Phil Jayhan

My understanding of the Exif metadata is it is a digital stamp which is embedded into the actual code of the picture; It shows many things, but one of them is it shows the day the picture was taken. And this date stamp is also changed when the picture is edited on photoshop; Apparently, it overwrites the old data, and replaces it with the new data. This picture of Daniel Lewin, alleged passenger on Flight 11, shows a picture being taken day of 9.11.01. September 11th, 2001. Which means this picture was last edited, or created on September 11th, 2001. The Exif data is embedded into the digital signature of the picture itself. From my understanding, when the new Exif data is written into the photograph, the old data is overwritten.

Caption or Obituary of Digital data stamp on Daniel Lewins picture;

This appears to mean that the AP Press had in their possession, a picture of Daniel Lewin, and his obituary written by midnight on 9.11.01. This presents an impossibility of course, as the sheer timing and speed with which they had Daniel Lewin's picture and full story of his death is not simply implausible or unbelievable, it is impossible. This is proof that Daniel Lewin was in some sort of way, either a fiction or a carefully prepared alias, and that he did not die on 9/11/01 as we were told.

This story would have been plausible if the picture had a metadata stamp of 9.19.2001 and beyond. But for the digital stamp to show the last editing of this picture being done on 9/11/01 is, as they say, a proverbial smoking gun. Did Daniel Lewin really die on 9/11/2001? And is this even a picture of the real Daniel Lewin, or did Daniel Lewin only exist in the few newspaper accounts about him, created over many years?



Original link:



Above; Daniel Lewins picture on CNN servers still showing this data. Below is the short bio contained there;

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

Julia.M.Lazare

• 9/11 - FAA memo says Flight 11 passenger was shot who happened to be a multi-millionaire elite Israeli military commando who understands Arabic and who happened to be sitting directly in front of one of the alleged hijackers.

Hijacker shot passenger on Flight 11: FAA memo; 'One bullet fired,' killing 9B occupant, but agency claims report was in error "An internal Federal Aviation Administration memo summarizing the Sept. 11 hijackings says a passenger aboard American Airlines Flight 11 was shot to death by a single bullet, WorldNetDaily has learned.

The FAA claims the memo, time-stamped Sept. 11 at 5:30 p.m., was written in error.

"It was a first draft," said FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown in a phone interview today. "There was no gun."

She said a final draft of the executive summary, received by FAA Administrator Jane Garvey, does not include the account of a gun being fired aboard the plane, which slammed into the first World Trade Center tower not long after departing Boston.

Brown refused to release the final draft, however, arguing it is "protected information."

WorldNetDaily has obtained a copy of the first draft of the memo, which can be viewed here.

Here is the key excerpt, which is very specific (although the time is plainly wrong):

"The American Airlines FAA Principal Security Inspector (PSI) was notified by Suzanne Clark of American Airlines Corporate Headquarters, that an on board flight attendant contacted American Airlines Operations Center and informed that a passenger located in seat 10B shot and killed a passenger in seat 9B at 9:20 a.m.

"The passenger killed was Daniel Lewin, shot by passenger Satam Al Suqami. One bullet was reported to have been fired."

In fact, Flight 11 had already crashed well before 9:20 a.m. (assuming the FAA memo writer was referring to the Eastern time zone and not a later one). At 8:25 a.m. – nearly an hour earlier than stated in the memo – Flight 11 had turned sharply off its planned westbound path and headed south toward Manhattan. It then crashed into the north tower at 8:48 a.m." - WorldNetDaily (02/27/02)

Friends think Flight 11 Israeli was 'executed'; Daniel Lewin, named in FAA shooting memo, was officer in elite unit of Jewish state's military

"In another tragic irony of Sept. 11, three of the five Islamic hijackers aboard American Airlines Flight 11 were seated next to an elite Israeli commando. And it may just have gotten that Jewish passenger killed before all the others.

In fact, his friends and associates are now sure of it, after reading a secret government memo naming Israeli-American Daniel C. Lewin as a gunshot victim on the flight.

WorldNetDaily published the Federal Aviation Administration memo in an exclusive article Wednesday. The FAA, while confirming the document is authentic, claims the report of Lewin's shooting, written several hours after the Sept. 11 hijackings, was premature and inaccurate.

His friends don't buy it.

"Danny was an officer in a secret unit of the Israeli army called 'sayeret matkal,'" said Yehuda Schwartzberg, a childhood friend from Jerusalem. "My guess is that he did something in some way to stand up against the hijackers, and was executed because of it."

Keith Lowery, a business associate of the late Boston high-tech executive who had dual citizenship, says the terrorists may have singled him out because of his "Jewishness" -- as they did Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl.

The FAA memo's summary of the Flight 11 shooting incident, real or not, is the most detailed and specific -- not to mention shocking -- of the four hijacking summaries. It says Lewin, sitting in seat 9B, was "shot by passenger Satam al-Suqami," sitting behind him in seat 10B. (Both names match those on the manifest released by the airline.)

"One bullet was reported to have been fired," the memo states. What's more, the report echoes another account of a fatal struggle in that same business-class section of the plane -- as revealed by the FBI.

An FBI investigative document reconstructing notes of a frantic phone call from a Flight 11 flight attendant to her manager on the ground in Boston, reveals that "a business-class passenger" was killed by the hijackers.

"A hijacker also cut the throat of a business-class passenger, and he appears to be dead," Amy Sweeney relayed to American flight services manager Michael Woodward on the ground at Logan International Airport.

She also relayed the exact seat numbers of the hijackers in the ninth and 10th rows -- the very rows cited in the controversial FAA report.

The FBI's account of the unrecorded call was leaked to the Los Angeles Times, which ran a story Sept. 20.

The 31-year-old Lewin, an Israeli citizen since a teen, was a captain in the Israel Defense Force and had extensive anti-terrorism training.

"Anyone who knows Danny knows that it was not his nature to go down without a fight," Schwartzberg said. "Maybe this (memo) shows that he died a hero."

An FAA special agent agrees.

"With his background in special forces, he would have had more of a fighting instinct click into gear, rather than be herded around" or fooled by their cover, said the agent, who wished to go unnamed. "They probably killed him first because he was fighting back."

Lewin, a graduate of MIT and Israel's Technion, lived with his wife, Anne, and two sons, Eitan and Itamar, in Brookline, Mass., where he helped run Akamai Technologies -- which he co-founded, nearly becoming a billionaire in the dot-com stock boom. He previously worked for IBM's research lab in Haifa, Israel. His parents and brothers all live in Israel.

Attempts to reach his family for comment were unsuccessful.

Lewin was traveling to Los Angeles on business." - WorldNetDaily (03/01/02)

Lewin: Flight 11's unsung hero? 'Knives wouldn't have stopped' ex-Israeli commando, army pal says "He could bench-press 315 pounds and squat more than 450 pounds as a teen-ager. As an officer in an elite unit of the Israeli army, he was trained to kill terrorists with a pen or a credit card, or just his bare hands.

On Sept. 11, he may have gotten the chance.

As fate would have it, Daniel C. Lewin, a 31-year-old Israeli-American, was seated on American Airlines Flight 11 between hijackers Mohammed Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari in the row in front of him, and hijacker Satam al-Suqami in the row behind him.

A secret Federal Aviation Administration executive summary, first uncovered by WorldNetDaily, says that al-Suqami, who would have been sitting directly behind Lewin in seat 10B, shot and killed Lewin with a single bullet.

The FAA maintains the high-level report was a mistaken first draft and that Lewin was more than likely stabbed, not shot, along with American Airlines crew members on Flight 11. (Box cutters were allowed that day through airline security, which the FAA regulated, but not guns.)

But a childhood friend who served with Lewin in the Israel Defense Force says only a bullet would have stopped Lewin.

Rephen recalls Lewin's injured hands after he returned from an Israeli anti-terrorist training course.

"They were pretty beaten up from the fighting he did," he said. "He knew how to fight with knives and take knives away from people."

He described Lewin, at about 5-11, 200 pounds, as "thick-boned." He says he witnessed him bench-press more than 300 pounds and squat close to 500 pounds.

"He was very, very strong and had a lot of meat on him," Rephen said. "They couldn't have subdued him by slashing him. The only way they could have stopped him was by shooting him."

Before returning to America, where he worked as an Internet company executive in Boston, the Denver-born Lewin was a captain in Sayeret Matkal, a top-secret reconnaissance unit of the Israeli army used for special anti-terror missions such as the raid on Entebbe. In 1976, Israeli commandos rescued 103 hostages from a gang of Arab terrorists at the airport in the Ugandan capital.

Lewin went on dozens of such missions, friends say. In the '80s, for example, he helped rescue thousands of Jews stranded in Ethiopia. His outfit – Unit 269 – secured the airport there during the airlift operation, friends say.

Rephen called Lewin "the best of the best."

"About 2,500 guys try out for the unit he was in," he said. "Twenty-five make it, and one gets chosen as an officer. It was him."

He was also extremely tough and determined, Rephen says. He recalls an earlier time, during basic military training, when Lewin fell into a ravine and was knocked unconscious and rushed to the hospital. "He was back the next day," Rephen said. He guesses that Lewin, who understood Arabic, sensed something was wrong on Flight 11 the moment he took his seat next to the three terrorists, including Atta, the ringleader.

"He probably picked up that they were on a suicide mission by what they were saying or wearing," Rephen said.

"Hamas and other Islamic terrorist groups put on headbands as badges of their death," he added. "If they put that stuff on, and he saw it, he would have known the ride was over."
And then he would have made his move.

"If I know Danny, when he realized what they were doing, he attacked them," Rephen said. "He probably cursed them in Arabic to scare them, and then he hurt them."

He speculates that during the struggle with Atta and the other hijacker sitting in front of Lewin in row 8, al-Suqami shot him from behind.

"I have no doubt they got a gun on the plane as a backup for a situation like that," Rephen said, speculating that they either brought it on board the plane, likely in pieces, or had it planted there earlier by ground services crew. The FAA report, though very specific, does not indicate whether Lewin was killed during a struggle or while sitting in his seat. Whatever happened, it likely went down within 15 minutes or so of takeoff. Authorities say the pilots were overpowered by then.

Rephen, like other Lewin friends and associates contacted by WorldNetDaily, doubts the report of gunfire was written in error.

"If this were an error, they wouldn't have been so fact-specific," Rephen said.
The FBI says the Lewin incident is still under investigation.

"I don't think we know for sure right now if he was killed" on board the flight, said FBI spokesman Paul Bresson. "All of this is something we're trying to figure out ourselves."
Source: killtown

Phil Jayhan

Related Stories:

---

Did they Use Mike Riveros picture as one of the passengers on 9/11?



John J Wenckus | Passenger of Flight 11 -- Mike Rivero | WhatReallyHappened.com -

---

Did they use Ari Fleischers picture as one of the Passengers on Flight 11?



From left to right:

Ari Fleischer - White House Spokesman - Michael Theodoridis - alleged Passenger from flight 11 - Ari Fleischer, Darker Complexion

---

Flight 77 Passenger - Is Lady Booth Olson, Barbara Olson of 9/11?



Also see these other Articles in this Section;

• 911 - Disturbing/Photoshopped Victim Picture of the Day
• Who is Ari Fleischer? 3rd Passenger from 9/11 Discovered Alive & Well?
• The Barbara Olson Look-a-like Contest - Is Lady Booth Olson, Barbara Olson of 9/11?
• Another 9/11 Passenger Found? Is Mike Rivero John Wenckus of Flight 11?
• CNN Memorial - Obvious Photoshop on Alleged WTC 911 Victims
• The "4" Flights of 9/11 - What Happened to the Passengers? Mystery Solved?
  
• Mystery of the Passengers & Planes of 911 Solved?
• 4 Passengers lists of 911 & Occupations of Victims
• Phantom passenger -alive and well- how many more?? ( 1 2)
• Flight 93: Forty lives, one destiny
• Passenger: Todd Beamer
• Pictures of Extra Equipment on Look-A-Like Flight 175
• Targeting Laser Light Spot at the World Trade Center!
• "Flight 175" WAS a Cargo/FUEL TANKER
• New Photo of 767 Showing 2nd Piece of Equip / Port Engine
• WTC MISSILE STRIKE 911: United Airlines Flight 175 Impossible Speed
• The Cleveland Airport Mystery
• Is this how United 93 was boarded?
• 911 Commission Timelines of 4 Aircraft: 9-11: Holes in the Radar
• 9/11 Flight 93 Passenger Uprising Theory Discounted - LA Times
• Flight 77 Passenger, Barbara Olsen of 9/11 - Back from the Dead?
• Last-Minute Pilots, Passengers, and Flight Attendants: The Unexplained Oddity of 9/11
• The Cleveland Airport Mystery
• Is this how United 93 was boarded?
• United Flight 175 victims at a glance
• How Many of the Alleged 246 Passengers Are Confirmed as Real?
• How Many Alleged Plane Victims Have Had Their Families Interviewed?
• WHY DOES MOTHER OF FLIGHT 77 VICTIM BELIEVE FLIGHT 77 DID NOT HIT THE PENTAGON?
• Surprising number of Passengers on Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon had Military ties
• Cheating Death At The Pentagon - A Story based on Lies
• Flight 11 Mystery-Flight 11 was not scheduled on 9/11, was scheduled for Maintenance
• May 2,1968: Advert in NY Times Warns of WTC Danger, Shows Plane About to Strike Tower
• Alex Jones & Sidekick Mike Rivero - Grandfathers of the 9/11 Truth Movement
• Question of the Day: Ari Fleischer, Flight 11 & Box Cutters
• Another Amazing 9/11 Passenger coincidence, and many inconsistencies
• 911 - Disturbing/Photoshopped Victim Picture of the Day
• 9/11 Victims Pictures - Anyone Look Familiar?
• 9/11 Passenger Mystery Unraveling? Is Mike Rivero, John Wenckus of Flight 11?
• Does anyone here know how to view Exif data on a Digital picture?

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

Phil Jayhan

David H. Rice - Alleged 9/11 Victim - Exif Data, Obit Created on 9/11/2001! Now this is extremely interesting. David H. Rice has a picture where the exif metadata digital stamp is showing the picture was last altered on 9/11/2001.

Notice the lower left of the Exif viewer, see the obit which was already written on 9/11/01. How would it even be remotely possible for a single person to be confirmed dead on the very day of 9/11? Why are there no other pictures available of this young hansome man? Why does it strongly appear by viewing the Exif data on this photograph that David H. Rice was somehow a fiction or a carefully prepared alias? Or perhaps something different altogether? This photos Exif data shows the last time this picture being taken and/or edited as that of 9/11/2001? This is rather disturbing because until now, it had appeared through our research that the only carefully prepared aliases were that of the passengers of the 4 flights, and at the Pentagon. David H. Rice and the Exif data on his photograph would now break this threshold and now show that at least one of the victims at the World Trade Center, David H. Rice, was perhaps a fiction or a carefully prepared alias.

And, with a fully formed, fully written short obituary?

David H. Rice Exif Data - Picture has Date stamp of 9/11/2001

Check this out you guys. David H. Rice's picture has an exif data stamp of 9/11/2001 and his obit was already written on 9/11/2001. Apparently there are not many pictures of this rather hansome and dapper young man; Google search brings up nothing; "David h Rice 911"

Download the free metadata exif reader software here: And try the picture below. Still has the stamp of 9/11/01/








Also see these other Articles in this Section;

Related Stories:


Did they Use Mike Riveros picture as one of the passengers on 9/11?



John J Wenckus | Passenger of Flight 11 -- Mike Rivero | WhatReallyHappened.com -



Did they use Ari Fleischers picture as one of the Passengers on Flight 11?



From left to right:

Ari Fleischer - White House Spokesman - Michael Theodoridis - alleged Passenger from flight 11 - Ari Fleischer, Darker Complexion



Flight 77 Passenger - Is Lady Booth Olson, Barbara Olson of 9/11?



Also see these other Articles in this Section;

• 911 - Disturbing/Photoshopped Victim Picture of the Day
• Who is Ari Fleischer? 3rd Passenger from 9/11 Discovered Alive & Well?
• The Barbara Olson Look-a-like Contest - Is Lady Booth Olson, Barbara Olson of 9/11?
• Another 9/11 Passenger Found? Is Mike Rivero John Wenckus of Flight 11?
• CNN Memorial - Obvious Photoshop on Alleged WTC 911 Victims
• The "4" Flights of 9/11 - What Happened to the Passengers? Mystery Solved?
  
• Mystery of the Passengers & Planes of 911 Solved?
• 4 Passengers lists of 911 & Occupations of Victims
• Phantom passenger -alive and well- how many more?? ( 1 2)
• Flight 93: Forty lives, one destiny
• Passenger: Todd Beamer
• Pictures of Extra Equipment on Look-A-Like Flight 175
• Targeting Laser Light Spot at the World Trade Center!
• "Flight 175" WAS a Cargo/FUEL TANKER
• New Photo of 767 Showing 2nd Piece of Equip / Port Engine
• WTC MISSILE STRIKE 911: United Airlines Flight 175 Impossible Speed
• The Cleveland Airport Mystery
• Is this how United 93 was boarded?
• 911 Commission Timelines of 4 Aircraft: 9-11: Holes in the Radar
• 9/11 Flight 93 Passenger Uprising Theory Discounted - LA Times
• Flight 77 Passenger, Barbara Olsen of 9/11 - Back from the Dead?
• Last-Minute Pilots, Passengers, and Flight Attendants: The Unexplained Oddity of 9/11
• The Cleveland Airport Mystery
• Is this how United 93 was boarded?
• United Flight 175 victims at a glance
• How Many of the Alleged 246 Passengers Are Confirmed as Real?
• How Many Alleged Plane Victims Have Had Their Families Interviewed?
• WHY DOES MOTHER OF FLIGHT 77 VICTIM BELIEVE FLIGHT 77 DID NOT HIT THE PENTAGON?
• Surprising number of Passengers on Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon had Military ties
• Cheating Death At The Pentagon - A Story based on Lies
• Flight 11 Mystery-Flight 11 was not scheduled on 9/11, was scheduled for Maintenance
• May 2,1968: Advert in NY Times Warns of WTC Danger, Shows Plane About to Strike Tower
• Alex Jones & Sidekick Mike Rivero - Grandfathers of the 9/11 Truth Movement
• Question of the Day: Ari Fleischer, Flight 11 & Box Cutters
• Another Amazing 9/11 Passenger coincidence, and many inconsistencies
• 911 - Disturbing/Photoshopped Victim Picture of the Day
• 9/11 Victims Pictures - Anyone Look Familiar?
• 9/11 Passenger Mystery Unraveling? Is Mike Rivero, John Wenckus of Flight 11?
• Does anyone here know how to view Exif data on a Digital picture?

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

Phil Jayhan

This is a cross post from Larry's new article on Price Waterhouse & Coopers and their likely involvement in 9/11 in some capacity.

Price Waterhouse Coopers Employees on Flights 11 and 175

Enjoy-
Phil




Price Waterhouse Coopers Employees on Flights 11 and 175 Price Waterhouse Coopers, 911 Money-Changing & Accounting Team?





Price Waterhouse Coopers had 5 employees on the passenger lists for flights 11 and 175.

Price Waterhouse Coopers is a Mega Accounting firm, a product of the merger between two accounting giants. It is the fourth largest professional services firm, in fact PWC has offices all over the world, in 151 countries.

While PWC is a very large Corporation, the fact that it had 5 employees aboard 2 flights on 9/11 is a statistically significant oddity. All 5 were on seemingly unrelated travel, and no ties, professional or personal, are mentioned between any of them.

The 5 passengers were;

Flight 11:

Kelly Ann Booms, 24, Brookline MA, Accountant, on a 4 week business assignment

Jessica Leigh Sachs, 23. Billerica MA, Auditor, on a business trip


Flight 175:

Daniel R. Brandhorst, 41, Los Angeles CA, Attorney, on vacation
Mr. Brandhorst was traveling with his partner David Gamboa and their adopted child.

Brian Kinney, 29, Lowell MA, Auditor, no reason for travel given

Patrick J. Quigley, 40, Wellesley Ma, Partner, on business


While very few of the 9/11 passengers received Victim's Compensation Fund money, four out of five PWC employees families did. Only the family of Kellly Booms did not.

There was a perfect cross-section of PWC on those lists. A Partner, An Attorney, and 3 Auditor/Accountants. It could also represent the make up of a Team.

What kind of things are PWC personal services teams doing?
They are involved in nearly everything imaginable. Here's a partial Client List from Wikipedia;


Many of the above corporations were involved in 911. Money had to be moved around to hide the purchase of expensive remote-controlled aircraft, fund background operations, pay personnel, cover for demolition operation, etc.. It took money to fund the 9/11 operation, and accountants somewhere saw a lot of money move. PWC is an Accounting firm responsible for watching and counting money for these clients worldwide.

If you wanted to leave a cold money trail THAT BIG you would require the services of a top accounting team.

Many facts point toward these passengers being real people. They definitely didn't die on flight 11 or 175.

So what happened to them? Were they;

1 Real people who were "reassigned" to a fat retirement or promoted and reassigned to PWC's office in Australia (, or Rome, or Paris, or Kabul?

2 Real people who were done away with by some other means (to keep them permanantly quiet)?

3 The PWC employees never existed at all, and a cozy relationship with spooks made PWC a good company to use for cover?

4 Spooks planted inside PWC for these purposes, now "reassigned" identity wise via the passenger lists?

I'm not sure, but I know they were not on flights 11 or 175. If they were choices 1 or 4 above, they are somewhere. These were all relatively young people, all would be under 50 today. If they were alive, we could expect some of them to be around for a long time.

Read their Biographies, look at their pictures, and see what you think.

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

Phil Jayhan

This is from another one of Larry's posts elsewhere on the forum; But want people to see more of the alarming information we have discovered through a joint private effort of just 10 -15 people or so, here at the forums.

Cheers-
Phil

Original link:
http://letsrollforums.com/another-am...11-t20996.html

Ruth Clifford McCourt and Paige Farley Hackel were inseparable friends for 20 years, then when they couldn't get tickets on the same flight boarded flights 11 and 175.

This fact is in every story on them I could find.

The major problem with this story line is that all four 911 flights were drastically under booked. There were plenty of extra seats on both flights. One story says;
None of the news stories or biographies of these two women ever mentions anything besides they couldn't get seats on the same flight.

Original link http://www.sun-sentinel.com/topic/la...1.story?page=1

see also: http://www.naebunny.net/~mommylemur/?p=1794
Only one obscure reference on the company website of Paige's stepson tries to explain that they decided to use frequent flyer miles they had accumulated on different airlines. http://www.phproductions.net/otherside.html
The explanation seems out of place in such a short memorial. Like it answers a question nobody has asked. The other articles mention that they always traveled together, and had taken several trips that very year together, making it seem more unlikely they would have to use miles from different airlines.


The picture of Paige and Ruth together above looks very strange indeed. The two subjects appear to be at different focal distances and appear to be "pasted together". Something about the shadowing is strange. Such a dark flash-shadow considering there is bright sunshine outside a sliding glass door behind them.


The only professor who matched the description at UCLA is this man, Professor Allen J. Scott. According to this bio he has served as "Associate Dean of the School of Public Policy and Social Research" among other things. http://www.spa.ucla.edu/dept.cfm?d=p...ty1.cfm&id=248

In this Yorkshire Post article, John Clifford is interviewed saying;


Quote:
“I was very concerned when the two buildings collapsed, because I knew Ronnie worked in one.
Notice he says Ronnie WORKS in one of the towers.

All of the other stories say Ron Clifford was headed to a meeting that had been rescheduled TO the WTC Marriot from the Marriot Marquis Midtown.

So apparently John Clifford's brother is confused about where his brother works.

Ron tells his story very unconvincingly in this video:


http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...jack.203129.jp



It keeps getting more bizarre, this story claims NYPD gives her wedding ring to her husband in September 2006, near the 5 year anniversary.

http://archives.tcm.ie/irishpost/200.../story4645.asp

Check out the Vatican references in this one:

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

Phil Jayhan

This is from one of Kelly's posts, and is an excellent resource in still tying together all prior research listed above! (2getherwestand)

Werev Specific Company's at the World Trade Center Targeted On 9/11!

Enjoy-
Phil

---

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Specific Companies in the World Trade Center Targeted on 9/11




Were specific companies in the World Trade Center targeted for attack on September 11, 2001?


Marsh & McLennan, Cantor Fitzgerald/CO2e.com/eSpeed and Aon Corp were engaged in an economic war game scenario with the Naval War College on 9/11. The game involved the use of carbon emissions trading software.

Cantor Fitzgerald/CO2e.com/eSpeed held the patent on the unique software which would be used in the future carbon emissions trading which will result in trillions of dollars of trades. The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) located at 10 Downing Street is currently estimated at $55 trillion.

Carlton Bartels, CEO of Cantor’s CO2e.com, invented and held the patent on the computer-based system for simulated automated carbon trading. Bartels was operating this simulated game and it is alleged that his simulation administrator codes were stolen. The game was hacked into which took the game from a simulation to a live game.

Were Marsh & McLennan, Cantor Fitzgerald/CO2e.com/eSpeed and Aon Corp destroyed to eliminate the competition in a future multi-trillion dollar carbon trading market?



Carlton Bartels In 2000, the Joyce Foundation provided a grant to Richard Sandor and Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management to develop a competing carbon trading software. At the time, Barack Obama was on the board of directors for the foundation. A second grant was made in 2001 and eventually led to the birth of the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) the only emissions reduction and trading system for all six greenhouse gases and the only operational cap and trade system in North America.

The Obama administration is currently strongly pushing carbon emission policy. While leaning heavily on congress, they have also instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to declare CO2 a dangerous threat to human health which will lead to regulation of carbon emissions.

Powerful forces behind the scenes appear to be orchestrating events to set up and profit from a carbon emissions trading system worth trillions of dollars.

The impact area of American Airlines Flight 11 in the North Tower was the offices of Marsh & McLennan. ( See below)

The offices above Marsh & McLennan were primarily Cantor Fitzgerald/CO2e.com/eSpeed. Cantor Fitzgerald was cut off from the rest of the building by the impact and suffered the greatest single loss by any company on 9/11. 658 of its employees died in the north WTC tower. [Business Week, 9/11/2006]

But Thomas Barnett’s two “mentors” at the firm that he interacts with—Bud Flanagan and Philip Ginsburg—are both out of the building at the time, for “accidental reasons,” and survive the attacks. [Institute of International Studies]

Marsh & McLennan loses 295 employees & 60 contractors.

In the South Tower, United Airlines Flight 175 impacts a zone mostly occupied by Fuji Bank. The Aon Corporation offices are above the impact area and they are also cut off. 175 employees of Aon Corp. die in the attacks.

There were 2605 deaths in 2 towers that day. Marsh & McLennan, Cantor Fitzgerald/CO2e.com/eSpeed and Aon Corp lost a total of 1153 persons. That is just over 44% of the total deaths—a staggering amount.

The employees of these 3 companies were a small fraction of the total number of individuals in the two towers but accounted for 44% of the deaths.




Early in 2000, a unique research partnership took place between the Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island and the Wall Street bond firm Cantor Fitzgerald. The venture is called the New Rule Sets Project and was directed by Thomas Barnett, Senior Strategic Researcher at the Decision Strategies Department of the Center for Naval Warfare Studies, U.S. Naval War College. source

May 1-June 4, 2001—A series of workshops are held at the World Trade Center to discuss the possibility of a terrorist attack on Wall Street.

June 4, 2001—“Cantor Fitzgerald/eSpeed conference” takes place at Windows on the World just above the offices of Cantor Fitzgerald. source

Present at the June 4 conference are Thomas Barnett, Carlton Bartels, Philip Ginsburg, William J. “Bud” Flanagan and R K Pachauri. Of these 4 men, only Carlton Bartels will die in the attacks.

Carlton Bartels was Chief Executive Officer of CO2e.com, which was formed by Cantor Fitzgerald and PriceWaterhouse Coopers in 2001 to to serve as the pre-eminent business-to-business online resource for corporations to understand, mitigate, and manage the transition and impact of greenhouse gas emission constraints on corporations globally. He has advised the U.S. Delegation to the Conference of the Parties and the White House Climate Change Task Force, as well as numerous governmental agencies throughout the world regarding the implementation of domestic and international emissions trading.



Philip Ginsberg Dr. Philip Ginsberg was an Executive Vice President at Cantor Fitzgerald, the world's largest broker of U.S. Government securities, Eurobonds, and sovereign debt. He was also Vice President of the Cantor Fitzgerald Foundation and Director of Cantor Fitzgerald International. Prior to this, Dr. Ginsberg served as a consultant to both industry and government, and held academic postings at the University of Washington, Rutgers University, and Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management. He also founded the Llorex Corporation, which specialized in financial information products. He has a BA in Mathematics from Cornell University, and an MA and PhD in Economics from Purdue University.

Admiral William “Bud” Flanagan, USN (ret.) was a Senior Managing Director at Cantor Fitzgerald LP. The admiral's portfolio focuses on emerging markets, particularly those brought about by government deregulation and privatization. He served in the U.S. Navy for 29 years, his final position being Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet from 1994-96, with geographic responsibilities for the entire Western Hemisphere and all of West Europe.



R K Pachauri On 9/11 Dr R K Pachauri was Vice-Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). He is currently the Chairman of the IPCC.

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

dutchtreat

Hi Phil,

In this clip it is mentioned that both flights 11 and 175 did hit sealed off it-rooms in both towers


The last 1.2 seconds of Flight AA11

greetz

Ben

__________________
We boogied in the kitchen, we boogied in the hall. I got some on my fingers so I wiped it on the wall - Chuck Berry

dutchtreat

Hey Phil,

finally found the article of the secured it=rooms in both towers


http://www.rense.com/general80/comprooms.htm

greetz

Ben


9/11 Planes Flew Directly Into Secure Computer Rooms In Both Towers
By Christopher Bollyn

1-11-8


9/11 remains an unsolved crime of terrorism. Many people who worked at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon have information, which can help solve this crime and find the parties responsible for killing thousands of innocent people.This article, for example, is the result of information provided by one such anonymous person. To solve this crime, it is crucial that the people who have information come forward and share that information. Together, we can solve this heinous crime and make this world a better place.

TARGET: COMPUTER ROOMS The two airplanes that struck the twin towers of the World Trade Center on 9/11 flew directly into secure computer rooms in both buildings. Is that simply a coincidence or were the computer rooms equipped to play a role in the crime? Were there homing devices, for example, in these rooms that guided the planes to their targets? Were there pre-placed explosives or Thermite on these floors to destroy the evidence and assist with the collapses? Let's look at the evidence.


Photo: Racks of computers that may have been similar to those in the crash zone

Photo: Racks of batteries that may have been similar to those in the crash zone The extreme weght of battery arrays requires floors be reinforced, which in turn provides an excuse for mysterious construction workers to enter and leave the area. But who would think to verify that all of the batteries truly are batteries? And who would think of verifying that all of the computers are truly under the control of the people they are supposed to work for?
NORTH TOWER



"At 8:46:30 a.m., five hijackers flew American Airlines Flight 11 (AA 11) with 11 crew and 76 passengers into the north face of WTC 1," according to the Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in September 2005: The aircraft flew almost straight toward the north tower, banked approximately 25 degrees to the left (i.e. the right wing elevated relative to the left wing) and descended at an angle of about 10 degrees at impact. Moving at about 440 mph, the nose hit the exterior of the tower at the 96th floor. The aircraft cut a gash that was over half the width of the building and extended from the 93rd floor to the 99th floor. All but the lowest of these floors were occupied by Marsh & McLennan, a worldwide insurance company, which also occupied the 100th floor. "The fuselage was centered on the 96th floor slab and filled the 95th and 96th floors top to bottom," the NIST report says. So, what was on the 95th and 96th floors of the north tower, which were rented by Marsh & McLennan, Lewis Paul "Jerry" Bremer's company? Bremer, it should be noted, was the Bush-appointed proconsul or administrator of occupied Iraq until the end of June 2004. During Bremer's reign there was no metering of the oil that was exported from Iraq. It is also primarily decisions taken by Bremer that are responsible for the misery and chaos that have afflicted Iraq since the U.S.-led occupation began. Previously, Bremer was the right-hand man for Henry Kissinger & Associates. The NIST report provides some information about "General Description of Tenant Layout." For the floors in question it says, "Generally open space filled with workstations. Offices, conference rooms, and work areas in exterior corners." But on the 95th floor,

Marsh & McLennan had a "large walled data center along north and east sides," according to the NIST report. And that's exactly where the plane hit * the north wall of the 95th floor. I called Marsh & McLennan to get a better idea of what was in this "large walled data center" into which American Airlines Flight 11 plunged with deadly precision. Reginald McQuay came on the line as a company spokesman. I told McQuay that Marsh & McLennan got hit broadside on 9/11 and that it appeared that the plane flew straight into their "walled data center," according to the NIST report. "No," McQuay said, "it wasn't really our data center. It was our computer center." Then he suddenly became somewhat distressed, saying he could not even focus on what I was saying and that I should call back next week. Fair enough, I thought. He had confirmed my primary suspicion, i.e. that the plane that struck the north tower appears to have been "homed in" or targeted on a secure computer center on the 95th floor * exactly like the plane that struck the south tower some 16 minutes later.


SOUTH TOWER



"Sixteen and a half minutes after the first impact, five hijackers flew United Airlines (UA) Flight 175, with 9 crew and 51 passengers, into WTC 2 at about 540 mph, about 100 mph faster than AA Flight 11," the NIST report says. "The center of the nose of the plane struck at the 81st floor slab. The plane was banked 38 degrees to the left (right wing upward) and was heading slightly (6 degrees) downward from the horizontal," it says. Although Flight 175 went straight into the 81st floor of the south tower, the NIST report provides no description of what was on the 81st floor. Not even one word. How odd. While we know that the Fuji Bank was the tenant on floors 79-82 of WTC 2, the NIST report fails to describe the "tenant layout" of floors 79, 81, and 82. I had repeatedly requested information from NIST about the layout of these floors, primarily because many tons of molten metal were seen falling from the 81st
floor prior to the collapse.



The source of the large amount of molten metal on the 81st floor had not been explained. What could have possibly melted in such large amounts on a normal floor to create several cubic meters of molten metal? You can watch the molten iron in both normal and slow motion at youtube:

youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

- new link! I have excerpts of the molten metal in this short video: ThermiteAtSouthTower.wmv If this was molten iron, as Professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University says, and if this molten iron was caused by an aluminothermic reaction of Thermite or Thermate (a steel-cutting explosive created from powdered aluminum, iron oxide, and sulfur), then somebody must have pre-loaded the 81st floor of WTC 2 with many tons of Thermate.


The molten metal seen falling from the 81st floor was not aluminum, as the NIST report suggests, because molten aluminum would appear silverfish-grey in daylight conditions. See our article on Michael Zebuhr's death for photos of molten aluminum: MoreOnMichaelZebuhr.html

The metal that is seen falling from the burning south tower is clearly yellow and white hot. This is much hotter than the fires that were observed. So, what produced such large amounts of extremely hot molten metal on the 81st floor of WTC 2? The aluminum oxide that is produced in the Thermite or Thermate reaction is a whitish smoke. White smoke was seen coming from the 81st floor prior to each flow of molten metal, according to the NIST report, and large amounts of white smoke are seen prior to and during the collapse of each tower. Was this drywall dust or was this Thermite?



Photo: The white smoke is coming from the corner of the
South Tower where the molten iron later poured out of.


Photo: A closeup of the corner of the South Tower where the molten iron poured from.

Photo: The South Tower starts to collapse. Molten iron
was blown out of the tower when the explosives went off. As the droplets cooled they turned red, creating a spray of red globules mixed with the white clouds of dust. Some of the whiteness may be due to the spray of aluminum oxide particles. You can watch a spray of molten iron from Thermite here:

youtube.com/watch?v=FEmHJORTlqk

youtube.com/watch?v=FEmHJORTlqk

the video was deleted; here is a different one I had imagined huge disguised flower pots of powdered Thermite near the elevators of a normal office floor of the south tower.

But even that didn't make sense. Furthermore, if the 81st floor was a normal office floor of Fuji Bank, why doesn't the NIST report simply say so? Silence was all I ever received from NIST. Then, suddenly, out of the blue, a former bank employee came forward, a person who had visited the 81st floor on a weekly basis. His information explains more than he probably thought and provides us with a major clue about what really happened on 9/11. Fuji Bank had torn up the 81st floor, he said, and stripped it down to the bare bone to reinforce the trusses so that the floor could hold more weight. Then they had built a raised floor and filled the entire floor with server-size Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) batteries. These units were bolted to the raised floor which stood about 3 feet above the reinforced 81st floor. Beneath the raised floor ran the cables and power supply that connected the army of batteries. IT techies had to get down on all fours and crawl around beneath the raised floor to connect cables.

"The whole floor was batteries," he said, "huge battery-looking things." They were "all black" and "solid, very heavy" things that had been brought in during the night. They had been put in place during the summer prior to 9/11, he said. But were they really batteries? "It's weird," he said. "They were never turned on." So, what really was on the 81st floor of WTC 2? What was in these heavy "battery-looking things?" Were they batteries, or were they Thermite? Only senior Information Technology (IT) personnel from Fuji Bank, or the Japanese banks affiliated with it, had access to the 81st floor computer room, according to the source. The Mizuho Bank was established originally as Mizuho Holdings, Inc. by the merger of Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank (DKB), Fuji Bank and the Industrial Bank of Japan (IBJ) in 2000. According to the former bank employee, employees of Shimizu-America Corp. also had access to the floor. Shortly after 9/11, the IBJ became the biggest player and took over the new corporation that had been created by the merger, primarily because the offices of the DKB and Fuji Bank had been destroyed in the World Trade Center, the source said.

The offices of the IBJ were located on the Avenue of the Americas and became the new headquarters for the bank. The DKB and Fuji Bank personnel soon found themselves out of work. "Nobody worked on that floor," the source said about Floor 81. The whole floor was taken up with a "whole bunch of batteries" and "enclosed server racks" that were so tall that one could not see over the top of them. The enclosed server racks were locked and the only people who could open them were employees of the Shimizu Corp., he said. Didn't the host of NIST scientists think that was worthy of mention? They either did not know that the 81st floor was full of "battery-looking things" or decided not to mention it. How odd. William Torrey, the Atlanta-based senior vice president of Shimizu-America, said he could not say anything about the work that Shimizu did on the 81st floor because of ongoing litigation. Asked about the litigation, Torrey said he could not comment on that either. Seth Martin, the non-Japanese spokesman for the Mizuho Corp., could not give any comment for this article. Mr. Martin did not respond to repeated calls.

The NIST documents that accompany the final report confirm the source's information that Fuji Bank had reinforced the 81st floor. Documents dated 1999 say that reinforcements were added to the floor trusses "to accommodate the new UPS workspace." The structural engineering firm was noted as LERA, or Leslie E. Robertson and Associates. SawTeen See, a managing partner of LERA, said the firm was unable to comment on the work it had done on the 81st floor. "We are not at liberty to comment on this or to provide any further information," she wrote. "Please contact the PANYNJ who are the project owners." PANYNJ is the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Fuji Bank & Trust reported 12 out of 125 Japanese expatriate employees missing the day after 9/11. Two American employees of Fuji Bank are also reported to have died on 9/11: Security officer Patrick Adams, 60 John Andreacchio, 52 Both men were from New York.
-------------------------
received:

Kevin Ryan
1/06/2008

NIST report | wtc

There appears to be a remarkable correlation between the floors upgraded for fireproofing in the WTC towers, in the years preceding 9/11/01, and the floors of impact, fire and failure. The fireproofing upgrades would have allowed for shutdown of the affected floors, and the exposure of the floor assemblies and the columns for a significant period of time. Exactly what work was done during that time?

In some sections of the NIST WTC report, the exact floors upgraded are listed. Other sections of the report suggest even more floors were upgraded, a total of 18 floors in WTC 1 and 13 floors in WTC 2, but the additional floors involved are not specified.[1]

WTC tower floors upgraded for firep! roofing and floors of impact, fires and failure on 9/11 (click for full size)

This relationship is unmistakable for WTC 1. Some investigators have pointed out that a number of floors failed simultaneously in this tower, in accordion-like fashion, before the rest of the building began to 'collapse'. These floors seem to match up almost exactly with the floors that were upgraded. See the film clip below, and the following Powerpoint sequence created by Gregory Urich.http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence/videos/docs/north_tower_collapse...http://www.cool-places.0catch.com/docs/Wtc1SeriesNW.ppt
Two blueprints for the 1999, 2000 construction upgrades to WTC 2, provided by a supporter, indicated that the work was done at almost exactly the point of impact and failure in that tower. That is, the southeast quadrant of WTC 2 was the focus of the work, at least on the 78th floor (the blueprints provided were for floors 77 and 78 only). It was the southeast quadrant of WTC 2, at and just above floor 78, where flight 175 hit.

We have also seen video of molten metal pouring from WTC 2 prior to its destruction. The relationship b! etween fireproofing upgrades and the pouring metal is close but not exact, as the molten metal seen in videos appears to be coming from floors 80 and 81. Communication to the NIST team from Frank Lombardi of the Port Authority, in 2002, indicated that only floor 78 of the impact failure floors of WTC 2 had been upgraded. But NCSTAR 1-6A (table 4-2, p 45) lists floor 85 as an upgraded floor as well. Could it be that certain areas within floors 79 to 84 were upgraded also, and not reported because the floors were not fully upgraded?

For the north tower at least, it is difficult to accept that this relationship is yet another unbelievable coincidence related to 9/11. Certainly the upgrade work allowed for access to critical areas. But in considering this, a number of other, admittedly far-fetched questions come to mind. Why was the upgraded fireproofing measured to be twice the thickness specified?[! 2] Could incendiary or explosive materials have been embedded within the upgraded fireproofing? Could these "construction" activities have involved installing mechanisms to direct the planes to the specific areas in which they hit each building?

In any case, the demolition hypothesis should be considered more than just simple demolition. If the idea was to create the appearance of a fire-induced collapse, then a fiery presentation was needed, much more than the jet fuel/office furnishings would have been able to provide. It seems that thermate may have been used not only to weaken or cut the steel infrastructure throughout the buildings, but also to help create that fiery presentation near the floors of impact.

It seems possible that a thermate-lik! e material, and/or other devices contributing to the destruction of the towers, could have been incorporated on the floors of impact and failure during the fireproofing upgrades. The access for such an operation would have been facilitated by the activity surrounding the fireproofing upgrades.

[1] NCSTAR 1-6A, page xxxvii, indicates which exact floors were upgraded. NCSTAR 1-6, page 20 repeats these claims, as noted in the figure above. Elsewhere in NCSTAR 1-6, on page lxxi, NIST muddies the water by saying "18 floors in WTC 1, including all the floors affected by the aircraft impact and fires" and ""13 floors in WTC 2, although none were directly affected by the aircraft impact and fires.". On this last part, NIST contradicts itself yet again in NCSTAR 1-6 (on page lxvii-lxi by stating that so! me of the floors upgraded in WTC 2 were affected by the impacts and fires (notably floor 7. As with the contradictory amounts of jet fuel referenced throughout NIST's report, these fireproofing upgrade statements appear to be another example of how detailed findings in the NIST team's lower level reports were confused or made vague in higher-level reports.

[2] NCSTAR 1-6A (p xl) states "The overall average thickness determined from the 356 individual measurements was found to be 2.5 in, with a standard deviation of 0.6 in." The same report (p 44) says "Note that some of the average thicknesses shown in Table 4-2 equal or exceed 3.5 in. No photos were available of upgraded floors to show the appearance of such high average thickness of SFRM." Floor 94 of WTC 1 stands out in this data, with a SFRM thickness of more than 4 in. The specification for these upgrades was on! ly 1.5 in, increased from the as-built specification of 0.75 in.

--------------------------------- Dick Eastman olfriend@nwinfo.net wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: Peter Wakefield Sault To: Dick Eastman Cc: Prof. Steven E. Jones Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 2:26 PM Subject: Re: bunk or debunk? Ted Olsen family friend Jon Moseley argues the impossiblity of WTC thermate demolition with conspiracy theorist "olfriend" Thermate for cutting steel members is not applied as "cannisters". As far as I can tell, the thermate is wrapped around the steel to be cut either as rope or as plastic and electrical ignition wires attached. That was what all the cable 'rewiring' in the towers was about in the weeks preceding the event - installing the ignition wires. I think we need to refer to Prof. Jones for a better idea of how thermate is applied. Since it not an explosive I don't think it is detonated in the same way as, say, C4, which I believe requires a detonation cap. I have found it impossible to find information on the Internet - largely due, it must be said, to the 'noise' generated by online 9/11 discussions about it but also because such information is restricted. (When I was a teenager, we were able to make nitrocellulose etc. at home because lab supplies, such as fuming nitric acid, were sold over the counter. All that is now gone and you cannot even buy a glass beaker or test tube without a license.)

__________________
We boogied in the kitchen, we boogied in the hall. I got some on my fingers so I wiped it on the wall - Chuck Berry

do2read

This makes a lot of sense Dutchtreat, and correlates to Phil's last post in this thread:

http://letsrollforums.com/were-speci...ld-t20775.html

__________________
"Don't worry about it - Americans don't read." Allan Dulles ...