"TEMPORAL COADJUTOR" Alex Jones Exposed - Page 3

**chocolate** · 19 Oct 2007 , 13:33 PM

Maybe Alex is right.

Phil Jayhan · 22 Oct 2007 , 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chocolate

Maybe Alex is right.

Ya, and maybe by the end of the month, all the girls at drive through windows will be bare breasted and handing out 100 dollar bills with every meal deal while singing "America the Beautiful..."

Better chance with all of this than your "theory."

cheers-
phil

**trueblue** · 22 Oct 2007 , 03:11 AM

I finally checked out the video; can;t figure out what he;s trying to say, except that he's NOT a government agent!

Maybe the problem is that people think of the Vatican as religious, and are oblivious to the number of highly placed Catholics woven throughout not only our political and business ugliness, but all over the globe.

When I have time, I will put together just a small list of influential "movers and shakers" who just happen to be very cozy with the Vatican, such as Rupert Murdock.
And I think people still don't get it that the Rothshild's climb to the pinnacle of wealth was hand in hand with the Vatican. Which came first, the Vatican's wealth, or the Rothschild's?

Phil Jayhan · 25 Oct 2007 , 20:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trueblue

I finally checked out the video; can;t figure out what he;s trying to say, except that he's NOT a government agent!

Maybe the problem is that people think of the Vatican as religious, and are oblivious to the number of highly placed Catholics woven throughout not only our political and business ugliness, but all over the globe.

When I have time, I will put together just a small list of influential "movers and shakers" who just happen to be very cozy with the Vatican, such as Rupert Murdock.
And I think people still don't get it that the Rothshild's climb to the pinnacle of wealth was hand in hand with the Vatican. Which came first, the Vatican's wealth, or the Rothschild's?

TB,

It also appears that he is "Protesting just a tad too much..." Doesn't it? I mean someone calls up and makes kind of a gentle, humble remark which he doesn't like, and then goes off on a 25 minute tirade, telling us 81 reasons why he isn't a plant. I think the video, although crude, is kind of effective to a point. And it at least gives us a better idea on who Jones works for, and who's paying for the 50 PAY RADIO stations and 150 hours of DAILY AIRTIME that he has. He sure as hell isn't paying those bills with DVD sales and subscriptions to his website.

And I had to laugh about him whining and pissing and moaning about people saying things on websites which aren't true about him, when this Joker is the guy who took my name, HOME PHONE NUMBER and accusations of me being a FEMA agent on his website just a few hours after my first interview with him. What a crock of crap Alex Jones is. And a big fat hypocrite as well.

cheers-
phil

At least that video gives us a better idea on who is paying for his huge PAY RADIO bills as well as his Shortwave costs.

bgfawcett · 7 Dec 2007 , 11:58 AM

Did anyone else notice this?

"I came across this website, spirituallysmart.com..."

And all he does is ask Jones whether he's Operation Mockingbird. He doesn't mention the Jesuits at all- just spirituallysmart.com. Yet Jones points out that he's criticized the Pope and the Vatican mentions he's only been in a Catholic church once etc. to rebut the caller...again, the caller didn't ask him if he was a Jesuit or working for the Vatican etc. Of course, spirituallysmart.com DOES accuse him of being a Jesuit Coadjutor. Does this indicate he's familiar with spirituallysmart?

Of course, he also denies being a Scientologist, so maybe he's just going through the list of accusations. (shrug)

I'd love to really hear a good debate between Alex Jones and Eric Jon Phelps (who seems to me to be the only person on the planet with a better memory than him

) and see how Jones tries to squirm his way out of the facts. Of course, Phelps is much more gentle and..well, Christian than Jones, and he'd probably be drowned out by his rantings.

**letsheepledie** · 31 Jan 2008 , 12:27 PM

yes attack those who put out info that nobody else has or was doing....

Phil Jayhan · 31 Jan 2008 , 16:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by letsheepledie

yes attack those who put out info that nobody else has or was doing....

Alex Jones kind of brings this upon himself, by his shady & unscrupulous, unethical practices. Like taking other 911 peoples phone numbers and home address's and placing them on the front page of his website, prisonplanet falsely accusing them of being FEMA agents. Encouraging all the psycho weirdo's to harass the crap out of me. And it worked rather well. Do you think this is proper behavior? Is this not Alex Jones attacking others, and in such a way which is unparalleled in 911? To actually take someones home address and phone number and to place this on the front page of prisonplanet? Tell us what you think of such behavior, would you please?

do you think it is proper behavior of a 911 activist to take someone else's phone # and place it on the web? Because thats what Alex Jones did to me, and hasn't ever done a single thing to correct is grave error!!!

People who do such things bring this sort of stuff upon themselves. And this is the least of his issues. Do you think that doing such things is ok? And approve? Enquiring minds wanna know.

I personally think it is unforgivable. Or do you think things like that are "not attacking people?"

Cheers-
Phil

**Chris_Morganti** · 1 Feb 2008 , 07:04 AM

I have an idea Phil, I listen to AJ's show all the time, and I know a way you could contact him.

Ring into his show and say you strongly disagree with him, he will (at least he says) put you to the front of the line.

And when you get a chance to talk, say here is what I disagree with, why did you put my phone number and address on prisonplanet?

Ask him politely of course, and ask him to explain and say you would like to settle this between you two and ask him to explain it and talk to you about it, ask him if you could contact him some how.

It's worth a try, try talking to him.

**LiveFreeOrDieTryin** · 1 Feb 2008 , 08:52 AM

The petty idiotic comments throughout the video are very telling. Lame.

**Ducati 749** · 1 Feb 2008 , 20:44 PM

And that is all that I have to say about that... <said like Forrest Gump>

22 Oct 2007 , 03:11 AM	#23
trueblue Moderator Join Date: 9 Feb 2005 Location: United States Posts: 4,080 Threads: 116 Blog Entries: 3 Thanked 109 Times in 73 Posts	I finally checked out the video; can;t figure out what he;s trying to say, except that he's NOT a government agent! Maybe the problem is that people think of the Vatican as religious, and are oblivious to the number of highly placed Catholics woven throughout not only our political and business ugliness, but all over the globe. When I have time, I will put together just a small list of influential "movers and shakers" who just happen to be very cozy with the Vatican, such as Rupert Murdock. And I think people still don't get it that the Rothshild's climb to the pinnacle of wealth was hand in hand with the Vatican. Which came first, the Vatican's wealth, or the Rothschild's? __________________ A LIE BELIEVED BY EVERYBODY IS NOT THE TRUTH

7 Dec 2007 , 11:58 AM	#25
bgfawcett Privileged Join Date: 26 Aug 2005 Location: Alberta, Canada Posts: 180 Threads: 41 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Did anyone else notice this? "I came across this website, spirituallysmart.com..." And all he does is ask Jones whether he's Operation Mockingbird. He doesn't mention the Jesuits at all- just spirituallysmart.com. Yet Jones points out that he's criticized the Pope and the Vatican mentions he's only been in a Catholic church once etc. to rebut the caller...again, the caller didn't ask him if he was a Jesuit or working for the Vatican etc. Of course, spirituallysmart.com DOES accuse him of being a Jesuit Coadjutor. Does this indicate he's familiar with spirituallysmart? Of course, he also denies being a Scientologist, so maybe he's just going through the list of accusations. (shrug) I'd love to really hear a good debate between Alex Jones and Eric Jon Phelps (who seems to me to be the only person on the planet with a better memory than him ) and see how Jones tries to squirm his way out of the facts. Of course, Phelps is much more gentle and..well, Christian than Jones, and he'd probably be drowned out by his rantings. __________________ In Christ, and for the Gospel of the Kingdom, Brett

1 Feb 2008 , 07:04 AM	#28
Chris_Morganti Moderator Join Date: 10 Oct 2004 Location: Australia Posts: 1,662 Threads: 186 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts	I have an idea Phil, I listen to AJ's show all the time, and I know a way you could contact him. Ring into his show and say you strongly disagree with him, he will (at least he says) put you to the front of the line. And when you get a chance to talk, say here is what I disagree with, why did you put my phone number and address on prisonplanet? Ask him politely of course, and ask him to explain and say you would like to settle this between you two and ask him to explain it and talk to you about it, ask him if you could contact him some how. It's worth a try, try talking to him. __________________ Founding Member, WeAreChange Western Australia http://wearechangewa.com/

1 Feb 2008 , 08:52 AM	#29
LiveFreeOrDieTryin Thinker Join Date: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 228 Threads: 16 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	The petty idiotic comments throughout the video are very telling. Lame. __________________

1 Feb 2008 , 20:44 PM	#30
Ducati 749 Moderator Join Date: 19 May 2004 Location: Arizona Posts: 1,059 Threads: 126 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	And that is all that I have to say about that... <said like Forrest Gump> __________________ So much poison in power, the principals get left out. So much mind on the matter, the spirit gets forgotten about. Grand Designs - Rush

19 Oct 2007 , 13:33 PM	#21
chocolate Reader Join Date: 19 Oct 2007 Posts: 4 Threads: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Maybe Alex is right.

31 Jan 2008 , 12:27 PM	#26
letsheepledie Reader Join Date: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 3 Threads: 1 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	yes attack those who put out info that nobody else has or was doing....