Phil Jayhan

I received this link from Kelly in chat, and its a good one! A good basic understanding and timeline of this technology;

Cheers-
Phil

_________________________


Raven1 ALPHA index
Raven1 SUBJECT index

Timeline: Electromagnetic Weapons

by Judy Wall, Editor, Resonance Newsletter

Electromagnetic (EM) weapons are of recent invention. They utilize the various frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum to disable or kill the target.

Psychotronic weapons are those EM weapons that interact with the nervous system of the target. These weapons usually operate in the very low (100 to 1,000 Hz) or extremely low (greater than zero but less than 100 Hz) frequency ranges. [See note by Eleanor White at end of this document.]

Today a new type of weapon is being touted, the "non-lethal" weapon. The idea behind this is to spare human life without actually losing the war. These weapons are also earmarked for use in civil disorders in which the goal is simply crowd control rather than annihilation. Some EM weapons fall in this category. However, even though these weapons are labelled "non-lethal" does not mean that they are not harmful, or cannot be lethal under certain conditions.

Paul Bartch mentioned in his letter "Non-Hertzian Waves ...", written in 1992, that there was nothing mentioned in the report on non-lethal weapons about the Low Frequency EM weapons. Small wonder. The government has been keeping these weapons to itself in top secrecy classification. Only recently have they been brought into the public spotlight.

The following is an overview of the development of electromagnetic research as relevant to weapons, as best we are able to put together, considering the cloak of secrecy that surrounds these weapons.

ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS TIMELINE

1934 "A method for Remote Control of Electrical Stimulation of the
Nervous System", a monograph by Drs. E. L. Chaffee and R. U. Light

1934 Experiments in Distant Influence, book by Soviet
Professor Leonid L. Vasiliev

Vasiliev also wrote an article, "Critical Evaluation of the Hypogenic
Method" concerning the work of Dr. I. F. Tomashevsky on experiments in
remote control of the brain.

1945 After World War II, the Allies discovered the Japanese had been
been developing a "death ray" utilizing very short radio waves focussed
into a high power beam. Tests were done on animals. The Japanese denied
ever testing it on humans. (From the Strategic Bombing Survey,
Imperial War Museum, London. Cited with photocopies in "Japanese Death
Ray", by Peter Lewis, Resonance #11, pp 5-9)

1950 The French conducted research on infrasonic weapons. (From
"The Road From Armageddon", by Peter Lewis, Resonance #13,
pp 9-14)

1953 John C. Lilly, when asked by the director of the National
Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) to brief the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), National Security
Agency (NSA), and the various military intelligence services on his work
using electrodes to stimulate directly the pleasure and pain centers in
the brain, refused.

He said, "Dr. Antione Redmond, using our techniques in Paris, has
demonstrated that this method of stimulation on the brain can be applied
to the human without help of the neurosurgeon ... This means that anybody
with the proper apparatus can carry this out covertly, with no
external signs that electrodes have been used in that person. I feel that
if this technique got into the hands of a secret agency, they would have
total control over a human being and be able to change his beliefs
extremely quickly, leaving little evidence of what they had done." (From
"Mind Control and the American Government", by Martin Cannon in Lobster
#23, pp 2-10. Cannon quites Lilly from his book, The Scientist,
Berkeley, Ronin publishers, 1988, also Bantam Books 1981. Research by
Peter Lewis.)

After a statement like that of Dr. Lilly's, how long do you think it would
take the agencies, FBI, CIA, NSA, etc. to contact Dr. Redmond in Paris?

1958, 1962 The U.S. conducts high-altitude Electromagnetic Pulse
(EMP) bomb tests over the Pacific. (From "The Road From Armageddon" by
Peter Lewis.)

1960 Headlines read "Khrushchev Says Soviets Will Cut Forces a Third;
Sees 'Fantastic Weapon' ". (From article of same title, by Max Frankel,
New York Times, Jan. 15, 1960, p 1 as cited in "Tesla's Electro-
magnetics and Its Soviet Weaponization", paper by T. E. Bearden.)

1965 A "Death Ray" weapon was developed by McFarlane Corporation,
described as a modulated electron gun X-ray nuclear booster, could be
adapted to communications, remote control and guidance systems, EM
radiation telemetry and death ray. McFarlane claimed NASA stole the
patent in 1965. Reported hearings before the House Subcommittee on
Department of Defense Appropriations, chaired by Rep. George Mahon (Dem. -
Texas). (From "Hearing Voices" by Alex Constantine, Hustler, Jan.
1994, pp 102-104, 113, 120, 134. Research by Harlan Girard.)

1965 "A project in the U.S. called Project Pandora ... was undertaken
in which chimpanzees were exposed to microwave radiation. The man who
was in charge of this project said, 'the potential for exerting a degree
of control on human behaviour by low level microwave radiation seems to
exist' and he urged that the effects of microwaves be studied for 'possible
weapons applications' ". (From "Electromagnetic Pollution: A Little Known
Health Hazard. A new means of control?" by Kim Besley, Great Britain,
p 14. Research from Woody Blue.)

1968 Dr. Gordon J. F. MacDonald, science advisor to President Lyndon
Johnson, wrote, "Perturbation of the environment can produce changes in
behavioural patterns." He was referring to low frequency EM waves in the
ionosphere affecting human brain wave patterns. (From his book, Unless
Peace Comes, a Scientific Forecast of New Weapons, cited in "New World
Order ELF Psychotronic Tyranny", a paper by C. B. Baker.)

1970 Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's National Security
Directo, said in his book, Between Two Ages, weather control was a
new weapon that would be the key element of strategy. "Technology will make
available to leaders of major nations a variety of techniques for conducting
secret warfare..." He also wrote "Accurately timed, artificially excited
electronic strokes could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce
relatively high power levels over certain regions of the Earth ... one
could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance
of a very large population in selected regions over an extended period."
(Cited in Baker's "ELF Psychotronic Tyranny" paper.)

1972 The Taser, first electrical shock device developed for use by law
enforcement, delivers barbed, dart shaped electrodes to a subject's body,
and 50,000 volt pulses at two millionths of an amp ove 12-14 seconds time.
(From "Report onthe Attorney General's Conference on Less Than Lethal
Weapons", by Sherry Sweetman, 1987, p 4, which cites "Non-Lethal Weapons
for Law Enforcement: Research Needs and Priorities. A Report to the
National Science Foundation by the Security Planning Corporation, 1972.
Research by Harlan Girard.)

1972 "A U.S. Department of Defense document said that the Army has
tested a microwave weapon. It was an extremely powerful 'electronic
flamethrower'. " (From "Electromagnetic Pollution")

1972 "A study published by the U.S. Army Mobility Equipment Research
and Development Center, titled 'Analysis of Microwaves for Barrier Warfare'
examines the plausibility of using radio frequency energy in barrier counter-
barrier warfare ... The report concludes that (a) it is possible to field
a truck-portable microwave barrier system that will completely immobilize
personnel in the open with present day technology, (b) there is a strong
potential for a microwave system that would be capable of delaying or
immobilizing personnel in vehicles, (c) with present technology, no method
could be identified for a microwave system to destroy the type of armoured
material common to tanks." (From "Electromagnetic Pollution" by Kim Besly,
p 15, quoting The Zapping of America by Paul Brodeur.)

The report further documents the ability to create third-degree burns on
human skin using 3 Gigahertz at 20 watts/square centimeter in two seconds.

1972 Dr. Gordon J. F. MacDonald testified before the House Subcommittee
on Oceans and International Environment, concerning low frequency research:
"The basic notion there was to create between the electrically charged
ionosphere in the higher part of the atmosphere and conducting layers of the
surface of the Earth this neutral cavity, to create waves, electrical waves
that would be tuned to the brainwaves ... about ten cycles per second ...
you can produce changes in behavioural patterns or in responses." (From
Baker's "ELF Psychotronic Tyranny" paper.)

1973 Sharp and Grove transmit audible words via microwaves [EW: That is,
voice to SKULL] (See "Synthetic Telepathy" in this issue of Resonance

[EW: On my web site, the relevant paragraphs of Judy's source article are
transcribed in: v2succes.htm ]

1975 - 1977 "Unpublished analyses of microwave bioeffects literature were
disseminated to the U.S. Congress and to other officials arguing the case for
remote control of human behavior by radar." (From the Journal of Microwave
Power, 12(4), 1977, p320. Research by Harlan Girard.)

1978 Hungarians presented a state-of-the-art paper on infrasonic weapons
to the United Nations, "Working Paper on Infrasound Weapons", United Nations
CD/575, 14 Aug 1978. (From "The Road From Armageddon" by Peter Lewis.)

1981 - 1982 "Between 1981 and September 1982, the Navy commissioned me to
investigate the potential of developing electromagnetic devices that could be
used as non-lethal weapons by the Marine Corp for the purpose of 'riot
control', hostage removal, clandestine operations, and so on." Eldon Byrd,
Naval Surface Weapons Center, Silver Spring MD. (From "Electromagnetic
Pollution" by Kim Besly, p 12.)

1982 Electromagnetic weapons for law enforcement use in Great Britain:

A 10-30 Hz strobe light which can produce seizures, giddiness, nausea, and
fainting was developed by Charles Bovill of the now defunct British firm,
Allen International. Addition of sound pulses in the 4.0 - 7.5 Hz range
increases effectiveness, as utilized in the Valkyrie, a "frequency" weapon
advertised in British Defense Equipment Catalogue until 1983.

The squawk box or sound curdler uses two loudspeakers of 350 watt output
to emit two slightly different frequencies which combine in the ear to
produce a shrill shrieking noise. The U.S. National Science Foundation
report says there is "severe risk of permanent impairment of hearing."

(From "Electropollution" by Kim Besley, citing the Manchester City Council
Police Monitoring Unit document.)

1982 Air Force review of biotechnology:

"Currently available data allow the projection that specially generated
radiofrequency radiation (RFR) fields may pose powerful and revolutionary
antipersonnel military threats. Electroshock therapy indicates the ability
of induced electric current to completely interrupt mental functioning for
short periods of time, to obtain cognition for longer periods and to
restructure emotional response over prolonged intervals.

"... impressed electromagnetic fields can be disruptive to purposeful
behavior and may be capable of directing and/or interrogating such
behavior. Further, the passage of approximately 100 milliamperes through
the myocardium can lead to cardiac standstill and death, again pointing to
a speed-of-light weapons effect.

"A rapidly scanning RFR system could provide an effective stun or kill
capability over a large area."

(From Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for
Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000. AFOSR-TR-82-0643, vol 1,
and vol 2, 30 July 1982. See below.)

1986 "The Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low-Intensity Conflict" by
Captain Paul Tyler, MC, USN quotes the above passage and further elaborates
on the theme. (Published in Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology
Lt. Col. David J. Dean, USAF, ed., Air University Press, Maxwell AFB, AL.
Research by Harlan Girard.)

1983 Nikolai Khokhlov, a Soviet KGB agent who defected to the West in
1976, interviews recently arrived scientists and reports: "The Soviet mind-
control program is run by the KGB with unlimited funds." (From The
Spectator, Feb 5, 1983, reported in "New World Order Psychotronic
Tyranny" by C. B. Baker.)

1984 "USSR: New Beam Energy Possible?", possibly associated with early
Soviet weather engineering efforts over the U.S. (From "Tesla's
Electromagnetics and Its Soviet Weaponization" by T. E. Bearden.)

1985 Women in the peace camps at Greenham Common began showing various
medical symptoms believed to be caused by EM surveillance weapons beamed at
them. (See "Zapping: The New Weapon of the Patriarchy", Resonance
#13, pp 22-24. Research by Woody Blue.)

1986 Attorney General's Conference on Less Than Lethal Weapons. Reviews
current weapons available, most date back to 1972: the Taser, the Nova
XR-5000 Stun Gun (can interrupt a pacemaker); the Talon, a glove with an
electrical pulse generator; the Source, a flashlight with electrodes at the
base. These devices are useful only at close range, except for the Taser,
and are generally restricted to correctional institutions.

Photic driving strobe lights tested by one conference delegate on 100 subjects,
produced discomfort. Closed eyelids to not block the effect. Evidence that
ELF produces nausea and disorientation. Suggestion to develop fast acting
electrosleep inducing EM weapon.

Discusses problem of testing weapons on animals and human "volunteers".
(From "Report on the Attorney General's Conference on Less Than Lethal
Weapons", by Sherry Sweetman, March 1987, prepared for the National Institute
of Justice. Research by Harlan Girard.)

How many of you will volunteer to get zapped by 50,000 volts from this little
Taser gun we're testing?

1988 The Pentagon is ordered by courts to cease EMP tests at several
locations due to a lawsuit filed by an environmental group. (From The
Washington Post, May 15, 1988, see "US and Soviets Develop Death Ray",
Resonance 11, p 10. Research by Remy Chevalier.)

1992 December. "The U.S. Army's Armament Research, Development and
Engineering Center is conducting a one-year study of ACOUSTIC BEAM
TECHNOLOGY ... the command awarded the one year study to Scientific
Applications and Research Associates of Huntington Beach CA. Related
research is conducted at the Moscow based Andreev Institute." (From "U.S.
Explores Russian Mind Control Technology", by Barbara Opal, Defense News,
Jan 11-17, 1993. Research by Harlan Girard and others.)

1993 The Russian government is offering to share with the United States
in a bilateral Center for Psychotechnologies the Soviet mind-control technology
developed during the 1970s. The work was funded by the Department of
Psycho-Correction at the Moscow Medical Academy.

"Acoustic psycho-correction involves the transmission of specific commands
via static or white noise bands into the human subconscious ...". The Russian
experts, among them former KGB General George Kotov, present in a paper a list
of software and hardware available for $80,000. (From Opal article, "U.S.
Explores Russian Mind Control Technology".)

[EW Comment: Circa 1996, I came across an advertisement by way of a Yahoo
search on mind control for "A genuine mind control device, $80,000, FOB
Singapore, from Gunderson International." Ring any bells? Could not get the
ad to display again.]

1993 February 28, beginning of 51 day siege on the Branch Davidians at
Waco Texas, which ended in the death of more than 80 people.

Until this incident, the electromagnetic weapons had kept a very low profile.
But in the documentary video, "Waco: The Big Lie Continues", footage from the
British Broadcasting (BBC) shows at least three EM weapons used by
U.S. government agents. First, the noise generators used against the
Davidians. Second, a powerful strobe light, shown during a nighttime sequence.
And the third was the Russian psychoacoustic weapon, considered, but agents
deny use of this weapon against the Waco people. FBI agents met with Dr.
Igor Smirnov in Arlington VA to discuss the possiblility of using the weapon
against the Davidians. (From "A Subliminal Dr. Strangelove", by Dorinda


Elliot and John Barry, Newsweek, Aug 22, 1994) Note (EW): "ELF" frequencies, as we know now, are not the most invasive weapons-capable frequencies. Doses of ELF can act as either sedatives or stimulants, entraining the target's EEG as with the Russian LIDA machine. Weapons which can transmit hypnotic commands silently and untraceably, over distance and through walls, can cause a far wider spectrum of effects. In other words, victims, don't assume that "ELF" is the only form of electromagnetic signal which can do damage. Raven1 ALPHA index
Raven1 SUBJECT index

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

Phil Jayhan

ALPHABETICAL Site Index
SUBJECT Site Index

Original link:
http://www.raven1.net/commsolo.htm


Aerial Mind-Control

The Threat to Civil Liberties

by Judy Wall, Editor/Publisher Resonance
Newsletter of the MENSA Bioelectromagnetics Special Interest Group

NEXUS Magazine, October-November 1999

Vol. 6, No. 6

Judy Wall can be contacted by mail at: Judy Wall, Editor/Publisher
RESONANCE
684 County Road 535
Sumterville FL
USA 33585


** She has stated that her interest is in objective reports only - not victim testimonials.**
Eleanor White's comments: This hard hitting article by Judy Wall, who is NOT a mind control victim and in fact avoids victim testimonials in favour of only factual objective material, contains some POWERFUL items not widely known among involuntary mind control experimentees. These items in her article below have had the font size increased a notch so that the visitor can scroll down and see just those items if time or interest is short. WAY TO GO, Judy!


USAF COMMANDO SOLO: AERIAL MIND CONTROL BROADCASTS

The United States Air Force uses aerial mind-control broadcasts against
civilian population as well as enemy troops. Some of these actions against
civilians are done with the intent of influencing public opinion and the
outcome of elections.

In a previous article, we examined mind-control technology, especially that
utilizing Silent Sound [TM], in which radio-frequency broadcasts carry
subliminal patterns that entrain the listener's brainwaves into a pre-
selected emotional state. According to ITV wire service reports, this
technology was used during Operation Desert Storm in 1991, as part of the
US Psychological Operations (PsyOps) directed against Iraqi troops. [1,2]

To the Desert Storm offensive we can now add several other incidents.
Alex Horvat, editor of The Probe, calls to our attention the 1998
video, Exotic Weapons of Mass Control, produced by Bob Fletcher.

"The excerpt played on Fletcher's video is from TLC (The Learning Channel)
and clearly states that Commando Solo was used in Haiti for what was called
Operation Uphold Democracy. As the general populace was violently
opposed to Aristide and most in favor of his ouster, it took nearly a year
of this clandestine counter-programming to get them to change their minds.
Instead of butchering a population physically, we can no manipulate them
mentally, virtually enslaving their thoughts with a criss-cross pattern
of flights by an EC-130 (which is just a C-130 heavily laden with electron-
ic hardware.) [3]

We were not at war with the citizens of Haiti, yet the U.S. Government
directed military weapons against this friendly, or at least neutral,
civilian population. The U.S. Government sanction the "rigging" of the
Haitian election by mental control of the people, programming them to cast
their votes for the Americans' favored candidate. And they had the nerve
to call it "Operation Uphold Democracy". Some sense of humor!
Stalin would have loved it. Hitler would have loved it. Why is the U.S.
Government doing this? Who is behind this flagrant violation of civil
liberties? Is it the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) which has a
long history of interfering in foreign government politics? Or has this
become standard military procedure?

The rationale is always the same: "to make the world safe for democracy".
Yet what is democracy if not freedom? Freedom to think your own thoughts;
freedom to express your own opinions; freedome to vote for the candidate
of your own choice.

Fletcher's video also mentions that the same technology was used against
the Bosnia population for a week to influence their election. [4] This
was probably done during Operation Joint Guard in 1995. [5]

The questions arise: If they have used mind-control broadcasts against
foreign civilian populations to influence elections, will they use them
against American citizens -- or have they already? What other countries
may be the recipients of this innovative technology?

Just what is this EC-130E Commando Solo? The United States Air Force has
helpfully published a fact sheet that describes the Lockheed built air-
craft. [6] This 1995 bulletin states that the "unit flyaway cost" is more
than US $100 million each, and that there are eight in the inventory. Its
primary function is "Psychological operations broadcasts". The crew
consists of four officers (pilot, copilot, navigator, control chief/EWO)
and seven enlisted members (flight engineer, loadmaster, five mission
crew.)

According to the fact sheet:

"Air Force Mission: Commando Solo conducts psychological operations and
civil affairs broadcast missions in the standard AM, FM, HF, TV and
military communications bands. Missions are flown at maximum altitudes
possible to ensure optimum propagation patterns. The EC-130 flies during
either day or night scenarios with equal success, and is air refuealable.
A typical mission consists of a single ship orbit which is offset from the
desired target audience. The targets may be either military or civilian
personnel.

"Secondary missions include command and control communications counter-
measures (C3CM) and limited intelligence gathering.

"Air Force Features: Highly specialized modifications have been made to
the latest version of the EC-130. Included in these modifications are
enhanced navigation systems, self-protection equipment, and the capability
of broadcasting color television on a multitude of world-wide standards
throughout the TV VHF/UHF ranges.

"Air Force Background: Air National Guard EC-130 aircraft flown by the
193rd Special Operations Group were deployed to both Saudi Arabia and
Turkey in support of Desert Storm. Their missions included broadcasts of
'Voice of the Gulf' and other programs intended to convince Iraqi soldiers
to surrender.

"The EC-130 was originally modified using the mission electronic equipment
from the EC-121, known at the time as the Coronet Solo. Soon after the
193rd SOG received its EC-130s, the unit participated in the rescue of US
citizens in Operation Urgent Fury, acting as an airborne radio station
informing those people on Granada of the US military action.

"Volant Solo, as the mission is now known, was instrumental in the success
of coordinated psychological operations in Operation Just Cause, again
broadcasting continuously throughout the initial phases of the operation."

Operation Just Cause? this is another propaganda name, applied to
the U.S. invasion of Panama to take out that country's leader, General
Noreiga, the CIA's erstwhile partner in drug smuggling. Apparently the
General had made someone mad -- how else to account for the massive in-
vasion of this tiny tourist country? To wit: "A superpower whipped the
poop out of 10 percent of the police force of a Third World nation. You
are supposed to be able to do that. It was done well, and I credit those
who did it. But it is important that we draw the right lessons from it"
according to an anonymous US Marine. [7]

Our Commander-in-Chief had another point of view: "...the roll call of
glory, the roster of great American campaigns -- Yorktown, Gettysburg,
Normandy, and now Panama."
--President George Bush, March 1990 [8]

MILITARY PSYOPS AGAINST CIVILIANS

In a phone call to the USAF Special Operations Command Public Affairs
Office, I questioned the legitimacy of using these subliminal broadcasts
against civilian populations. [9]

[Judy Wall's article on Silent Sound for details.]

I was told that it was all perfectly legal, having been approved by the
U.S. Congress (!). It may be okay by Congress, but I sincerely doubt that
it would be approved by the recipient populations.

That conversation also elicited more information concerning the Commando
Solo units. For instance, the Air National Guard
of the individual states in the U.S. can also operate
Commando Solo aircraft, should the Governor of a state
request assistance. That means the PsyOps mind-control
technology can be directed against
U.S. citizens.

The Commando Solo aircraft have participated in the following missions--
possibly more, as the early missions of Volant Solo 1 were not known to
this spokesperson:

- Operation Urgent Fury (Grenada, Oct-Nov 1983, Jan-Jun 1985)
- Operation Just Cause (Panama, late December 1989)
- Operation Desert Shield (Kuwait, Iraq, from August 1990)
- Operation Desert Storm (Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iraq, 1991)
- Operation Uphold Democracy (Haiti, 1994-1995)
- Operation Joint Guard (Part of a UN oepration in
Bosnia-Herzegovina, 1995)
- Operation Desert Thunder (part of a UN operation in Iraq)
- Operation Desert Fox (Iraq, 2 to 3 days in December 199

Other countries are known to have a similar aircraft, but the PR officer
declined to identify them, suggesting that I check out Jane's Defence
Weekly for such information. Not having access to that particular
publication, I searched through my copy of Jane's Radar and Electronic
Warfare Systems 1993094. [10] The Commando Solo unit was not listed,
but a browse through the book was informative as to the numerous types of
electronic offence and defence systems available. These include sta-
tionary and mobile land units (many housed in large trucks), shipboard and
airborne models as well as well as space-based technology. If the military
is spending US $100 million per airborne unit (times eight, we're talking
US $800 million here), I think it is safe to assume that they have tried
out mind control equipment with less expensive, roving land units (trucks),
but use the airplanes to cover wider areas and hard-to-reach locations of
the world.

And I might add, we can asume that they have tried out the efficacy of this
mind-control technology. Even the US military would not waste $800 million
on something unless it has been proven to work, and work effectively, even
under the adverse situation of military combat. This is an important
point.

The initial research into mind control in the USA was conducted udner the
auspices of the CIA. The flagrant abuse of human rights in experimenting
on unsuspecting persons was based on the supposition that the veracity of
experiments would be compromised if a subject knew that he was participating
in an experiment. In the case of mind-control technology, tehis supposition
might very well be true. But that does not justify its use -- or so said
the Nuremburg Code, the tenets of which were used as a legal basis to pro-
secute Nazi scientists for war crimes. However the US seems to have
excused its own military and scientific community from adhering to that
Code. [11]

MANIPULATING MIND AND BODY BY SATELLITE

The next logical step in mind control would be to incorporate this tech-
nology into satellite communications. Since other countries are known
to have similar capabilities, there could occur a sitution in which
electronic mind control warfare is waged against a civilian population,
receiving conflicting mental manipulation from both sides. What would be
the mental state of individuals so targetted? Would it cause a rise in
mental aberrations and schizophrenia? And what are the limits of mind
manipulations? Can people be forced to commit suicide? Can physical
ailments or psychosomatic illnesses be induced?

A March 1990 report from Bosnia-Herzegovina in the former Yugoslavia sug-
gests the latter may have already happened. The report concerns 2,990
ethnic Albanians who were admitted to hospital with complaints of lung and
skin problems for which doctors could find no physical cause. [12]

It is not a far step from manipulating a person's emotional state to influ-
encing bodily functions. Indeed, much of the literature on documenting
microwave effects on biological systems deals with precisely this phenom-
enon. In fact, studies of the physical effects of microwave exposure
(including radio frequencies) generally preceeded studies of mental effects.

A meeting sponsored by Defense & Foreign Affairs and the International
Strategic Studies Association was held in Washington DC in 1983. High-level
officials from many countries met for this conference. They discussed
psychological strategies related to government and policymaking. A summary
of the agenda reads: "The group will be discussing the essence of future
policymaking, for it msut be increasingly clear to all that the most effec-
tive tool of government and strategy is the mind... If it's any consolation
to the weapons-oriented among defense policymakers, the new technologies of
communications -- satellites, television, radio, and mind-control
beams -- are 'systems' which are more tangible than the more
philosophically based psychological strategies and operations.

[Eleanor White's comment: Anyone know where to get a copy?]

"But we should make no mistake; it will be the 'psychologically based'
systems which determine the world's fate in coming years: the condition of
the minds of populations and leaders. And we should not ignore the fact
that the USSR [this was in 1983] is working on electronic systems to
'beam' messages directly into the brain. What good, then, are conventional
systems if these types of weapons are not countered? And, on a more basic
level, what good is a weapon system if public opinion or political con-
straints prohibit its deployment?" [13]

It is obvious that they found the answer to that last question. If the
public does not know about a weapon system, it cannot prohibit its deploy-
ment. This is the situtation that applies to mind-control technology.

MIND CONTROL AGAINST 'POTENTIAL' ENEMIES

The US military is aware that certain actions or procedures may not be
acceptable to the American public. Metz and Kievit express these concerns
in their paper, "The Revolution in Military Affairs and Short Conflict War."
[14] "The use of new technology may also run counter to basic American
values. Information age -- and in particular, information warfare --
technologies cause concerns about privacy... American values also make the
use of directed-energy weapons ... morally difficult, perhaps unacceptable.
The advantage of directed-energy weapons over conventional ones is


Later they state: "We must decide whether innovative military capabilities
are, in fact, acceptable and desirable. That can only happen through open
debate. The military must be a vital participant, but not the sole one."

But there has been no open debate.

On July 21, 1994, the US Department of Defense proposed that non-lethal
weapons be used not only against declared enemies, but against anyone
engaged in activities that the DOD opposed. That could include almost any-
body and anything. Note that the mind-control technology is classified
under non-lethal weapons. [15]

A 1998 news item states that US Air Force General John Jumper "predicts
that the military will have the tools to make potential enemies see, hear,
and believe things that do not exist" and that "The same idea was con-
tained in a 15-volume study by the USAF Scientific Advisory Board, issued
in 1996, on how to maintain US air and space superiority on the battle-
fields of the 21st century". [16,17]

It seems that, in miltary parlance, a "prediction" means: "Don't be
surprised when you find out we've already got this, but it's classified
and we can't admit to it just yet."

Notice that General Jumper predicts that mind control technology will be
used against potential enemies. The military and government
agencies may apply this term to any group or individual they perceive as
a threat to their own interests. Potential enemies may be counter-culture
individuals, those of opposing political viewpoints, economic or financial
competitors, biological undesirables, etc. It is part of the military
agenda to identify potential threats so as to be prepared to meet them.
Experience has shown that the US Government (the CIA and FBI, for example)
has moved against these people or groups, slandering, harassing, even
killing them, without adequate cause or legal sanction.

A weapon that can be used in secret lends itself to abuse by unethical
individuals in positions of power. The military and secret services have
shown themselves often to be lacking in ethical constraints. After all,
the job of the military is war; it is killing people; and so,
just how this is accomplished may be considered irrelevant. Lesser evils,
like mind control, pale by comparison.

Of course, it can be argued that it is far more humane to brainwash a
person via mind control technology than it is to torture or kill them.
Others vehemently deny this. They'd rather be dead than a mental slave to
Big Brother! That is what revolutions are about. And if I recall
correctly, that is the idea behind the US Bill of Rights.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WARNS OF DANGERS

Awareness of the existence of mind-control technology, and hence its
dangers and possibility for misuse, seems to be more prevalent than in
Europe than in other areas. The European Parliament recently passed a
"Resolution on environment, security, and foreign policy". [18] This
document includes these articles:

"23. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the new 'non-lethal'
weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies also covered
and regulated by international conventions...

"27. Calls for an international convention introducing a global ban on
all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form
of manipulation of human beings."

The United States will ignore these resolutions, of course, as it has
other EP requests; for example, as mentioned in the same document:

"24. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by
virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern
and calls for it's legal, ecological and ethical implcations to be exam-
ined by an international independent body before any further research and
testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration
to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any
subsequent meeting to be held by its competent committee into the environ-
mental and public risks connected with the HAARP programme currently being
funded in Alaska..."

One of HAARP's potential uses is a communications system. The military
officially acknowledges two communications-related applications: (1) to
replace the existing Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communica-
tions system now operating in Michigan and Wisconsin; (2) to provide a way
to wipe out communications over an extremely large area, while keeping the
miltary's own communications system working. [19]

As we have seen, the mind-control subliminal messages are carried on radio-
frequency broadcasts.

[Judy Wall's article on Silent Sound for details.]

The HAARP facility could be used to broadcast global mind-control messages,
or such messages could simply be inserted into existing systems.

Dr. Igor Smirnov, of the Institute of Psycho-correction in Moscow, says in
regard to this technology: "It is easily conceviable that some Russian
'Satan', or let's say Iranian [or any other 'Satan'], as long as he owns the
appropriate means and finances, can inject himself [intrude] into every con-
ceivable computer network, into every conceivable radio or television broad-
cast, with relative technological ease, even without disconnecting cables.
You can intercept the [radio] waves in the aether and then [subliminally]
modulate every conceivable suggestion into it. If this transpires over a
long enough time period, it accumulates in the heads of people. And even-
tually they can be artificially manipulated with other additional measure-
ments, to do that which this perpetrator wants [them to do]. This is why
[such technology] is rightfully feared." [20]

A WORLDWIDE MIND CONTROL MISSION

To return to the USAF Fact Sheet, it concludes: "In 1990 the EC-130 joined
the newly formed Air Force Special Operations Command and has since been
designated Commando Solo, with no change in mission. This one of a kind
aircraft is consistently improving its capabilities.


The next few years should see continued enhancements to the EC-130 and its
worldwide mission."

About the Author:
Judy Wall is the Editor of RESONANCE, the newsletter of the
Bioelectromagnetics Special Interest Group of American MENSA Ltd.
Viewpoints expressed here are her own personal views.

ENDNOTES

1. Wall, Judy, "Military Use of Mind Control Weapons", NEXUS,
5/06, Oct-Nov 1998
2. "Psychological operations" are defined as:
"Planned operations to convery selected information and
indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions,
motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior
of foreign governments, organizations, groups and individuals.
The purpose of psychological operations is to induce or
re-inforce foreign attitudes and behavior favorable to the
originator's objectives. Also called PsyOps." From
"Joint Doctrine for Information Operations", Joint pub-
lication 3-13, 9 October 1998. Thanks to Harlan Girard
of the International Committee on Offensive Microwave
Weapons (PO Box 58700, Philadelphia PA 19102-8700, USA)
for the excerpt.
3. Horvat, Alex, "Commando Solo", The Probe, vol. 4,
No. 1, Winter 1998/99, p.44; available from PO Box 905,
St. Peters, MO 63376, USA.
4. Fletcher, Bob, Exotic Weapons of Mass Control;
video available from The Probe (see above) or
Global Insights, A675 Fairview Dr. #246, Carson City NV,
89701 USA, tel 1-800-729-4131.
5. An item of interest is that the US had a new type of
aerial reconnaissance plane positioned over the former
Yugoslavia from July 14, 1995, about six months before
the US officially intervened. The 10-million-dollar
unmanned saucer-shaped spy craft is nicknamed "Dark Star".
Information from C-Com (Classified Communications
3(12), Dec 1995; Erich A. Aggen, Jr., (editor), citing
CE Chronicles nos. 1 and 2 and Raising Awareness
newsletter.
6. Fact Sheet, dated March 1995. The address on the publication
is AF Special Operations Command Public Affairs Office,
100 Bartley Street, Hurlburt Field, FL 32544-5273, USA.
They no longer supply printed copies, but you can access
the document at http://www.hurlburt.af.mil
7. Morrison Taw, Jennifer, "Operation Just Cause: Lessons For
Operations Other Than War", Rand Corp., 1996, p. vii;
quoting from "Some Questions Whether the US Is Ready
for LIC", Navy News and Undersea Technology,
August 27, 1990, p.7.
8. Morrison Taw, Jennifer, ibid,. p.1.
9. Telephone conversation of February 26, 1999, with
AF Special Operations Command Public Affairs Office;
voice (850) 884-5515, email paprhode@hqafsoc.afoc.af.mil
10. Blake, Bernard (ed.) Jane's Radar and Electronic
Warfare Systems 1993-94, Jane's Information Group
Inc., 1340 Braddock Place, Suite 300, Alexandria VA
22314-1651, USA; also Jane's Information Group,
Sentinel House, 163 Brighton Road, Couldson, Surrey
CR5 2NH, UK.
11. (a) "US Nullifies Nuremburg Law", Earth Island Journal,
Winter 1996-97. (b) Hightower, Jim, "Unregulated Experiments
on Humans", New Times, June 19-25, 1997; cites
Stolberg, Sheryl Gay, "Unchecked Research People Raises
Concern on Medical Ethics", New York Times, May
14, 1997. (c) See "Ban on Medical Experiments Without
Consent is Relaxed", New York Times, November 5,
1996, p.1; copy available for 50 cents from David Park
Brooks, 3456 17th St., San Francisco CA 94110. (d) Also
see Senator John Glenn's bill S-193, "Human Subjects
Research Protection Act of 1997", Congressional Record,
US Senate, January 22, 1997. (e) "In 1994, a congress-
ional subcommittee found up to 500,000 Americans between
1940 and 1974 were endangered by secred defense-related
tests including radiation experiments, mustard gas, LSD
and biological agents." See Pitch Weekly, April
17-23, 1997.
12. Schaefer, Paul, "Experimentation and Warfare", article
citing The Kansas City Star, between March 25
and 31, 1990.
13. Summary, The Perth Corporation, Defense & Foreign
Affairs, November 1983.
14. Metz, Steven, and James Kievit, "The Revolution in
Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War", US Army
War College, Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013-5050, USA,
pp. 15-16 and 29. [See also Krawczyk, Glenn, "Big
Brother's Recipe for 'Revolution in Military Affairs'",
NEXUS 2/26, June-July 1995.]
15. Schaefer, Paul, "Psyops: Invisible Warfare", Zuni
Mountain Citizen (precise date unknown, late 1998/
early 1999), p.5.
16. "Microwave Weapons", Microwave News, March/April
1998; Louis Slesin (editor), citing Aviation Week,
March 9, 1998.
17. Same article as above, citing Microwave News,
January/February 1997.
18. "Environment, Security, and Foreign Affairs", Resolution
A40005/99, Minutes of 28/01/99 - Provisional Edition,
European Parliament. For copy, thanks to Grattan Healy,
Advisor on Energy & Research, Green Group in the European
Parliament, LEO 2C35, Rue Wiertz Straat, B-1047 Bruxelles,
Belgium, email ghealy@europarl.eu.int
19. For more info on HAARP, see Begich, Nick and Jeanne
Manning, Angels Don't Play This HAARP, Earthpulse
Press, PO Box 201393, Anchorage AK 99520, USA, Tel. (907)
249-9111.
20. From a German documentary, "Geheimes Russland: Moskau -
Die Zombies dr roten Zaren" ("Secret Russia: Moscow -
The Zombies of the Red Czars") aired on German TV network
ZDF on December 22, 1998. Script translation by Jan
Weisemann. The full text is to be published in
Resonance, No. 35.
21. Reed, Chris, Lockheed C-130 Hercules and Its Variants,
Schiffer Publishing Ltd, Atglen, PA, 1999.


ALPHABETICAL Site Index
SUBJECT Site Index

__________________
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"

what2put

I believe Judy may find this guy very interesting
His contact details are available on his website ucsdefence.com


http://data.argusoog.org/radio/2010/ArgusoogRadio-20101119-ProjectCamelot.mp3