Smoking guns that prove 'COVID-19' is a planned psyop and simulated pandemic

alpha77

Member
See here more proof of the OBVIOUS strategy that they now used for probably more than 100 years. Demonize the critical thinkers or the ones not going along w/ gov/industry dictatorship:

It says in short "Part of the opponents of Corona measures are prone to violence"

An "expert" aka gov shill says: "a new form of international extremism" this is so laughable considering the fact that the gov/big industry/pharma/millitary industrial complex are extremists/facists/communists themselves..


Edit, so here a video where it also shows headlines in the UK saying simmilar things:
Eg. "Anti vaxxer found with blades to cut those that take them down, union says"

ANYNONE surprised... it is always the same this can only end if no one takes the MSM and gov seriously anymore and more then 30-40% of people just say NO to the BS. Imho protests esp. with violence (which may be staged anyway) play more into the hands of the PTB...opinions?


The vid above is good info, the guy has some good thoughts, esp. when he says that they do NOT want everyone to be jabbed, they NEED a minority who refuse. Follow his line of thinking??



Edit, if the OP thinks these kind of posts are too OT in his thread, perhaps cause not directly related to the "planned" smoking gun thing, we could move them somewhere else. Perhaps open a thread for the ongoing developments??
 
Last edited:

Tritonus

New member

PART VIII: DECEPTION & FOREKNOWLEDGE

27. The EU was preparing “vaccine passports” at least a YEAR before the pandemic began. Proposed COVID countermeasures, presented to the public as improvised emergency measures, have existed since before the emergence of the disease.
Two EU documents published in 2018, the “2018 State of Vaccine Confidence” and a technical report titled “Designing and implementing an immunisation information system” discussed the plausibility of an EU-wide vaccination monitoring system.
These documents were combined into the 2019 “Vaccination Roadmap”, which (among other things) established a “feasibility study” on vaccine passports to begin in 2019 and finish in 2021:

This report’s final conclusions were released to the public in September 2019, just a month before Event 201 (below).
*
28. A “training exercise” predicted the pandemic just weeks before it started. In October 2019 the World Economic Forum and Johns Hopkins University held Event 201. This was a training exercise based on a zoonotic coronavirus starting a worldwide pandemic. The exercise was sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI the vaccine alliance.
The exercise published its findings and recommendations in November 2019 as a “call to action”. One month later, China recorded their first case of “Covid”.
*
29. Since the beginning of 2020, the Flu has “disappeared”. In the United States, since Februart 2020, influenza cases have allegedly dropped by over 98%.

It’s not just the US either, globally flu has apparently almost completely disappeared.
Meanwhile, a new disease called “Covid”, which has identical symptoms and a similar mortality rate to influenza, is supposedly sweeping the globe.
*
30. The elite have made fortunes during the pandemic. Since the beginning of lockdown the wealthiest people have become significantly wealthier. Forbes reported that 40 new billionaires have been created “fighting the coronavirus”, with 9 of them being vaccine manufacturers.
Business Insider reported that “billionaires saw their net worth increase by half a trillion dollars” by October 2020.
Clearly that number will be even bigger by now.
* * *
These are the vital facts of the pandemic, presented here as a resource to help formulate and support your arguments with friends or strangers. Thanks to all the researchers who have collated and collected this information over the last twenty months, especially Swiss Policy Research.
 

gl69m

Member
Asked, yes, about 3 people who are above me asked. Three! They already know my position, but I made no comment when they asked.
Truthfully, the answer is not easy to swallow. Why should I work for a company who commands I take the poison? I'm sure people are out there thinking it will only be "once". I don't believe that. "once" will turn into "once a year".

They already are treating the unvaxxed different than the vaxx.
  1. Earlier this year, if you were vaxxed you did not have to wear a mask. The unvaxxed did.
  2. The vaxx get to wear a sticker around work stating they took the jab.

Sadly, people are not in a position to lose their job so they end up taking it.
(from post 36)

Preciate the response Tritonus. Right now I am not sure yet whether my company will mandate a vax for all employees or perhaps will relegate certain jobs/tasks or at certain client sites only to vaxxed employees, I think that is a distinct possibility. The site we subcontract at where I work an e-mail went out for that company (a big Pharma company in their own right [but is not producing a 'covid' vax so far], I won't mention the company name but they bought a little old company named Monsa-, I think you know which company I mean...) that subcontractors also get the e-mail, that as of Sept 27th, only vaxxed employees will be allowed to do certain functions for the company, I'm not going to state any further what those are. I'm pretty sure that a slew of corps. and companies are now doing this, and is probably just another step down the slippery slope of more and more control etc.


from alpha77 (post #41)
Edit, if the OP thinks these kind of posts are too OT in his thread, perhaps cause not directly related to the "planned" smoking gun thing, we could move them somewhere else. Perhaps open a thread for the ongoing developments??
thanks alpha, yeah I'd say I'm not worried about moving any posts already posted in the thread here, but perhaps some of the posts dealing with "are viruses real or not" debate and particularly viruses other than alleged 'sarscov2' are a bit off topic, perhaps start another thread for those. Any posts that are advocating that viruses aren't real I am not at all opposed to that being posted here, but I'd prefer those mainly stick to as it pertains to showing proof that 'sarscov2' isn't real and which would bolster the case that 'covid-19' is a simulated and fake plandemic. If it can be proven 'sarscov2' does not exist, never been isolated etc., that by itself is not proof that no viruses exist at all, same goes for if measles virus turned out to not exist as well; this is akin to if it turned out the moon landings were all faked that would still not prove that the moon is fake or that the earth is flat etc., I think everybody probably get's my point lol:).


The video from the nurse in post #35, this illustrates how the false 'covid' paradigm of 'covid disease' is killing people, and that paradigm is mainly trying to paint the picture of how allegedly contagious or deadly this 'virus' is: and so any patients labeled with 'covid' and seriously sick just simply have to be treated totally different than the way respiritory illnesses were treated prior to 'covid'; the nurse stated he didn't really understand any better at first but eventually figured some things out, and so part of it is error from at least partial ignorance and trusting authorities, some of it is simply gross medical malpractice, and some health experts had to be aware that this paradigm is total bullshit so I would say those people that pushed this paradigm as true and real to be followed meticulously are murderers plain and simple. And even if some Cov virus exists and is anything like 'sarscov2' there is no way in hell this paradigm is true period dot; so even if I turn out to be wrong and there truly is some novel 2019 Cov virus circulating in the world population, this false medical paradigm has to be fought tooth and nail, the only thing this paradigm could lead to is insanity of more and more authoritarian control like we have seen now for over a year and a half. This paradigm is false in several ways very much paralells the way that the fake/false HIV/AIDS=DEATH paradigm campaign was rolled, but of course the alleged mechanism of action and transmissability of the two 'viruses' are very very different though.
 

gl69m

Member
More posts from the original thread

Post #3 (from gl69m)

More smoking gun(s) from gov. Andrew “preparation drill” Cuomo, this time it's a "social exercise",

Live: New York Governor Andrew Cuomo Holds Coronavirus Briefing | NBC
Streamed live on May 13, 2020





Amid Ongoing Covid-19 Pandemic, Governor Cuomo announces Fourth Region Hits Benchmark to Begin Reopening May 15th
May 13, 2020
https://www.newyorkled.com/ny-govern...e-may-13-2020/
Quote:

Governor Cuomo: “We are doing the most transparent discussion and reopening operation of any state. Why? Because it only works if people understand it and if people are part of it. This is not a government exercise that we’re doing here. This is a social exercise. The 19 million people of New York State are doing this and the best I can do is give them the information. … This is a function of the actions of every individual and every family.”

Not a government exercise right? Pleasus, well yes it is definitely also a “social exercise" too, not just as of May 13th either, was from the beginning of this psyop.

I'm taking it out of context will be the sheople argument, ok how in the fuck is this still not a government operation of “re-opening” when they (state governors and cabinets) have the powers to say they can keep everyone “non-essential” shutdown until “we” reach their bullshit pseudoscience 'covid-19' magical number non-sense fake news benchmark numbers?? Heh!?! If you watch the video through the first 7 minutes, you'll see what I mean.

Also, his “social exercise” statement still has to be understood in context to his April 11th statement of “on this preparation drill”, these really can't be understood outside of the conception of a fucking psyop, a systemwide simulation training drill, outside of that they make no fucking sense at all. The social exercise also to see how many "want" to re-open or not, you'll have the sheople bait, lazy ass people who could afford to sit at home because they're so scare of the phantom virus, who may actually getting unemployment or their stimulus bribe money- dreaming that the govt. will keep paying them to stay at home, and then wake up to the nightmare after such time an actual "re-opening' happens and they have no job anymore, and then eventually the "bailout' will run out of funds. He keeps bringing up the endless fearmongering of 'case resurgences' for "opening" baack up too soon and added the Fauci warnings on top it to drive home the point!

I can almost guarantee this, like the un-employment backup funds or whatever that was 300 billion or something to pay people to stay at home, yeah right, they'll keep doing that forever and ever in the 2nd, 3rd 4th 5th bullshit 'case spike' waves right? No fucking way that is going to happen, it is an engineered house of cards made to come tumbling down, I'm sure there are also some small business owners who are still solvent as of yet that think they're going to get bailed out to resume business or full business, I'm sure they have the same shock awaiting them too.


I'm adding this clip from today's bullshit phony coronie briefing helping from the governator Cuomo, simply because this absurd hypocrisy could technically be considered (IMO) a (smoking gun) motive of psyop, via economic devastation in the planned psyop for especially certain targeted segments of society here in U.S., but doubtless all other countries as well:

Live: New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo Holds Coronavirus Briefing | NBC News
5/27/20





Hypomotherfuckingcrit
7:72, NY, MA, NJ, PA, MI, IL, CA- 7 states 1/3 of National GDP, after talking about more possible legislation for 'covid' relief funding now going on in Washington D.C., he says,
Quote:

"the covid states, the states that, that bore the brunt of the covid virus, they're 1/3 of the national gdp. How can you tell 1/3 of the country to go to heck? And then think you're gonna see an economic rebound?"

No shit mother fucker, you didn't think of that when the 'covid' psyop team told how many % of the workforce that they were "un-essential"???!!! The fucking hypocrisy makes me fume, can't help it... Just before that he is crying about 'how can you cut funding to schools?' yada yada, and they were the motherfuckers that closed all the schools down!! and said oh no their all done for the year, and the 'new fucking normal' is education at a social distance via all online after all this from what even billdoe gates discussed with governator's brother Chriss CNN anchor (their new proposed educational paradigm for the 'future'), so the absurdity of acting like he gives a fuck about funding being cut to the schools, just more insanity from all this bullshit.


Gotta add this smoking gun from the CDC, job posting from November 2019, I posted this here previously (http://letsrollforums.com//showpost....&postcount=214),

Public Health Advisor (Quarantine Program)

Job ID
HHS-CDC-D3-20-10640010 Date posted 11/15/2019

https://jobs.cdc.gov/job/dallas/publ...m/250/14136286

This job link gives a “custom job error” now so the job posting is gone, so this is the record of it that we have now, which I didn't paste all of the original page but I got most of it and certainly the relevant bits I feel.
Quote:

Location Dallas, Texas, El Paso, Texas, Houston, Texas, Seattle, Washington, Anchorage, Alaska, Los Angeles, California, San Diego, California, San Francisco, California, Miami, Florida, Atlanta, Georgia, Honolulu, Hawaii, Chicago, Illinois, Boston, Massachusetts, Detroit, Michigan, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Newark, New Jersey, New York, New York, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, San Juan Department: Department of Health And Human Services

Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Job Announcement Number: HHS-CDC-D3-20-10640010
SALARY RANGE: $51440.0 to $93077.0/Per Year
OPEN PERIOD: 2019-11-15 to 2020-05-15
SERIES & GRADE: GS--9/11

JOB SUMMARY:
Serves as a project representative for a program responsible for preventing theimportation and spread of communicable diseases.

DUTIES:

"Assist in planning and implementing a program for preventing the importation of communicable diseases from abroad and spread of these diseases domestically.", "Monitor disease trends and consults with senior leaders to ensure that appropriate measures are taken to prevent the introduction/spread of communicable diseases by travelers, etiologic agents or vectors.", "Provide technical assistance, consultation and guidance to national, state and/or local agencies; health organizations; federal, state and local law enforcement agencies; airport and seaport activities; hospital networks, and other private entities.", "Ensure appropriate communication networks, planning documents and emergency response protocols are in place, tested and regularly updated.", "Develop and present training to various governmental agencies and local partners on emergency response protocols, communicable diseases and quarantine activities." ]

REQUIREMENTS:
US Citizenship is required. Background Investigation is required. E-Verify: If you are selected for this position, the documentation that you present for purposes of completing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Form I-9 will be verified through the DHS "E-Verify" System. Federal law requires DHS to use the E-Verify System to verify employment eligibility of all new hires, and as a condition of continued employment obligates the new hire to take affirmative steps to resolve any discrepancies identified by the system

HOW TO APPLY:

To apply for this position, you must complete the online application and submit the documentation specified in the Required Documents section. Special Notes - This announcement is being used to create an inventory of applicants for Public Health Advisor (Quarantine Program) positions and will be used to fill immediate and future needs. Applicants are encouraged to apply early in order to maximize their employment opportunities. Your application will remain in the inventory of tentatively qualified applicants. Applicants that are among the best qualified will be referred to the selecting official for consideration as requests to fill vacancies are processed by the Human Resources Office. The first cut-off date for you to be referred will be December 2, 2019. Thereafter, additional referral lists will be generated throughout the open period as vacancies occur. If further evaluation or interviews are required, you will be contacted. This is an open continuous announcement. Qualified applicants will be considered as job opportunities occur and may or may not receive further notification regarding the status of their application. A complete application package must be submitted by 11:59 PM (EST) on05/15/2020 of this announcement to receive consideration.

The incumbent must be able to qualify for unrestricted access to secure areas at U.S ports. The incumbent must be able to qualify for a secret security clearance. The incumbent must be able to obtain an official U.S. passport. The incumbent must have a valid State government-issued driver's license. The incumbent is required to be current in his/her immunizations per ACIP guidelines. Must undergo baseline and periodic health screening procedures such as respiratory fit testing and PPD tests for tuberculosis exposure. May be required to wear an N-95 respirator. The incumbent must be physically fit enough to work long hours and frequently travel on foot to remote gate areas in a short period of time. The incumbent must be required to provide basic quarantine station support, including purchasing, property inventory, document processing, timekeeping, and answering inquiries, etc.

If you are a veteran with preference eligibility and you are claiming 5-points veterans' preference, you must submit a copy of your DD-214 or other proof of eligibility. If you are claiming 10-point veterans' preference, you must also submit an SF-15, "Application for 10-Point Veterans' Preference" plus the proof required by that form. For more information on veterans' preference see http://www.fedshirevets.gov/job/vetpref/index.aspx.

Subject to permanent reassignment to another CDC Quarantine Station or duty station as the needs of the service warrant. Subject to temporary assignment at any location in the United States and its territories or possessions, in foreign countries, or at sea. Selectee will be required to sign a Geographic Mobility Agreement. These positions are subject to shift work, weekend work, irregular work schedule and evening hours. On call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, independent of shift work assignments. The incumbents will be required to wear a uniform. The incumbent must be able to qualify for unrestricted access to secure areas at U.S ports.
 

gl69m

Member
Post #5 from original thread (from gl69m)

I'm adding this tidbit about the U.S. Intelligence industry, not really a smoking gun per se, but this adds context to how they pull off psyops, and the foolish notion, every time some braindead sheople gives the nonsense argument that the bigger the lie the bigger the conspiracy, that some hoaxes/conspiracies would have to be just "too big" to pull off and way too many people would have to be in on it, yada yada yada,

United States Intelligence Community(16 different agencies listed here, This page was last edited on 4 June 2020)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community
Quote:

The United States Intelligence Community (IC) is a group of separate United States government intelligence agencies and subordinate organizations, that work separately and together to conduct intelligence activities to support the foreign policy and national security of the United States. Member organizations of the IC include intelligence agencies, military intelligence, and civilian intelligence and analysis offices within federal executive departments. The IC is overseen by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which itself is headed by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), who reports to the President of the United States.[1][2]

Among their varied responsibilities, the members of the Community collect and produce foreign and domestic intelligence, contribute to military planning, and perform espionage. The IC was established by Executive Order 12333, signed on December 4, 1981, by U.S. President Ronald Reagan.[3]

The Washington Post reported in 2010 that there were 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies in 10,000 locations in the United States that were working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence, and that the intelligence community as a whole includes 854,000 people holding top-secret clearances.[4] According to a 2008 study by the ODNI, private contractors make up 29% of the workforce in the U.S. intelligence community and account for 49% of their personnel budgets.[5]

I wonder how many this number (854,000) is in 2020?



United States Intelligence Community Seal of the United States Intelligence Community
Agency overviewFormedDecember 4, 1981Agency executive


Websiteintelligence.gov

Members

The IC is headed by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), whose statutory leadership is exercised through the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). The other 16 members of the IC are:[9]


The official seals of U.S. Intelligence Community members.

Organization Parent Organization Federal Department Date est. Sixteenth Air Force United States Air Force Defense 1948 Intelligence and Security Command United States Army Defense 1977 Central Intelligence Agency none Independent agency 1947 Coast Guard Intelligence United States Coast Guard Homeland Security 1915 Defense Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense Defense 1961 Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence United States Department of Energy Energy 1977 Office of Intelligence and Analysis United States Department of Homeland Security Homeland Security 2007 Bureau of Intelligence and Research United States Department of State State 1945 Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence United States Department of the Treasury Treasury 2004 Office of National Security Intelligence Drug Enforcement Administration Justice 2006 Intelligence Branch Federal Bureau of Investigation Justice 2005 Marine Corps Intelligence Activity United States Marine Corps Defense 1978 National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense Defense 1996 National Reconnaissance Office United States Department of Defense Defense 1961 National Security Agency/Central Security Service United States Department of Defense Defense 1952 Office of Naval Intelligence United States Navy Defense 1882


220px-IC_Circle.jpg





The US Intelligence Community Is Bigger Than Ever, But Is It Worth the Cost? (17 agencies listed here)
February 6, 2015
https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2015/02/us-intelligence-community-bigger-ever-it-worth-it/104799/
Quote:

The intelligence community has grown to an enormous size and Americans have no clue what they’re paying for.

The U.S. spends nearly $1 trillion on national security programs and agencies annually, more than any other nation in the world. Yet despite this enormous investment, there is not enough evidence to show the public that these programs are keeping Americans any safer – especially in the intelligence community. Excessive government secrecy prohibits the public and oversight agencies alike from determining whether our expensive intelligence enterprise is worth the investment.

The United States intelligence community is comprised of 17 federal agencies assigned an array of missions relating to national defense, foreign relations, homeland security and law enforcement.

In 2010, the Washington Post documented almost 2,000 private companies working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence. Over 5 million government employees and private contractors now hold security clearances giving them access to classified information.


I wasn't able to find good articles on "intel" personnel numbers world wide so not sure of the total numbers, and I suppose more than a few "in on" would obviously be needed to carry out and keep a world wide hoax like 'covid-19' under wraps, perhaps we should at least give that number an estimate of at least double the U.S. number, making 10 million available with security clearances from all the nations of the U.N., as a generic number but perhaps it is more than double but no point in speculating further on that.

So with these intelligence numbers assuming this information is accurate about 850,000 top secret clearance holders and more than 5 million secret security clearance holders, all sworn to secrecy and loylaty, and if some intel personnel are key "scientists' (private contractors) in certain govt. sponsored testing labs around the world, pulling off the 'covid' hoax should be a snap, and the standard sheople argument of "the rabbit hole" is too deep is completely invalidated. The term "rabbit hole" to dismiss "conspiracy theories" is just a stupid term and proves nothing as just a phrase, we're all living in the stupid "rabbit hole"- the enormous web of "intel" all around us, everywhere; whether they know it or believe it or not.


Let's move on to a few more smoking guns or at least garden variety pandemic simulations and one pandemic written plan for Illinois

Completed Projects
SPARS Pandemic Scenario

John Hopkins Center For Health Security
Bloomberg School of Public Health
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity...mpleted-projects/spars-pandemic-scenario.html
Quote:

The Center’s SPARS Pandemic exercise narrative comprises a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future. Its purpose is to prompt users, both individually and in discussion with others, to imagine the dynamic and oftentimes conflicted circumstances in which communication around emergency MCM development, distribution, and uptake takes place. While engaged with a rigorous simulated health emergency, scenario readers have the opportunity to mentally “rehearse” responses while also weighing the implications of their actions. At the same time, readers have a chance to consider what potential measures implemented in today’s environment might avert comparable communication dilemmas or classes of dilemmas in the future.

The self-guided exercise scenario for public health communicators and risk communication researchers covers a raft of themes and associated dilemmas in risk communications, rumor control, interagency message coordination and consistency, issue management, proactive and reactive media relations, cultural competency, and ethical concerns. To ensure that the scenario accounts for rapid technological innovation and exceeds the expectations of participants, the Center’s project team gleaned information from subject matter experts, historical accounts of past medical countermeasure crises, contemporary media reports, and scholarly literature in sociology, emergency preparedness, health education, and risk and crisis communication.

The scenario is hypothetical; the infectious pathogen, medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, and government agency responses are entirely fictional.

THE SPARS PANDEMIC 2025 -2028 A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity...ve/pubs-pdfs/2017/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf
Quote:

Page 4
However, laboratory tests were negative for influenza. Unable to identify the causative agent, officials at the Minnesota Department of Health’s Public Health Labora-
Page 5
tory sent the patients’ clinical specimens to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), where scientists confirmed that the patients did not have influenza. One CDC scientist recalled reading a recent ProMed dispatch describing the emergence of a novel coronavirus in Southeast Asia, and ran a pancoronavirus RT-PCR test. A week later, the CDC team confirmed that the three patients were, in fact, infected with a novel coronavirus, which was dubbed the St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SPARS-CoV, or SPARS), after the city where the first cluster of cases had been identified.
Page 6
As a result, early case fatality estimates were inflated. By late November, the CDC reported an initial estimated SPARS case fatality rate of 4.7% (By contrast, WHO reported that the overall case fatality rate for SARS was 14-15% and over 50% for people over the age of 64. Later in the SPARS outbreak, data that included more accurate estimates of mild SPARS cases indicated a case fatality rate of only 0.6%).

Another SARS coronavirus, yippee...

More Flu chatter, many pandemic scares over a long period of time, seems like every few years or something,

Infectious Disease Preparedness: Reflections from CDC’s Pandemic Flu Exercise
Oct 05, 2018 https://www.naccho.org/blog/article...s-reflections-from-cdcs-pandemic-flu-exercise
Quote:
On September 12-14, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducted a pandemic influenza functional exercise in response to a fictional influenza pandemic with federal, state, local, and non-governmental partners. The National Association of County & City Health Officials (NACCHO) and local health departments were among those that participated in the exercise.


The CDC had also involved local health departments, NACCHO, and other partners in two meetings preceding the exercise to develop the injects and create and more realistic scenario. These injects made this fictional influenza pandemic more realistic and prompted the CDC to respond and act as they would during an actual pandemic.

What strategies were employed to contain the outbreak?



The strategies employed during the outbreak reflected those in the Community Mitigation Guidelines to Prevent Pandemic Influenza – United States, 2017. These strategies included non-pharmaceutical interventions such as school closures, social distancing, and using face masks. Other interventions included use of antivirals (in this scenario, the virus was resistant to some but not all drugs) and vaccines. While a vaccine for this pandemic virus was not yet available to the public at the time, there was supply of influenza vaccine in the Strategic National Stockpile. This vaccine was not matched to the pandemic virus but could be used as a priming dose.

During the exercise, some challenges specifically related to the fictional influenza pandemic were implementation of school closures and vaccination of priority groups. Several state and local participants expressed the consequences of implementing school closures such as increased congregation in other public settings, lack of access to free or reduce meals for children in greatest need, and challenges parents face in arranging childcare, particularly in low-income households. Similarly, participants recognized several practical challenges with vaccinating target populations, such as providing clear and consistent public communication regarding the decision and rationale for prioritizing certain groups, establishing closed points of dispensing, and managing individuals seeking vaccination but do not fall within the target groups. While the exercise was not intended to resolve these ongoing challenges, these takeaways offer important areas to for the CDC and partners to continue addressing in preparation for a future influenza pandemic.


Here is a memo style announcement like document for a county in Illinois,

DEKALB COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATE: July 23, 2019
https://health.dekalbcounty.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/5-Minutes-2019-07-23.pdf
interesting bits here
Quote:

Community Health and Prevention & Health Promotion and Emergency Preparedness – Cindy Graves Ms. Graves stated that we continue to plan to participate in the August 13-16 Crimson Contagion State EP Drill. (covered that in post #1) Limited information has been coming from the State. Rockford and Chicago Regions will primarily focus on Information Sharing which includes opening the Emergency Operations Center, Public Information, continued internal communication, requesting supplies, etc. This drill is a precursor to the Full-Scale Exercise in October 2020 with a Pandemic Flu scenario.

Is this last part their talking about, really just the second or more systemwide training and simulation exercises that we saw in the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board document, of which we know now that 'covid-19' is at least the first of this pandemic simulation exercises (still ongoing) to be carried out by Oct. 2020, or that one is simpy just the 'covid' exercise that began in December 2019 in Wuhan? Can't really say I'm sure right now.

Illinois pandemic and simulated pandemic operation plan manual (I'm sure there is probably one for each state I bet)
Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response Plan Version 5.1 March 2020

https://edgarcountywatchdogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/illinois-pandemic-influenza-plan-version-51march-2020.pd

lot to look at in this document, very long, 120 pages, try and select most relevant snips here: seems this document had to have been written before March 2020, perhaps not though if Illinois had yet to declare a state medical emergency, but if so why would it not have worded it with 'coronavirus' sars-cov-2?
Quote:

page i

Illinois Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response Plan March 2020Version 5.1i
FOREWORD
Influenza is an acute viral infection that spreads easily from person-to-person. It causes illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths every year in Illinois. Intermittently over the centuries, changes in the genetic makeup of influenza virus have resulted in new strains to which people have never been exposed. These new strains have the potential to cause a pandemic or worldwide outbreak of influenza, with potentially catastrophic consequences. In Illinois alone, a pandemic of even modest severity could result in thousands of deaths and the sickening of millions, even among previously healthy persons.

In 2009, a new strain of influenza virus, 2009A(H1N1)pdm, emerged. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) worked with manufacturers to develop a vaccine; however, the time it took to develop a vaccine caused a severe shortage in available vaccine

The Illinois Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response Plan was developed:
To identify steps that need to be taken by state government and its partners prior to a pandemic to improve the level of preparedness;and
To coordinate state government-wide response activities in the event a pandemic occurs.
These preparedness and response activities are organized according to the six pandemic phases identified by the World Health Organization (WHO).

This plan was developed through a collaborative process involving Illinois Department of Public Health offices and divisions and partner state agencies that have a pandemic response role.

well page ii, table shows version 5.10 was written in March 2020,

5.00 / 04/25/2014 / Executive Overview / Title changed to Executive Overview 5.10 / 03/02/2020 / All / Modified version of the plan
does this make any sense that this is written in late February 2020 with Influenza all over the document when the Sars-cov-2 health emergency had already been declared for the U.S. on Jan 31, 2020?? not to me, unless they are saying plan was modified with original influenza plan not redacted et al, lame excuse but maybe they would claim that.

page 15

Federal Government
The federal government has assumed primary responsibility for a number of key elements of the national plan,including:
Vaccine research and development.

Coordination of national and international surveillance.

Assessment and potential enhancement of the coordination of vaccine and antiviral capacity and coordination of public-sector procurement.
Assessment of the need for and scope of a suitable liability program for vaccine manufacturers and persons administering the vaccine.
Development of a national “clearinghouse” for vaccine availability information, vaccine distribution and redistribution.
always about the stupid fucking vaccine, as though that will save everybody...
whistle.gif


page 16

Influenza pandemic will place a substantial burden on inpatient and outpatient health care services. Because of the increased risk of exposure to pandemic virus in health care settings, illness and absentee ism among healthcare workers in the context of increased demand will further strain the ability to provide quality care.

In addition to a limited number of hospital beds and staff shortages, equipment and supplies may be in short supply. The disruptions in the health care system that result from a pandemic also may have an impact on blood donation and supply.

page 21 in table

Role and Responsibilities

Maintain a 24-hour communications center for communicating with emergency response personnel from all agencies and organizations.

Coordinate, integrate and manage over all state efforts involving the collection, analysis, planning, reporting and displaying of information.

Provide, direct and coordinate logistical/resource operations with the assistance of the designated support agencies. Allocate state response resources effectively and according to need; monitor their location when in use.

Request a Disaster Mortuary Operational Response Team (DMORT)2 through FEMA and/or the National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) when local jurisdictions are overwhelmed and have requested state assistance to implement mass fatality management activities. (planned mass graves here?)

Develop scripted emergency public information messages for broadcast over Emergency Alert System (EAS) following disaster.

Coordinate state monitoring and enforcement of community-based isolation and quarantine orders.

Maintain critical infrastructure and implement contingency plans in the absence or failure of such critical infrastructure.

Coordinate high volume public information hotlines and a mechanism for tracking call types for rumor control purposes
I'm sure they will argue "scripted" doesn't mean fake simulation, but combined with "rumor control", now come on wtf!..

Page 66
Restriction of Movement or Activities to Control Disease Spread Primary Agency:IDPH Support Agencies: Governor’s Office, AG, IEMA, ISP and IDCMS

PurposeThis annex outlines the state’s authorities and capabilities to impose restrictions on the movements or activities of persons for the purpose of preventing or controlling the spread of a dangerous infectious disease.

Scope

The restriction of movement and/or activities involves the ability of state and local jurisdictions to be prepared legally, procedurally and materially to contain and monitor: exposed individuals or those suspected of being exposed (term: quarantine); infected individuals (term: isolation); defined groups or locations, such as individual schools, workplaces, malls and public transit systems, as determined on a case by case basis (term: focused measures to increase social distance); and entire communities, ranging from voluntary widespread cancellation of most activities (term: snow days), eliminating large gatherings of people, such as sporting events, shutting down other places where people congregate, such as schools and places of employment, or enforced restriction of movement into and out of defined areas.

Key Terms

Isolation: Isolation is the separation of a person or a group of persons infected or believed to be infected with a contagious disease to prevent the spread of infection. Ill persons are usually isolated in a hospital, but they also may be isolated at home or in a designated community-based facility, depending on their medical needs.

Quarantine: Quarantine is the separation and restriction of movement or activities of persons who are not ill, but who are believed to have been exposed to infection, for the purpose of preventing transmission of diseases.



Modes of application include:•Persons are usually quarantined in their homes, but they also may be quarantined in community-based facilities.

Quarantine can be applied to an individual or to a group of persons who are exposed at a large public gathering or to persons believed exposed on a conveyance during international travel.

Quarantine also can be applied on a wider population or geographic-level basis (e.g., snow days) with the voluntary or enforced prohibition of movements or activities. This measure is usually not technically considered quarantine because it is not directly linked to a known or highly suspect exposure (at best, the basis might be some degree of likelihood of exposure due to circumstantial or indirect evidence, such as high disease prevalence in a particular town or neighborhood ). These options are described and compared in the attachment following this annex (Attachment8-1)

Page 67
Quarantine (a period of isolation to prevent disease spread) is not effective in controlling multiple influenza outbreaks in large, immunologically naïve populations, because the disease spreads too rapidly to identify and to control chains of transmission. Even if quarantine were somewhat effective in controlling influenza in large populations, it would not be feasible to implement and enforce with available resources, and would damage the economy by reducing the workforce. Most people will voluntarily quarantine themselves in their home.


Quarantine may be of limited use in slowing the spread of disease during the earliest stages of influenza outbreaks, only if special circumstances apply. For example, were a case of influenza-like illness to be identified in an isolated group, such as the passengers and crew of an airplane, public health officials could prevent or slow the spread of disease to other groups by:-Quarantining all passengers and crew members for several days-Transferring all who become ill to isolation wards for treatment-Treating all influenza-like illness in the wider community with suspicion

page 70 (siezure of public and private property for this exercise by the governor?)
Gain access to and utilize facilities and property Upon the declaration of a disaster pursuant to Section 7 of the IEMA Act (20 ILCS 3305/7), the governor may exercise, among other things, the following emergency powers: recommend the evacuation of all or part of the population from any stricken or threatened area within the state if the governor deems this action necessary (20 ILCS 3305/7(a)(6)); prescribe routes, modes of transportation, and destinations in connection with evacuation (20 ILCS 3305/7(a)(7)); and control ingress and egress to and from a disaster area, the movement of persons within the area, and the occupancy of premises therein (20 ILCS 3305/7(a)(
icon_cool.gif
).•Appropriate private property for public use Upon the declaration of a disaster pursuant to Section 7 of the IEMA Act (20 ILCS 3305/7), the governor may, on behalf of the state, take possession of, and acquire full title or a lesser specified interest in, any personal property as may be necessary to accomplish the objectives set forth in Section 2 of the act, including airplanes, automobiles, trucks, trailers, buses and other vehicles; coal, oils, gasoline and other fuels and means of propulsion; explosives, materials,

page 71
Impose isolation, quarantine, and closure

at no substantial danger to the public’s health any longer exists (20 ILCS 2305/2(b)). (they won't force this upon people, ...) No person may be ordered to be quarantined or isolated and no place may be ordered to be closed and made off limits to the public, (unless they have to of course, ha ha) however, except with the consent of the person or the owner of the place or upon the order of a court of competent jurisdiction (20 ILCS 2305/2(c)). In order to obtain a court order, IDPH must prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that the public’s health and welfare are significantly endangered and all other reasonable means of correcting the problem have been exhausted and no less restrictive alternative exists (20 ILCS 2305/2(c)).

page 77
Rumor Control
When widespread rumors, inaccuracies or misperceptions are identified, the JIC will be consulted so correct information can be promptly communicated to the public through the media. These miscommunications may be identified in media broadcasts, in print media or through public inquiries.

page 81
Planning Assumptions and Considerations
The 1918 Spanish flu pandemic killed approximately 40 million people. It is estimated that in the United States a “medium-level” pandemic could cause 89,000 to 207,000 deaths. Based on current modeling from CDC’s FluAid 2.0, projections of statewide fatalities range from 7,907 to 47,462 based on low-to-high severity flu deaths.

initially, in the event of an influenza outbreak, the responsibility of fatality management will reside at the local level. Planning and response may require the participation and cooperation of local agencies, such as, but not limited to:
1.County coroners/medicalexaminers2.Funeraldirectors3.Municipaloffic ials4.Emergency managementagencies5.Firedepartments6.Emergency medicalservices7.Rescueservices8.Hospitals9.Munici pal and state law enforcementagencies10.Ancillary volunteer agencies (e.g., American Red Cross)

page 83
Temporary Morgues
In a pandemic influenza outbreak, once local capabilities are exceeded, the state will assist local government in securing resources and assist with the establishment of temporary morgues.A temporary morgue should be established after determining that the expected number of cases will exceed the capacity of normal operations.

page 84-85
Documentation
Documentation refers to maintaining timely and accurate records concerning personnel involved and expenditures of time and money.Record all incoming personnel, equipment and time of arrival. Issue identification and a task description to people reporting to the staging area(s). As noted, preparing a method of identification before an incident will save time and help reduce confusion at the scene. Document all expenditures, ordered goods, services or equipment, to include the requestor, arrival and departure times.

Documentation is essential for:
a.Management of the crime scene
b.Effective handling of tasks during the incident
c.Reconstruction of incident events
d.Protection against lawsuits
e.Lessons Learned for future events and modification of existing plans
f.Financial reimbursement
Precautionary note: While it is important to document events and actions, consider that over-documentation can hinder the operations.
essential information for covering up the crime scene hoax, in this case the 'covid' murder hoax

DMORT Activation
Upon notification of a mass fatalities incident, IEMA may request that the U. S. Public Health Service (USPHS) provide a team of experts to assist the coroner/medical examiner in assessing the situation to determine if federal government assistance is required.


Dignity of the Deceased
The deceased must be treated with respect and dignity in all thoughts and actions.
but afterwards, just toss em'
A bioethics committee will be consulted before any decisions are made on the mass burial or disposal of victims.

page 89
7.0 Training and Exercise Schedule and Plan

Planning Assumptions and Considerations•All exercises will be designed and conducted in compliance with state exercise standards, as defined by the Illinois Terrorism Task Force.•Local health departments are funded to prepare and respond to all hazardous events including a pandemic in local communities.•Training and exercise requirements are outlined in annual preparedness grants to local health departments.•All public information is coordinated by the Office of the Governor’s communications staff.•All agencies and staff will be NIMS compliant, as required by executive order.•Staff need to be trained and exercises conducted in advance so staff are aware of the NIMS and ICS structure androles

page 90-91
Drill
A drill is a coordinated, supervised exercise activity, normally used to test a single specific operation or function. With a drill, there is no attempt to coordinate organizations or fully activate an emergency response plan and operating structure. Its role in a comprehensive exercise program is to practice and to perfect one small part of the response plan and to help prepare for more extensive exercises designed to coordinate and to test several functions and involve a wider spectrum of participants. Drills also are used to provide training with new equipment, to develop new policies or procedures, or to practice and to maintain current skills. The utility of a drill is its focus on a single, relatively limited portion of the overall emergency management system, thereby permitting a targeted, highly intensive look at a potential problem area.

Tabletop Exercise

A tabletop exercise is a facilitated analysis of an emergency situation in an informal, stress-free environment. It is designed to elicit constructive discussion as participants examine and resolve problems based on existing operational plans and identify where those plans need to be refined. The success of the exercise is largely determined by group participation in the identification of problem areas. There is minimal attempt at simulation in a tabletop exercise. Equipment is not used, resources are only deployed on paper, and time pressures are not introduced.

Functional Exercise

A functional exercise is an interactive, fully-simulated test of an organization’s ability to affect a coordinated response to a stressful situation under time-pressured and more-or-less realistic circumstances. This type of exercise gets its name from the fact it tests one or more functions of an organization’s operations plan. The range of suitable objectives for this type of undertaking is broad, and encompasses the coordination, integration and interaction of an organization’s policies, procedures, roles and responsibilities before, during or after an event.The intended audience for a functional exercise consists of policy, coordination and operations personnel who will practice responding in a realistic way to carefully planned and sequenced messages given to them by “simulators.”

Because these messages should reflect ongoing events and problems that might occur in a real emergency, they must be scripted in a manner likely to cause participants to make decisions and then act on them. This complexity makes the functional exercise more difficult and time-consuming to design than drills and tabletop exercises.Participants will be required to make on-the-spot decisions and then act on them. These actions can generate a variety of actual consequences, such as responses from other players and resource shortages. These secondary consequences can, in turn, further stimulate activity within the realm of the exercise environment.Functional exercises make it possible to test several functions and to include several agencies or departments within an agency without incurring the cost of a full-scale exercise (described below). Thus, in almost all cases, a functional exercise is a prerequisite to a full-scale exercise. In some instances, taking part in a functional exercise also may serve as a full-scale exercise for a participating organization (e.g., a hospital may conduct its own full-scale exercise as part of a community-wide functional exercise)

Full-scale Exercise
A full-scale exercise simulates a real event as closely as possible. It is designed to evaluate the operational capabilities of emergency management systems in a highly stressful environment, and attempts to simulate the full spectrum of conditions that those with a response role might face. (not all healthcare workers will really know it's all just an exercise, to see how they will respond, I would think here, not everybody is "in on it" anyhow, yada yada) To accomplish these things, a full-scale exercise must include the actual mobilization and movement of emergency personnel, equipment and resources. Ideally, a full-scale exercise should test and evaluate most of the functions provided for in the applicable emergency operations plan(s).

A full-scale exercise differs from a drill in that it coordinates the actions of several entities, tests several emergency functions and puts participants in actual v. simulated operating environments (e.g., state, state agency and/or local emergency operations centers;dispensing and vaccination centers; “on-scene” command posts.The requisite level of realism is achieved through a variety of techniques,including:•“On-scene” actions and decisions• Simulated victims•Search and rescue requirements•Use of actual emergency communication protocols, channels and devices•Actual v. “on paper only” allocation and deployment of personnel, equipment, supplies and other critical resources

Full-scale exercises are regarded as the ultimate in the test of response effectiveness “trial by fire” that is as close as practicable to an actual event. Because they are expensive and time consuming, it is advisable this form of exercise be reserved for the highest priority hazards and functions, and they be conducted only after the applicable emergency response plans and operational structure are well developed, widely understood and tested through one or more of the four less resource-intensive processes described elsewhere in this document
Is not all this basically the same as the EVENT 201 and Clade X scenarios???

There is a ton in this document to unpack, enough of that for now, will add more later.
 

gl69m

Member
Post #6 from original thread (from Viking911)

Gates $100B Deal For TRACING APP. 6 Months Before CV19 Even Started!

edit: that video apparently was removed, so I found a link that has podcasts pertaining to the same subject, hopefully good info and wasn't some pure rabbit hole..
 

Dude 111

Active member
gl69m said:
Sad to hear that Dude, have you lost any of these friends due to this yet?

Yes they dont talk to me,they think im crazy...... I tried going over one day a few weeks ago and they werent that nice to me... They say im not taking it seriously...

YES I AM!!!!! -- I know its all crap... The guy said to me "Take your head out of your ass and do your research" and I said "I did my research and I dont like what im seeing"

Its very sad........
 

gl69m

Member
Post #8 from original thread (from gl69m) (note- old LRF links won't work)

Adding this one, not necessarily as a smoking gun per se, but certainly as a huge red flag;

from thread

Are the COVID-19 Test Kits Designed to Produce False Positives (Plandemic)?
from post #4, my list of biases built into the CDC 'covid-19' pcr test protocol, bias #17 (posted 10 Apr 2020),
http://letsrollforums.com//showpost....20&postcount=4
Quote:

DC-006-00019, Revision: 03 CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases Effective: 3/30/2020CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use OnlyInstructions for UseCatalog # 2019-nCoVEUA-01 1000 reactionsFor In-vitro Diagnostic (IVD) UseRx Only
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download


17- no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available (page 38 ),assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA. Is this a possible admission the virus is fake and that the '2019-nCoV' genome may be a mock (theoretical genome)? Well, I think it's possible: my tinfoil hat dunning-kreuger senses (not spidy senses
biggrin.gif
) are tingling, how about yours?

slighter longer excerpt and explanation from post #5 (posted 10 Apr 2020)
http://letsrollforums.com//showpost....21&postcount=5
Quote:

17- From page 38,
Quote:
Performance Characteristics
Analytical Performance:

Limit of Detection (LoD):

LoD studies determine the lowest detectable concentration of 2019-nCoV at which approximately 95% of all (true positive) replicates test positive. The LoD was determined by limiting dilution studies using characterized samples.

The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
I'm thinking that normally there is quantified virus isolates to validate test methods normally, here they did their fast-tracked validation with “transcribed” full length RNA of the N gene, from the genome published from this GenBank accession deposit MN908947.2. This is perhaps the second genome version of the original genome published by Chinese scientists (I think on Jan 5th 2020) for the alleged 2019-nCoV virus, subsequently renamed SARS-CoV2 virus.

Is it possible that no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were currently available, because they didn't (don't exist)? Is this genome perhaps a mock genome, and this transcribed RNA put into this test validation (and for the 2019-nCoV positive controls also in subsequent actual specimen testing?) was actually artificially printed nucleic acid? I have a hunch (
icon_think.gif
).

And to place in context, proof demonstrating that the CDC, according to their 'covid-19' pcr document, no "quantified" (therefore no "isolated" virus either) virus was used to test their method/protocol on, and further revision of the same document also shows that they did not add any further testing/results for any further validation of that particular method,

from post #30 (posted 13 Jul 2020)
http://letsrollforums.com//showpost....0&postcount=30
Quote:

Update to this document from above link (same link as in post #4, https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download, this time on page 39):
Quote:
CDC-006-00019, Revision: 04 CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases Effective: 6/12/2020

CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel
For Emergency Use Only
Instructions for Use
Catalog # 2019-nCoV
EUA-01 1000 reactions
For In-vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Use
Rx Only

Page 39

Performance Characteristics


Analytical Performance:

Limit of Detection (LoD):

LoD studies determine the lowest detectable concentration of 2019-nCoV at which approximately 95% of all (true positive) replicates test positive. The LoD was determined by limiting dilution studies using characterized samples.

The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. Samples were extracted using the QIAGEN EZ1 Advanced XL instrument and EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (Cat# 62724) and manually with the QIAGEN DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat# 61904). Real-Time RT-PCR assays were performed using the ThemoFisher Scientific TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (Cat# A15299) on the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument according to the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions for use.

from post #31 (posted 19 Jul 2020)
http://letsrollforums.com//showpost....7&postcount=31
Quote:

New revision (05) for the CDC 'covid' pcr protocol document:

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download



Quote:
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)

Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel

For Emergency Use Only
Instructions for Use
Catalog # 2019-nCoVEUA-01

1000 reactions
For In-vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Use
Rx Only

CDC-006-00019, Revision: 05 CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases Effective: 07/13/2020

from page 39

Performance Characteristics

Analytical Performance:

Limit of Detection (LoD):
LoD studies determine the lowest detectable concentration of 2019-nCoV at which approximately 95% of all (true positive) replicates test positive. The LoD was determined by limiting dilution studies using characterized samples.

The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. Samples were extracted using the QIAGEN EZ1 Advanced XL instrument and EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (Cat# 62724) and manually with the QIAGEN DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat# 61904). Real-Time RT-PCR assays were performed using the ThemoFisher Scientific TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (Cat# A15299) on the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument according to the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions for use.


the big piece the gargantuan pink elephant in the room is that they still don't mention using any "quantified" (and therefore not "isolated") virus stocks or in other words didn't use isolated/quantified 'sars-cov2' virus, why the fuck not??!! surely there has been plenty of time for them to generate these viral stocks, if this virus were real?? Seriously. To me this kind of feels like another smoking gun,
 

gl69m

Member
from post #17 (from Sinister Dick Cheney)
WHAT IF they released a disease they knew was harmless until you accepted an injection that helped it? There were credible rumors that when CVS employees were entering people's identification info into the system specific batch numbers were given to specific people. WHAT IF those batch numbers were assigned to people based on their social media posts, and what big tech and others involved in the Covid con job knew about everyone? We all know big tech is spying. The same people are behind this shot - BILL GATES, could it be anymore obvious? That bastard has the full slate of everything you ever typed into one of his operating systems, which is what those incessant constant updates were for . . not "security" - that was a con. They were really to analyze who you were. AND HIS SHOT DECIDES WHO LIVES OR DIES, depending on what batch number you get, all based on what all those "updates" sent him. Google gets it even quicker, without updates.

From - JimStone.is - http://82.221.129.208/1/.uc8.html
I had this very similar thought last year, that people are chosen to be 'pos' or "neg" in the 'covid' tests (pcr mainly) based on their personal and demographic information, by the testing regime with their AI quantum computer algorithms (Al Gore rhythms haha), and I posted about that in post#13 of the original thread, so gonna post that one out of order from the original thread cause I think this of significance. I mean, if a patient voluntarily gets a test and the AI knows this persons info and political beliefs, those who believe the 'pandemic' is gonna kill us all and all are surly gonna come up 'pos' way nore often than a skeptic like me: after all I tested "negative" 4 times in a row, 2 back in April and two in June, in pursuit of the surgery I had in June in New Jersey for my chronic pelvic pain. And I go maskless and social dipshitless (no "social distancing" of 6 feet blah blah for me) wherever I can since probably July 2020, so is it possible the AI algorithm knows I would be demanding to see all the lab data including the pcr run data and demanding a retest etc.? cause I knew a 'pos' result was gonna fuck up my chances of seeing the surgeon in April and getting the surgery in June; they expected a "neg" test from IL in order to be seen in clinic in New Jersey but to have a procedure (injections like a nerve block) or surgery they required a "neg" test while in Jersey which takes 24-48 hours so it was tricky to schedule all those appointments around that and then it was a roll of the pcr dice to get the result that wasn't going to fuck up my plans of getting the nerve block in April and the surgery in June. Either I was lucky as hell or maybe their AI algore-rythm knows the fuck better to give a 'pos' result to people like me...

post #13 from original thread (from gl69m)
Very interesting video on “pandemic simulations” and “synthetic populations from 6 years ago, not a smoking gun by itself by any means but I think it may well relate to how the 'covid-19' infection/death numbers are generated, I believe “synthetically” and not real infections or data and certainly not real 'covid' deaths in other words a simulated pandemic and not a real pandemic.

Stats in Action: Infectious Diseases
Jun 3, 2014
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cpus_ieYNX4&t=44s
U.S. Census Bureau
Scientists use American Community Survey statistics to simulate the spread of disease, allowing decision-makers to prepare for the next potential outbreak. Dr. Irene Eckstrand from the National Institutes of Health, and Bill Wheaton from RTI International, use the ACS data to create "synthetic" populations and determine the effect of disease transmission.

Comments are turned off. Learn more
I hate it when the comments are turned off, sometimes they are more entertaining and enlightening/educational
biggrin.gif
(links sometimes too that take it further etc.) than the actual video or many times equal to that.

MIDAS = Models of Infectious Disease Agents Study, funded basically by NIH (of which fraudci is also part of https://www.oar.nih.gov/about/fauci). Long synopsis short here, MIDAS uses data from the U.S. Census Bureau (most recent Census data as in the 2010 census in this video) and the ACS (American Community Survey, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs), to create “synthetic populations”(based on real population data of course), then pandemic simulations are run by super computers to simulate the data to see who gets infected, who gets sick who doesn't et al. The data is very specific demographically and geographically, race/gender/age/socio-economic status/political affiliation/medical history-vital stats (I imagine) etc. etc., NSA edward snowden shit.

@~2:00 in, Wheaton states that no other database compered to the ACS combined with census data can provide the level of detail necessary to run these simulations; Eckstrand states that they can (and I'm sure they do) run thousands of these computer simulations in an afternoon (she says “this is synthesized, not your real data”, meaning it is not real infection data but it is real demographic information data being used to input into the pandemic simulation).

My suspicion is that this methodology is how the 'covid-19' “testing' infection/death numbers are generated, synthetically. I am not saying that they are not ever “testing” anybody at all (testing but for what in reality? if 'sars-cov-2' is not a real virus?, I couldn't answer that); but I've repeatedly stated that we really have no idea who is really tested or not, and no such evidence have I seen yet that anyone has really had such a test performed (PCR diagnostic test medical documentation specifically), but surely they are actually performing these tests on some people, but the number of “total tests performed” is far more than the number of total people (patients or prospective screenings for 'covid' etc.) actually tested, due to multiple specimens collected and multiple tests performed from each specimen et al.

Some kind of criteria must be being used (by AI super-computers) to determine who is chosen as 'positive' as opposed to negative, medical history (pre-existing conditions/diseases especially, lung diseases for sure, age, geography, race for sure {it is reported that black and hispanics are in higher proportion of infection and death rate etc.}); perhaps political affiliation, I would assume more democrats vs republicans (I wonder if there is data on this or not), liberals (and fake liberals) vs conservatives, those who would not really question the diagnosis based on the way the media has fed the lie to the public and so on and so on.

Then there was a report like this one almost a week ago,

600,000 people were told they had COVID-19 despite not being tested

https://thepostmillennial.com/600-000-people-were-told-they-had-covid-19-despite-not-being-tested
July 27, 2020 10:51 AM 2 mins reading
The healthcare program Tricare at the United States Department of Defense Military Health System falsely told more than 600,000 people they had been infected with the novel coronavirus, according to the Daily Wire. Turns out they had never been tested.

The email, apparently sent in error, read: "As a survivor of COVID-19, it’s safe to donate whole blood or blood plasma, and your donation could help other COVID-19 patients," the email stated. "Your plasma likely has antibodies (or proteins) present that might help fight the coronavirus infection. Currently, there is no cure for COVID-19. However, there is information that suggests plasma from COVID-19 survivors, like you, might help some patients recover more quickly from COVID-19."

One beneficiary took to Facebook to see if anyone else had received the strange email, saying: "Just wondering [if] anybody [got] an email from Tricare saying since you are a COVID survivor, please donate your plasma.?? I have NOT been tested ... Just remember all those people inputting data are human and make mistakes."

Human Military "issued a call to blood donors located near military installations that are collecting plasma from recovered coronavirus patients, also known as convalescent plasma, as a potential treatment for the illness," but it apparently went to every "beneficiary located near a collection point," according to a report from Military.com.

Human issued a formal apology just hours after, saying that "in an attempt to educate beneficiaries who live close to convalescent plasma donation centers about collection opportunities, you received an email incorrectly suggesting you were a COVID-19 survivor." The company added that "you have not been identified as a COVID-19 survivor and we apologize for the error and any confusion it may have caused," according to the report.

The report noted that the corporate communications lead, Marvin Hill, admitted to the error, writing that "as a part of an effort to educate military beneficiaries about convalescent plasma donation opportunities, Humana was asked to assist our partner, the Defense Health Agency."

"Language used in email messages to approximately 600k beneficiaries gave the impression that we were attempting to reach only people who had tested positive for COVID-19. We quickly followed the initial email with a clear and accurate second message acknowledging this. We apologize."


The Daily Wire reported that other healthcare organizations have been epicenters of confusion, writing that "Nashville man Brock Ballou said he received at least three calls from the state regarding his apparent symptoms after testing positive for the novel coronavirus. Mr. Ballou said he was never tested, however."
Now this may well get chalked up with plausible deniability as just some e-mailing carbon copy (cc) error of some sort and not taken seriously. But is this perhaps one part of the above method I was talking about to “synthesize” an infected “pandemic simulation population”? So these 600,000 people who were never tested for 'covid' at all were apologized to and explained it was an error, but we would never be given any evidence/assurance that these numbers are not still included in the 'covid' infection/case numbers now will we? I sure as hell don't think so.

I want to add here a couple of videos, documentaries about the original SARS pandemic, now I believe that pandemic was likely real but total truth not told, but it could be fictional too how the hell would I know: but I think the actual infection rate claimed and geographical spread was probably way under reported but it's lethality probably way over reported as well, perhaps that was true for MERS epidemic as well, and other emerging coronaviruses in last ten years.

I will also say I have sees in conspiracy circles this year floated certain ideas that viruses aren't real (I've seen that one a few years ago too) or that they are just waste excreted from cells (exosomes) etc., I don't really buy any of that, but I also don't buy that viruses really have no known biological function at all which seems to be kind of a prevailing sort of scientific consensus.


My personal thought that came to my mind recently is that viruses all originate from each individual species, are created by each species for a biological purpose in house; genetic signaling within the body (multi-cellular organisms) for repairing or some form of de-toxification etc. or some other function; but the excess excreted viral particles of each species a certain % remain viable in the environment for varying periods of time and can therefore rarely “infect” other differing organisms or/and including other individuals of the same multi-cellular organism of origin. So I see it possible that some influenza viruses, perhaps originating as a virus created by a swine or bird species that serves a positive function for them but excreted and can then occasionally (and probably very rarely, considering the number of viruses contacted per individual organisms and people here) be absorbed and “infect” people or other animals to create a negative function or illness (and occasionally death). That's my little virus hypothesis, I haven't attempted so far to follow up on that, it sounds logical to me anyways.

SARS Documentaries on Youtube: these could be smoking guns of a sort, 'covid-19' being a planned sequel to the SARS epidemic/pandemic.

Killer Bug - SARS Coronavirus
Dec 31, 2014

SARS, one of the most Dangerous Virus Documentary
Jul 26, 2017



I've only watched these two videos once all the way through, I assume that the documentaries were produced several years prior to the published dates on Youtube, but I don't really know when they were produced with exact dates. Now except for the numbers (infections/deaths) and the scale and total spread of the original SARS epidemic/pandemic, and the nature of the extreme dramatic atmosphere and fearmongering in these two videos, if you simply scale up SARS 1.0 numbers to that close to the SARS 2.0 numbers, if you switched these documentaries with a 'covid' title and virus name?, now I ask could anybody tell the freaking difference with these two documentaries from 'covid' documentaries coming out now at all?? I seriously fucking doubt it, the similarities of the way SARS “disease' is presented in these videos differs less than a dime's worth of difference between that and 'covid-19', in my opinion.
This last video is unavailable, channel account was terminated.
 

Sinister Dick Cheney

Active member
If you are a celebrity a famous person on TV or big on Twitter you get a harmless saline shot this is why very few famous people are suffering after being vaxxed. If you are a nobody or a troublemaker you get the kill shot. A few famous people have died from the vaccine, Hank Aaron the home run king of baseball died after his covid shot they screwed up when they gave him his vaccine. But for all the big stars you see on TV who are all in favor of everyone getting vaxxed they all got saline solution shots or vitamin shots nothing dangerous for fear of killing them. The medical cabal can't have Jimmy Kimmel or Stephen Colbert dropping dead from their vaccine that would destroy the propaganda narrative real fast. So famous guys like them are never at risk.
 

gl69m

Member
from Sinister Dick Cheney (post #53)
If you are a celebrity a famous person on TV or big on Twitter you get a harmless saline shot this is why very few famous people are suffering after being vaxxed. If you are a nobody or a troublemaker you get the kill shot. A few famous people have died from the vaccine, Hank Aaron the home run king of baseball died after his covid shot they screwed up when they gave him his vaccine. But for all the big stars you see on TV who are all in favor of everyone getting vaxxed they all got saline solution shots or vitamin shots nothing dangerous for fear of killing them. The medical cabal can't have Jimmy Kimmel or Stephen Colbert dropping dead from their vaccine that would destroy the propaganda narrative real fast. So famous guys like them are never at risk.
My thought on the vaxxines is that most likely most of the doses most people are getting are placebos and so are more or less the negative control group, and there may be multiple positive control groups with the actual drugs and of a range of varying titrated doses of the lipid nano-particles (PEGylated too) that carry the mRNA or DNA of their modified coronavirus "spike" protein. And there is likely lots with doses tainted with who knows what for other nefarious purposes including bonafide "kill shots" (for specific people too meted out by AI algorithms? scary shit if true), but without being able to independently test any lots of vax, plausible deniability of that notion will of course be maintained.

Of which the reputed spike protein is supposed to be from 'sarscov2' virus which is quite possibly a fictitious genome IMSO but I digress. I know it's been reported in articles that the mRNA for the spike protein in the Moderna (I believe) and or Pfizer vaxxines has been modified with genetic engineering to supposedly taylor it so that the form of the protein expressed will be in the fixed "prefusion" form on the protruding part of the subunit of the protein; not going to dig up those articles at the moment though. But I'm not sure if the genetic alterations to the modified mRNA coding sequence have been published or not, likely it would be their proprietary trade secret I would guess but I have not looked that up so far.

There was a few comments on a You Tube video that I found that summed up in almost perfect wording better than I could myself, when I had the very same thought in April 2020, sort of answering the question of "how much spike protein would this basic and simple gene therapy product induce in cells in the body after inoculation?" The comments came from this video,

S Kaz S Kaz 1 month ago
So are we going to do a large double blind study for mRNA booster shots? Shouldn’t we?
229


flagmichael

flagmichael

1 month ago

Not really. The pharmacology is very much as we saw with the second doses.
7


Mariano Gil Glz

Mariano Gil Glz

1 month ago

@flagmichael ?????, if your body was injected twice, and did not get a good immune response, they said it had, why on earth a third dose? These things are not to cure you they have another purpose, spread deaths, so does not look suspicious, it is a russian roulette.
21


artpatronforever

artpatronforever

1 month ago (edited)

@flagmichael Because of the variable multiplier that is the cell machinery inoculated with mRNA and the unknown number of cells that will be successfully inoculated, the realized dose of spike protein is an unknowable variable, and may result in an effect that produces a range of reaction depending on the individual, anything from a slightly sore arm to more serious reaction that can be fatal. It is the variable nature of the realized dose inherent for the technology that makes it a roll of the dice. For a conventional vaccine there is no variable present involving cellular machinery being messaged to produce a toxic pathogenic protein in an unknowable amount, but there is a fixed dosage of inoculant that can be titrated to fit the patient weight and other parameters. By its nature the mRNA technology is dangerous and is experimental no matter the number of persons who risk receiving it and no matter the approval status.
20



artpatronforever

artpatronforever

1 month ago

@Mariano Gil Glz You are precisely correct. From one injection to the next even for the same individual, it is a roll of the dice for mRNA inoculation because of the unknown variable how many cells will be successfully inoculated and the unknown multiplier that the inoculated cells will apply to their task of producing a pathogenic protein that is highly TOXIC. Each shot has a range of potential effect from benign to fatal as an inherent disadvantage for the mRNA technology.
9


artpatronforever

artpatronforever

1 month ago

@flagmichael You know as much about pharmacology as a fish knows about a motorcycle.
artpatronforever summed it up very well, they likely have no clue how much spike protein will be produced each dose administered: however I will have to search and see if the spike protein levels produced in the blood were even been measured in the initial human guinea pig trials in 2020, or being measured after the vaxxines were released to public for the further mass gene therapy experiment. Maybe I'm wrong and they claim it is at specific known levels. I'm sure some co-vidiot vaxxine defender will claim artpatron is wrong about that, but that certainly makes sense to me on the face of it.

I love how artpatron chided flagmichael, haha!

BTW, I could really care fucking less what 'Dr' 'covid' death Hansen says about Ivermectin and 'covid', I'm posting the video strictly to source these comments.


I wanted to briefly note this article I saw recently that outlines the serious concerns of the vaxxines and the mass gene therapy experiment,

Copyright@ Alejandro Sousa | Biomed J Sci & Tech Res | BJSTR. MS.ID.005501.26444Research ArticleISSN: 2574 -1241
mRNA, Nanolipid Particles and PEG: A Triad Never Used in Clinical Vaccines is Going to Be Tested on Hundreds of Millions of People

I'm hoping to come back to this article for a basic review and post it in the Con-vid vaxxine thread.
 

Sinister Dick Cheney

Active member
This is why you see many news articles about saline solution being found in batches of the vaccine and they pretend it was a mistake and they call all the people who got vaxxed with saline to tell them you have to return to the location to get vaxxed again. Nobody knows how many vials are saline mixed in with the poison vaccine. When you see a famous person being vaxxed on camera it's 100% a saline solution shot they can't risk the famous person dropping dead on camera.
 

Sinister Dick Cheney

Active member
The challenge was how to coerce healthy adults to accept experimental medical procedure en masse.

Step One: Massive media hysteria based on exaggeration and fraud
Step Two: Suppression of cures
Step Three: Manic promotion of vaccines as the only solution
Step Four: “Collective punishment” – business and social services shutdowns, mandatory masks “until the vaccine.”
Step Five: Vaccines mandatory as a condition of employment, travel and using public resources
 

gl69m

Member
@Sinister Dick Cheney (posts #55 & #57)

Thanks for the response about the saline shot stories, I have no doubt it is true that most of the shots are pure saline; however I doubt that the real vax (that produces the spike protein) is necessarily very deadly (probably it is a low rate), at least initially. If the DNA spike vax or even the mRNA spike vax can integrate into even a small number of cells and then be expressed at later periods of time in an inoculated person's life, that sounds like a mysterious auto-immune type syndrome coming on. The chances of death initially is probably low unless someone is given a pretty high dose of the lipid nano-particles that produce the spike protein in their cells. Of course that is not taking into account other ingredients not divulged in the formulations. But I do doubt that they want to automatically kill off everyone straight off with this vax, I'm certain they are thrilled to see the results that their mRNA concoction can produce the protein they want and elicit an anti-body response. Whether these anti-bodies confer resistance to anything worthwhile is of serious doubt in my mind of course, so don't expect me to be taking this vax ever even if the death risk is actually initially low.

Still all a mass gene therapy experiment, and of course idiot critics out there are whining about people calling it gene therapy when that's exactly what it is on the most basic level, delivering a gene product to induce your cells to produce a foreign protein of interest to them, regardless of whether or not it is intended to alter any genomic DNA in your cells or not; and there is good reason to suspect this can happen even if it might end up being rare. Had an argument over last weekend on Facebook with someone I went to highschool with and 'scientist' friend of his who tried to argue that these vaxxes have zero element of "gene therapy" but they are flat out wrong, and I have found a Securities Exchange Commission document from Moderna that admits that the FDA considered mRNA delivery products as "gene therapy" in 2018, I will post that on the Con-vid Vax thread.



I want to post the last post of the original thread, was from probably a year ago in October 2020,

Post #14 (from gl69m)

Post #14 (from gl69m{LRF})


Been thinking about this for almost two weeks now, Trumpty Dumpty testing 'positive' for the rona; and now the full recovery, all in less than two weeks time it seems. Surly this has to be another smoking gun to the 'covid' psyop, is it not? Just looking at the antics of the blowhard potus along with all of the absurd fearmongering fear porn put out there about this p(l)andemic for so many months now, why would any rational people believe all this bullshit? But I guess some do, stubborn political correctness I guess...

Trump is obviously a liar very often, possibly 9 times out of 10 that he opens his mouth, but on the 'covid' psyop I think he has provided many clues to the fact that 'covid-19' is a complete scam, a fraud. Not that he cares how the vast majority of the people have fallen for it, he considers all people not in the elite bracket at least as high as himself as nothing but "losers and suckers" anyway. Many on my Facebook friend list, people opposed to Trump were saying they believed he is probably lying about being 'positive' for the rona, no shit, that's because it isn't real, but sadly they will argue it's real till blue in the face if you point that out so I've quite trying to do that on Facebook...


President Donald Trump Tests Positive for Covid-19
10.2.20
https://www.wired.com/story/donald-trump-positive-coronavirus-covid-19/
Actual details of the president’s illness are scant; his physician Sean Conley wrote a memorandum released by the White House press office saying that “the President and First Lady are both well at this time.” Melania Trump tweeted, “We are feeling good.” At a rally two weeks ago, Trump told the crowd that the virus “affects virtually no one.” (small nugget of truth from the con man?)

Not only is that not true, but the possible consequences are much more severe for people who are older and obese. In a weird twist of luck for Trump, though, Covid-19 has been around for long enough that health care workers and scientists have begun to come up with ways to treat it. Here are the kinds of options health care workers might consider for someone like the president.


Even though people of any age and any health status can get very sick and die from Covid-19, three of the things that make the disease most deadly are being male, old, and overweight. That’s not great for the president. Trump is 74 years old and, as of June, weighed 244 pounds. Technically that makes him mildly obese. Across an entire population, all other things being equal, Covid-19 kills hardly anyone under 50.
(another nugget of truth from this article? but left out the part telling us that "Covid-19" is not a real virus...)
But over 50, the numbers start to climb. For people older than their mid-seventies, the mortality rate for Covid-19 is around 4 percent. “Compared to an 18- to 29-year-old, someone aged 73 is about 5 times more likely to be hospitalized and about 90 times more likely to die of Covid,” says Bob Wachter, chair of the department of medicine at UC San Francisco. “Once you’re up to age 75, that death number becomes 220 times more likely to die.”
Trump tests negative to COVID-19 on consecutive days: White House doctor
Updated October 13, 2020 — 9.15am first published at 9.01am
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-...-days-white-house-doctor-20201013-p564iz.html

Live updates: Barron Trump also had coronavirus but has now tested negative along with first lady, she says
Oct. 14, 2020
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/10/14/coronavirus-covid-live-updates-us/


Another thought had occurred to me, who is being spared ('recovered') as opposed to falling 'victim' to the dreaded 'covid-19'? They just couldn't spare Herman Cain for example, he was also 74 this year just like Trump, was he really in worse health than Trump before being 'positive? He was supposedly doing better just before he died I guess. I liked Herman Cain better than most republicans or conservatives and also more than most other black conservatives.

Herman Cain dies from COVID-19 at age 74
Jul. 30, 2020
https://www.restaurantbusinessonline.com/leadership/herman-cain-dies-covid-19-age-74
News reports indicated that Cain had been doing better in recent days, though he continued to draw off a supplemental supply of oxygen to ease his breathing. Often with COVID cases, patients are on an upswing when they suddenly crash and die.
How many people have died that have allegedly got the rona in the White House? I don't think these articles mentioned any deaths,

At least 22 in Trump’s circle have tested positive for coronavirus
Thu 8 Oct 2020
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...s-campaign-military-test-positive-coronavirus

34 people connected to White House, more than previously known, infected by coronavirus: Internal FEMA memo
The administration has sought to downplay the spread.
October 7, 2020
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/34-...iously-infected-coronavirus/story?id=73487381


Very long list of "notables" and govt. officials (and maybe some celebrities on this list too?) allegedly dying from 'covid',

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_deaths_due_to_COVID-19

List of "notables" "recovering' from 'covid' apparently without issue: Shout out to Viing911 for that post (and gosh, Sept. {blues} Clues forum too I guess, sheesh
icon_lol.gif
icon_rolleyes.gif
)

http://letsrollforums.com//showpost.php?p=280181&postcount=151


Perhaps they are offing notables and officials that aren't going along with or cooperating enough with the 'covid' and further (21/30) agendas?

'Celebrity' or 'Notable' Covid-19 Deaths Call Into Question Rates Of
April 07, 2020
https://www.realclearmarkets.com/ar...eaths_call_into_question_rates_of_104095.html
It’s possible that dying from CoVID-19 makes a marginally notable person more likely to be included in Wikipedia’s list—but we see the trend even among celebrities whose deaths are not listed as CoVID-19. I cross-checked using lists of pre-defined people, such as major-league baseball former players, and found similar increases (although for baseball only 5 deaths versus an expected 4, so no statistical significance).

None of these factors seems adequate to explain the 18:1 ratio between the increase in death rate of notable people versus the announced CoVID-19 deaths among the general population.
(this right here was the most "notable" thing this article said, 18 to 1??!! but yet this seems to be the complete opposite {at least so far} with people with the rona in the White House...)
Some possible explanations that come to mind (I leave out the “massive conspiracy theory to cover up the seriousness of the crisis” as too implausible to credit).
Okay, so what about all the marches and protests and riots and fake or manufactured riots?, regardless of who all the true guilty parties (provocateurs mostly IMO) really are. Political rallies, and how about events like Sturgis in South Dakota?

Fact check: Post online misstates Sturgis Rally's coronavirus cases
Sep. 17. 2020
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...id-19-cases-misstated-online-post/3458606001/
The claim: A post online attributes 88 positive tests to Sturgis Rally, 0.02% infection rate of attendees

Motorcyclists from around the country converged on Sturgis, South Dakota, for the town’s annual motorcycle rally in August — most unmasked and ignoring social distancing guidelines. Some on social media are claiming the event had little effect on the spread of COVID-19.

“Mass testing of Sturgis workers, residents result in no more positive results % than the rest of the state average,” a screenshot of a post reads. “Actually on the low end of the scale. All positive cases were asymptomatic."

The post goes on to say the South Dakota Department of Health is allegedly attributing 88 positive tests to the rally, and that with 450,000 rally attendees, that’s a 0.02% infection rate. (88, one of the good ole' white stupremacist's numbers. OMG, they got it wrong by 46 'cases', supposedly 124)


Study suggests rally led to over 260,000 COVID-19 cases

A California research group set out to estimate the impact of a single COVID-19 “super-spreader” event – and in the case of the Sturgis Rally, the impact was large.


The study, released by the Center for Health Economics and Policy Studies at San Diego State University, estimates that 266,796 COVID-19 cases across the country in the month following the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally can be traced back to the event, which took place from Aug. 7-16. That figure is 19% of the 1.4 million COVID-19 cases between Aug. 2 and Sept. 2.
The researchers used cellphone data to identify areas that saw a large number of rally-goers and tracked cases both before and after the event, the Argus Leader reported.


More:South Dakota dismisses 'elite class of so-called experts,' carries on with state fair after Sturgis rally fueled COVID-19 surge
Both South Dakota’s governor and secretary of health have criticized the study, the Argus Leader reported.


Fact check:Tuberculosis is more dangerous than COVID-19, but context matters
(best fact check of the article IMO!)

Our rating: False

We rate the claim that the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally led to 88 positive tests attributed to the rally, which is a 0.02% infection rate among attendees, as FALSE because it was not supported by our research. The state of South Dakota has attributed 124 cases in the state to the rally. The Associated Press reported that at least 290 people in 12 states who attended the rally have also tested positive. Taken together, that's an infection rate of 0.09%.
Of course, very little mask wearing and social distancing at Sturgis it appears,



Smash Mouth plays to packed crowd at Sturgis motorcycle rally
Aug 11, 2020


It can be asked, why are still so many businesses still shut down, but not large political rallies or events like Sturgis or marches and protests and counter protests etc. etc.? Why? Should be obvious to rational people, 'covid' is a lie, a scam/fraud and a hoax...
 
Top