Terral

Greetings to All:

The Pentagon was attacked on 9/11 by a rogue element inside our own military using a poorly executed plan that failed from the very beginning. The inside-job bad guys used a retrofitted radio-controlled A-3 TNT-filled Jet to launch a missile attack (like this) at 9:31:39 AM (see FAA Timeline here) on Column Line (CL) 14 using this flight path, but the complicated maneuvers caused the radio operator to lose control and altitude at the critical moment, which caused the starboard wing to begin clipping the five downed light poles. The radio operator had a panic attack for fear that the painted up A-3 would crash into the Pentagon lawn, so he pulled back on the joystick to create what the CIT boys are calling the “Flyover Plane,” NOT at 9:38 AM, but at 9:31:39 AM when the Pentagon clocks stopped. The radio operator then began making a wide turn to the north that was witnessed by the C-130 pilot and many other people, until making the final attack strike on the Wedge One Wall between CL 9 and CL 15 at 9:36:27 AM just about 5 minutes later to create Terry Cohen's "Terrible Explosion" that took place 'after' the Original 9:31:39 AM attack.


http://video.google.nl/videoplay?doc...51276150910098

The problem for our inside-job bad guys is that the Pentagon Limestone-clad masonry wall required the ‘inside’ explosion from the missile strike, in coordination with the A-3 CL 9-15 massive explosion, to take down the E-Ring roof during the 9:31:39 AM attack run. This attack location was chosen far in advance because of the CL 11 control-joint that would bring down the E-Ring roof very efficiently and effectively. However, the A-3 Jet was forced over the E-Ring roof at 9:31:39 AM and also struck the second story concrete slab in the 9:36:27 AM attack, which means the E-Ring roof fell just one foot (look carefully at the control joint above the fire truck) to become wedged tightly against the northern side of CL-11. Our inside-job bad guys then had a terrible problem, because many explosive charges were needed to eventually bring the E-Ring Roof down at 10:15:16 AM about 45 minutes after the original missile attack.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WefPzgxvfS4


This means the inside-job bad guys had to go around fabricating the many different “Official Timelines” that are filled with contradictions (ACAAR = Page 200) in order to give their fake “Flight 77” Cover Story the resemblance of credibility. The inside-job bad guys have been working everyday running their counterintelligence disinformation campaigns to cover their tracks from that time to today.

Lloyd England’s taxi was struck by Pole #1 during the 9:31:39 AM missile strike, which is the reason he saw a single smoke plume from the original small CL 13-15 entry hole (picture). While he and his partner were wrestling around with the light pole, then the A-3 Jet created the “Big Boom*” that knocked him down and almost killed him for the second time in just 5 minutes. :0) Many people think the light pole evidence was staged, because they are BLIND to the 911Truth that we have been looking at ‘two attacks’ all along. The second ‘Big Boom’ happened 5 minutes later at 9:36:27 AM, while Lloyd and his helper were removing the pole from his windshield. The next series of explosions started at 9:42 AM, which is event #27 on my Pentagon Timeline here.

The reason you have so much confusion and contradiction between all these Pentagon witnesses is because ‘some’ of them saw the 9:31:39 AM A-3 Flyover and others saw the actual Jet hit the Pentagon at 9:36:27 AM like these two witnesses:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD0qpbwHCYI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=schV0rKCRwA

The 9:31:39 AM witnesses saw the A-3 disappear into the single smoke plume on the ‘South-of-Citgo’ Flight Path, while the 9:36:27 witnesses saw the same painted-up Jet crash into the Pentagon wall using the “North-of-Citgo” Fight Path shown here. The 9:31:39 AM witnesses saw the light poles flying around, but the 9:36:27 AM people saw no signs of any light poles being hit along the North-of-Citgo Flight Path. That is the reason some so-called Pentagon Investigators think the light pole evidence is all staged. :0) We have small bits of Jet debris, because the A-3 was blown into a kazillion bits at impact. Nobody has ever found one piece of any real Boeing 757-200 Jetliner debris, because this damage and this damage was NOT created by any real 100-Ton Jetliner going any 533 miles per hour. :0) That is the reason no 'time-change' parts have ever been produced by the inside-job FBI/Bushie Administration bad guys in the first place. The damage pattern is consistent with a ‘three attack’ scenario from the 9:31:39 AM missile strike, the 9:36:27 AM Jet attack ‘and’ the subsequent Controlled-Demolition Explosions that eventually brought the E-Ring roof down at 10:15 AM.

This is The 911Truth that MANY so-called leaders of the impotent 911Movement do NOT want you to see. :0)

GL,

Terral

Phil Jayhan

Terral,

Some interesting and intriguing points that you make. I myself prefer to simply rest after I think I have proven what didn't happen at the Pentagon. This has worked very well for me and I know a lot of others here follow the same wisdom.

Personally I don't buy into that whole argument about having to provide a case which will satisfy a court of law, as thats not where this is supposed to be played out. There is more than ample evidence and even proofs that 911 was engineered by high up elements of a Federal government long subverted by the same. And personally feel that this should be played out by full blown congressional hearings and that thats where it needs to come out.

U.S. Courts really do not have the Jurisdictional power over sitting Presidents. The only person in the Nation that has true jurisdictional power over the Presidency or those under him would be the Provost Marshal who is the only person in the United States who actually has the Jurisdiction to actually arrest a sitting President.

Addendum Edit; The only other body that to my knowledge which has Jurisdiction over a sitting President would be the U.S Congress, in full blown hearings and investigations, followed by articles of impeachment. Once impeached, the President loses his veil of cover and, in a perfect world, would then and only then be subject to prosecution for crimes committed while sitting as President.

To prove what didn't happen, in my opinion is more powerful than trying to prove what did happen, and in my humble opinion, pays better dividends. But thats just me. And we are all workers on the same Wall, tearing it down brick by brick, but thought I would just throw that out there for your consideration.

Interesting post, and you can be sure I'll chew on it for a while and see where it leads me. It is worthy of consideration.

Cheers & Welcome to the Forums!
Phil

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

Merc Mercy

Two words: Absolute Crap.

JFK

There was once a time when I respected your work and looked forward to reading more of it.

With responses like the above, I no longer do.

Why is it that you can not have a civilized discussion as to why you disagree with what others post instead of insulting their work ?

Sometimes I wonder if it is really Merc Mercy doing the typing from behind that keyboard.... And if it is, What happened to him.

I am really tired of the "Jerry Springer" tactics.

That is all.

__________________
"Before....... the end of my term...... I have something to tell you."
"The very word 'secrecy' is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings."

http://myspace-343.vo.llnwd.net/0194...49633343_m.gifhttp://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_8.gif http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2006/02/18/348811/wtc7.gif

JayT78

The Main problem i have with this theory is your saying that the guy controlling the A-3 panicked because it hit the 5 light poles.
Managed to pull up and over the Pentagon, all this within a split second.

Then it turned back for another pass at the Pentagon to finally hit it, and the plane managed to do all that after hitting 5 Light poles

I cant get past this bit to take any of the rest seriously...

Is that really what you are saying?? or am i not reading it right

Firehorse

JayT78's point is a good one... what kind of plane could hit all those poles and then circle back for a precision strike? (without touching the lawn)
I'm open to all possibilties but this seems a bit far-fetched... but then so does the official 911 explanation...

Rings of Saturn

TERRAL said:

I have been thinking about this....

Vigilant Guardian anyone?

Please see my Hypothesis- 911 in the weary, tired, hussled forum...

Phil Jayhan

De Ja Vue anyone? Here we seem to go again. A fight started elsewhere ends up on our forums, and all the players simply move their arguments to here.

I guess the fault partly lies with Terral for making this unnecessary comment;

This is simply unneeded rhetoric. I really didn't agree with much of Terrals post, but since it is all speculation on what happened, and none know or can prove it, I simply held my tongue and remained neutral and gave as positive reply as I could.

And now we have Merc back here spouting off with more fighting words. The same Merc who called all of us, well, the filthy words he used were simply bad enough not to repeat. But in the same tirade from Merc, he told us all that we have no right to question anything he says, because he is the final authority on everything regarding the Pentagon.

Merc,

You were already banned from here for poor etiquette and a nasty disposition. And the only reason your now able to post is because vBulletin has holes in porting over banned members. I do believe if your going to be able to stay here and post, that you owe the entire forum an apology for your past behavior which was more than just a little bit "poor."

Terral,

Please refrain from any more inflammatory comments in your posts that might turn a thread into a fight, as I knew who you were speaking about when you made those comments.

---

And JFK,

Your comments are about right on the money. What happened to you Merc? You used to be a rather nice person who could engage in normal mature conversation without going off the deep end. Your antics hardly help your case.


Cheers-
Phil

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

Terral

Alrighty Then. :0) But no. I was referring to the leaders of other Boards like AE911Truth.org, 911Truth.org, PilotsForTruth.org, 911Movement.org and other places where they have no concern for what really hit the Pentagon. I certainly never included these CIT boys as the leaders of anything . . .

This guy almost got me banned last time for simply posting my views and now he is up to his stupidity again. No sir. Merc was banned because of Merc and his nonsense. Letting him parade around this place using his insults means I need to place another moratorium on posting here, before he gets us both into trouble.

GL,

Terral

Phil Jayhan

You know this just pisses me off Terral. Apparently you didn't look closely enough under Mercs name or else I would have never seen this post.

Merc Mercy
BANNED

You know, no matter what I do here I am always the loser. I just can't win. You guys want to drag me into your fights, take sides, and all that happy horseshit. Thats my general reward for the forums here. And the kicker here is what I have poured into this place financially and emotionally to get this abuse. You really should have taken a closer look under Mercs name before you wrote the post.

And since I am the bad guy here no matter what I do, or how fair I try to be to everyone except undeserving asswipes like Merc, I still get dumped on!

So I guess you know how I feel about your little Moratorium now, hunh? And probably have a good idea as well as what you can do with it as well, right?

Cheers-
Phil

And I might as well just get this out in the open since I am always the bad guy no matter what I do. I have nothing to lose here after all do I? Your setting yourself up for failure here. And your doing it by your approach. You want to prove what happened, the only problem is you cannot. You do not have the necessary proof. It is only a theory. I could never take your little hypothesis out to the streets and convince people of anything with it. But I can convince people all day long of what didn't happen. And have done it about 20,000 different times now to about 20,000 different people.

And they all walk away knowing and believing 911 was an inside job or at the very least, walk away questioning the official lies of that day. And I use my own methods doing this, showing people what DIDN'T happen. And I'll be honest here Terral, in this sense, I too couldn't give a crap what happened at the Pentagon. I personally don't think anything hit the Pentagon. No plane, no missile, no nothing. I think they simply had placed explosives in the building during the Rehab that was going on, and thats the only reason that part of the Pentagon was clear of people, except for the Naval Intelligence Unit they wanted to take out. All shaped charges built into the walls, ceilings, etc...

The only Pentagon eyewitness that I think is worth a hill of beans is the guy who said he smelled cordite.

But I don't ever even bother discussing this or arguing about it because it CANNOT be proven. It is at best only a THEORY. BUT, I CAN PROVE to people what DIDN'T HAPPEN. And do it everywhere I go, all day long, and have GREAT SUCCESS!!!!!!!!

So I guess this makes me an even worse guy, right? An enemy of the truth, because I can now be lumped together with the other "fakes and frauds" who you say don't care what hit the Pentagon. And lets get this straight as well too.

I do care about what happened at the Pentagon, but am smart enough to know the cards we hold. And we don't hold enough evidence to say WHAT happened. But we do hold enough to show the governments story is a lie. And the only place where I really care about what happened at the Pentagon is a full-blown Congressional Investigation and Congressional hearings, with subpoena powers and teeth to scare people involved into squealing out the truth. Apart from that we are likely to never know what exactly happened.

Cheers-
Phil



MORATORIUM ON NONSENSE

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"