SoldierOfTheLord

http://www.infowars.com/joseph-andre...mily-walters/?

Joseph Andrew Stack’s Facebook: Who is Emily Walters?


Donald Borsch Jr.
RightPundits.com
February 18, 2010

Today, a man named Joseph Andrew Stack killed himself by flying a single prop plane into an office building in Austin, TX. His name is all over the news, and understandably so. The building that he crashed into housed the IRS and had 190 employees. In his planning to kill himself, he left a suicide note. This note has been removed from the Internet, but we have it here for you to view within an article from Renovo Media. It had originally been posted on Embedded Art. In this note, you will notice the words of a man who hated the IRS deeply.



This afternoon, there was a Facebook page with Joseph’s name on it, and it gave the distinct impression of him being a TEA Party-type, citing Ron Paul and using the Gadsden Flag as the FB icon. It would appear he was nothing more than a right-wing extremist who had an axe to really grind with the IRS. Please notice I said, “it would appear.”
The nagging question is, however, who created this Facebook page for Joseph Andrew Stack? The answer: a woman named Emily Walters. However, the FB page in question has been removed due to the sensitive nature of this morning’s event. The link to see it, that I have set here, is from Bungalow Bill’s Conservative Wisdom.

Who is Emily Walters, and why would she create a Facebook page for a dead man? It seems suspiciously convenient for her to place several TEA Party-ish and right-wing links and articles onto that FB page, now doesn’t it? It is suspiciously convenient that the media has already started to paint a picture of Joseph Andrew Stack being a fringe right-winger whose hatred for government, and the IRS specifically, drove him to kill himself and try to kill IRS employees in Austin.

Hating the IRS is not an issue that can be solely claimed by the left or the right, or pinned onto the left or the right exclusively. People from all “political stripes” don’t really care for the IRS. There is more to this story than we are seeing.

Again, who is Emily Walters and when will she be questioned as to how she put Joseph’s Facebook page together? There are questions that are not being asked, and it’s time we started.

__________________
Jesus is the Way, the TRUTH, and The Life - the 9/11 truth WILL come out, He will not let the LIE stand! The word is getting out by leaps and bounds - let's stand together and be ready - because "the glass is about to overflow"!! ;)
-Kathy

Jack A. Lope

I am just seeing this now for the first time. I don't have TV so sometimes I miss things as they first happen. A small price to pay really. The first thing I'm thinking here is why doesn't his little manifesto mention any thing about flying or learning to fly or piloting a plane at all. Seems a bit odd to me that something of that nature would not have even been mentioned at all. I think it is a pretty good chance that these types of attacks will be on the rise. Mostly planed false flags but there will be legitimate ones as well but they will be seized upon none the less. http://letsrollforums.com/warning-ne...er-t20080.html Check this out from a couple weeks ago and see if you agree with me. Something stinks here that is for certain.

Cheers
Jack

__________________
The green crusaders of the global warming community want to put a moratorium on the very gas responsible for making the world green. They say the debate is over. That may be the only thing they are right about

SoldierOfTheLord

Ok guys...tell me you can't see the following phrase coming...

"Well, these crazy "truthers" as they call themselves. This is just a perfect example of what we've been warning you about. These people are on edge! Any of them could break at any second and become "suicide bombers" - just like those "terrible terrorists" that crashed those planes on 9/11!!"

Shoot - they're already callin truthers "terrorists"! This sounds to me like a next logical step. Don't you think? <raises one eyebrow>

KiBBLeZ

Hmm... It's very suspicious how "truthers, birthers, teaparty protesters, constitutionalists, conservatives, libertarians and right-wingers in general" are being blamed for this by the mainstream media.

However Stack, in his suicide note at least, doesnt mention any of these things! The only menion of 9/11 in the note is simply "the 911 nightmare." He also ends the note with a quote promoting Communism and bashing capitalism. Thats not right-winged at all! Thats as left as you can go!

On another note: A central bank and a heavy progressive income tax are two of the 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto...

Andrew Joseph Stack was a right-winged Communist extremist who gave up his life fighting the principals of Communism!

What to you all think?

__________________
WAR is a racket. It always has been.

Barnabas

Wow, that is deep, good catch I believe you are on to somthing.

__________________
http://www.lesfeldick.org/

KiBBLeZ

Also, as I have mentioned in the chat before...

According to http://www.news10.net/news/story.asp...=75626&catid=2 he was flying a PA-28-236 Dakota.
The specs on these types of planes can be found at http://www.risingup.com/planespecs/i...plane417.shtml

According to that site, the plane's top speed is 148 knots (170.3153586 mph), NOT the reported "over 200 mph." The plane was around 50 feet above the ground before it crashed into the building, so it did not nosedive into the building which would have increased speed. Perhaps he had a higher-output engine in the plane, or it was typical newscaster exaggeration, I'm not sure.

Another point is: Could that small plane have done so much damage to the building by itself? Even if he had filled it up before taking off it would (according to the site) only have <72 gallons of fuel in it. I doubt it was jet fuel, either, like on 9/11. There had to have been some sort of bomb or other explosive accelerant present. Perhaps he had a bomb with him in the plane.

Or perhaps there were bombs present in the building, reminiscent of Oklahoma City 1996 bombing or of 9/11. That would confirm this attack to be a false flag attack used to demonize right-wingers, truthers, teaparty members, etc.

What happened in Austin:










Compare this to some other photos of small plane crashes:













Notice the running theme of "No fireball explosions." There HAD to have been some sort of explosive accelerant present in Austin. What are your opinions on this?

2getherwestand

Musings of a Dead Man

Musings of a Dead Man


Formerly: http://deadmanmusings.blogspot.com


Paul A Drockton M.A.


One of a Handful in the world to score perfect scores on various, professionally administered, IQ Tests.






"Dead Man Musings"




























Join The Constitution Party!




Was Joe Stack's Plane Crash a "False Flag"?


URGENT! Please Retweet!!!







So, some guy gets mad at the IRS and runs his plane into a Building that supposedly offices about 190 IRS employees. His suicide note states that he was harassed by the IRS for 16 years because he tried to set up a means of receiving non-taxable income. I have a few questions, and I don't think I am alone on this:




1. Why would a guy target the IRS building when he states in his suicide rant that it was his accountant that screwed up:


"When we received the forms back I was very optimistic that they were in order. I had taken all of the years information to Bill Ross, and he came back with results very similar to what I was expecting. Except that he had neglected to include the contents of Sheryl’s unreported income; $12,700 worth of it. To make matters worse, Ross knew all along this was missing and I didn’t have a clue until he pointed it out in the middle of the audit. By that time, it had become brutally evident that he was representing himself and not me."




Yet, we must assume that his accountant does not have a small plane sticking out of the side of HIS office building.




2. Were there IRS Case Workers Assigned to his particular situation? Names behind the harassment as it were? Once again, I will assume that none of them have a small plane sticking out of the side of their homes or garages.


3. The man identified specific targets. Yet, he doesn't mention any agents by name in his rambling letter. Instead, he cites an IRS code that deals with his status as an employee versus an independent contractor. Again, no specific names.



Who Benefits?

It seems pretty clear that Joe stack didn't leave too much evidence behind. He burned his house down. This makes it impossible to verify any documents he had in his possession. Pretty convenient, don't you think? Also, he stole a plane. Who was the owner and can we trace him or her to anyone, or company associated with the intelligence community?


1. The Tea Party movement demonstrated that Americans are indeed fed up with the burden of taxation in this country. Now, they could be labeled as potential terrorists and placed on a government "watch list". I would say the biggest beneficiary in all of this would be the IRS and the Globalist Bankers/Illuminati that get paid via the Income Tax.




First, a little history:


"The Revenue Act of 1861 proposed that "there shall be levied, collected, and paid, upon annual income of every person residing in the U.S. whether derived from any kind of property, or from any professional trade, employment, or vocation carried on in the United States or elsewhere, or from any source whatever." This was the first federal income tax.


The 1861 Tax Act was passed but never put in force. Rates under the Act were 3% on income above $800 (equivalent to $115,000 in 2002 dollars), and 5% on income of individuals living outside the U.S." (source)




Note that the tax was a relatively meager amount on people making 115,000 dollars per year and, it was never enforced. I am sure had they tried to enforce it...well. You know. The tax was repealed 10 years later. It is also important to note that, had it been enforced, it would have effected less than 1% of the population.


" in 1894 Congress enacted a flat rate Federal income tax, which was ruled unconstitutional the following year by the U.S. Supreme Court because it was a direct tax not apportioned according to the population of each state. The 16th amendment, ratified in 1913, removed this objection by allowing the Federal government to tax the income of individuals without regard to the population of each State." (Ibid)




But, wait, there is more to the story. Americans were told that the tax would be only used to "soak the rich" and that the average Joe would be unaffected. This was during the "Trust-Busting" days of Teddy Roosevelt and the Standard Oil monopoly. People were angry, and viewed the tax as a way to steal from the rich and give to the poor.


"The Socialist Labor Party advocated a graduated income tax in 1887.[8] The Populist Party "demanded a graduated income tax" in its 1892 platform.[9] The Democratic Party, led by William Jennings Bryan, advocated the income tax law passed in 1894,[10] and proposed an income tax in its 1908 platform." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution)




I wonder if they will ever learn that the rich only steal from less rich. President Taft, a Republican, was the one who got the job done.


"On June 16, 1909, President Taft, in an address to Congress, proposed a 2% federal income tax on corporations by way of an excise tax and a constitutional amendment to allow the previously enacted income tax." (ibid)




The Constitutional Amendment for the Income Tax passed in 1913. Anyway, it was all a pack of lies. The target was never corporations or the wealthy. The real reason why the Federal Income Tax was passed has more to do with the passage of the "Federal Reserve Act" than any other factor.




1. The Federal Reserve Act was also enacted in 1913. In essence, it granted a charter to a private, foreign owned corporation to print our money. It also gave them the privilege of charging 6% interest on every dollar they circulated.


2. the Income tax was enacted to pay the interest on this "foreign owned" currency.


3. Our money is printed by the Treasury Department, which serves as a front for the biggest scam ever imposed on a free people in the history of the world.


4. These Illuminati Bankers now own us and are in the process of dismantling the rest of our Constitution and right to dissent by running false flags like Joe Stack's. They are more than willing to sacrifice one "Stack" for a whole bunch of other stacks.




By labeling the anti-tax movement as a "Terrorist Organization", they are taking away the most effective form of resistance we have against them.


The beatings will stop when the sheep stop their bleatings.


Lamb chops anyone?


Note: Special Blog Talk Radio Program today at 12:00 Eastern on This Topic.

__________________
2getherwestand

SoldierOfTheLord

Ok - so - if this was a setup - we're wondering why? Here we go...


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100220/...h_small_planes
Austin plane crash exposes gap in US air security



By MICHELLE ROBERTS and MICHAEL TARM, Associated Press Writers Michelle Roberts And Michael Tarm, Associated Press Writers – 31 mins ago
GEORGETOWN, Texas – After 9/11, cockpit doors were sealed, air marshals were added and airport searches became more aggressive, all to make sure an airliner could never again be used as a weapon. Yet little has been done to guard against attacks with smaller planes.
That point was driven home with chilling force on Thursday when a Texas man with a grudge against the IRS crashed his single-engine plane into an office building in a fiery suicide attack. One person inside the building was also killed.
"It's a big gap," said R. William Johnstone, an aviation security consultant and former staff member of the commission that investigated the Sept. 11 attacks. "It wouldn't take much, even a minor incident involving two simultaneously attacking planes, to inflict enough damage to set off alarm bells and do some serious harm to the economy and national psyche."
The suburban Georgetown Municipal Airport that pilot Joe Stack entered hours before his airborne attack in nearby Austin had the casual atmosphere of a sleepy parking garage. Pilots were not subject to baggage checks, metal detector scans or pat-downs. And they are usually not required to file flight plans.
"How are they going to stop it? This guy had a hangar, and he had access to the airport," said Beth Ann Jenkins, president of Pilot's Choice, a flight school near where Stack kept his Piper.
Travis McLain, manager of the airport, said: "I don't know of a rule or regulation or safety precaution that could have prevented what happened yesterday."
The easy access and lack of security are the result of years of debate — and stalemate — over how much of a threat small aircraft pose as terror weapons and how they could be regulated without stifling commerce and pilot freedom.
While the airlines quickly accepted tougher security after Sept. 11, the general aviation industry, which includes everything from privately owned propeller-driven planes to large corporate jets, have aggressively fought new measures.
The proposed rules would require that operators of medium and large general-aviation aircraft demonstrate that flight crews have undergone a criminal background check. They would also be required to verify passengers are not on the no-fly lists already used by large airlines.
Private pilots fly approximately 200,000 small and medium-size planes in the U.S., using 19,000 airports, most of them small. The planes' owners insist the aircraft have nothing in common with airliners but the sky.
"I don't see a gaping security hole here," said Tom Walsh, an aviation security consultant. "In terms of aviation security, there are much bigger fish to fry than worrying about small aircraft."
He said most would-be terrorists would draw the same conclusion — that tiny aircraft don't pack a big enough punch.
Planes like Stack's weigh just a few thousands pounds and carry no more than 100 gallons of fuel, he noted. A Boeing 767 weighs 400,000 pounds and carries up to 25,000 gallons of fuel.
Walsh and other general aviation advocates argue that stringent security and bureaucracy would deter recreational fliers and slow down a vibrant, multibillion-dollar general aviation industry, causing economic damage.
"What it comes down to is that the cure could be worse than the disease," he said.
Jeffrey Price, a Denver-based aviation expert, said: "If I own my plane, I can drive to the airport, get in and just take off. Pilots want that sense of freedom. ... Like motorcycle riders."
Every pilot, from the beginner student to the commercial airline pilot, is checked against the government's terror watchlist. Also, under federal rules imposed after Sept. 11, people enrolling in flight schools must show proof of U.S. citizenship or, if they are foreigners, must undergo a background check.
All pilots of every stripe must have with them every time they fly a medical certificate attesting to their health. The certificate is based on a physical exam, but the application form also includes questions about the pilot's mental health. Stack's medical certificate was current, dated May 2009. He was an instrument rated pilot, able to fly single-engine and multiengine airplanes, and no enforcement action had ever been taken against him.
Beyond that, however, most security measures at general aviation airports are voluntary.
The Transportation Department's inspector general, Richard L. Skinner, reviewed security at several general aviation airports last year, including three in the Houston area, and concluded that general aviation "presents only limited and mostly hypothetical threats to security."
Skinner did endorse efforts to lock or disable parked planes to prevent people bent on mayhem from stealing them.
Tougher restrictions were debated after Sept. 11 and after a few incidents in which pilots deliberately crashed small planes into buildings.
In 1994, a Maryland truck driver with a history of instability crashed a plane on the south lawn of the White House. In 2002, a 15-year-old boy stole a plane and crashed it into a downtown skyscraper in Tampa, Fla. Pilots of small planes have also frequently flown into the secure airspace over the key government buildings in Washington.
The general aviation lobby has exerted its considerable clout to fend off new measures. The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, or AOPA, National Business Aviation Association, National Air Transportation Association and General Aviation Manufacturers Association spent $6 million lobbying in Washington last year.
"There was no way to impose one overall security structure that would fit every general aviation airport's needs," said AOPA spokesman Chris Dancy. The association has about 400,000 members.
At the Georgetown airport, where 240 small aircraft are based, manager McLain said she hopes Stack's suicidal attack doesn't lead to an overreaction.
"I would hope that common sense and cooler heads would prevail," McLain said.
___
Associated Press Writers Joan Lowy and Sharon Theimer in Washington also contributed to this report.

SoldierOfTheLord

Ok guys - here's more! Front Page MSN & Newsweek - check it out..."Ooooo look at those crazy old mean old truthers!!"

http://www.newsweek.com/id/233518?GT1=43002
SPONSORED BY:



PHOTOS
Town Hall Face

An unsightly condition caused by unsanitary health-care politics









Know Your Conspiracies

NEWSWEEK's guide to today's trendiest, hippest, and least likely fringe beliefs.


By David A. Graham | Newsweek Web Exclusive
Feb 12, 2010



Like recurring nightmares, conspiracy theories aren't necessarily gone for good just because they disappear for a while. They often come back, sometimes in slightly different forms. Their last golden age came during the middle of the Bush administration, which saw rumors from the political left about connections between the Bushes and the bin Ladens, insinuations about the military-industrial complex and the Patriot Act—actually, pretty much every plotline in Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. Nothing breeds paranoid theories like political exile, which means that with Democrats back in the White House, it's the right's turn to take up the standard, a task it isn't shirking. And of course, several leftist theories remain in circulation. If you're having a hard time keeping all these paranoid points of view straight, here's a handy primer.
SUBSCRIBE Click Here to subscribe to NEWSWEEK and save up to 88% >>
1. Barack Obama was not born in the United States.
It's not clear where he must have been born instead: some say Indonesia; some say Kenya (initial suggestions that Hawaiian natives weren't citizens when he was born in Honolulu in 1961 were quickly dismissed). The point, so-called birthers say, is that he wasn't born in the good old US of A, hence isn't a natural-born citizen and therefore cannot legally be president.
Proponents: Chief birther and Beverly Hills dentist and attorney Orly Taitz, WorldNetDaily editor Joseph Farah, Rep. Nathan Deal (R-Ga.), former presidential and Senate candidate Alan Keyes, assorted tea partiers.
Kernel of Truth? It's fully debunked. Forged Kenyan birth certificates have been exposed, and—despite protestations to the contrary—Obama's birth certificate has been certified by the state of Hawaii, and images have been shown on national television. And that's leaving aside plenty of circumstantial proof, like birth announcements in both major Hawaiian papers from August 1961.
2. Anthropogenic global warming is a hoax. Proponents of the theory that the earth's temperature is rising—especially Al Gore and the United Nations—are trying to pull the wool over the world's eyes. Some believers say that warming is negligible in the scope of geological history, and many argue that even if warming is happening, it's not because of human activity. The goals of Gore and his ilk, they say, are to kill market competition, encourage socialist control, keep scientists' research coffers filled, and/or work to bring about a one-world government by giving the U.N. power to regulate the climate and by eroding national sovereignty.
Proponents: Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), rogue Canadian climate scientist Tim Ball, journalist and British aristocrat Lord Christopher Monckton, Sarah Palin, National Review.
Kernel of Truth? Deniers have long taken advantage of scientists' cautious statements, and "Climategate" breathed new life into the movement, but the science stands: warming is real, and it's caused by human actions.
3. Goldman Sachs intentionally created the economic crisis.
Swooping in from the left, Rolling Stone screed-master Matt Taibbi argued in July that investment bank Goldman Sachs, "a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity," has for years created bubbles (dotcom, real estate) while betting against them. As a result, it reaps gains from the run-up but also wins big in the collapse because of its hedges. Ergo, Goldman Sachs created the financial crisis for its own gain. A less virulent strain of this theory notes the many former Goldman execs (Hank Paulson, Robert Rubin, Joshua Bolten, Neel Kashkari, etc.) in government and posits that they have designed the government's economic policy to help the firm.
Proponents: Matt Taibbi, journalist Robert Scheer, Glenn Beck, the Pragmatic Capitalist, the blogosphere.
Kernel of Truth? Goldman undoubtedly did better than any competitor from the financial crisis, and CEO Lloyd Blankfein even admitted—albeit cryptically—that the company had "participated in things that were clearly wrong." This theory is tougher than others to debunk fully, because there's no empirical data available either way. Nonetheless, while Goldman may have profited, that alone doesn't prove malice or conspiracy.
4. Democrats' health plan will create death panels. Part of Barack Obama's devious plan to reform health insurance will be the creation of panels of experts who will decide whether or not patients are "worth" treating, making them arbiters of life and death.
Proponents: Sarah Palin,Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), a lot of angry town-hall-meeting attendees.
Kernel of Truth? Palin was apparently referring to a provision of draft legislation that would have funded consultation about end-of-life care. There was and is, however, no plan for rationing care as a cost-cutting measure, and fact-checking outlet PolitiFact named the theory the "Lie of the Year" in 2009.
5. Barack Obama is a secret Muslim. Drawing many of the same backers as the birther movement, this theory claims that Obama was indoctrinated into Islam while living in Indonesia during his childhood. They worry Obama is trying to undermine America's Judeo-Christian heritage, institute Islamic religious law, betray Israel to the Arabs, and perhaps even allow Al Qaeda to win the war on terror.
Proponents: Anonymous chain e-mail, Libyan dictator Muammar Kaddafi, Swift Boater and propaganda wizard Jerome Corsi.
Kernel of Truth? Nope. Obama belonged to a Christian church in Chicago (for which he ironically also caught flack) and has a record of unambiguous support for Israel and hawkish policies on eradicating Al Qaeda's strongholds in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
6. Sarah Palin is not the mother of her 1-year-old son, Trig.
Someone else—perhaps even her daughter Bristol—is.
Proponents: Journalist and blogger Andrew Sullivan and … well, that's about it. Perhaps also Joy Behar.
Kernel of Truth? No. Sullivan has couched the whole thing as just pointing out minor discrepancies and asking for reasons—not directly making accusations. Palin has understandably refused to dignify these questions with responses. No one else has picked up the theory publicly, although privately some liberals regard it as plausible.
7. ACORN is part of a liberal conspiracy to steal elections.
The coalition of community organizations first came under fire after allegations that members were filing fraudulent voter-registration forms in order to beef up the Democratic vote in the 2008 elections. Pressure heated up after a videotaped sting humiliated the group.
Proponents: Glenn Beck, conservative commentators Michelle Malkin and Andrew Breitbart, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), unsuccessful N.Y. Conservative Party congressional candidate Doug Hoffman.
Kernel of Truth? The showed questionable conduct at the very least, but neither they nor anything else proves a vast left-wing conspiracy between Democrats and ACORN to steal elections.

SoldierOfTheLord

Ooo ooo - check out THIS one!

http://stevenjohnhibbs.wordpress.com...now-confirmed/

Proof That Joe Stack Was Not A Tea Party Member Now Confirmed!


February 19, 2010: Paul Joseph Watson / Prison Planet.com


Even before many of the details were confirmed surrounding yesterday’s tragic events in Austin, political operatives were callously exploiting the incident to advance their agenda in demonizing opponents of big government as terrorists who crash planes into buildings – unfortunately for them it has since emerged that Joe Stack was not a “fringe extremist” and he was not a member of any Tea Party organization.
Time Magazine instantly labeled Stack a domestic terroristand openly implied links to the Tea Party by including a red link to an article about the Tea Party movement in the middle of their story about the Austin plane crash.
A Washington Post editorial compared Stack with Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and claimed, “His alienation is similar to that we’re hearing from the extreme elements of the Tea Party movement.”
This is of course a ludicrous aspersion to make. Polls show that at least 66 per cent of the entire country are angry with the federal government – that doesn’t mean that 200 million Americans are going to slam planes into buildings or indeed do anything violent. Tea Party protests have been noted for their peaceable nature – not so much of a window has been broken.
New York Magazine jumped on the bandwagon, writing that Stack’s rhetoric “could have been taken directly from a handwritten sign at a tea party rally,” again overwhelmingly implying that anti-tax groups and small government advocates should be silenced because they are dangerous extremists.
But by far the most belligerent reaction came from the Obamanoid blog websites, places like the Daily Kos which carried a post entitled, “Teabagger terrorist attack on IRS building.”
“After months of threats on the United States government, and government institutions, the Anti-Government forces known as the teabaggers have struck with their first 911 (sic) inspired terrorist attack,” read the post.
Of course, blaming random acts of violence on the liberty movement has become par for the course for those who wish to crush the free speech of their political adversaries. The University of Alabama-Huntsville murders were also blamed on the Tea Party movement until it turned out that the killer was an Obama-worshipper.
Unfortunately for those who like to exploit tragedies to further their own anti-free speech talking points, it turns out that Stack was not a “teabagger,” he was not a “terrorist,” and he was no Timothy McVeigh, he was a guy pushed to the edge, a sad figure in the mould of Michael Douglas’ character in the movie Falling Down.
Austin Tea Party director Greg Holloway told Newsmax that Stack was not a member of the Austin Tea Party.
“His name does not appear on any of their contact lists, Holloway says. He does not know of any tea party leader who ever met him,” writes David A. Patten.
Asked his reaction to media reports linking the tea party movement to the tragedy, Holloway told Newsmax, “I think it’s just the whole notion of a few people in politics, and I’ll include some of the media, that everything is about political process rather than about people. Here you’ve got a terrible tragedy involving so many people, and the first thought is: ‘How do I use this to forward my own agenda and to try to attack someone else’s?’
National tea party leader Everett Wilkinson also poured cold water on any links to Tea Party groups. “As far as I know, Joseph Andrew Stack was not a member of the tea party movement,” he said. “The movement is not involved in protesting the IRS, but rather government spending. Our best wishes go out to the families and people involved.”
In addition, despite efforts to portray Stack as a political extremist, friends told CBS News that Stack “talked politics like everyone but didn’t show any obsession.”
People who knew Stack said he was an easy going guy, a view backed by Infowars producer Rob Dew, who knew Stack from the Austin music scene and said he was a reserved, soft-spoken, well-dressed man. Dew expressed his shock that Stack could have been capable of flying a plane into a building.
The picture that emerges from all this is not of a violent terrorist hell-bent on destruction to further his paranoid political agenda, as many in the media have attempted to portray, but a man driven to the edge of sanity as a result of his personal disputes with the IRS.
That didn’t stop controlled shill Glenn Beck comparing Stack to Osama Bin Laden and fitting him in to his fairytale delusion about terrorists being within Obama’s inner circle ready to kill the President. Beck even threw the people he claims to represent – Tea Party members – under the bus by saying Stack could be a “radical constitutionalist,” which is how a lot of Tea Party members would describe themselves.
To characterize yesterday’s tragedy as a deadly portend of the “domestic terror” waiting to be unleashed on U.S. cities by disgruntled Americans is not only completely irresponsible, it’s a revelatory insight into how desperate the establishment is – both fake left and right – to neutralize growing peaceful political opposition to the big government agenda across the country.
The Tonka Report Editor’s Note: Once again, the MSM is caught in blatant propaganda as the truth shines forth in the Patriot Movement… – SJH