material you have uncovered may actually be based on quotes or paraphrases from the covert 9/11 script. In other words, there could still have been no real planes... or black boxes for that matter -- but the game players had been initially instructed to pretend there were. And so their "going through the motions" became a part of the historical document trail that the post-facto "investigators" eventually decided it was best to ignore.
|
| |
|
| The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to andy tyme For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#4 |
|
Admin
Join Date: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 3,520
Threads: 113
Thanked 9,863 Times in 2,648 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Investigators have identified the signal from one of the black boxes in the WTC
Yes, I will say that the first item in the document is a hoax, there were no black boxes. Certainly none that arrived by airplane.
Another one I like is that 46,760 tons of debris were removed in a 12 hour period. A Tri-axle dump truck is usually set up to carry a 20-22 ton load. The size of the bed is set up such that a load of dense graded stone (with nearly no air) will produce such a weight. A load of debris has many materials lighter than rock, and also has a lot of air space between items, reducing weight. A more realistic weight for a debris truck would be 15 tons max. Even at 22 tons, it would take 2,125 loads in a 12 hour period, or an average of 177 loads per hour. Totally impossible. 3 loads leaving each minute, and that is giving all benefits of doubt. If they were talking about steel beams, we have seen the way they were carefully loaded. We could study the photos and look up the brand of truck and trailer to determine the load but it would be easier to generously estimate.Trailers are designed for the normal maximum legal weight limits. Even if the legal limits were suspended, the trailers would carry 35 tons. Even at 35 tons, it would take 1,336 loads in 12 hours, 111 loads per hour. Each load had to be rigged by men at the pile,picked up by a crane (we have seen these beams handled by cranes) carefully lowered onto the trucks. Some were also handled by teams of two large excavators with Pinchers, also not a rapid process. This process would have to be completed every 30 seconds to produce these results, and again, with the number of cranes and excavators on site, this is ridiculous. Since both alternatives are unachievable, there can be no combination of the two that could move this kind of debris in that time frame. Don't forget that all of this material had to be off loaded at Pier 25 too, in the same time frame. There are certainly not enough cranes on the Pier to once again move this material in such a preposterous time span. Looks like once again, in the early days after 9/11, they are caught protesting too much. Stephanopoulis and Giuliani were already explaining the small debris pile on the morning of 9/12, when nobody was asking. Kinda like blurting out "I didn't do it" before any one asks. Here they are at it again. Throwing out absurd figures to over sell the idea that there was a huge pile, which had disappeared rapidly. We have proven over and over that neither was the case. There is no indication of trucks leaving the site at that pace, there would have been a steady stream. They knew the debris pile was their Achilles Heel. They had to sell it at every opportunity. That document they provided is nearly a farce. They may as well claim Godzilla ate the debris overnight. Thanks for posting it caveman. Tell a very Big Lie, repeat it often. 46,760 tons. Right. l __________________
"Don't worry about it - Americans don't read." Allan Dulles ... |
| |
|
| The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to do2read For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Privileged
Join Date: 4 Jan 2011
Location: Hollow Town
Posts: 3,388
Threads: 137
Thanked 10,753 Times in 2,985 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Investigators have identified the signal from one of the black boxes in the WTC
Quote:
Maybe you saw 9/11 instead of 9/17! ![]() ![]() 1.) This document says 6 days instead of 12 hours for the 46,760 tons. 2.) Agreed with 15 ton per truck. [could be 16,4. See further on.] 3.) 46,760:6 days/144 hours, that would be 7793 ton per day, 325 ton per hour:15 ton a truck >> 22 trucks per hour. [If the trucks loaded 16,4 ton, that will reduce the loads to 20 per hour.] 4.) See 3. 5.) With a 35 ton per truck scenario, well let's be generous and make it 29,5 ton per truck. That would cut the numbers right in half, wich is 11 trucks per hour. 11 trucks X 29,5 = 324,5 ton X 144 hours = 46,728 ton. 6.) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Let's see what we can find on 7,8 and 9. Quote:
Quote:
The first article says; 46,760 tons in 6 days. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
115,755 tons in 14 days. [ see ^the same date september 25th] Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But a 'puzzling' estimated 1,2 million number for a source in NEW YORK?? That is not even close to the 1,8 million they all mention? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Bit confusing here. The 911 memorial page says may 10, 2002! Wich is 8 months and they mention 1,4 million ton. The article that Debra K Rubin wrote, there was 1,6 million removed in just 7 months?? [That would be april.]Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Let's continue...110,000 trucks in 9 months and 14 days [284 days]. That is an averaged 387 ton per day. 110,000 trucks times 15 ton per truck would be close to the estimated 1,8 million ton. But 110,000 trucks times 15 ton per truck is 1,65 million ton? So i am missing 150,000 ton here, unless the trucks loaded 16,4 ton a piece and that times 110,000 trucks covers "just about" the 1,8 million ton. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Some weird numbers? The biggest diffence is 600,000 ton or more??? Maybe you can find some answers here. http://letsrollforums.com/mayor-giul...10-t25683.html Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
76.459 tons times 2 = 152.918 X 10 = 1.529.180 tons. + 480 trucks to complete the 110.000 trucks x 16,4 ton a truck. Makes a total of 1.537.052 Ton. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
1,537,052 ton is hauled away from Ground Zero, the estimate was 1,6 million or 1,8 million ton by much authorities. Either way there is a hugh amount of WTC steel missing.... Quote:
![]() Quote:
__________________
“Let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories…...?” George Walker Bush Last edited by Dr FUBAR; 4 Dec 2012 at 18:18 PM. Reason: finished tread |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|
| The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Dr FUBAR For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#6 | |||
|
Reader
Join Date: 28 Jan 2012
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 16
Threads: 4
Thanked 45 Times in 13 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Investigators have identified the signal from one of the black boxes in the WTC
Dr. Fubar, you are right.
If you compare the number given in de letter to the governor with the confidential situation report #13 (see below), the numbers match up quite well. First of all the front page (so you can see where these number came from in the first place): ![]() and here is the exact number given by the OEM on page 3, which is of course the number for september 18th. ![]() Kind request for now: May I ask (as initiator of this thread) not to go offtopic further regarding the amount of debris. If needed we can open a seperate thread on that one. I would like to keep this thread on the issue of the black boxes and the new finding that a signal has been tracked on or before September 18th. So what do we know... Fact 1. Black boxes. Black boxes are designed to survive a whole scala of disasters. Of course there are examples where the black boxes have not be retrieved, but in most cases is it not the actual retrieval of the black boxes that is an issue. When there is trouble regarding black boxes it has to do with data not being able to be read etc. Black boxes are installed in the back of the plane to enhance the chances of them actually surviving the disaster. ![]() Fact 2. Broad attention towards finding the boxes. In the aftermath of 9/11 broad attention was given to make rescueworkers aware of the fact that retrieving these boxes was considered vital. As example: this poster was being spread: ![]() Quote:
The letter of director of OEM of NY send to the governor states clearly (even as first item in this 'fairly' important' document) that investigators have tracked a signal from one of the black boxes. ![]() Fact 4. Reports by New York Times. On September 19th, the New York Times reports the following: Quote:
Fact 5. DeMasi and Bellone Both DeMasi and Bellone stated that black boxes were indeed recovered, Bellone only having seen one of them, DeMasi having accompanied the FBI personell that actually retrieved the boxes. Fact 6. Official Report 9/11 commission. A footnote to the official 9/11 commission report states: Quote:
The black box of flight 93 (or some say: alleged black bo has been recovered. ![]() Fact 8. Dan Rather. At some point (we do not know exactly which date/time yet, some sites mention September 12 th) Dan Rather of CBS announced that one of the black boxes was found. Some minutes Dan Rather apoligized and said he made a mistake. Initiatial announcement: download FLV Apologies and no box found: download FLV Main question. Where do we go from here? I see that we should consider aiming a FOIA request which pinpoints exactly to these matters. Questions must be answered, like: - Who were the 'investigators' from which the director of OEM got the news that one of the beacons was beeping? - Who was the source of the New York Times who said there was beeping, but still a lot of digging needed to be done. Any suggestions to take this to a deeper level? Caveman @Andy. I see no reason why on September 18th actual resque operations at the WTC would suffer from exersize drills from 9/11 (regarding the point of one of the boxes beacons beeping). If the director of OEM states to the governor that investigators have identified a beacon beeping, it's the real thing beeping, not an exersize |
|||
| |
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to caveman For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#7 | |
|
Privileged
Join Date: 4 Jan 2011
Location: Hollow Town
Posts: 3,388
Threads: 137
Thanked 10,753 Times in 2,985 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Investigators have identified the signal from one of the black boxes in the WTC
Quote:
No problem! Got a little carried away!? Now back on topic all. ![]() __________________
“Let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories…...?” George Walker Bush |
|
| |
|
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dr FUBAR For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#8 |
|
Privileged
Join Date: 21 Jan 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 361
Threads: 24
Thanked 1,314 Times in 334 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Investigators have identified the signal from one of the black boxes in the WTC
Caveman, I don't mean to put a damper on your research and enthusiasm but I think it's important that we don't get sidetracked by digressionary tactics of the 9/11 hoaxers.
|
| |
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Saoirse For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#9 |
|
Reader
Join Date: 28 Jan 2012
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 16
Threads: 4
Thanked 45 Times in 13 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Investigators have identified the signal from one of the black boxes in the WTC
@Saoirse: I understand your point from the belief that no commercial airliner did hit the WTC. However, i am purely investigating whether or not documentation from one or the other agency contradicts the story of another agency.
While this finding of official mentioning of the beacons of the flight recorders might be only a small issue for the event as a whole, I think is it worthy investigating why the director of OEM of NY reports to the governor about the beacon of one of the flight recorders being 'active' and the NTSB denying any flightrecorder was being presented to them by the FBI. Exact date of retrieval of the black boxes. As a matter of fact I can pretty well pinpoint the date that most likely the flightrecorders WERE found. ![]() Soon after all search and rescue operations started, we see the first reports of the NTSB being present at the site. The meeting minutes of september 24th show the NTSB being present and requesting assistance in case the black boxes are to be recovered. ![]() From the NYFD Incident Action Plan from september 25th we learn that the NTSB is planning to set up 'observation points'. ![]() From the NYFD Incident Action Plan from september 25th we learn that five (5) observation points are active, and a sixth is on it way to be realised. ![]() By september 28th all six observation points are active, as we read in the NYFD documentation for that day: ![]() From this day on the six observation points are mentioned every day in the FDNY documentation, like for example september 30th: ![]() Just to check if everything is still in place we check the docs on october 3th: a number of 6 camera points (tracking stations) are still in place: ![]() Watch out, major clue arriving shortly! On oktober 21th still a number of five (5) monitoring stations is active. (I've been told that the sixt location had to be given up because of changes in the crane plan for Ground Zero...) ![]() But... What happens at october 22th? All but two monitoring stations have been removed. ![]() Clearly 'five' was still in the original papers handed to all chiefs at the meeting, however, during the meeting it was announced that in stead of 5 stations only 2 stations remain. As of october 23th, the number of stations operational to assist in the retrieval of the flight data recorders is as low as 2: ![]() I have yet to fight myself through another pile of action reports and other 9/11 stuff, but I have the following hypothesis: The black box or boxes that were being mentioned by DeMasi and Bellone were retrieved at october 21th, 2001. Caveman |
| |
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to caveman For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#10 |
|
Privileged
Join Date: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 1,044
Threads: 67
Thanked 1,973 Times in 732 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Investigators have identified the signal from one of the black boxes in the WTC
Over a month after collapse and they still needed water cannons to douse the fires?
That's some fire!! |
| |
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Orion67 For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|