Queen of Heaven, Semiramus

Jer 7:18: The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes (wafers) to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.
[hr:fb0d456b99]
Jer 44:17: But we will certainly do whatsoever thing goeth forth out of our own mouth, to burn incense unto the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto her, as we have done, we, and our fathers, our kings, and our princes, in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem: for then had we plenty of victuals, and were well, and saw no evil.
[hr:fb0d456b99]

Jer 44:18: But since we left off to burn incense to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto her, we have wanted all things, and have been consumed by the sword and by the famine.
[hr:fb0d456b99]
Jer 44:19: And when we burned incense to the queen of heaven, and poured out drink offerings unto her, did we make her cakes (wafers) to worship her, and pour out drink offerings unto her, without our men?
[hr:fb0d456b99]

[hr:fb0d456b99]
Exodus 20:4: You shall not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
[hr:fb0d456b99]

[hr:fb0d456b99]


Satan delights in reversing the first of the 10 commandments. The Satanic religion is a mirror opposite of the truth. What is white they call black.


Shalom,
Solomon

__________________
http://letsrollforums.com/imagehosti...31d74ca08f.jpg

I add more on Mary = Semeriamus soon.

Solomon

__________________
http://letsrollforums.com/imagehosti...31d74ca08f.jpg

Solomon,

Please build upon this information in this post which I have already started to compile and chronicle; This way we won't waste any of our time and effort do double work, as the subject is comprehensive and vast and honestly takes people a long time of studying and thought to begin to see how it all fits together. Check this post below and then build upon this, the information about Semeramis, the Queen of Heaven from there onward!

Thanks,
Phil

[hr:aeafb1df46]

By; Phil Jayhan

Where do I start with all of this? How to take 5000 years and condense it, so we can make use of this information; An old saying is this; "If we forget our history and the errors of our history, we are apt to repeat them; But what if we don't know our history, and everything we know is a candy coated lie? What then becomes our lot?"

If any of you want to get a grip on all of the Secret Societies, International Banking, the Conspiracy of Nations, and Luciferian religions and undertones we all know and can see parts of post 911, then this information will become invaluable to you.

Here is a brief outline;

1. All false Religions have been started out by a Mother Harlot of the Mystery Religions, who has spawned them through time
2. All Secret Societies are run and controlled by the same Mother Harlot, and tied into the Mystery Religions
3. All International Banking Corporations are run by this same Mother of Harlots
4. Most of the Community of Nations (Nearly all National Governments) have been subverted by one branch or other of this Mother of Harlots

[hr:aeafb1df46]

A. The Mystery Religions Foundation is the worship of Semeramis, and her "god son" Nimrod, claimed by Semeramis (Queen of Heaven) to be born of God, by the Holy Spirit, and killed by the 'Serpent' (Shem) spoken of in Genesis 3:15. And then resurrected and lifted into the Sun on his Chariot, and who also became ruler, by means of his resurrection, ruler of the 'Underworld.'

**Remember, it doesn't even matter whether you believe in ANY of this; Is what matters is what THEY believe. Whether or not any of it is true, false, etc. can be dealt with in other threads and discussions. I am defining their 'Mystery Religions' and what THEY believe; These are all things which THEY believe, which THEY believe happened, and all of this, some 12-1500 years before Christ.

B. Those who control the Zionist Movement, both now, and all through history, have been those who control the 'Mystery Religions'

Reason: Because God gave the promise of a Savior in Genesis 3:15, and Semeramis, a god, claimed this promise happened to her, i.e Virgin Birth, Holy Spirit Seed Created Child, Miracle birth of the god Son Nimrod or Osiris, and his having been put to death by the Serpent, Shem, and then resurrected and made into the likeness of the Sun, and ruler of the underworld. i.e. Resurrection from the Dead

Zionist Aims & Goals through the 6 empires; From Egypt the first, to Babylon, Medo-Persian Empire, Assyrian Empire, Grecian or Greek Empire to the Holy Roman Empire (Rome 1) onto the Holy Roman See (Rome II)

1. To capture Zion, ransack it, carry away Israelites as slaves, usurp Gods Holy Temple and place their own man inside this Temple, ruling the world therefrom; This was the goal and aim of the first 6 empires of this 'Mystery Religion' founded upon the Mother/Child worship of the false Madonna, Semeramis and her son, Nimrod, aka, Osiris the Great. Numerous times this goal was achieved, God allowing this to happen because of the Israelites disobedience to his Holy Law. This was promised for disobedience in Deuteronomy 4 & 26;

2. The last empire, Rome II, the Holy Roman See, also has had the same exact Zionist aims and Zionist goals as the previous 6 empires, howbeit, she has gone about her Zionist aims & goals differently. Through deception shall she do war & conquer. And one stark difference between her Zionist goals and aims between this present Empire from the previous 6, is that she needs to populate the Land of Israel with Jews to produce her goals. Yet the end goal is the same. To own and rule Jerusalem, Zion & Israel. To place their own man, head of the Mystery Religion of Babylon on the Trhone of David, eventually placing himself inside of Gods rebuilt Temple, where he will proclaim himself to be God, and then rule the world with Israel as the head and the Nations as the tail.

3. Here is Gods description of the Mother of Harlots, or the Beast in Revelation;

---- A. Revelation 12:6 The seven heads are seven empires; Egypt, Babylon, Assyria, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome I (Holy Roman Empire), Rome II (Holy Roman See - Present)
Notice the heads of this beast are all connected to the same beast, yet span the length of time, and empires. The Dragon here that all the heads, or seven empires spoken of, and are connected to, is Satan. The 10 horns spoken of which are upon the seven heads, are 10 Kings who have yet to take power. Probably the Kings of the 10 divisions of Earth under the New World Order.

4. The reason of the great enmity of these 7 empires towards the Jews, Israel, & Christians is because Lucifer/Satan figured out enough of Gods promise of a redeemer and Savior and enough of what he intended to do, to co-opt it, and hijack it before it even happened. This would be the false Mother/Child Worship of Semeramis and her 'god' son, Nimrod or Osiris, no doubt inspired by Lucifer. And then his 'god-life' and the alleged resurrection. All of the other Kingdoms and Empires were also wroth at Israels God, YHWH, for destroying their very first Kingdom & Empire, founded by THEIR god Nimrod or Osiris the Great, and his wife and Mother, Semeramis. [Egypt was destroyed in 10 single days of Judgments by God through Moses] They were also very concerned at the prophecies that had began to be chronicled by Israels prophets about the promised seed of "Genesis 3:15." For these prophecies were alleged by these other kingdoms and empires to have already happened, (Through Semeramis and Osiris the Great, her son and Husband). thus if YHWH, the God of the Jews brought to pass this prophecy of Genesis 3:15, it would show their religion, which predated the Jews religion by at least 1200 years, and nearly identical, to be false. Thus another reason for their great enmity towards the Jews all through history. Three times can I think of, right off the top of my head, where this enmity and great hatred flared; The Assyrians conquered the Northern Kingdom of Israel and carried many of the people away as Captives and slaves to Assyria. The Babylonians conquered and carried away many of the Southern Kingdom of Judah away as captives and slaves to Babylon. (This captivity lasted 70 years before the Jews were allowed to return, and this at the directive of Cyrus the Great, the Mede, who had conquered Babylon and decided to release the Jews so they could go and rebuild Israel and worship YHWH) This is all in this history books.

The final time Israel was allowed to be conquered by YHWH was by Titus is 67-70 AD, when God allowed all of the Jews to be scattered, taken captives and slaves, and scattered to the four winds of heaven, and Jerusalem to be looted, even to the looting of Gods Temple, and the gold which covered the Temple walls. When Titus finally was able to retake Jerusalem and quell the Jewish rebellion against Rome, he ordered large fires to be made inside of Gods dwelling and Temple so that the gold would be melted off the walls and carried away. The fires were so hot it made the gold flow like a river, and it became embedded in many of the cracks between the giant floor stones of the Great Temple, as well as between the cracks of the foundational side stones of the Temples foundation. And Titus ordered that each and every floor stone and foundational wall stone of the Temple be removed to get all of the melted gold. And thus the prophecy of Jesus came true; "See this Temple? I declare to you that not one stone will be left standing... All of the gold was then carried away, back to Rome, as well as many of the Temple artifacts, and quite possibly, the Holy Ark of the Covenant, the Seat of the Great God YHWH in his Temple. And thus were the desolations decreed by God against Israel fulfilled.

We have spoken of a total of 4 Bible characters whose different names and titles in different languages need to be listed, so you can learn them and learn to look for their names or titles in different nations, locations, and vocations both then, and all through time; I will add to this list the more important ones as I learn them and remember them, for they are many;

[hr:aeafb1df46]Semeramis: [Origin yet Unknown] Also known as, and the same person or title as; The Goddesses; Columbia; Aphrodites; Isis; Ishtar; Venus; Ashtoreth; Astarte; Queen of Heaven; Lady Liberty; Freitag; Frigga; Freeda; Madonna; Freedom; Cybelle; The Statue of Mary & Jesus is really a statue of Semeramis and her 'god' child Nimrod or Osiris;
[hr:aeafb1df46]
Ham: [Triplet Son of Noah] Also known as, and the same person or title as; The Gods; Saturn; Ninus; Jupiter; Bel; Bal; Baal; Bel Berith; Belus;
[hr:aeafb1df46]
Shem: [Triplet Son of Noah] Also known as, and the same person or title as; The Gods; Thor; Hercules; Marduk;
[hr:aeafb1df46]
Nimrod [Son of Cush who was Son of Ham, who was Son of Noah] Also known as, and the same person or title as; The Gods; Osiris the Great; Molech; Gilgamesh; Vishnu; Mars; Zeus; Poseidon; Dagon; Janis; Amon Ra;
[hr:aeafb1df46]

America - Foundations & Origins

Consider: the land known today as the District of Columbia bore the name "Rome" in 1663 property records; and the branch of the Potomac River that bordered "Rome" on the south was called "Tiber." This information was reported in the 1902 edition of the Catholic Encyclopedia's article on Daniel Carroll. The article, specifically declaring itself "of interest to Catholics" in the 1902 edition, was deleted from the New Catholic Encyclopedia (1967).

Columbia: One of the many names of Semeramis
District of Columbia: = District of Semeramis - Thus showing even by name, is controlled by Rome & the Mystery Religion.

**Washington D.C. was previously called "Rome". The 10 mile square of the land was owned by a Jesuit family (because the Catholic church was not allowed to own land here) who donated it to a Virginian corporation that eventually became the United States. **Jon Simon Contribution

Many of you no doubt have seen portions of this scheme, but probably not the entire picture as is presented here; The 10 square mile area of Washington D.C. [District of Columbia] was first purchased by a Jesuit, then named Rome, and then later ceded to a Virginia corporation, whence it was renamed Washington D.C. where it was later set up to became the U.s. Corporation.[sic] And the Federal Reserve Corporation of America acts as the financial wing of this 10 square mile wide Corporation, and the Internal Revenue Service acts as the collection agency. This triple headed trinity monster owes allegiance to Rome, Italy. There is more than likely something very similar to this set up in every nation which the Vatican and Jesuits have subverted and corrupted. Thus Washington D.C. or the "District of Columbia" actually only has Jurisdiction over the District of Columbia [10 Square miles] Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Has anyone ever wondered why Washington D.C. looks identical to Rome in architecture? Now you know the reasons!

[hr:aeafb1df46]

The Statue of Freedom, Statue of Liberty, Statue of Columbia, Statue of Mary, The Origins of Washington D.C. Previously named Rome, And Rome, Italy, previously named City of Saturn

[hr:aeafb1df46]

[hr:aeafb1df46]
This woman, named Semeramis, a real person from our historical past played such a significant role and was prominently famous, that a day of the week was named after her; The day Friday is actually named after this ancient 'goddess Semeramis.' Her name in the European tongues, Frieda, Frigga is the derivative where this day of the week was named. Frigga-Day = Fri-day. As a matter of fact, all of the days except Sunday and Monday were named after real people, alleged to have been gods. We will deal with the reason of why they were reputed to be 'gods' later on in this thread. But there were good reasons for people to so venerate these people. All of Ancient mytholgy is based upon these very real people who can still be traced through history books and accountings of contemporary writers of the ages.
[hr:aeafb1df46]
[align=left:aeafb1df46]Can anyone see any similarities between this statue of "Freedom" and the Statue of "Liberty?" If so, it is because it is of the same goddess, Freedom or Columbia, or Lady Liberty as she was also known the the early worshipers of her. Lady Liberty was indeed one of the names of Semeramis. The word Freedom is a takeoff of her name in the German & Nordic tongues, Freeda, Frigga, Freitag. She sits atop our U.S. Capitol Building in Washington D.C. [District "of" Columbia] She also "graces" the Top of, many, if not all of our State Capitol buildings. Notice how "she" is given the highest place of Honor on our Nations Capitol building, which is the 2nd highest place or altar in Washington D.C. She is above all! But not quite 'all.' The phallus of Nimrod, which is what the Washington Monument is, is a little bit higher than her. Nimrod was both her husband, and son, also known as Osiris the Great, and the 'god' son who was killed by the "serpent god" Shem, and allegedly resurrected! Is it not fitting that these two people from our historical past, who both reigned as 'gods' should have such prominence in our Capitol? For these two people are the VERY foundation of the 'Mystery Religions.' And are the main and chief cause of our deterioration of "freedom and Liberty" ironically enough. In the truest sense of the word, "freedom truly is slavery." And thus the saying work makes free also becomes true along with the reasons thereof. Because both Semeramis and her son Nimrod had once enslaved the entire world through their mystery religion, and mechanizations of war and conquest. And we are today fighting against their children and children's children, who have ruled in one way or another, all through time, in their similitude. And for any who also see the similarity between her and the statues of Mary in the Roman Catholic Church, it is because they also are one and the same person. Is it not also ironic, to say the least, that Semeramis and Nimrod are the two top figures in Washington D.C. previously named Rome? And who founded Rome, the city in Italy, which sits atop seven hills? It was Nimrods Grandfather Ham, and was, before being named Rome, called the 'City of Saturn." after himself.[/align:aeafb1df46]

Also, the Ironies never seem to cease in researching and compiling this material; Where was this statue of "Freedom" made? This particular statue was given birth in a City named, Rome, Italy. And as pointed out, the City of Rome, previously named the City of Saturn, was founded by and named after Ham, or rather his god title, Saturn, and Ham was the Grandfather of Nimrod, who was both the husband and son of Semeramis. And Semeramis was the former wife of Cush, as well as Nimrods father, and then later his wife, and Nimrod was the son of Ham or the god Saturn. See if you can follow this along, as sometimes it truly is dizzying! Yet true!


[hr:aeafb1df46]
When Freedom—the statue perched atop the dome of the U.S. Capitol—was hoisted into place on Dec. 2, 1863, Philip Reid was there, at least in spirit, standing tall and relishing his greatest accomplishment.

Reid was a slave at the Bladensburg Foundry when he supervised the bronze casting of the statue. Shortly after its completion, the District of Columbia issued its own Emancipation Proclamation abolishing slavery within the capital city and Philip Reid became a free man himself.

This is a true story that belongs near the top the list of Great Chronologies of American History, a story that every American, particularly students, should study and take heart.

The story is best told by Patrick Reynolds in his "Cartoon History of the District of Columbia (The Red Rose studio, Willow street, PA, 1997).

"Thomas Crawford completed the full-size plaster model of Freedom at his studio in Rome, Italy in 1856. When cast in bronze, it would stand atop the Dome of the United States Capitol.

The Model leaves Rome

"In April, 1858, the model left Rome in six crates aboard the ship Emily Taylor. While crossing the Atlantic, the Taylor sprung a leak, which got progressively worse. The Taylor made it to Bermuda and was condemned.

Original link:
http://www.nathanielturner.com/biogr...genewalton.htm
[hr:aeafb1df46]
More info link:
http://www.letsrollforums.com/forums...shington++rome
[hr:aeafb1df46]

English: ---Tuesday-----Wednesday-------Thursday--------Friday----------Saturday
Anglo: -----Tiw'day--------Woden'day-------Thor'day ---------Frigg'day---------Seterne'day
Bible: ----- Nimrod----------Cush-------------Shem ------------Ishtar-----------Ham
Sumer: --- Dumuzi'day----Nabu'day----------Enlil'day---------Inanna'day--------Belus/Bel'day
Roman: --- Mars'day ------Mercury'day ------Jupiter'day------Venus'day---------Saturn'day
Egypt: -----Osiris'day------[s:aeafb1df46]Horus'day[/s:aeafb1df46]---------Set'day-----------Isis'day---------Nepthys'day
India: ------Mangala'day--Buddha'day-------Guru'day---------Sukra'day---------Sani'day
Babylon: --Nergal'day-----Nebo'day----------Marduk'day------Ishtar'day--------Ninus'day

Sun-day & Moon-Day are easy enough to see where they came from without any explanation. The Sun and the Moon were but two of the celestial objects of their worship & adoration. The Egyptian day for Wednesday was a mistake. I called to double check with Mike & he confirmed it was a mistake, so it will remain crossed out until the correct name for the Egyptian Wednesday is found.

Source: Shekinah Prophecy - Book
Author: Mike Young
[hr:aeafb1df46]

[align=left:aeafb1df46]
Take note in the above pictures the identical obelisks at the Vatican (Left) and the Washington Monument. (District of Columbia- Right) They are both symbols of the Phallus of Osiris and the worship of the male sexual organ, particularly of their god, Osiris the Great, also known as Nimrod. The Washington Monument is 555.5 feet tall, above ground, with a foundation of 20% it's height beneath ground or 111 feet. The numbers, above ground and below ground for this monument added together total 666. Notice the near identical architecture of the Vatican and the U.S. Capitol Building. [/align:aeafb1df46]

[hr:aeafb1df46]
I will add to this post here much more information, so please check back to this post as a starting point until I finish compiling this list and string of information;

Cheers-
Phil

__________________


"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton

Solomon,

Got some more data on Semeramis which I haven't hit on in the above post?

cheers-
Phil

__________________


"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton

Chapter 27
The Jesuits

THE "Society of Jesus," commonly called "the Jesuits," is a secret order of the Roman Catholic Church, founded August 15, 1534, by the Spaniard, Ignatius Loyola, and sanctioned by Pope Paul III, September 27, 1540. Loyola had received a military training, and when he later became an extreme religious enthusiast, he conceived the idea of forming a spiritual militia, to be placed at the service of the pope. The Jesuit T. J. Campbell says:

"They are called the Society or Company of Jesus, the latter designation expressing more correctly the military idea of the founder, which was to establish, as it were, a new battalion in the spiritual army of the Catholic Church."–The Encyclopedia Americana, art. "Jesuits."

Organization And Rules Of The Society

Loyola organized his Company on the strictest military basis. Its General was always to reside at Rome, supervising from his headquarters every branch scattered over the world. Theodor Griesinger says:

"Its General ruled as absolute monarch in all parts of the world, and the different kingdoms of Europe, Asia, Africa, and America lay at his feet divided into provinces. Over each province was placed a provincial, as lieutenant of the general, and every month it was the duty of this provincial to send in his report to his General .... From these thousands of reports the General was in possession of the most accurate information regarding all that was going on in the world. Moreover, by means of the Father Confessors at the various Courts, he was initiated into all the secrets of these latter. [The officials] had to be careful to report nothing but the exact truth, [for] each one of them was provided with an assistant who was also in direct coramunication with the General, [who checked the reports of the one against the other.]"–"History of the Jesuits," p. 280. London:1892.

The Abbate Leone, after personal investigation, writes:

"Every day the general receives a number of reports which severally check each other. There are in the central house, at Rome, huge registers, wherein are inscribed the names of all the Jesuits and of all the important persons, friends, or enemies, with whom they have any connection. In those registers are recorded . . . facts relating to the lives of each individual. It is the most gigantic biographical collection that has ever been formed. The conduct of a light woman, the hidden failings of a statesman, are recounted in these books with cold impartiality. . . When it is required to act in any way upon an individual, they open the book and become immediately acquainted with his life, his character, his qualities, his defects, his projects, his family, his friends, his most secret acquaintances."–"The Secret Plan of the Order," with preface by M. Victor Considerant, p. 33. London:1848.

Similar registers are also found in the offices of the provincials, and in the "novitiate houses," so that when one Jesuit follows another in office, he has at his finger tips the fullest knowledge of the most secret lives of those for whom he is to labor, whether they are friends or foes. The Abbate Leone says of his secret investigation of this fact:

"The first thing that struck me was some great books in the form of registers, with alphabeted edges.

"I found that they contained numerous observations relative to the character of distinguished individuals, arranged by towns or families. 'Each page was evidently written by several different hands."–Id., p. 31.

Those who enter the Jesuit society spend two years of "noviceship," and then take the "simple vows." After several more years of intensive training, they take the fourth vow, by which they pledge themselves under oath to look to their General and their Superiors as holding "the place of Christ our Lord," and to obey them unconditionally without the least hesitation. The Jesuits being a secret order, they did not publish their rules. How then can we be absolutely sure about these regulations? Dr. William Robertson says:

"It was a fundamental maxim with the Jesuits, from their first institution, not to publish the rules of their order. *25 These they kept concealed as an impenetrable mystery. They never communicated them to strangers, nor even to the greater part of their own members. They refused to produce them when required by courts of justice." But during a lawsuit at Paris, in 1760, Father Montigny committed the blunder of placing the two volumes of their "Constitutions" (the Prague edition of 1757) in the hands of the French court. "By the aid of these authentic records the principles of their government may be delineated"–"History of Charles the Fifth," Vol. II, p. 332. (See also "History of the Jesuits," Theodor Griesinger, pp. 435-439, 474-476.)

The author was so fortunate as to have the privilege of carefully reading "The Constitutions of the Society of Jesus." He saw a Latin edition of 1558, and an English translation of it printed in 1838, together with the three Papal Bulls: 1. The Bull of Pope Paul III, given September 27, 1540, sanctioning "The Society of Jesus." 2. The Bull of Clement XIV, abolishing the "Society," July 21, 1773.3. The Bull of Pins VII, restoring it, August 7, 1814. We shall now quote from "The Constitutions," thus presenting firsthand evidence of their Rules:

"It is to be observed that the intention of the Vow wherewith the Society has bound itself in obedience to the supreme Vicar of Christ without any excuse, is that we must go to whatever part of the world he shall determine to send us, among believers or unbelievers"–"Constitutions," pp. 64, 65.

"Displaying this virtue of obedience, first to the Pope, then to the Superiors of the Society . . . we . . . attend to his voice, just as if it proceeded from Christ Our Lord; . . . doing whatever is enjoined us with all celerity, with spiritual joy and perseverance; persuading ourselves that everything is just; suppressing every repugnant thought and judgment of our own in a certain obedience .... Every one.., should permit themselves to be moved and directed under divine Providence by their Superiors just as if they were a corpse, which allows itself to be moved and handled in any way .... Thus obedient he should execute anything on which the Superior chooses to employ him "–Id., pp. 55, 56.

It is this corpse-like obedience, required of all its members, that has made the Jesuits such a power in the world. Rene Fulop-Miller in his book: "The Power and Secret of the Jesuits," commended by Father Friedrich Muckermann, leading Jesuit writer of Germany, and Father Alfonso Kleinser, S. J., and the Deutsche Zeitung, Berlin's leading Catholic organ, says:

"The Society of Jesus represented a company of soldiers. Where 'duty' in the military sense is concerned, as it is in the Society of Jesus, obedience becomes the highest virtue, as it is in the army. The Jesuit renders his obedience primarily to his superior . . . and he submits to him as if he were Christ Himself"–"The Power and Secret of the Jesuits," pp. 18, 19.

"So the Jesuits seek to attain to God through 'blind obedience.' "Ignatius requires nothing less than the complete sacrifice of the man's own understanding, 'unlimited obedience even to the very sacrifice of conviction."–Id., pp. 19, 20.

He taught his Jesuit members by a complete "corpse-like obedience" to be governed by the following principle:

"'I must let myself be led and moved as a lump of wax lets itself be kneaded, must order myself as a dead man without will or judgment."–Id, p. 21.

"It was the obedience of the Jesuits that made it possible to oppose to the enemies of the Church a really trained and formidable army"–Id., p. 23.

"For, within a short time after the foundation of the order, the Jesuits were acting as spiritual directors at the courts of Europe, as preachers in the most remote primeval forests, as political conspirators, disguised and in constant danger of death; thus they had a thousand opportunities to employ their talents, their cleverness, their knowledge of the world, and even their cunning"–Id., p. 26.

Jesuits Decide On Their Mission

Loyola first planned to convert the Mohammedans of Palestine, but finding himself entirely unprepared for that work, and the road blocked by war, and finding, after his return to Paris, that the Protestant Reformation was turning the minds of men from the Roman church to the Bible, he resolved to undertake a propaganda of no less magnitude than the restoration of the Papacy to world dominion, and the destruction of all the enemies of the pope. The Jesuit T. J. Campbell says:

"As the establishment of the Society of Jesus coincided with the Protestant Reformation the efforts of the first Jesuits were naturally directed to combat that movement. Under the guidance of Canisius so much success attended their work in Germany and other northern nations, that, according to Macaulay, Protestantism was effectually checked. In England . . . the Jesuits stopped at no danger, . . . and what they did there was repeated in other parts of the world .... The Jesuits were to be found under every disguise, in every country.

"Their history is marked by ceaseless activity in launching new schemes for the spread of the Catholic faith.

"They have been expelled over and over again from almost every Catholic country in Europe, always, however, coming back again to renew their work when the storm had subsided; and this fact has been adduced as a proof that there is something iniquitous in the very nature of the organization"–The Encyclopedia Americana, sixteen-volume edition, Vol. IX, art. "Jesuits." 1904.

Loyola's plan of operation was to have his emissaries enter new fields in a humble way as workers of charity, and then begin to educate the children and youth. After gaining the good will of the higher classes of society, they would, through their influence, secure positions as confessors to the royal families, and advisers of civil rulers. These Jesuit Fathers had been skilfully trained to take every advantage of such positions to influence civil rulers and direct them in the interest of the Roman church, and to instill in them, that it was their sacred duty to act as worthy sons of the Church by purging their country from heresy. And when war against "heretics" commenced, the Jesuits would not consent to any truce till Protestantism was completely wiped out.

At the time Loyola and his "knights" took the field, the Protestant Reformation had swept over the greater part of Europe, and one country after another was lost to the Papacy. But in a short time the Jesuits had turned the tide. The Netherlands, France, and Germany were swept by fire and sword till the very strongholds of Protestantism were threatened. The Protestant countries were finally forced to combine in the Thirty Years' War to save themselves from being brought back by force under the papal yoke. (See "History of the Jesuits," T. Griesinger, Book II, chap. 2.)

The Abolition Of The Jesuit Order

As long as this war of extermination was waged against Protestantism, the assistance of these daring "knights" was accepted, but when they continued to meddle in politics, and to gather the civil reins in their own hands, the Catholic princes at length became aroused to their danger, and complaints began to pour into the Vatican from various heads of Catholic states. Finally, Pope Clement XIV, after four years of investigation, felt compelled to abolish the Jesuit Order. In his "Bull of Suppression," issued July 21, 1773, he wrote, that repeated warnings had been given to the Society of "the most imminent dangers, if it concerned itself with temporal matters, and which relate to political affairs, and the administration of government." It was "strictly forbidden to all the members of the society, to interfere in any manner whatever in public affairs." Clement then cites eleven popes who "employed without effect all their efforts · . . to restore peace to the Church" by keeping the Jesuits out of "secular affairs, with which the company ought not to have interfered," as they had done "in Europe, Africa, and America."

The Pope continues:

"We have seen, in the grief of our heart, that neither these remedies, nor an infinity of others, since employed, have produced their due effect, or silenced the accusations and complaints against the said society .... In vain [were all efforts.]" –"Bull of Clement XIV," in "Constitutions of the Society of Jesus," pp. 116, 117. London:1838.

"After so many storms, troubles, and divisions . . . the times became more difficult and tempestuous; complaints and quarrels were multiplied on every side; in some places dangerous seditions arose, tumults, discords, dissensions, scandals, which weakening or entirely breaking the bonds of Christian charity, excited the faithful to all the rage of party hatreds and enmities. Desolation and danger grew to such a height, that . . . the kings of France, Spain, Portugal, and Sicily,–found themselves reduced to the necessity of expelling and driving from their states, kingdoms, and provinces, these very companions of Jesus; persuaded that there remained no other remedy to so great evils; and that this step was necessary in order to prevent the Christians from rising one against another, and from massacring each other in the very bosom of our common mother the Holy Church. The said our dear sons in Jesus Christ having since considered that even this remedy would not be sufficient towards reconciling the whole Christian world, unless the said society was absolutely abolished and suppressed, made known –their demands and wills in this matter to our said predecessor Clement XIII"–Id., p. 118.

"After a mature deliberation, we do, out of our certain knowledge, and the fulness of our apostolical power, suppress and abolish the said company .... We abrogate and annul its statutes, rules, customs, decrees, and constitutions, even though confirmed by oath, and approved by the Holy See .... We declare . . . the said society to be for ever annulled and extinguished"–Id., pp. 119, 120.

"Our will and meaning is, that the suppression and destruction of the said society, and of all its parts, shall have an immediate and instantaneous effect"–Id., p. 124.

"Our will and pleasure is, that these our letters should for ever and to all eternity be valid, permanent, and efficacious, have and obtain their full force and effect .... Given at Rome, at St. Mary the Greater, under the seal of the Fisherman, the 21st day of July, 1773, in the fifth year of our Pontificate"–"Bull for the Effectual Suppression of the Order of Jesuits." Quoted in "Constitutions of the Society of Jesus," p. 126.

We now respectfully ask: Can any Roman Catholic doubt that the pope is telling the truth about the Jesuits? If he is telling the truth, can we be blamed for feeling that there is a Jesuit danger, after that society has been reinstated and has labored incessantly for more than a century, and is unchanged in principle?

When we reflect upon their past history, and remember that the Jesuits have been expelled from fifty different countries, seven times from England, and nine times from France, and from the Papal States themselves, there must be a reason why civil governments, Catholic as well as Protestant, have found it necessary to take such steps. Only in countries such as the United States, where they are allowed to carry on their work peaceably, we hear little of them. But some day Americans may wake up to find our present generation completely Romanized, and our boasted "liberty" a thing of the past. The prophet declares: "And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; . . . and by peace shall destroy many." Daniel 8:25..

Any one desiring to know the historical facts should read the "History of the Jesuits," by T. Griesinger, and "The Roman Catholic Church," by F. T. Morton, pp. 167, 168.

"The end justifies the means." This maxim is generally attributed to the Jesuits, and while it might not be found in just that many words in their authorized books, yet the identical sentiment is found over and over again in their Latin works. Dr. Otto Henne an Rhyn quotes many such sentiments from authorized Jesuit sources. We quote from him the following:

"Herman Busembaum, in his 'Medulla Theologiae Moralis' (first published at Frankfort-on-the-Main, 1650) gives this as a theorem (p. 320). Cum finis est licitus, etiam media sunt licita (when the end is lawful, the means also are lawful); and p. 504:Cui licitus est finis, etiam licent media (for whom the end is lawful, the means are lawful also). The Jesuit Paul Layman, in his 'Theologia Moralis,' lib. III., p. 20 (Munich, 1625), quoting Sanchez, states the proposition in these words. Cui concessus est finis, concessa etiam sunt media ad finem ordinata (to whom the end is permitted, to him also are permitted the means ordered to the end). Louis Wagemann, Jesuit professor of moral theology, in his 'Synopsis Theologiae Moralis' (Innsbruck and Augsburg, 1762) has. Finis determinat moralitatem actus (the end decides the morality of the act)."–"The Jesuits," pp. 47, 48. New York:1895.

"But the mischief is that the whole moral teaching of the Jesuits from their early days till now is but a further extension of this proposition, so redoubtable in its application."–ld., pp. 49, 50. *26

Rene Fulop-Miller says of the Jesuits:

"In actual fact, the Jesuit casuists deal with two forms of permissible deception, that of 'amphibology' and that of reservatio mentalis. 'Amphibology' is nothing else than the employment of ambiguous terms calculated to mislead the questioner; 'mental reservation' consists in answering a question, not with a direct lie, but in such a way that the truth is partly suppressed, certain words being formulated mentally but not expressed orally.

"The Jesuits hold that neither intentional ambiguity nor the fact of making a mental reservation can be regarded as lying, since, in both cases, all that happens is that one's neighbor is not actually deceived, but rather his deception is permitted only for a justifiable cause.'''–'' The Power and Secret of the Jesuits," pp. 154, 155.

The Jesuit Gury gives examples of this; among others he says:

"Amand promised, under oath, to Marinus, that he would never reveal a theft committed by the latter .... But . . . Amand was called as a witness before the judge, and revealed the secret, after interrogation.

"He ought not to have revealed the theft, . . . but he ought to have answered: 'I do not know anything,' understanding, 'nothing that I am obligated to reveal,' by using a mental restriction .... So Amand has committed a grave sin against religion and justice, by revealing publicly, before the court, a confided secret."–"The Doctrine of the Jesuits," translated by Paul Bert, Member of the Chamber of Deputies, Professor at the Faculty of Sciences (in Paris), pp. 168, 169, American edition. Boston:1880.

Alphonsus de Liguori, the sainted Catholic doctor, says in "Tractatus de Secundo Decalogi Praecepto," on the second [third] precept of the decalogue:

"One who is asked concerning something which it is expedient to conceal, can say, 'I say not,' that is, 'I say the word "not" since the word 'I say' has a double sense; for it signifies 'to pronounce' and 'to affirm':now in our sense 'I say' is the same as 'I pronounce.'

"A prisoner, when lawfully questioned, can deny a crime even with an oath (at least without grievous sin), if as the result of his confession he is threatened with punishment of death, or imprisonment, or perpetual exile, or the loss of all his property, or the galleys, and similar punishments, by secretly understanding that he has not committed any crime of such a degree that he is bound to confess.

"It is permissible to swear to anything which is false by adding in an undertone a true condition, if that low utterance can in any way be perceived by the other party, though its sense is not understood."–The Latin text, and an English translation of the above statements are found in "Fifty Years in the Church of Rome," by Father Chiniquy, chap. XIII, and in "Protestant Magazine," April, 1913, p. 163.

Violations of the sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth commandments are justified by many leading Jesuit writers, according to many quotations from their books, cited in "The History of the Jesuits," by Theodor Griesinger, pp. 285-304, 478-488, 508-616, 670, 740; and in Gury's "Doctrines of the Jesuits," translated by Paul Bert; and in "The Jesuits," by Dr. Otto Henne an Rhyn, chap. V.

Theodor Griesinger quotes from eight prominent Jesuit authorities, who advocate that it is permissible to kill a prince or ruler who has been deposed by the pope. Here are a few samples:

"In the 'Opuscula Theologica' of Martin Becan, at page 130, the following passage occurs:

"'Every subject may kill his prince when the latter has taken possession of the throne as a usurper, and history teaches, in fact, that in all nations those who kill such tyrants are treated with the greatest honor. But even when the ruler is not a usurper, but a prince who has by right come to the throne, he may be killed as soon as he oppresses his subjects with improper taxation, sells the judicial offices, and issues ordinances in a tyrannical manner for his own peculiar benefit'"

"With such principles Father Hermann Buchenbaum entirely agreed, and,in the Medulla Theologia Moralis,' permission to murder all offenders of mankind and the true faith, as well as enemies of the Society of Jesus, is distinctly laid down. This 'Moral Theology' of Father Buchenbaum is held by all the Society as an unsurpassed and unsurpassable pattern-book, and was on that account introduced, with the approval of their General, into all their colleges.

"Imanuel Sa says, in his aphorisms, under the word ' Clericus', the rebellion of an ecclesiastic against a king of the country in which he lives, is no high treason, because an ecclesiastic is not the subject of any king.' 'Equally right,' he adds further, 'is the principle that anyone among the people may kill an illegitimate prince; to murder a tyrant, however, is considered, indeed, to be a duty.'

"Adam Tanner, a very well known and highly esteemed Jesuit professor in Germany, uses almost the identical words, and the not less distinguished Father Johannes Mariana, who taught in Rome, Palermo, and Paris, advances this doctrine in his book 'De Rege' (lib. i., p. 54), published with the approbation of the General Aquaviva and of the whole Society, when he says: 'It is a wholesome thought, brought home to all princes, that as soon as they begin to oppress their subjects, and, by their excessive vices, and, more especially, by the unworthiness of their conduct, make themselves unbearable to the latter, in such a case they should be convinced that one has not only a perfect right to kill them, but that to accomplish such a deed is glorious and heroic.' . . .

"But most precise are the words of the work, so highly prized above all others by the Roman Curie, :Defensio Fidei Catholicce et Apostolicae [Defence of the Catholic and Apostolic Faith]' of the Jesuit Suarez, which appeared in Lisbon in the year 1614, as therein it is stated (lib. vi, cap. iv, Nos. 13 and 14): 'It is an article of faith that the Pope has the right to depose heretical and rebellious kings, and a monarch dethroned by the Pope is no longer a king or legitimate prince. When such an one hesitates to obey the Pope after he is deposed, he then becomes a tyrant, and may be killed by the first comer. Especially when the public weal is assured by the death of the tyrant, it is allowable for anyone to kill the latter.'

"Truly regicide could not be taught by clearer words .... The sons of Loyola . . . declared that a more learned, or God-fearing book, had never appeared .... Indeed, from this time forth no Jesuit professor whatever wrote on moral theology, or any similar subject, without adopting the teaching of Suarez."– "History of the Jesuits," pp. 508-511.

Can any one doubt that the Jesuits have faithfully carried out this "Article of Faith," wherever they thought it advisable, when he reads of the many attempts upon the life of Queen Elizabeth of England; of the "Gunpowder Plot" to murder James I, and to destroy the "Houses of Parliament" in one blast; of the assassination of William, Prince of Orange; of the attempts upon his son, Maurice, Prince of Orange, and upon Leopold I of Germany, by agents of that Society? We could refer to the "Holy League" of 1576, sponsored by the Jesuits, for the purpose of uniting Catholic Europe to crush Protestantism and the assassination of Henry III and Henry IV of France in the interest of that scheme.

"The Jesuits were, indeed, the heart and soul of the Leaguist conspiracy."–Id., p. 210. See also pp. 508-608.

If the political activities of the Jesuits, of which Pope Clement XIV complained so pathetically, are not a serious problem to civil governments, then why were the Jesuits expelled from so many states, Catholic as well as Protestant, as the following table shows? Francis T. Morton, Member of the Massachusetts Bar, gives the following:

Jesuits Expelled From. . .
Saragossa 1555 Canton Grisons 1804
La Palinterre 1558 Naples again 1810
Vienna 1566 France again 1816
Avignon 1570 Moscow, St. Petersburg, Canton Soleure 1816
Antwerp, Portugal, etc 1578 Belgium 1818
England 1579 Brest (by the people) 1819
England again 1581 Russia again 1820
England again 1584 Spain again 1820
England again 1586 Rouen Cathedral (by the people) 1825
Japan 1587 Belgium, schools 1826
Hungary & Transylvania 1585 France, 8 colleges closed 1828
Bordeaux 1589 Britain and Ireland 1829
Holland 1596 France again 1831
Touron and Berne 1597 From entering Saxony 1831
England again 1602 Portugal 1834
England again 1604 Spain again 1835
Denmark, Venice, etc 1606 Rheims (by the people) 1838
Venice again 1612 From entering Lucerne 1842
Amura, Japan 1613 Lucerne again 1845
Bohemia 1618 France again 1845
Moravia 1619 Switzerland 1847
Naples and Netherlands 1622 Bavaria and Genoa 1848
China and India 1623 Papal States, by Pius IX, Sardinia, Vienna, Austria 1848
Turkey 1628 Several Italian states 1859
Abyssinia 1632 Sicily again 1860
Malta 1634 Spain again 1868
Russia 1723 Guatemala 1871
Savoy 1724 Switzerland 1871
Paraguay 1733 German Empire 1872
Portugal 1759 Mexico (by the viceroy) 1853
Prohibited in France 1762 Mexico (by Comonfort) 1856
France again 1764 Mexico (by Congress) 1873
Spain, colonies, Sicilies, Naples 1767 New Granada since 1879
Parma and Malta 1768 Venezuela 1879
All Christendom, by bull of Clement XIV 1773 Argentine Republic 1879
Russia 1776 Hungary 1879
France again 1804 Brazil 1879
France again 1880

–" The Roman Catholic Church and Its Relation to the Federal Government," pp. 167, 168. Boston:1909.

Those who feel that the foregoing facts constitute no danger to American civil and religious liberty, would do well to remember that the Jesuits carry on an extensive educational program in this country, and that, according to their textbooks, their principles of civil government are diametrically opposed to the American ideas of separation of church and state. See their "Manual of Christian Doctrine, by a Seminary Professor," pp. 131-133. Philadelphia:1915.

The author has stated the foregoing facts, not because of any enmity towards Jesuits as individuals, nor to Catholics in general, but only from a feeling of responsibility to enlighten the American people regarding a public danger. We can truly love the persons, while we warn people against their dangerous tendencies. If we did not sincerely love everybody, we would not be true Christians. (Matthew 5:43-48.) Jesus loves the sinner, while He hates his sins; and we must have the mind of Christ. (Philippians 2:5; 1 Corinthians 2:16.)

To those who wish to study this subject further we recommend the careful reading of the following books, besides those referred to in this chapter: "History of the Jesuits," by Andrew Steinmetz, London, 1848; "History of the Jesuits," by G. B. Nicolini, London, 1854; "Secret Instructions of the Jesuits," translated from the Latin by W. C. Brownlee, D. D., New York, 1841; "The Footprints of the Jesuits," by R. W. Thompson; "The Jesuit Enigma," by E. Boyd Barrett; "The Programme of the Jesuits," by W. Blair Nearby, London, 1903; "Provincial Letters," by Blaise Pascal, New York, 1853; "History and Fall of the Jesuits," by Count Alexis de Saint-Priest, London, 1861; "Political Life of an Italian," by Francesco Urgos, Battle Creek, Mich., 1876; and "The Jesuit Morals, collected by a Doctor of the College of Sorbonne in Paris," translated into English, London, 1670.

__________________


"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton

I just ran this IP address and check this out;

Check out the nameserves on this IP address in blue; Osiris and Isis --

WHOIS - 138.87.153.113

Location: United States [City: Bloomington, Illinois]


OrgName: Illinois State University
OrgID: ISU-3
Address: 3500 Telecommunications
City: Normal
StateProv: IL
PostalCode: 61790-3500
Country: US

NetRange: 138.87.0.0 - 138.87.255.255
CIDR: 138.87.0.0/16
NetName: ILSTU
NetHandle: NET-138-87-0-0-1
Parent: NET-138-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Assignment
NameServer: OSIRIS.ILSTU.EDU
NameServer: ISIS.ILSTU.EDU

__________________


"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton

I don't think this has been posted yet...

“They [i.e., the Jesuits] have so constantly mixed themselves up in court and state intrigues that they must, in justice, be reproached with striving after world dominion. They cost kings their lives, not on the scaffold, but by assassination, and equally hurtful as the society of Illuminati; they were the foremost among the crowd, at all events, who applauded the murder scenes in Paris [during the French Revolution].”
Hector Macpherson (Author of the book The Jesuits in History)


"They" (that is, the sons of Loyola), it is stated in the document dated 29th November 1793, "have so constantly mixed themselves up in Court and State intrigues, that they must, in justice, be reproached with striving after universal dominion. They cost Kings their lives, not on the scaffold, but by assassination; and equally hurtful as the Society of Illuminati, they were the foremost among the crowd, at all events, who applauded the murder scenes in Paris [during the French Revolution]. They robbed the States of their most capable youths whom they enticed into their institutions, and procured for themselves, by their monopoly in the direction of study, in Catholic countries, an excessive and immoderate influence over all opinions. They held in their hands all the springs for working upon mankind; money, protection, confessionals, and other means were plentifully at their command. They might thus work for good if they wished to do so, but they labored at the beck and call of their superiors alone, for their own peculiar advantage and aggrandizement, without any regard whatever for the well-being of mankind; and it is impossible, therefore, to indulge in conviction that the re-establishment of the Society of Jesus can be productive of any benefit whatever."


Grand-Duke Maximilian Francis-pictured w/ his sister [1756-1801]

"Would you give over this most sacred trust, the education of youth, to such men? Fanatical half monks, who do not, in the least, possess the knowledge of ordinary preceptors, and who are very far removed from the summit of modern science; a loose heap of Italians, French, and Germans collected together, full of pride and self-esteem, who, without true culture and information, inveigh with hate against freedom and enlightenment; men who fundamentally falsify history and the science of nature, in order not to mention the ideas of modern times; who only propagate stupidity and superstition; and, as they belong to no particular country of their own, drive out of the minds of their pupils the most noble of all feelings, that of patriotism." - By a free Swiss citizen

This is really a good brief post Kirby! Is this book available online for people? (Hector Macpherson (Author of the book The Jesuits in History) And if so, can you please provide a link?

Good stuff man!

Cheers-
Phil

__________________


"In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend." --Alexander Hamilton