BBC's Jane Standley reports collapse of World Trade Center 7 - 20 minutes early

Admin

Administrator
Staff member
Is this studio backdrop really live footage of the Manhattan 9/11 landscape?


I'm curious to where your going with this but the footage can't be live footage, of course. They have already announced the fall of WTC 7 many times if you include the chevron saying it over and over again at the bottom of the screen. And there it is the entire broadcast, right over her shoulder...

So what's your angle?

cheers-
phil ;)
 
It could well have been all pre recorded footage broadcast live.. So WTC7 could have been demolished prior to the above broadcast.
And the footage above looks the same as all the other faked footage.
The BBC dodged a bullet most people thinking that the footage is real despite WTC7 still standing.
 
Last edited:
Here's archived footage of the BBC broadcast from 4.55- 5.35pm. at 36 mins, the news anchor confirms the collapse of WTC7.
There it was in plane sight the live 9/11 footage screened in real time was all fake, everyone thinking the BBC had fore knowledge, when in fact they hadn't up dated the live fake footage. Some interesting comments in there as well.
 
Last edited:

Phil Jayhan

Administrator
Staff member
Here's archived footage of the BBC broadcast from 4.55- 5.35pm. at 36 mins, the news anchor confirms the collapse of WTC7.
There it was in plane sight the live 9/11 footage screened in real time was all fake, everyone thinking the BBC had fore knowledge, when in fact they hadn't up dated the live fake footage. Some interesting comments in there as well.

Personally I think there was also footage of the World Trade Center which was real. e.g. The people in the windows shots, the jumpers, some of the Evac scenes, etc,.But it's obvious the overwhelming duration of "The 9/11 Broadcast" was pre-made studio shots, scripted eyewitnesses,. etc

The top comment was the best one I read and it was a doosey. Loved the straight up sarcasm.

"Since we all know that conspiracies don't exist, I would like to propose what I believe is the most likely explanation for this little glitch. This was simply a common time warp, of the kind we have all seen so often in the movies. BBC skipped into the future for a short while, reported news that hadn't happened yet, and then returned to the present. No big deal. Happens all the time. Remember Occam's Razor - what is more likely? That a group of people conspired to commit a crime in secret (patently absurd), or a simple time warp? The answer is obvious."



cheers
phil ;)
 
Top