Go Back   Let's Roll Forums > The U.S. Government Conspiracy of 9/11 > 911 For the Tired, Weary, Hustled Masses
Connect with Facebook

Reply
 
Bookmark and Share Thread Tools
Old 7 Sep 2004 , 14:07 PM   #1
Phil Jayhan
Admin
 
Phil Jayhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 23 Feb 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 22,824
Threads: 2784
Blog Entries: 28
Thanked 7,881 Times in 2,899 Posts
Phil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond repute
Exclamation Targeting Laser Light Spot at the World Trade Center!

This is a very interesting piece of evidence. It is unique in many ways. A few seconds before what is alleged to have been Flight 175, by the Government and the Airlines, what appears to be a bright white targeting laser painting the side of the World Trade Center. It starts to the far left of the side of the World Trade Center which is about to be struck, and then drifts over about 70% across the side of the WTC, and then the plane hits right underneath this laser light. And after the plane goes into the World Trade Center, this bright white laser light jumps onto the emerging fireball now coming out the right side of the World Trade Center, and then jumps onto the face of a building perhaps a mile away, perhaps 2 miles away.

Some people claim this is a piece of paper, being lit up by the Sun, drifting across the facade of the South Tower. But this isn't really a reasonable hypothesis because;
  • The laser light then jumps onto the fireball emerging from the planes impact of the tower. Thus it is fairly resilient paper, seeing how the fireball it lands on does not incinerate it. ---
  • The laser light on the South Tower jumps from the facade of the World Trade Center, South Tower, onto the fireball, and then onto the face of a building a good distance away. About a mile. In the snap of your fingers. Thus because of the speed this laser light travels, it is impossible for it to be a piece of paper, floating across the South Towers facade. ---
  • Also, notice that this is the dark side of the building. And the Sun is hidden. Thus there could be no source of light to illuminate the piece of paper. It should also be remembered that the person filming this is literally miles and miles away from the World Trade Center as she is filming this. Are we to believe that a piece of paper miles away could really be seen from such a distance, even with the zoom on the Camera? The idea is as silly as it is preposterous ---
  • The idea that it is a piece of paper really isn't even plausible. Because it happens right in the last few seconds before the Military Drone hits the building. And then this phenomena can't be found again on any other footage. ---
  • And to put the paper theory to rest, if it were a piece of paper, reflecting light, it would be an awful large piece of paper. And we can assume many other pieces of paper would be drifting around the outside of the world trade center after the North Tower was struck. Yet we see this phenomena only once. In the last few seconds before the Military Drone, struck the World Trade Center. With so many pieces of paper drifting around, why is it the only one which lights up and looks like a laser targeting light? ---
Others have speculated that it is a light from the Aircrafts wing. Right at the Wing junction, where it meets the fuselage, there is a headlight on each wing.
  • But this can be ruled out completely, because the laser light is still visible after the plane impacts the World Trade Center. It jumps onto the Fireball, after impact, and then jumps onto another building a good distance away. Thus it cannot be one of the planes own headlights.
The only logical conclusion is exactly what it looks like. A targeting laser light, more than likely to help guide the plane to hit exactly where it was intended to hit. If it looks like a targeting laser, and acts like a targeting laser light, chance are, it is indeed a targeting laser light. We can probably assume that there were multiple and redundant guidance systems employed to make sure this Military Drone hit exactly where it was intended to hit. I think it is safe to assume it also employed GPS guidance systems. And perhaps even a radio beacon inside the World Trade Center as well. More than likely triple redundant systems were employed to insure it struck its target right where it was intended. And it is possible as well, that this is the very reason the "pod" or extra piece of equipment was added to this aircrafts fuselage. It is possible that the appendage on the bottom of this aircraft goes together with the targeting laser. To read the laser and help guide this aircraft to its proper designated target.


Laser Targeting UAV, Evidence of Military Technology on 9/11 (original)


Here it is from the same video-cam, but now with an MSNBC logo, as MSNBC ran this Video on 911;


To compare this laser light on the facade of the World Trade Center, watch this short video massacre of Iraqi's which are bing painted with a targeting laser;


And to see some Military Laser Targeting Pods on Military Aircraft, which look and awful lot like the appendage on the planes fuselage, alleged to have been Flight 175 at the South Tower, see the spoiler below;

Spoiler:


Original link:
http://www.vectorsite.net/twbomb_12.html

< PREV | NEXT > | INDEX | SITEMAP | SEARCH | LINKS | UPDATES | BLOG | EMAIL | HOME

[12.0] Targeting Pods

v1.6.0 / chapter 12 of 13 / 01 nov 06 / greg goebel / public domain
* Smart weapons often require specialized targeting systems, and so it is useful to include them in this document. This chapter provides a survey of targeting pods.






[12.1] INTRODUCTION TO TARGETING PODS
[12.2] ALD / PAVE KNIFE / TRIM / LRMTS & PAVE PENNY
[12.2] PAVE SPIKE / PAVE TACK / TRAM / IRADS / ETC
[12.3] LANTIRN / NITE HAWK & ETC
[12.4] SNIPER / ISRAELI LITENING / ATFLIR / ATP
[12.5] FRENCH ATLIS, PDLCT, DAMOCLES / BRITISH TIALD

[12.1] INTRODUCTION TO TARGETING PODS

* With the introduction of laser guided bombs, some means were also required to guide them, and this led to the first generation of LGB targeting pods. In its simplest possible configuration, such a pod was fitted with a turret containing a TV boresighted with a laser, with the rest of the pod providing support systems. The pod was usually carried by a two-seat strike aircraft, with the weapons system officer (WSO) in the back seat viewing the target image provided by the pod, and using a joystick or similar hand controller to keep the target lined up in the display crosshairs.


For various reasons, some first-generation targeting pods could not be used to designate a target for the aircraft carrying the pod. This meant that the aircraft with the pod had to "buddy designate" for aircraft without the pod but carrying LGBs. Of course, pods were quickly improved to allow an aircraft to "self-designate" or "auto-designate" its own LGBs. Other refinements were introduced. The camera could be designed to provide either a wide field of view (FOV) to help find a target, or a narrow FOV for precise targeting.
One of the problems with the simple targeting pod described above is that once the strike aircraft has dropped its LGB and is departing the target area, the tracking movement of the pod turret may turn the target image upside down, making it confusing for the WSO to keep the crosshairs on target. A "horizon-natural" system automatically flipped the image over if it became inverted. Another useful item was a recorder to store video and other data for "post strike" intelligence.


Of course, TV is limited to daylight and fair weather. Light-intensifying TV cameras could be used to overcome darkness, but the more favored solution was to use a "forward looking infrared (FLIR)" imager, which could be used night or day, and also to a degree in murky weather. FLIR imagery can be confusing, since its images show the heat patterns from a target, not the patterns of reflected light that a camera can pick up, and so FLIR displays can generally be switched to display a positive or negative image in hopes that the WSO can make more sense of one than the other. Since fitting both FLIR and a TV camera in a pod was difficult for a time, FLIR generally displaced TV cameras in "second-generation" targeting pods.


FLIRs were also used in "navigation pods", which used a wide-angle FLIR that was fixed to stare forward to show the pilot the terrain ahead. There were also "laser spot tracker" pods that allowed an aircraft to spot a target illuminated by a laser target designator carried by ground troops or other aircraft, making the aircraft something like a "smart", reusable LGB itself. The laser spot tracker was often ganged with a "laser rangefinder".


* The current "third generation" of targeting pods consolidates many of the functions provided by various different earlier pods. A modern targeting pod might contain the following elements:
  • A FLIR with multiple FOVs for targeting. A second fixed FLIR with a wide FOV might also be used for navigation, but a single FLIR could be used for targeting, and then set to a wide-angle mode and fixed forward for navigation.
  • A solid state "charge-coupled device (CCD)" visible-light camera, also with multiple FOVs.
  • A laser target designator, possibly along with a laser spot tracker and laser rangefinder. It appears that these functions may be combined using the same subsystems, though details are unclear.
  • Miscellaneous items, such as a recorder, a GPS-INS navigation system, or terrain-following radar.
Although air forces focused on low-level strike for decades, improved air defenses have now made this dangerous. Modern targeting pods are designed to pinpoint targets from long range, using high-magnification FLIRs or CCD cameras on stabilized mounts to keep the target in the crosshairs. Another feature being implemented in modern targeting pods is GPS-INS capability, with the WSO able to download the GPS coordinates of a target obtained by the pod into a weapon before launch.


* Integral aircraft multimode radars have been used for strike targeting for decades, with modern systems often including a "synthetic aperture radar / moving target indicator (SAR/MTI)" mode that can not only provide a radar image of a target area but also identify targets that are moving on the ground faster than a specified velocity.


Traditionally, SAR/MTI could be used to pinpoint a target but not actually guide a weapon to it, as does a targeting pod. The development of GPS-guided weapons now gives the capability of pinpointing a target, obtaining its GPS coordinates, and downloading the coordinates into a GPS-guided weapon just before weapons drop. This doesn't necessarily replace a targeting pod, but it provides a useful all-weather attack capability.


SAR/MTI can also be used along with a laser targeting pod through aircraft systems integration, with the SAR/MTI cueing the pod on a target, and the pod then conducting the attack. The ultimate goal of such systems integration effort is a seamless integration of all sensors and targeting systems on the aircraft, with "sensor fusion" being performed to give the pilot a straightforward unified display of the battle area. Not very surprisingly, this has proven to be a tough job, requiring very sophisticated software.
BACK_TO_TOP

[12.2] ALD / PAVE KNIFE / TRIM / LRMTS & PAVE PENNY

* As mentioned briefly in an earlier chapter, the ancestor of laser modern laser targeting pods was the "AN/AVQ-9/9A Paveway Airborne Laser Designator" (ALD)", which was developed by Martin Marietta for the early Paveway LGBs. ALD was not a pod. It was clipped inside the cockpit of an F-4 Phantom, and the WSO used a telescopic sight ganged to a laser to perform target designation. The fact that the ALD had to be sighted out of one side of the F-4 made it difficult or impossible for an ALD-equipped Phantom to launch an LGB and designate it as well, so the ALD was strictly used for "buddy" designating for other strike aircraft. The scheme worked well in any case, and laser designation became known as "Zotting", after the anteater named "Zot" in the BC comic strip who nailed ants with his long and lethally accurate tongue.


Air Force veterans say that a Fairchild C-119 "Boxcar" cargo transport was also configured as a flying target designator platform, but the literature says little about it and it may have been an early operational test system.


* ALD led to the first laser-designation targeting pod, the Ford Aerospace "AN/AVG-10 Pave Knife", which was a 550 kilogram (1,200 pound) banana-shaped pod that could be carried on an F-4 or A-6 Intruder strike aircraft. The weapons operator watched the image using a small Sony TV fitted into the cockpit, and steered the TV camera and laser with a hand controller. The pod could be given initial target lock through the strike aircraft's gunsight. Pave Knife was a great improvement over ALD, in particular providing a self-designation capability.


A laser pod was also developed for the Rockwell OV-10A Bronco in the early 1970s, with the laser integrated into an electronics system named "Pave Spot" and the entire aircraft designated "Pave Nail". The Bronco was too small to carry LGBs on its own, but as a spotter aircraft it could designate targets for strike aircraft.


* The US Navy also got into the targeting pod business, though through a more indirect path. In 1967, they introduced into combat a sensor system designated "Trails-Roads Interdiction Multisensor (TRIM)". TRIM was intended to observe enemy movements on the ground in night or bad weather, and originally carried only low-light TV and FLIR.

TRIM was originally fitted to Lockheed AP-2H Neptune aircraft and later A-6 Intruders, where it was integrated with the A-6's digital navigation-attack system. In 1972, TRIM was modified with an updated FLIR, and the TV system was replaced with a laser designator. The TRIM target designator was used for buddy LGB designation. For reasons that are unclear, it could not be used for self-designation.

* Several strike aircraft of this era were also fitted with laser spot trackers. For example, the Harrier GR.3 "jump jet" was fitted with an extended "Snoopy nose" that carried a Ferranti "Laser Ranger & Marked Target Seeker (LRMTS)", which as its name implied also carried a laser rangefinder. The Ferranti LRMTS was also fitted to some versions of the Swedish SAAB 35 Draken fighter supplied to Denmark.



The USAF A-10 Warthog close-support aircraft is fitted with a laser spot tracker in the form of its "Pave Penny" pod, which is mounted on a pylon below the cockpit. The Pave Penny pod does not have a laser rangefinding capability.
BACK_TO_TOP

[12.2] PAVE SPIKE / PAVE TACK / TRAM / IRADS / ETC

* One of the first targeting pods in widespread use was the Westinghouse "AN/ASQ-153 Pave Spike". The US obtained 156 of them for their F-4 Phantoms between 1974 and 1979. Pave Spike was a great improvement over Pave Knife, since it was smaller and lighter, and introduced the horizon natural capability. Pave Spike's laser also could be used for rangefinding, feeding target coordinates into the F-4's weapons control computers for more precise targeting of "dumb" bombs.
A handful of simplified versions of Pave Spike, designated "AN/AVQ-23E", were provided to the British Royal Air Force for their Buccaneer strike aircraft. They would prove their worth for the RAF in the Gulf War, "spiking" laser guided bombs into targets with extreme accuracy.


Pave Knife led to another large laser targeting pod, the "AN/AVQ-26 Pave Tack", which included a laser and FLIR, plus a videotape recorder for post-strike damage intelligence. Pave Tack was originally used on F-4 Phantoms and then carried by the General Dynamics F-111 Aardvark. Pave Tack was first used by the F-111s during the airstrikes against Libya in 1986, OPERATION EL DORADO CANYON, and was later used with very great success by F-111s during the Gulf War for "tank plinking".




The above right picture is taken from the CNN Footage; And this footage definitely shows that this aircraft has some non standard equipment attached to its fuselage. It is off centered on the fuselage, between the engines. It casts its own shadows like the engines do, as well as having its own reflections, as the engines do. It is therefore neither a shadow, or a reflection, as shadows do not cast shadows, and reflections do not cast reflections of themselves. To see some slow motion clips of this footage above, click on one of the two Video links below;* The US Navy also improved its laser designation systems. By 1978, TRIM had led to a second-generation system fitted to Grumman A-6E Intruder carrier-based strike aircraft, with the designation "AN/AAS-33 Target Recognition and Attack Multisensor (TRAM)".


TRAM was not a pod. It was built into the A-6E, and was only visible as a small "thimble" turret under the nose of the aircraft that contained a FLIR and laser. TRAM was integrated into the A-6E's weapons control system and could also be used as a laser rangefinder for delivery of "dumb" bombs. Like Pave Tack, it included a videotape recorder.


TRAM was first used by A-6Es participating in OPERATION EL DORADO CANYON, and also saw extensive use in the Gulf War. In both cases, the A-6Es were mostly armed with "dumb" bombs and used TRAM as a rangefinding aid, with considerable success.






A FLIR-laser designator turret very similar to TRAM was built into the Rockwell OV-10D Bronco "Night Observation Gun Ship (NOGS)", with a new and improved turret implemented for the next generation OV-10D+.


The Lockheed-Martin F-117 Nighthawk stealth strike fighter has this functionality built into it from the ground up, with the system designated "Infra-Red Acquisition & Designation System (IRADS)". IRADS consists of a laser turret under the nose and a FLIR on top of the nose. Both devices are hidden in wells that are covered by a screen to keep the aircraft "stealthy".


* Traditionally, Soviet-Russian aircraft have featured built-in targeting systems, such as the "Klyon PS" carried by some variants of the Sukhoi Su-22 Fitter, Su-25 Frog, and Mikoyan MiG-27. This is a very unusual target designator by Western standards, since the laser isn't mounted in a turret and the pilot doesn't have either a TV display or a hand controller. It was so different, in fact, that there was a tendency at first to believe that it was a laser rangefinder or spot tracker and that reports that it was a target designator were in error. It simply didn't seem to have any of the pieces.


The laser shines through a forward window and has a limited range of travel, 12 degrees to either side, 6 degrees up and 30 degrees down. The pilot lines up the target initially in his sight, and once the is locked the laser stays locked automatically on the target under control of the aircraft's flight navigation systems.


The Klyon PS would seem to have some disadvantages. The pilot can't turn completely away from the target after release, leaving the aircraft more exposed to ground fire than an aircraft with a targeting pod. In addition, although the scheme would clearly be workable for a laser-guided missile, it is unclear how effective it would be for guiding laser-guided bombs, which being unpowered tend to lag the release aircraft. It could certainly be used to buddy-designate an LGB for another aircraft.
The Klyon PS is actually reported to be an effective targeting system, and the primary reason for this scheme was apparently less any technical obstacle than a desire for operational simplicity. It is uncomplicated to use, an important consideration in the single-seat daylight strike aircraft that carry it. A pilot would be hard-pressed to maneuver an aircraft while keeping a target lined up in the crosshairs of a display using a joystick while doing so. The F-117 Nighthawk can do this trick, but that aircraft is designed to make straight-in attacks at night, when it is almost completely invisible in most respects and has little need for evasive maneuvers, with the machine on autopilot while the pilot guides the bomb.


It is unlikely that mounting a TV camera and a laser in a turret was any great technical challenge to Soviet engineers, and apparently an external targeting pod was developed in the 1970s. It was followed by a relatively sophisticated built-in target designator, the "Kayra", that has been used on two-seat aircraft such as the Sukhoi Su-24M and Su-27K Flanker. The Russians have more recently introduced a new targeting pod for the Su-27, named the "UOMP Sapsan", with a FLIR and laser designator.
BACK_TO_TOP

[12.3] LANTIRN / NITE HAWK & ETC

* Probably the best-known targeting pod, or rather targeting pod system, is the Martin-Marietta (now Lockheed Martin) "Low Altitude Navigation and Targeting, Infrared, for Night (LANTIRN)". LANTIRN is actually a pair of pods:
  • The "AN/AAQ-13" navigation pod, which includes FLIR and radar for terrain following and mapping, plus support computing and other electronics.
  • The "AN/AAQ-14" targeting pod, with FLIR and a laser designator. A variant of this pod is sold for export under the name "Sharpshooter".
LANTIRN is carried by the F-15E Strike Eagle and the F-16C/D Viper. It was first used in the Gulf War in an operational test capacity. It is in service with at least ten nations. LANTIRN was adapted to the now-retired F-14D "Bombcat" strike fighter. The Bombcat only carried the targeting pod, but the pod was updated with a GPS-INS navigation system.




Lockheed Martin is also providing LANTIRN upgrades that add technology developed for their next-generation "Sniper" pod, discussed in the next section, and more specialized kit, under the designation of "Enhanced LANTIRN" or "LANTIRN 2000". The updates are tailored to customer need. The Danish Air Force has updated their LANTIRNs with the CCD camera, high altitude laser target designator and rangefinder, and the laser spot tracker from the Sniper. The Netherlands Air Force has obtained 20 LANTIRNs with the CCD camera and high-altitude laser designator and rangefinder.

The US Navy is updating the laser target designators of their existing LANTIRN pods, and the Air Force is likely to follow, since they have a replacement part supply problem with their existing lasers. The USAF is planning to update the LANTIRN targeting pod with a radiometer sensor and a digital recording system to provide post-strike damage intelligence. The radiometer sensor, which will take measurements in two infrared bands, is essentially a "light meter" that will help determine the effectiveness of weapons impact on a target.


* The US Navy fielded a somewhat confusing set of pods for their F/A-18C/D fighters in the 1980s. The McDonnell Douglas "AN/ASQ-173" carried a laser spot tracker, apparently like that used in the A-10's Pave Penny pod, and a strike camera, while the Hughes "AN/AAR-50" pod provided a navigation FLIR.


The most sophisticated pod was the "AN/AAS-38 Nite Hawk", where "Nite" stood for "Navigation IR Targeting Equipment". The initial AN/AAS-38 included a targeting FLIR with 4x magnification, plus a laser rangefinder. The "AN/AAS-38A" added a laser target designator, and the "AN/AAS-38B" added a laser spot tracker, eliminating the need for the AN/ASQ-173 pod.
BACK_TO_TOP

[12.4] SNIPER / ISRAELI LITENING / ATFLIR / ATP

* As mentioned above, in the mid-1990s, Lockheed Martin developed a targeting pod named "Sniper" as a follow-on to LANTIRN. Sniper includes a set of updated and new electronic systems:
  • An updated diode-pumped laser target designator with greater reliability. Arcing problems prevent the LANTIRN laser from being operated at altitudes greater than 7,600 meters (25,000 feet), but the Sniper laser can be operated at up to 12,200 meters (40,000 feet). The pilot can select an eye-safe alternate laser for training scenarios.
  • A third-generation FLIR imager with greater resolution, sensitivity, and reliability than the FLIR imager used on LANTIRN. The FLIR is built around a 640 x 512 pixel solid-state infrared array and has three FOVs: wide (3.6 x 3.6 degrees), narrow (1 x 1 degree), and digitally expanded (0.5 x 0.5 degree). It also has a 4x continuous zoom, "continuous" in this sense meaning that it can take on any zoom value from 1 to 4 instead of discrete steps of, say, 1, 2, 3, or 4.
  • Improved stabilization systems, also required for high-altitude release to make sure the crosshairs can be kept on the distant target.
  • An up-to-date computer system.
  • A laser spot tracker and a night vision goggle (NVG) compatible laser marker.
  • An automatic target recognition system.
  • A 659 x 494 pixel CCD TV imager with two fields of view and 4x continuous zoom.
The long-range capabilities of the Sniper are so impressive that it outranges traditional short-wing LGBs. At 175 kilograms (387 pounds), Sniper is smaller than the 257 kilogram (567 pound) LANTIRN AN/AAQ-14 targeting pod. Sniper has a distinctive wedge-shaped nose with a synthetic sapphire window assembly. The wedge shape provides better aerodynamics when mounted near a fighter's engine inlet, and is less observable to radar. The sapphire windows are much more resistant to scratching or cracking, capable of surviving intact when struck by a rock at a few hundred KPH. Sapphire is also highly transparent in the visible and infrared light ranges.





Sniper has a modular design with half the parts count of the AN/AAQ-14. It is designed to be easily maintained, does not require specialized tools for disassembly, and has a "self boresighting" system to ensure alignment of the targeting laser and the sensor systems. Sniper is being sold on the export market under the name "Pantera". Sniper subsystems are also being rearranged and incorporated into the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, as well as in the "AN/AAQ-30 Hawkeye Target Sight System (TSS)" for the US Marines' AH-1Z Cobra helicopter gunship.


* Rafael of Israel has developed a targeting pod known as "Litening", beginning work on the program in the mid-1980s and introducing the pod in 1993. The Litening pod is sold by Northrop Grumman in the US.
The Litening II, which initially entered service with Israel in 1997, is a compact unit, with a length of 2.21 meters (7 feet 4 inches), a diameter of 40.6 centimeters (3 feet 5 inches), and a weight of 200 kilograms (440 pounds). It includes:
  • A third-generation FLIR with three levels of zoom.
  • Two optical CCD imagers, one with a narrow field of view and the other with a wide field of view.
  • A laser spot tracker.
  • A laser target designator and rangefinder, capable of operating at 12,200 meters (40,000 feet). The laser is designed so that its target-marking "spot" is visible to anyone wearing night-vision goggles, and so another strike aircraft does not need a laser spot tracker to home in on the target.
  • INS subsystems for image stabilization and boresighting to the aircraft.
  • A self-contained environmental control unit.
The new "Litening ER (Extended Range)" variant is similar to the Litening II, except for a FLIR with twice the resolution. A newer version designated the "Litening AT (Advanced Targeting)" was introduced in 2003 and featured further increased resolution, improved targeting accuracy, compatibility with GPS guided munitions, and multitarget cueing. Rafael has mentioned that they are also developing an emitter-location system for the Litening that will allow it to target GPS jammers for destruction.
Foreign customer for the Litening include:
  • Germany, for use on the Tornado;
  • Greece, for McDonnell Douglas F-4E Phantom strike aircraft.
  • India, for use on the Mig-27, Jaguar, and Mirage 2000.
  • Romania has apparently integrated the Litening II with their MiG-21 Lancer fighter upgrade.
  • Spain, with 25 ordered for the Spanish Air Force's F/A-18C/D Hornets.
  • The US Air Force, for Reserve and Air National Guard F-16s, which lacked a targeting capability. The USAF wanted to buy off-the-shelf targeting pods to provide such a capability, and Northrop Grumman has supplied over a hundred Litening IIs and Litening ATs, with initial deliveries in 1998.
  • The US Marine Corps, for use with their Harrier II jump-jet strike aircraft (Litening ER pods) and F/A-18 fighters (Litening AT) pods, with 120 obtained as of 2005. The Italians leveraged off the evaluation for the Harrier II and bought four pods for their Harrier IIs, while the Spanish Navy bought two for their jump-jets. The other user of the Harrier II, the British, apparently have been interested in acquiring Litening II pods but haven't done so yet.
  • Venezuala, for use on the F-16.
Sweden has also evaluated the Litening II for the SAAB 39 Gripen fighter and selected it as the standard pod for export Gripens. Chile is believed to have obtained the pod for its Northrop F-5s.


US Litening pods have seen combat action. USAF Reserve pilots used the pod, which is mounted under the right side of the F-16's engine inlet, to locate and attack Iraqi air-defense elements during actions over Iraq in May and June 2000. The pod also served during the US intervention in Afghanistan in 2001:2002.


The Litening II proved more useful for daylight missions than the older LANTIRN pod, which does not have an optical imager. F-16 pilots using Litening II pods could search an area with the wide-field imager, and then zoom in on a target with the narrow-field imager. The Reserve found the new pods extremely reliable in field operations, with about twice the mean time between failure (MTBF) of the older LANTIRN pods.


Litening-ER pods used on USMC Harriers provided excellent service during the US invasion of Iraq in the spring of 2003, being used for reconnaissance as well as targeting,


* Raytheon has developed new targeting pod, the "AN/ASQ-228 Advanced Technology FLIR (ATFLIR)", to replace the Nite Hawk pod on the Hornet and the new F/A-18E/F Super Hornet fighters. ATFLIR includes a much more capable FLIR than the Nite Hawk, providing greater stability, resolution, and 30x magnification; improved laser rangefinder and target designator; a CCD TV camera for daylight targeting; and a high-rate datalink system.
ATFLIR is regarded as having from three to five times more range than the Nite Hawk. It can also provide GPS coordinates for GPS-guided bombs, and the Navy plans to add air-to-air modes later. Testing was completed in 2003 and the pod is now in production. The Navy hopes to obtain 574 ATFLIRS in all.


* The USAF conducted an "Advanced Technology Pod (ATP)" competition to replace LANTIRN, with an order of 522 pods for F-16s and F-15Es to go to the winner. Lockheed Martin's Sniper pod won the competition in August 2001, with initial deliveries in 2003. During fighting with Iraqi insurgents after the occupation of that country, the Air Force found that the Litening AT and Sniper XR pods were a very valuable asset. They not only supported precision attacks on ground targets, but provided an extremely useful surveillance and reconnaissance capability to help keep an eye on what was going on down on the ground. The USAF believes the Sniper XR will be the last external targeting pod obtained by the service, since aircraft in the procurement pipeline have built-in targeting systems.

BACK_TO_TOP

[12.5] FRENCH ATLIS, PDLCT, DAMOCLES / BRITISH TIALD

* The first French targeting pod was the "Automatic Tracking and Laser Integration System (ATLIS)", which was built by Thomson-CSF using subsystems supplied by Martin Marietta. ATLIS began tests in 1976:77, and entered production as the smaller and lighter ATLIS II in 1980, with the SEPECAT Jaguar as the initial carrier aircraft.

ATLIS consists of a TV system with a boresighted laser. Since ATLIS is carried by single-seat strike aircraft Jaguars, it has an interesting automatic target lock capability, allowing the pilot to launch a weapon and then go back to flying the aircraft. Once the pilot gets the target in the crosshairs and then launches the weapon, ATLIS automatically keeps the laser beam locked on the target without further operator intervention, using some type of pattern-matching or edge-detection techniques. An INS keeps the laser on target even if clouds disrupt the pattern while the weapon is on the way to the target.

ATLIS is mounted on French attack aircraft such as Mirage F1, and Mirage 2000, and was mounted on the now-retired Jaguar. The most familiar laser-designated store for these aircraft is the AS-30L laser-guided ASM, though French SAMP LGBs can be also be designated. The Iraqis even used ATLIS on the Mirage F1 to designate for Soviet-Russian Kh-29L (AS-14 Kedge) ASMs. Interestingly, the ATLIS targeting pod has been used with Pakistani F-16s for use with the AS-30L and other laser-guided munitions, and ATLIS has been used with Thai F-16s as well.


* The French have developed a more advanced targeting pod, the Thomson-CSF "Pod de Designation Laser a Camera Thermique (PDLCT / Laser Designation Pod With Infrared Camera)". As its name suggests, it provides both television and thermal infrared target imaging and laser designation. It is used on Armee de l'Air Mirage 2000s.

Thales (as Thomson-CSF has been renamed) has also introduced their third-generation targeting pod, known as the "Damocles". It includes the latest FLIR technology, providing higher resolution and sensitivity; improved laser target designator and rangefinder; and two viewing modes, including a wide-angle mode of 4 x 3 degrees and a narrow viewing mode of 1 x 0.5 degrees. It does not appear to have a TV camera.


Damocles is designed to be more rugged and easier to maintain than its predecessors. It is now going into service with French Mirage 2000s, Super Etendard, and the new Dassault Rafale. Thales is also promoting an export version, the "Shehab".

* The British developed a targeting pod, the GEC-Marconi "Thermal Imaging Airborne Laser Designator (TIALD)", for use with RAF Tornado strike aircraft. TIALD was combat-tested in prototype form during the Gulf War and produced in small numbers. It contains a television imager, a FLIR imager, and a laser all operating through common optics in a rotating-swiveling head.


TIALD has a number of interesting operating modes. At long range, it can be slaved to the Tornado's air-to-ground radar to lock onto the target, and then the weapons operator can choose between a wide or narrow field of view image. The narrow field mode has 2X and 4X magnification capability. TIALD has "auto-tracking" capabilities to keep the laser beam locked on a designated target, and also contains a profile in ROM to allow it to recognize when the laser is being blocked by parts of the carrier aircraft.
BACK_TO_TOP


Spoiler:
It is interesting to note, that while we can't be for certain exactly what this extra additional equipment is, apart from a formal criminal investigation, there are other aircraft which have similar configurations as the one seen in the above pictures and video. But they are not civilian airliners. They are Military planes. Below is a picture of an E8-C with a J-Stars attached to its fuselage.





It is obvious after a closer look at all the news networks own footage from the day, that there is an extra piece of hardware, which has been added onto the fuselage, and which doesn't belong. It can also be assumed that whomever placed this there would have wanted to camoflage it as good as possible. Thus the pod has been placed over the wing root, off centered on the right hand side, just forward of the gear well door, to help avoid detection. Now as we go into further study of all the strange feats of the aircraft prior to impact, I would like to point out here that this alone is enough to warrant a complete investigation into 911 and what really happened. As we previously stated, there is no chance that a plane with such a large extra piece of equipment mounted to its fuselage, could ever have taken off from Bostons Logan International that morning.

Thus we have a problem. This couldn't be Flight 175. And it certainly doesn't take an expert to come to this conclusion, as it is in plain sight. The questions that this raises are manifold. Where did Flight 175 really end up, if not at the 2nd World Trade Center? And where did this extra plane, with all this extra military type hardware come from? I would love to supply you with the answers to those questions, but the simple truth is, I don't know what happened to Flight 175, or the people. And no matter how hard we dig, we probably can never know, apart from a formal investigation, which starts with arrests and indictments, and ends with answers.

The people who committed this horrible tragedy are still in power, and it is certain they cannot be trusted with the reigns of power while they be investigated. The evidence presented thus far is enough to send the entire administration, and all their respective Cabinet members to Guantanamo for 1000 lifetimes. And we have barely scratched the surface of this terrible days events. There is no way George Tenet and all senior CIA Staff didn't know about this 'look-a-like' flight 175. The same applies with all Federal agencies, as well as the entire Bush Cabinet.

And it is obvious by now, after having only just begun, that 19 Arabs with Box - Cutters, had nothing to do with this pod on the bottom of the aircraft. And we can safely rule out this being a civilian airliner. Thus we are stuck with this being some sort of U.S. Military plane, by process of elimination. Since it is on a 'Suicide Mission' we can be certain it is a Military drone, most likely a radio controlled plane, with several layers of redundant systems for pinpoint guidance insurance. What type of aircraft it is, really isn't that important, although it would be nice to know, so as to be one step closer to getting all the criminals who did this. What is important, is these manifold evidences prove beyond a doubt, that this plane couldn't have been Flight 175.

Now as we continue with the odyssey of Flight 175 you will be exposed to all of the other feats of this famed flight. Before impact, a large laser light spot appears from nowhere onto the left side of the World Trade Center, and as the plane gets closer, the laser light moves across the building about 70% across, and then the plane hits just beneath it. It then dances onto the fireball, then onto a buildings face more than a mile away in an instant!

E-8C JOINT STARS




Download
Fact Sheet Tools Printable Fact Sheet Video



E-8C JOINT STARS

Original Link:
http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=100

Mission
The E-8C Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System, or Joint STARS, is an airborne battle management, command and control, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platform. Its primary mission is to provide theater ground and air commanders with ground surveillance to support attack operations and targeting that contributes to the delay, disruption and destruction of enemy forces.

Features
The E-8C is a modified Boeing 707-300 series commercial airframe extensively remanufactured and modified with the radar, communications, operations and control subsystems required to perform its operational mission. The most prominent external feature is the 27-foot (8 meters) long, canoe-shaped radome under the forward fuselage that houses the 24-foot (7.3 meters) long, side-looking phased array antenna.

The radar and computer subsystems on the E-8C can gather and display detailed battlefield information on ground forces. The information is relayed in near-real time to the Army and Marine Corps common ground stations and to other ground command, control, communications, computers and intelligence, or C4I, nodes.

The antenna can be tilted to either side of the aircraft where it can develop a 120-degree field of view covering nearly 19,305 square miles (50,000 square kilometers) and is capable of detecting targets at more than 250 kilometers (more than 820,000 feet). The radar also has some limited capability to detect helicopters, rotating antennas and low, slow-moving fixed wing aircraft.

As a battle management and command and control asset, the E-8C can support the full spectrum of roles and missions from peacekeeping operations to major theater war.

Background
Joint STARS evolved from Army and Air Force programs to develop, detect, locate and attack enemy armor at ranges beyond the forward area of troops. The first two developmental aircraft deployed in 1991 to Operation Desert Storm and also supported Operation Joint Endeavor in December 1995.

Joint STARS supported NATO troops over Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1996, Operation Allied Force from February to June 1999, and Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003.

The 116th Air Control Wing is America's first "Total Force" wing. The former 93rd Air Control Wing, an active-duty Air Combat Command unit, and 116th Bomb Wing, a Georgia Air National Guard unit, were deactivated Oct.1, 2002. The 116th Air Control Wing was activated blending Guard and active-duty Airmen into a single unit.

The 116th ACW is the only unit that operates the E-8C and the Joint STARS mission. The 17th and final E-8C aircraft was delivered on March 23, 2005.

General Characteristics:
Primary Function: Airborne battle management
Contractor: Northrop Grumman Corp. (primary)
Power Plant: Four Pratt and Whitney TF33-102C
Thrust: 19,200 pounds each engine
Wingspan: 145 feet, 9 inches (44.4 meters)
Length: 152 feet, 11 inches (46.6 meters)
Height: 42 feet 6 inches (13 meters)
Weight: 171,000 pounds (77,564 kilograms)
Maximum Takeoff Weight: 336,000 pounds (152,409 kilograms)
Fuel Capacity: 155,000 (70,306 kilograms)
Payload: electronic equipment and crew
Speed: 449 - 587 miles per hour (optimum orbit speed) or Mach 0.52 - 0.65 (390 - 510 knots)
Range: 9 hours
Ceiling:
42,000 feet (12,802 meters)
Crew: (flight crew), four; (mission crew) normally 15 Air Force and three Army specialists
Unit Cost: $244.4 million (fiscal 98 constant dollars)
Initial operating capability: December 1997
Inventory: Total Force wing, 17; Reserve, 0

Point of Contact
Air Combat Command, Public Affairs Office; 130 Andrews St., Suite 202; Langley AFB, VA 23665-1987; DSN 574-5007 or

e-mail: accpa.operations@langley.af.mil

September 2007




Story Credits: Jack - Locutus, Henrik Melvang, Phil Jayhan, Rob Rice

Story Research & Support: Hdhntr, Locutus, HiddenAgenda, The_Editor

the_editor just made this video of the Cameraplanet laser video for 'LetsRoll911.org' named "Laser.html"



Radio Shows - Jim Fetzer & The Real Deal:
Death Certificate #0001:
The Hollow Towers & Pre-Demolition of WTC:
Flight 11 Frauds:
Flight 175 Frauds:
Flight 77 Frauds:
Flight 93 Frauds:
The 911 Jumper Frauds:
North Tower Frauds:
Media Complicity and Fraud:
Media 9/11 Memorial Frauds:
The 9/11 Memorial Wall:
9/11 & WTC Corporate Fraud:
Pending Research Requests from Lets Roll Members:
MISC: Great Research Links on this Material above:
Former Stickies for the Hussled Masses:
|
Phil Jayhan is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Phil Jayhan For This Useful Post:
Old 7 Sep 2004 , 14:10 PM   #2
hdhntr
Privileged
 
Join Date: 27 May 2004
Posts: 5,369
Threads: 135
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
hdhntr is on a distinguished road
HO-LY SHIT!!!!

Adding now, to the appropriate place in the Tanker Topic...
hdhntr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 Sep 2004 , 14:21 PM   #3
imploder
Academic
 
Join Date: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 738
Threads: 68
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
imploder is on a distinguished road
WHOOOOH!! Utterly incredible. I'm speachless. Brilliant work there editor. Truly amazing stuff. That laser spot is unmistakeable.
imploder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 Sep 2004 , 14:21 PM   #4
Phil Jayhan
Admin
 
Phil Jayhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 23 Feb 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 22,824
Threads: 2784
Blog Entries: 28
Thanked 7,881 Times in 2,899 Posts
Phil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond repute
ya, isn't it great work HH?

Clean crisp and well, and a fricking "laser"....

We have two more showing the laser that we will eventually have in the Evidence locker. as soon as they get edited and slown down; 3 videos total thus far, with two known sources; Hlava Pavel, and either Camerplanet or MSNBC, whoever it is that shot that footage we saw above, as MSNBC also plays this same laser video, but runs it with the MSNBC logo.

This will be presented along our 'chain of evidence' and for everyone who doesn't notice, in the video the laser beam actually jumps to the right of the plane after impact and ends up on the red fireball, then darts 4-5 blocks to the right and ends up 'painting' that smaller, shorter building in the foreground.

What we have here is a right handed person, aiming a laser targeting rifle at the WTC, when the plane enters the building, he brings his body back and starts to rest the rifle, still ON. This is where the laser ends up on the fireball. He then takes another second or two and takes in his handy work and further rests his rifle, and this is where the laser jumps across 4 blocks or so and ends up on the face of that shorter brown building.

Quite compelling.

cheers-
phil jayhan
Phil Jayhan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 Sep 2004 , 14:25 PM   #5
hdhntr
Privileged
 
Join Date: 27 May 2004
Posts: 5,369
Threads: 135
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
hdhntr is on a distinguished road
I need something corroborative on this. Another clip, and image or two. Anything.

By itself, people might say it's a big piece of floating something or other.

Could it be that...?

I just looked at it a couple of times, and it's making me nervous, as I just included it, without much thought, into the Tanker and War Games' topics.

Help?
hdhntr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 Sep 2004 , 14:28 PM   #6
Locutus
Privileged
 
Join Date: 12 May 2004
Posts: 3,297
Threads: 317
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Locutus is on a distinguished road
Watch 911 IPS carefully...it is in there all over the place....and its not a piece of paper, unless there is paper that can turn itself off and on like a fricking lightbulb.
Locutus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 Sep 2004 , 14:30 PM   #7
Phil Jayhan
Admin
 
Phil Jayhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 23 Feb 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 22,824
Threads: 2784
Blog Entries: 28
Thanked 7,881 Times in 2,899 Posts
Phil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Jayhan
ya, isn't it great work HH?

Clean crisp and well, and a fricking "laser"....

We have two more showing the laser that we will eventually have in the Evidence locker. as soon as they get edited and slown down; 3 videos total thus far, with two known sources; Hlava Pavel, and either Camerplanet or MSNBC, whoever it is that shot that footage we saw above, as MSNBC also plays this same laser video, but runs it with the MSNBC logo.

This will be presented along our 'chain of evidence' and for everyone who doesn't notice, in the video the laser beam actually jumps to the right of the plane after impact and ends up on the red fireball, then darts 4-5 blocks to the right and ends up 'painting' that smaller, shorter building in the foreground.

What we have here is a right handed person, aiming a laser targeting rifle at the WTC, when the plane enters the building, he brings his body back and starts to rest the rifle, still ON. This is where the laser ends up on the fireball. He then takes another second or two and takes in his handy work and further rests his rifle, and this is where the laser jumps across 4 blocks or so and ends up on the face of that shorter brown building.

Quite compelling.

cheers-
phil jayhan
Read this above and watch again a few times. And HH, trust me here will ya? More video to come, and this shows up on the Hlava Pavel video as well; Hell, look at the New York Times picture of the '767' right on top of the building, but not yet hitting it; There's a GIANT FRICKING perfectly round laser light on the side of the building, right in front of the plane;



Hey guys, whats that big GIANT WHITE ROUND LIGHT right in front of the plane? The FRICKING LASER!

cheers-
Phil


All laser reference are always said like Dr. Evil....
Phil Jayhan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 Sep 2004 , 14:31 PM   #8
hdhntr
Privileged
 
Join Date: 27 May 2004
Posts: 5,369
Threads: 135
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
hdhntr is on a distinguished road
It's cool!

I just posted this quote from phil, accompanying it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Jayhan
ya, isn't it great HH?

Clean crisp and well, and a fricking "laser"....

We have two more showing the laser that we will eventually have in the Evidence locker. as soon as they get edited and slown down; 3 videos total thus far, with two known sources; Hlava Pavel, and either Camerplanet or MSNBC, whoever it is that shot that footage we saw above, as MSNBC also plays this same laser video, but runs it with the MSNBC logo.

This will be presented along our 'chain of evidence' and for everyone who doesn't notice, in the video the laser beam actually jumps to the right of the plane after impact and ends up on the red fireball, then darts 4-5 blocks to the right and ends up 'painting' that smaller, shorter building in the foreground.

What we have here is a right handed person, aiming a laser targeting rifle at the WTC, when the plane enters the building, he brings his body back and starts to rest the rifle, still ON. This is where the laser ends up on the fireball. He then takes another second or two and takes in his handy work and further rests his rifle, and this is where the laser jumps across 4 blocks or so and ends up on the face of that shorter brown building.

Quite compelling.

cheers-
phil jayhan
hdhntr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 Sep 2004 , 14:40 PM   #9
godhelpus
Reader
 
Join Date: 31 Jul 2004
Posts: 33
Threads: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
godhelpus is on a distinguished road
okay on the original plane_hits_south_tower.mov 38mb, go to +00:05:36;28

and look above the fire on the left hand side, of the south tower, where the plane hit.

now watch til the screen goes black

you should see what i believe is more paper/debris
__________________
don't believe everything you hear in this world, as everyone is out to screw you.

trust only your mother and father.
godhelpus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 Sep 2004 , 14:46 PM   #10
Phil Jayhan
Admin
 
Phil Jayhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 23 Feb 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 22,824
Threads: 2784
Blog Entries: 28
Thanked 7,881 Times in 2,899 Posts
Phil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond reputePhil Jayhan has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by godhelpus
okay on the original plane_hits_south_tower.mov 38mb, go to +00:05:36;28

and look above the fire on the left hand side, of the south tower, where the plane hit.

now watch til the screen goes black

you should see what i believe is more paper/debris
helpus,

No, watch the laser. It disappears for a brief nanosecond after impact, then ends up on the fireball, and is clearly visible on the fireball;

1:11:08 laser on fireball

1:14:08 that same laser finds a good distance away, on that brown building which is shorter in the foreground.


Cheers-
Phil
Phil Jayhan is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Let's Roll Forums > The U.S. Government Conspiracy of 9/11 > 911 For the Tired, Weary, Hustled Masses


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger