Phil Jayhan

Notice the strange similarities. And remember, the pod on the above craft which hit the 2nd WTC, has a similar pod, which they of course were trying to camoflage, by placing it off-centered on the wing-root. The above photgraph is of a 4 engine, E-8C with a JSTARS pod on it's fuselage. It could have been one of these, or it could have been one of the smaller units, perhaps an LDT/Laser Detector Tracker, which are smaller in size....

And here is a link to a Der Spiegel Magazine cover, run in July of 04 that shows the pod as well as that of the bomb, which can be seen between between the engine and the pylon...

http://img46.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img46ℑ=Spiegel.jpg


************************************************** ****

Exhibit 175-1-NASA Remote Controlled Crash 1984

This evidence establishes the exhistence of High Tech Remote Control technologies which were developed long before September 11th, 2001, and more than capable of both landing an aircraft (13 successfull landings) as well as crash land the same aircraft, again using Remote Control technology. This NASA Program occurred in 1984, 17 years before September 11th, 2001. This technology has had 17 or more years to improve. It is now common knowledge, and proven that there are remote systems to remotely fly commercial airliners., and have been for more than 20 years now.

[web:d24f1512fb]http://www.letsroll911.org/phpwebsite/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id= 25[/web:d24f1512fb]

Original NASA Link: http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Mov...M-0004-01.html


************************************************** ****

Exhibit 175-1A

This is an actual photograph of the aircraft that is alleged to have become Flight 175 on September 11th, 2001.
[NTSB Designation: N612UA]

Original photograph from Airliners.net, taken by Sam Chui.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/188134/L/



************************************************** ****

Exhibit 175-1B-CNN [Frame 54 - Frame 143]

Exhibit 175-1B-CNN

Shows extra Equipment added on fuselage of aircraft, Exhibit 175-1A, alleged to have been Flight 175, and alleged to have taken off from Bostons Logan International Airport. Throughout the chain of evidence it will be referred to as Exhibit 175 1B-CNN, or 'the CNN Video footage.' *

*Note: Extra Equipment, also called a 'Pod or Canopy' is clearly visible and the same shape and size, in 87 of the above 89 frames.

Also visible is the bright orange flash, [Frame 134 & 135] which happens before and just as, the alleged Flight 175 impacts the South Tower of the World Trade Center Complex, which also shall be known and called Tower 2 and the 2nd Tower, WTC 2 or 2nd WTC, respectively. It also shows blackened rear fusing mechanism in the last 2-3 frames of above sequence, on right rear section of Exhibit 175-1B-CNN. [Frame 140-143]

Exhibit 175-1B-ABC-Sequence1



************************************************** ****

Exhibit 175-1C-CNN-Negative-Video

Exhibit 175-1C-CNN-Negative-Video

Exhibit 175-1C-Negative-Stills

Exhibit 175-1C-CNN-Negative-Stills


************************************************** ****

Exhibit 175-1D-NewsDay12th

The Front cover of NewsDay magazine, a New York paper, clearly shows "Psuedo Flight 175' before impact, with an extra, very large piece of equipment, or undercarriage Pod, off centered a bit to the right, on the bottom of the fuselage. They ran this front cover picture on September 12th, most likely with very little idea what they were missing.






************************************************** ****

Exhibit 175-1E-ABC - Evan Fairbanks Still

This is a picture taken from the Evan Fairbanks, ABC Video. While filming the ArchBishop of Wales, at the Trinity Church, he, quite by accident, caught this on his Video Camera. On this photograph, the undercarriage pod is clearly visible between the two engines, off centered on the bottom fuselage. Notice also that the 2 engines are already casting their own shadows, very close to them, and this pod casts it's own shadow as well.





************************************************** ****

Exhibit 175-1F-New York Times/Pavel Hlava

This picture was run right on the front page of the New York Times as well. Just as you see it, with the 'pod' and everything staring people right in the face...





************************************************** ****

Exhibit 175-1G

This picture was and is being sold at Ground Zero for Years as part of a commemorative album of 911. Purchased from 3 Street Vendors. Part of a 20 picture album. The Photograph was high quality resolution and also on high quality Fuji film. This is a 2400x2400 resolution scan of this picture. This picture not only once again confirms the pod on the aircrafts fuselage, but also something newly discovered. This picture is the very first clear picture of the far wing of this alleged flight 175. And it shows more Military ordinance tucked on this far wing, nestled between the engine and the pylon.


http://www.mistakesweremade.com/2ndT...iginalSize.jpg


Exhibit 175-1H

This picture is a cutout of the above photograph and an enlargment.





************************************************** ****

Exhibit-175-1I-Here is New York
Exhibit-175-1J-CNN File Photo


The image on the left clearly shows jet fuel being sprayed out of the undercarriage of this aircraft just prior to impact. Notice the two white vertical sprays coming out of the forward center fuselage, as well as the rear center fuselage.

The image on the right, again clearly shows the pod on the undercarriage of this aircraft just prior to impact. It also shows the effects of the plane spraying out the jet fuel, as well as the probable intention. To mask the bottom of this aircraft from grond video and picture taking. To blur the video and pictures by laying down a huge blanket of jet fuel and fumes, which will create poor quality images in the last final moments before impact. The image on the right, shows that the left side of the plane is starting to almost disappear. The left wing, and the left rear tail wing. This effect is the direct result of the plane spraying out this jet fuel in its final few moments before impact.

Original Photo found at this URL; http://hereisnewyork.org//jpegs/photos/2087.jpg





Enlargment of above photograph;
http://www.letsroll911.org/images/je...prayblowup.jpg



************************************************** ****

Exhibit-175-1K-CNN - Different Angle

This still frame from Fox News shows both the pod and the bright orange emmision just before and during impact, recorded by all the other News Networks as well.







************************************************** ****

Exhibit-175-L-CNN/ABC/CameraPlanet-4 Way Video-Missile

Exhibit-175-L-CNN/ABC/CameraPlanet-4 Way Video-Missile


************************************************** ****

http://www.letsrollforums.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

hdhntr

Note: Different angle, different camera.

Same pod.

Phil Jayhan

Add to at will, we have many visitors from george Noory's show, if anyone hasn't noticed...

Kind of neat!

Cheers-
phil jayhan

Add you favorite pod pictures at will! Fire!

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

hdhntr

Note in each of the two pics above the way the left wing is getting completely blurred out, in EXACTLY the same way...!?
How is that possible...?

Phil Jayhan

Also note that each of the engines casts their 'own' shadow, as well as the 'pod' located off right on the central fuselage. Two engines, two shadows, two engines and a pod, 2 shadows plus another for the pod = 3 shadows.

Simple math.
911 for Dummies.

Is all they needed to do was slow down the video;

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

kaha

Some knucklehead shows up and claims it's a wing-root fairing in 4...3...2....

heh

RedPillNeo

Not to mention, there is no shadow from the pylon. The pod casts its own shadow! (Or is this a special transparent pylon on this particular plane?)

No matter how many times I ponder the natural bulge of the wing root fairing on a "normal" 767, it always comes back to the fact that there is not a shadow from the pylon. If the "pod" is simply the engine's shadow, how can this be?

I asked another friend today, without prompting or hinting, to look at the plane and tell me if she saw anything unusual. After squinting for a minute and mumbling that she doesn't know much about airplanes, she said, you mean that thing right there?

hdhntr

What do you mean by the pylon? Please clarify that for us. Thanks.

RedPillNeo

Pylon meaning engine mount.
All the airliner guys that came through managed to rub off some airplane nomenclature.

The area of the wing and fuselage between the "pod" and the engine should have an unbroken shadow between the engine and the "pod", if the pod is a shadow of the engine on the wing root fairing. That is, unless you would have us believe the engine floats beneath the wing, with nothing solid to connect it and block sunlight.

Sure, light is diffusing from below to illuminate the wing, reducing the shadow of the pylon. I still say that a shadow of the engine does not explain the pod!

hdhntr

HARDLY!

Particularly not when pod fires a missile!