Go Back   Let's Roll Forums > The U.S. Government Conspiracy of 9/11 > The Mystery of Flights 11, 77, 175 & 93
Connect with Facebook

View Poll Results: Flight 175, was it the real deal. Or are we fooled the Hollywood style.
It was the real Flight 175. 0 0%
No plane. 2 6.06%
It was a 175 look-a-like or a drone. 14 42.42%
It was CGI in combination with explosives. 16 48.48%
It was something else. Please share this info. 1 3.03%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Bookmark and Share Thread Tools
Old 10 Feb 2012 , 10:40 AM   #1
Dr FUBAR
Admin
 
Dr FUBAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 4 Jan 2011
Location: Hollow Town
Posts: 3,388
Threads: 137
Thanked 10,751 Times in 2,985 Posts
Dr FUBAR has a reputation beyond reputeDr FUBAR has a reputation beyond reputeDr FUBAR has a reputation beyond reputeDr FUBAR has a reputation beyond reputeDr FUBAR has a reputation beyond reputeDr FUBAR has a reputation beyond reputeDr FUBAR has a reputation beyond reputeDr FUBAR has a reputation beyond reputeDr FUBAR has a reputation beyond reputeDr FUBAR has a reputation beyond reputeDr FUBAR has a reputation beyond repute
Flight 175, was it real or....?!

I just want to find out what are your thoughts about Flight 175. There are a lot of people who believe in different 'consparacies' and with that, many different 'theories'.

The question is. Was flight 175 for real or was it something else?! I have 10 clips in this post with all kind of flavours.
A few with sounds of a plane, some without a plane, some with what looks like a plane, fireballs and disappearing wings.

But think good before you are replying on this topic.

10 Videos with 10 stills, "FREEZED" on YouTube within 10th's of seconds and all stills are taken when the smoke breaths out on the east side of the North Tower.


































Or do you have any other thoughts, with another clip?!


And please don't forget your vote in the poll please.

*Please keep your opinion short and keep this topic on track!*

TY
__________________
“Let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories…...?” George Walker Bush .
Dr FUBAR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Dr FUBAR For This Useful Post:
Old 11 Feb 2012 , 08:15 AM   #2
fireblade911
Thinker
 
fireblade911's Avatar
 
Join Date: 18 Dec 2011
Location: south wales
Posts: 183
Threads: 44
Thanked 361 Times in 132 Posts
fireblade911 has a brilliant futurefireblade911 has a brilliant futurefireblade911 has a brilliant futurefireblade911 has a brilliant futurefireblade911 has a brilliant futurefireblade911 has a brilliant futurefireblade911 has a brilliant futurefireblade911 has a brilliant futurefireblade911 has a brilliant futurefireblade911 has a brilliant futurefireblade911 has a brilliant future
Re: Flight 175, was it real or....?!

i think you might be on to somethink here doc? i dun think its the plane or a drone i think its explosives, strange how them puffs of smoke on the other tower comes out a little befor it happend? hmmmmm..


fb.


edit. got me thinking now doc.
__________________
My 911 youtube page.

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheSolid...1?feature=mhee
fireblade911 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to fireblade911 For This Useful Post:
Old 11 Feb 2012 , 15:41 PM   #3
do2read
Admin
 
Join Date: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 3,520
Threads: 113
Thanked 9,849 Times in 2,647 Posts
do2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Flight 175, was it real or....?!

Explosives to make the hole. A few tensioned cables tied to the core to make sure the exterior piece doesn't fall outward when cut loose and give you away. A simultaneously timed pyrotechnic fireball (Orlando City Hall) to cover this operation. Add in a couple of office paper confetti bombs.

Plant some plane debris.

Plane overlaid in real time, like the lines and graphics on the broadcasts of major sporting events.

After the initial event, crank up the fake fires, and the smoke machines. Cue up the dummy jumper launches.

Replay the "plane" footage at every opportunity, and within hours the whole world will have no doubt they saw the plane hit the WTC.





Real planes would be far too risky.



The greatest magic trick/performance art piece/propoganda stunt of all time. As Seen On TV.



Yes, I was once a staunch, unwavering proponent of planes (767 tanker)and buildings full of murdered workers, but I was wrong. At that time we had theories, and they did not stand the test of time. Now we have facts, proven facts.

Thanks Fubar, great thread.


l
__________________
"Don't worry about it - Americans don't read." Allan Dulles ...
do2read is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to do2read For This Useful Post:
Old 11 Feb 2012 , 16:01 PM   #4
DoYouEverWonder
Reader
 
DoYouEverWonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 80
Threads: 1
Thanked 206 Times in 63 Posts
DoYouEverWonder has much to be proud ofDoYouEverWonder has much to be proud ofDoYouEverWonder has much to be proud ofDoYouEverWonder has much to be proud ofDoYouEverWonder has much to be proud ofDoYouEverWonder has much to be proud ofDoYouEverWonder has much to be proud ofDoYouEverWonder has much to be proud of
Re: Flight 175, was it real or....?!







Muslim terrorist who've never flown a heavy Boeing don't get this lucky.

In the first image, the explosion is from within the building and blows out a crucial corner, specifically the NE corner around the 81st floor.

The second image is of the damage to this corner.

The 81st floor was a crucial floor for the controlled demolition of WTC 2.

The 81st floor was where the dozen elevator hoists were installed. This equipment weighed 100's of tons.

The 81st floor was reinforced with steel beams and heavier columns. In order to bring down a building you have to attack the strongest points. Also, releasing the incredible load this floor carried, reduced the amount of explosives needed.

The demolition of both Towers was planned to push the buildings toward the east side of the complex and away from the surrounding streets. This is why the east side of the 81st floor was targeted.
__________________
---------------

<a href=http://letsrollforums.com/www.beyondpoliticsand911.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=627 target=_blank>www.beyondpoliticsand911.com</a>
DoYouEverWonder is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to DoYouEverWonder For This Useful Post:
Old 11 Feb 2012 , 16:34 PM   #5
mrstrman
Reader
 
Join Date: 9 Feb 2012
Posts: 15
Threads: 4
Thanked 21 Times in 7 Posts
mrstrman will become famous soon enoughmrstrman will become famous soon enough
Re: Flight 175, was it real or....?!

It sure looks like charges were set off in both buildings at the same time.
mrstrman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mrstrman For This Useful Post:
Old 12 Feb 2012 , 10:38 AM   #6
EvaDestruction
Thinker
 
Join Date: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 234
Threads: 2
Thanked 207 Times in 107 Posts
EvaDestruction has much to be proud ofEvaDestruction has much to be proud ofEvaDestruction has much to be proud ofEvaDestruction has much to be proud ofEvaDestruction has much to be proud ofEvaDestruction has much to be proud ofEvaDestruction has much to be proud ofEvaDestruction has much to be proud of
Re: Flight 175, was it real or....?!

do2read

Why do you think real planes would be too risky?
EvaDestruction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to EvaDestruction For This Useful Post:
Old 12 Feb 2012 , 14:02 PM   #7
Baplasmastate
Reader
 
Join Date: 23 Dec 2011
Posts: 83
Threads: 3
Thanked 88 Times in 47 Posts
Baplasmastate is a glorious beacon of lightBaplasmastate is a glorious beacon of lightBaplasmastate is a glorious beacon of lightBaplasmastate is a glorious beacon of lightBaplasmastate is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Flight 175, was it real or....?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by EvaDestruction View Post
do2read

Why do you think real planes would be too risky?
It would just be easier if all the explosives are pre planted and work in a particular sequence. Free of planes coming in and fucking it up maybe?

I don't know if the footage can be used to confirm anything except how fake it is, but DYEW raised a good point about the south tower impact zone. If that section was a critical location for explosives I can't see flying anything at it period.
__________________
Trust No One
The Government Denies Knowledge
The Truth IS Out There
Baplasmastate is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Baplasmastate For This Useful Post:
Old 12 Feb 2012 , 23:43 PM   #8
do2read
Admin
 
Join Date: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 3,520
Threads: 113
Thanked 9,849 Times in 2,647 Posts
do2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond reputedo2read has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Flight 175, was it real or....?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by EvaDestruction View Post
do2read

Why do you think real planes would be too risky?
Just unnecessary for the illusion. Too many possibilities for things to go wrong.

The illusion was easier, and nearly fool-proof. More like a Vegas spectacle or Disney ride, just like clockwork.



l
__________________
"Don't worry about it - Americans don't read." Allan Dulles ...
do2read is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to do2read For This Useful Post:
Old 13 Feb 2012 , 00:07 AM   #9
clive
Privileged
 
clive's Avatar
 
Join Date: 3 Jul 2010
Location: Down Under Land
Posts: 2,631
Threads: 197
Blog Entries: 153
Thanked 5,543 Times in 2,032 Posts
clive has a reputation beyond reputeclive has a reputation beyond reputeclive has a reputation beyond reputeclive has a reputation beyond reputeclive has a reputation beyond reputeclive has a reputation beyond reputeclive has a reputation beyond reputeclive has a reputation beyond reputeclive has a reputation beyond reputeclive has a reputation beyond reputeclive has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Flight 175, was it real or....?!

The speed of the 'aircraft' is also quite a contentious issue.

The variation in knots shown by the videos is something that is a bit odd.

However, I presume due to the different video angles and recording speeds this may cause discrepancies.
__________________
Any man can overcome adversity. If you truly want to test a man's character, give him power." — Abraham Lincoln
clive is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to clive For This Useful Post:
Old 13 Feb 2012 , 15:29 PM   #10
22205
Writer
 
22205's Avatar
 
Join Date: 1 Jan 2010
Location: belly of the beast
Posts: 253
Threads: 5
Blog Entries: 2
Thanked 713 Times in 218 Posts
22205 has a reputation beyond repute22205 has a reputation beyond repute22205 has a reputation beyond repute22205 has a reputation beyond repute22205 has a reputation beyond repute22205 has a reputation beyond repute22205 has a reputation beyond repute22205 has a reputation beyond repute22205 has a reputation beyond repute22205 has a reputation beyond repute22205 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Flight 175, was it real or....?!

my opinion: It was a 175 look-a-like or a drone, WITH explosives timed to go off immediately prior to penetration, cutting all significant obstacles behind the facade (floorpans and columns) out of the way to allow seamless entry into the building. once inside, a separate set of explosives went off onboard the plane, disintegrating it into smaller pieces, in order to make sure the plane didnt remain as one solid mass headed for impact with the center core, something which may have swayed the building too much (possibly even toppled some upper part of it).
__________________

lyingest p.o.s. ever: http://letsrollforums.com/member.php?u=9070
22205 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 22205 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Let's Roll Forums > The U.S. Government Conspiracy of 9/11 > The Mystery of Flights 11, 77, 175 & 93



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger