Thanks Rob, preciate this effort you are taking and I'm glad to try and help. At least I hope I have enough knowledge/awareness of the subject (biology/biotech in particular) to help in regards to addressing the claims of the GoErie article and doctors (of said position like quoted in the article). My credentials alone will not garner any respect from the likes of the Erie doctor/health official in this particular case here or any other doctors (mostly clown doctors nowadays when it comes to subject of 'covid') towing the 'covid' official narrative of course.
This type of response is important IMO, in how the public very much needs to express such concerns to the media and "health officials" and government that are making decisions that are drastically affecting all lives in our country and world wide, extremely negatively of course, and the actions we take to resist and combat the absurd 'pandemic' measures and restrictions and 'mandates'. How are un-vaxxinated people (like ourselves here) going to be treated compared to vaxxinated people at the end of the day? when all this agenda keeps marching forward, that is a huge question and has to be hit and hit hard.
It's gonna take me some time to go through his response and help re-butt that, and then help formulate a response and further questions as a follow up.
I wanted to add some links that we can use (selected portions from for brevity) as part of the response and further questioning, I plan on doing more in depth posts of these in a couple of the other 'covid-19' threads:
This one addresses the 'covid' PCR testing,
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major
scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for
false positive results
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at:
PDF | This extensive review report has been officially submitted to Eurosurveillance editorial board on 27th November 2020 via their submission-portal,... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
www.researchgate.net
Direct link to PDF file for their
Review Report - Corman-Drosten et al., Eurosurveillance 2020
Preprint · November 2020
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4298004
CITATIONS
0
READS
4,320
22 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Science against panic in the COVID-19 crisis View project
Applying evolutionary concepts to explain, prevent and treat modern diseases View project
Klaus Steger
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
247 PUBLICATIONS 7,814 CITATIONS
PCR Lab Visit: Whistleblowers Kevin McKernan, Bobby Malhotra Explain Why COVID Tests are "Garbage"
Premiered Jan 24, 2021
This group called themselves International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS); they put out an addendum to their initial paper with reviews of actual lab studies testing the PCR protocol in question in their review. I haven't had a chance to look at any of it yet.
Addendum - Corman Drosten Review Report by an International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS)
PDF | Background:: After submitting our review report on Corman et al. (referred hereinafter as CD-report) and republishing it on a scientific preprint... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
www.researchgate.net
This group's primary website get's a flag by my browser saying it's "un-secure" and dangerous to click on and therefore your shit can get hacked blah blah blah so that's why I searched up other links to find the paper.
Doctor addresses school board over mask mandates and testing and quarantine policies for students/faculty etc.
MVCSC School Board Mtg 8/6/2-Board allows public to speak on agenda-no speakers were requested by MV
Streamed live on Aug 6, 2021
Watch from about ~13:30 in to about ~21:42:
Dr. Dan Stock (I think he's from McCordsville, Indiana) starts @~15:10 in, he gives about a 6 and 1/2 minute talk about why the 'covid' guidelines are faulty and would not stop spread of "coronaviruses" (masks, social distancing, quarantining of close contacts etc.), and therefore make no sense to implement and enforce. Dr. Stock brought links to his sources, studies on a flash drive for review by the school board. Don't know what those studies are at the moment.
Comments are turned off as well as the "save" video feature (with some ridiculous explanation "save feature turned off for content made for kids"). There are a significant assortment of attacks against Dr. Stock by the media and other youtube doctors who tout the official 'covid' line; I don't know how much any of them addressed the studies he provided, if they did it was surly hit pieces of dis-information IMO, but may take a look at a couple if I have time just to see.
Just from my own bio knowledge and perspective I would quite likely agree with what Dr. Stock said generally about 'covid', however only if I (or we also) were to take it seriously that an actual 'covid' virus exists which is extremely dubious at best the way I see it.
Aside from the flaw of accepting the virus ('sars-cov2') as real on face value, both of these talks are good expert voices (a lot closer than any of our credentials will ever be viewed as obviously, by the "experts' and cov-idiots) that are opposing the 'covid' official narrative to present to people like our dear ECHD doctor in rebuttal of his claims and 'data' to our questions. There are plenty of other doctors and scientists out there to draw from too opposing this and of course every single one of them are always under attack for going against the "official narrative", whether they are for real or not it seems to me.