The Pentagon Attack: The True Flight Path Proves A Military Deception

**Craig Ranke CIT** · #1 02-18-2008, 03:36

The Pentagon Attack: The True Flight Path Proves A Military Deception

By: Craig Ranke
Citizen Investigation Team
February 17th, 2008
www.ThePentaCon.com

Citizen Investigation Team has made it our mission to pursue new independently obtained hard evidence proving the 9/11 deception while focusing on the Pentagon attack. We have spoken directly with dozens of witnesses, first responders, and victims. We have surveyed the topography and local landscape. We have conducted an extensive analysis of all previously published witness accounts by plotting their positions and analyzing their actual points of view. We have sought out previously unknown witnesses by canvassing the area and we have heavily scrutinized all official reports.

Our primary focus has been to determine the true flight path of the plane as reported by eyewitnesses in comparison with the official data and reports. The results have been devastating as we can now prove on multiple fronts how the actual flight path does not match with the physical damage or any of the officially released data.

We strongly believe that the missile claims were first introduced by the suspect to deliberately deflect our attention from the true flight path of the plane by distracting us from the fact that there was a plane at all. This in turn made people who question 9/11 seem crazy to all of the genuine witnesses who were in the area and saw the plane headed fast towards the Pentagon timed perfectly with a big explosion.

Those who are familiar with our February 2007 release "The PentaCon Smoking Gun Version" know that we have demonstrated how the plane that was believed to have hit the building actually flew on the north side of the former CITGO gas station right in front of the Pentagon. This is evident because all of the known witnesses who were on the property at the time unanimously and independently agree that this is where the plane flew. We present first hand testimony from 4 witnesses; Pentagon police Sergeants William Lagasse and Chadwick Brooks, employee at the gas station Robert Turcios, and an auto mechanic who was up the street on Columbia Pike Edward Paik.

This single claim proves a military deception as it is agreed by the organization Pilots for 9/11 Truth and all experts that it is physically impossible for a plane on the north side of the gas station to have toppled the light poles or damage the building as reported by the American Society of Civil Engineers.

(ASCE report page 39)

The unanimous first hand eyewitness testimony we present was filmed on location and is not directly refuted by any of the previously published accounts. In addition to the 4 witnesses presented in the documentary, the north side claim has since been further corroborated by two additional witnesses, Pentagon courier Levi Stephens who was in the Pentagon south parking lot and air traffic controller Sean Boger who was in the Pentagon heliport tower right next to the alleged impact point.

The level of independent corroboration is so high that the notion all of these people could be so drastically mistaken about such a simple right or left detail in the exact same way is not a viable consideration.

Nevertheless, Citizen Investigation Team has not stopped with the north side evidence. Establishing where the plane flew in the final moment before the physical damage begins with the light poles was critical but we have now also established how the plane originated from east of the Potomac River and flew over the skies of Washington DC.

This fact is 100% irreconcilable with the data released in 2006 by the National Transportation Safety Board or NTSB that allegedly came from Flight 77's black box allegedly recovered from the Pentagon and also the alleged radar data released in 2007 by the 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron or 84 RADES.

The official data never has the plane over Washington DC at all.

NTSB reported flight path:

Latitude and longitude coordinates from the 84 RADES data:

We have supporting evidence of the east of the Pentagon/Potomac River claim from Colin Scoggins and Kevin Nasypany on the NORAD tapes, quotes from the C-130 pilot Steve O'Brien and transportation secretary Norman Mineta, as well as an exclusive on location interview with previously unknown witness Steve Chaconas, a charter boat captain who was on the Potomac River bass fishing with clients on 9/11.

All of this data is irreconcilable with the official story and further proves a deception on 9/11.

This information is revealed in our brand new full length presentation, "The Pentagon Flyover: How They Pulled It Off".

We expose how the decoy jet that flew over the skies of Washington DC and crossed over from the east side of the Potomac River to Arlington before looping around to the north side of the former CITGO station timed perfectly with the explosion at the Pentagon was disguised with a 2nd plane cover story involving the C-130 that was seen over the Pentagon soon after the event and the white E4B or "Doomsday plane" that was reported flying over the White House.

We present an exclusive interview with alleged witnesses Keith Wheelhouse who claims he saw a C-130 "shadow" the American Airlines jet as it plunged into the Pentagon but veer away at the last moment. This serves the purpose of the 2nd plane cover story perfectly but is in stark contrast to statements from the C-130 pilot who claims he was too far away from the Pentagon to be able to tell this is where the explosion he saw came from.

Overall it's clear that the evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt a military deception on 9/11. Attention to what really happened at the Pentagon particularly in regards to the true flight path of the plane is paramount to exposing this world wide psychological black operation that has been used as the pretext for permanent global war.

**OmegaPoint** · #2 02-18-2008, 14:59

Proof of no Boeing impact. (demonstrating that your wonderful work and efforts are entirely consistent, with reality itself). Indeed it must have been a flyover, there is no other conclusion, and that the Military set up this phony flight path, as recorded by the FDR (flight data recorder) and released by the NTSB, has now been confirmed by CIT and their credible witnesses.

Proof of Flyover

Perspectives and scale analysis on the Pentagon Wall area of destruction, pre-outer wall collapse.

NOTE: NO MARK ON THE GRASS. NOTHING!
Size comparison with fire engine

Post outer wall collapse, about a half hour after impact.

Relative Engine Size (use trucks to approximate for scale)

Gee, those engines are pretty BIG, and not very far from the the main body of the plane either...?

Now this (bear in mind that a Boeing engine, 1 ft off the ground, would come to about the level of the little red light on the fire engine, or about two firemen tall)

Once again, no mark on grass, intact wall to the right of hole where there SHOULD have been an engine impact hole, but again, nothing.
No impact damage from tail section, - intact windows - around "the hole" but no tail section, and if it "fell off", nothing, no wreckage of any kind for the most part. It just plain doesn't FIT! The official story about it therefore, is false and a lie, and your work Craig and that of your team, only serves to reaffirm and corroborate that inevitable conclusion when looking at this evidence.

It appears that these spools remained in place and did not tip over, from a Boeing hitting the building at high speed. Of course that section of the Pentagon was under construction for reinforcement, for protection from the very thing that actually happened, and so those spools are not connected with the fire truck, but with the rennovation construction equipment adjacent to the .. let's call it the area of destruction, instead of the impact area, since we do not know what impacted, if anything. It could have simply been a series of explosions and shaped charges, along with small amounts of plane debris planted for good measure, none of which even matches up with alleged Boeing aircraft, piloted by Hani Hanjour of all people! Absurd, in the extreme, is the official story, and Craig, you and your Citizens Investigation Team, you've done history itself a lot of good I think, in getting to the root of this Pentagon mystery.

More Scale Comparisons

click to enlarge, left side "impact area"

right side

front on shot, wall pre-collapse
(which happened about twenty minutes later I believe)

Don't just take our word for it, judge for yourself.

---
It's a PentaCON all right! Craig, you guys nailed it I think, with your little citizens investigation team. Thank you, for your work.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...37574426&hl=en
phil can you figure out how to make this google video live? then delete this comment. thanks.

**F/O** · #3 02-18-2008, 15:33

Maybe those spools rolled up from out yonder in the wake of the jet. Ya'll rednecks never thought about that did ya?

**OmegaPoint** · #4 02-18-2008, 23:45

There's still another shoe to drop...

Coming Soon...

New, as yet unreleased credible, first hand, eyewitness accounts of the Pentagon plane, on approach, and, ..?

Watch this thread for updates by Craig, and watch for the release of their new film... to be released here and everywhere any day now..

---

Trailer for "The Pentagon Flyover: How They Pulled It Off"

Monday February 18, 2008

Here is the trailer for our upcoming presentation that will reveal more groundbreaking evidence independently obtained by CIT. This new full length feature will show you exactly why and how they were able to pull off the Pentagon flyover and we will present new evidence proving the official black box and radar data fraudulent. Stay tuned to ThePentaCon.com for the February 2008 release of this explosive information.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBDVNuM2TbY

**Craig Ranke CIT** · #5 02-25-2008, 21:40

Full version now released!

http://www.thepentacon.com/PentagonFlyover.htm

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...86327617173136

It's an hour and 40 minutes packed full of critical information.

Please spread the word.

Peace,
CIT