Smoking guns that prove 'COVID-19' is a planned psyop and simulated pandemic

alpha77

Active member
See here more proof of the OBVIOUS strategy that they now used for probably more than 100 years. Demonize the critical thinkers or the ones not going along w/ gov/industry dictatorship:

It says in short "Part of the opponents of Corona measures are prone to violence"

An "expert" aka gov shill says: "a new form of international extremism" this is so laughable considering the fact that the gov/big industry/pharma/millitary industrial complex are extremists/facists/communists themselves..


Edit, so here a video where it also shows headlines in the UK saying simmilar things:
Eg. "Anti vaxxer found with blades to cut those that take them down, union says"

ANYNONE surprised... it is always the same this can only end if no one takes the MSM and gov seriously anymore and more then 30-40% of people just say NO to the BS. Imho protests esp. with violence (which may be staged anyway) play more into the hands of the PTB...opinions?


The vid above is good info, the guy has some good thoughts, esp. when he says that they do NOT want everyone to be jabbed, they NEED a minority who refuse. Follow his line of thinking??



Edit, if the OP thinks these kind of posts are too OT in his thread, perhaps cause not directly related to the "planned" smoking gun thing, we could move them somewhere else. Perhaps open a thread for the ongoing developments??
 
Last edited:

Tritonus

Active member

PART VIII: DECEPTION & FOREKNOWLEDGE

27. The EU was preparing “vaccine passports” at least a YEAR before the pandemic began. Proposed COVID countermeasures, presented to the public as improvised emergency measures, have existed since before the emergence of the disease.
Two EU documents published in 2018, the “2018 State of Vaccine Confidence” and a technical report titled “Designing and implementing an immunisation information system” discussed the plausibility of an EU-wide vaccination monitoring system.
These documents were combined into the 2019 “Vaccination Roadmap”, which (among other things) established a “feasibility study” on vaccine passports to begin in 2019 and finish in 2021:

This report’s final conclusions were released to the public in September 2019, just a month before Event 201 (below).
*
28. A “training exercise” predicted the pandemic just weeks before it started. In October 2019 the World Economic Forum and Johns Hopkins University held Event 201. This was a training exercise based on a zoonotic coronavirus starting a worldwide pandemic. The exercise was sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI the vaccine alliance.
The exercise published its findings and recommendations in November 2019 as a “call to action”. One month later, China recorded their first case of “Covid”.
*
29. Since the beginning of 2020, the Flu has “disappeared”. In the United States, since Februart 2020, influenza cases have allegedly dropped by over 98%.

It’s not just the US either, globally flu has apparently almost completely disappeared.
Meanwhile, a new disease called “Covid”, which has identical symptoms and a similar mortality rate to influenza, is supposedly sweeping the globe.
*
30. The elite have made fortunes during the pandemic. Since the beginning of lockdown the wealthiest people have become significantly wealthier. Forbes reported that 40 new billionaires have been created “fighting the coronavirus”, with 9 of them being vaccine manufacturers.
Business Insider reported that “billionaires saw their net worth increase by half a trillion dollars” by October 2020.
Clearly that number will be even bigger by now.
* * *
These are the vital facts of the pandemic, presented here as a resource to help formulate and support your arguments with friends or strangers. Thanks to all the researchers who have collated and collected this information over the last twenty months, especially Swiss Policy Research.
 

gl69m

Member
Asked, yes, about 3 people who are above me asked. Three! They already know my position, but I made no comment when they asked.
Truthfully, the answer is not easy to swallow. Why should I work for a company who commands I take the poison? I'm sure people are out there thinking it will only be "once". I don't believe that. "once" will turn into "once a year".

They already are treating the unvaxxed different than the vaxx.
  1. Earlier this year, if you were vaxxed you did not have to wear a mask. The unvaxxed did.
  2. The vaxx get to wear a sticker around work stating they took the jab.

Sadly, people are not in a position to lose their job so they end up taking it.
(from post 36)

Preciate the response Tritonus. Right now I am not sure yet whether my company will mandate a vax for all employees or perhaps will relegate certain jobs/tasks or at certain client sites only to vaxxed employees, I think that is a distinct possibility. The site we subcontract at where I work an e-mail went out for that company (a big Pharma company in their own right [but is not producing a 'covid' vax so far], I won't mention the company name but they bought a little old company named Monsa-, I think you know which company I mean...) that subcontractors also get the e-mail, that as of Sept 27th, only vaxxed employees will be allowed to do certain functions for the company, I'm not going to state any further what those are. I'm pretty sure that a slew of corps. and companies are now doing this, and is probably just another step down the slippery slope of more and more control etc.


from alpha77 (post #41)
Edit, if the OP thinks these kind of posts are too OT in his thread, perhaps cause not directly related to the "planned" smoking gun thing, we could move them somewhere else. Perhaps open a thread for the ongoing developments??
thanks alpha, yeah I'd say I'm not worried about moving any posts already posted in the thread here, but perhaps some of the posts dealing with "are viruses real or not" debate and particularly viruses other than alleged 'sarscov2' are a bit off topic, perhaps start another thread for those. Any posts that are advocating that viruses aren't real I am not at all opposed to that being posted here, but I'd prefer those mainly stick to as it pertains to showing proof that 'sarscov2' isn't real and which would bolster the case that 'covid-19' is a simulated and fake plandemic. If it can be proven 'sarscov2' does not exist, never been isolated etc., that by itself is not proof that no viruses exist at all, same goes for if measles virus turned out to not exist as well; this is akin to if it turned out the moon landings were all faked that would still not prove that the moon is fake or that the earth is flat etc., I think everybody probably get's my point lol:).


The video from the nurse in post #35, this illustrates how the false 'covid' paradigm of 'covid disease' is killing people, and that paradigm is mainly trying to paint the picture of how allegedly contagious or deadly this 'virus' is: and so any patients labeled with 'covid' and seriously sick just simply have to be treated totally different than the way respiritory illnesses were treated prior to 'covid'; the nurse stated he didn't really understand any better at first but eventually figured some things out, and so part of it is error from at least partial ignorance and trusting authorities, some of it is simply gross medical malpractice, and some health experts had to be aware that this paradigm is total bullshit so I would say those people that pushed this paradigm as true and real to be followed meticulously are murderers plain and simple. And even if some Cov virus exists and is anything like 'sarscov2' there is no way in hell this paradigm is true period dot; so even if I turn out to be wrong and there truly is some novel 2019 Cov virus circulating in the world population, this false medical paradigm has to be fought tooth and nail, the only thing this paradigm could lead to is insanity of more and more authoritarian control like we have seen now for over a year and a half. This paradigm is false in several ways very much paralells the way that the fake/false HIV/AIDS=DEATH paradigm campaign was rolled, but of course the alleged mechanism of action and transmissability of the two 'viruses' are very very different though.
 

gl69m

Member
More posts from the original thread

Post #3 (from gl69m)

More smoking gun(s) from gov. Andrew “preparation drill” Cuomo, this time it's a "social exercise",

Live: New York Governor Andrew Cuomo Holds Coronavirus Briefing | NBC
Streamed live on May 13, 2020





Amid Ongoing Covid-19 Pandemic, Governor Cuomo announces Fourth Region Hits Benchmark to Begin Reopening May 15th
May 13, 2020
https://www.newyorkled.com/ny-govern...e-may-13-2020/
Quote:

Governor Cuomo: “We are doing the most transparent discussion and reopening operation of any state. Why? Because it only works if people understand it and if people are part of it. This is not a government exercise that we’re doing here. This is a social exercise. The 19 million people of New York State are doing this and the best I can do is give them the information. … This is a function of the actions of every individual and every family.”

Not a government exercise right? Pleasus, well yes it is definitely also a “social exercise" too, not just as of May 13th either, was from the beginning of this psyop.

I'm taking it out of context will be the sheople argument, ok how in the fuck is this still not a government operation of “re-opening” when they (state governors and cabinets) have the powers to say they can keep everyone “non-essential” shutdown until “we” reach their bullshit pseudoscience 'covid-19' magical number non-sense fake news benchmark numbers?? Heh!?! If you watch the video through the first 7 minutes, you'll see what I mean.

Also, his “social exercise” statement still has to be understood in context to his April 11th statement of “on this preparation drill”, these really can't be understood outside of the conception of a fucking psyop, a systemwide simulation training drill, outside of that they make no fucking sense at all. The social exercise also to see how many "want" to re-open or not, you'll have the sheople bait, lazy ass people who could afford to sit at home because they're so scare of the phantom virus, who may actually getting unemployment or their stimulus bribe money- dreaming that the govt. will keep paying them to stay at home, and then wake up to the nightmare after such time an actual "re-opening' happens and they have no job anymore, and then eventually the "bailout' will run out of funds. He keeps bringing up the endless fearmongering of 'case resurgences' for "opening" baack up too soon and added the Fauci warnings on top it to drive home the point!

I can almost guarantee this, like the un-employment backup funds or whatever that was 300 billion or something to pay people to stay at home, yeah right, they'll keep doing that forever and ever in the 2nd, 3rd 4th 5th bullshit 'case spike' waves right? No fucking way that is going to happen, it is an engineered house of cards made to come tumbling down, I'm sure there are also some small business owners who are still solvent as of yet that think they're going to get bailed out to resume business or full business, I'm sure they have the same shock awaiting them too.


I'm adding this clip from today's bullshit phony coronie briefing helping from the governator Cuomo, simply because this absurd hypocrisy could technically be considered (IMO) a (smoking gun) motive of psyop, via economic devastation in the planned psyop for especially certain targeted segments of society here in U.S., but doubtless all other countries as well:

Live: New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo Holds Coronavirus Briefing | NBC News
5/27/20





Hypomotherfuckingcrit
7:72, NY, MA, NJ, PA, MI, IL, CA- 7 states 1/3 of National GDP, after talking about more possible legislation for 'covid' relief funding now going on in Washington D.C., he says,
Quote:

"the covid states, the states that, that bore the brunt of the covid virus, they're 1/3 of the national gdp. How can you tell 1/3 of the country to go to heck? And then think you're gonna see an economic rebound?"

No shit mother fucker, you didn't think of that when the 'covid' psyop team told how many % of the workforce that they were "un-essential"???!!! The fucking hypocrisy makes me fume, can't help it... Just before that he is crying about 'how can you cut funding to schools?' yada yada, and they were the motherfuckers that closed all the schools down!! and said oh no their all done for the year, and the 'new fucking normal' is education at a social distance via all online after all this from what even billdoe gates discussed with governator's brother Chriss CNN anchor (their new proposed educational paradigm for the 'future'), so the absurdity of acting like he gives a fuck about funding being cut to the schools, just more insanity from all this bullshit.


Gotta add this smoking gun from the CDC, job posting from November 2019, I posted this here previously (http://letsrollforums.com//showpost....&postcount=214),

Public Health Advisor (Quarantine Program)

Job ID
HHS-CDC-D3-20-10640010 Date posted 11/15/2019

https://jobs.cdc.gov/job/dallas/publ...m/250/14136286

This job link gives a “custom job error” now so the job posting is gone, so this is the record of it that we have now, which I didn't paste all of the original page but I got most of it and certainly the relevant bits I feel.
Quote:

Location Dallas, Texas, El Paso, Texas, Houston, Texas, Seattle, Washington, Anchorage, Alaska, Los Angeles, California, San Diego, California, San Francisco, California, Miami, Florida, Atlanta, Georgia, Honolulu, Hawaii, Chicago, Illinois, Boston, Massachusetts, Detroit, Michigan, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Newark, New Jersey, New York, New York, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, San Juan Department: Department of Health And Human Services

Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Job Announcement Number: HHS-CDC-D3-20-10640010
SALARY RANGE: $51440.0 to $93077.0/Per Year
OPEN PERIOD: 2019-11-15 to 2020-05-15
SERIES & GRADE: GS--9/11

JOB SUMMARY:
Serves as a project representative for a program responsible for preventing theimportation and spread of communicable diseases.

DUTIES:

"Assist in planning and implementing a program for preventing the importation of communicable diseases from abroad and spread of these diseases domestically.", "Monitor disease trends and consults with senior leaders to ensure that appropriate measures are taken to prevent the introduction/spread of communicable diseases by travelers, etiologic agents or vectors.", "Provide technical assistance, consultation and guidance to national, state and/or local agencies; health organizations; federal, state and local law enforcement agencies; airport and seaport activities; hospital networks, and other private entities.", "Ensure appropriate communication networks, planning documents and emergency response protocols are in place, tested and regularly updated.", "Develop and present training to various governmental agencies and local partners on emergency response protocols, communicable diseases and quarantine activities." ]

REQUIREMENTS:
US Citizenship is required. Background Investigation is required. E-Verify: If you are selected for this position, the documentation that you present for purposes of completing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Form I-9 will be verified through the DHS "E-Verify" System. Federal law requires DHS to use the E-Verify System to verify employment eligibility of all new hires, and as a condition of continued employment obligates the new hire to take affirmative steps to resolve any discrepancies identified by the system

HOW TO APPLY:

To apply for this position, you must complete the online application and submit the documentation specified in the Required Documents section. Special Notes - This announcement is being used to create an inventory of applicants for Public Health Advisor (Quarantine Program) positions and will be used to fill immediate and future needs. Applicants are encouraged to apply early in order to maximize their employment opportunities. Your application will remain in the inventory of tentatively qualified applicants. Applicants that are among the best qualified will be referred to the selecting official for consideration as requests to fill vacancies are processed by the Human Resources Office. The first cut-off date for you to be referred will be December 2, 2019. Thereafter, additional referral lists will be generated throughout the open period as vacancies occur. If further evaluation or interviews are required, you will be contacted. This is an open continuous announcement. Qualified applicants will be considered as job opportunities occur and may or may not receive further notification regarding the status of their application. A complete application package must be submitted by 11:59 PM (EST) on05/15/2020 of this announcement to receive consideration.

The incumbent must be able to qualify for unrestricted access to secure areas at U.S ports. The incumbent must be able to qualify for a secret security clearance. The incumbent must be able to obtain an official U.S. passport. The incumbent must have a valid State government-issued driver's license. The incumbent is required to be current in his/her immunizations per ACIP guidelines. Must undergo baseline and periodic health screening procedures such as respiratory fit testing and PPD tests for tuberculosis exposure. May be required to wear an N-95 respirator. The incumbent must be physically fit enough to work long hours and frequently travel on foot to remote gate areas in a short period of time. The incumbent must be required to provide basic quarantine station support, including purchasing, property inventory, document processing, timekeeping, and answering inquiries, etc.

If you are a veteran with preference eligibility and you are claiming 5-points veterans' preference, you must submit a copy of your DD-214 or other proof of eligibility. If you are claiming 10-point veterans' preference, you must also submit an SF-15, "Application for 10-Point Veterans' Preference" plus the proof required by that form. For more information on veterans' preference see http://www.fedshirevets.gov/job/vetpref/index.aspx.

Subject to permanent reassignment to another CDC Quarantine Station or duty station as the needs of the service warrant. Subject to temporary assignment at any location in the United States and its territories or possessions, in foreign countries, or at sea. Selectee will be required to sign a Geographic Mobility Agreement. These positions are subject to shift work, weekend work, irregular work schedule and evening hours. On call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, independent of shift work assignments. The incumbents will be required to wear a uniform. The incumbent must be able to qualify for unrestricted access to secure areas at U.S ports.
 

gl69m

Member
Post #5 from original thread (from gl69m)

I'm adding this tidbit about the U.S. Intelligence industry, not really a smoking gun per se, but this adds context to how they pull off psyops, and the foolish notion, every time some braindead sheople gives the nonsense argument that the bigger the lie the bigger the conspiracy, that some hoaxes/conspiracies would have to be just "too big" to pull off and way too many people would have to be in on it, yada yada yada,

United States Intelligence Community(16 different agencies listed here, This page was last edited on 4 June 2020)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community
Quote:

The United States Intelligence Community (IC) is a group of separate United States government intelligence agencies and subordinate organizations, that work separately and together to conduct intelligence activities to support the foreign policy and national security of the United States. Member organizations of the IC include intelligence agencies, military intelligence, and civilian intelligence and analysis offices within federal executive departments. The IC is overseen by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which itself is headed by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), who reports to the President of the United States.[1][2]

Among their varied responsibilities, the members of the Community collect and produce foreign and domestic intelligence, contribute to military planning, and perform espionage. The IC was established by Executive Order 12333, signed on December 4, 1981, by U.S. President Ronald Reagan.[3]

The Washington Post reported in 2010 that there were 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies in 10,000 locations in the United States that were working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence, and that the intelligence community as a whole includes 854,000 people holding top-secret clearances.[4] According to a 2008 study by the ODNI, private contractors make up 29% of the workforce in the U.S. intelligence community and account for 49% of their personnel budgets.[5]

I wonder how many this number (854,000) is in 2020?



United States Intelligence Community Seal of the United States Intelligence Community
Agency overviewFormedDecember 4, 1981Agency executive


Websiteintelligence.gov

Members

The IC is headed by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), whose statutory leadership is exercised through the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). The other 16 members of the IC are:[9]


The official seals of U.S. Intelligence Community members.

Organization Parent Organization Federal Department Date est. Sixteenth Air Force United States Air Force Defense 1948 Intelligence and Security Command United States Army Defense 1977 Central Intelligence Agency none Independent agency 1947 Coast Guard Intelligence United States Coast Guard Homeland Security 1915 Defense Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense Defense 1961 Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence United States Department of Energy Energy 1977 Office of Intelligence and Analysis United States Department of Homeland Security Homeland Security 2007 Bureau of Intelligence and Research United States Department of State State 1945 Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence United States Department of the Treasury Treasury 2004 Office of National Security Intelligence Drug Enforcement Administration Justice 2006 Intelligence Branch Federal Bureau of Investigation Justice 2005 Marine Corps Intelligence Activity United States Marine Corps Defense 1978 National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense Defense 1996 National Reconnaissance Office United States Department of Defense Defense 1961 National Security Agency/Central Security Service United States Department of Defense Defense 1952 Office of Naval Intelligence United States Navy Defense 1882


220px-IC_Circle.jpg





The US Intelligence Community Is Bigger Than Ever, But Is It Worth the Cost? (17 agencies listed here)
February 6, 2015
https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2015/02/us-intelligence-community-bigger-ever-it-worth-it/104799/
Quote:

The intelligence community has grown to an enormous size and Americans have no clue what they’re paying for.

The U.S. spends nearly $1 trillion on national security programs and agencies annually, more than any other nation in the world. Yet despite this enormous investment, there is not enough evidence to show the public that these programs are keeping Americans any safer – especially in the intelligence community. Excessive government secrecy prohibits the public and oversight agencies alike from determining whether our expensive intelligence enterprise is worth the investment.

The United States intelligence community is comprised of 17 federal agencies assigned an array of missions relating to national defense, foreign relations, homeland security and law enforcement.

In 2010, the Washington Post documented almost 2,000 private companies working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence. Over 5 million government employees and private contractors now hold security clearances giving them access to classified information.


I wasn't able to find good articles on "intel" personnel numbers world wide so not sure of the total numbers, and I suppose more than a few "in on" would obviously be needed to carry out and keep a world wide hoax like 'covid-19' under wraps, perhaps we should at least give that number an estimate of at least double the U.S. number, making 10 million available with security clearances from all the nations of the U.N., as a generic number but perhaps it is more than double but no point in speculating further on that.

So with these intelligence numbers assuming this information is accurate about 850,000 top secret clearance holders and more than 5 million secret security clearance holders, all sworn to secrecy and loylaty, and if some intel personnel are key "scientists' (private contractors) in certain govt. sponsored testing labs around the world, pulling off the 'covid' hoax should be a snap, and the standard sheople argument of "the rabbit hole" is too deep is completely invalidated. The term "rabbit hole" to dismiss "conspiracy theories" is just a stupid term and proves nothing as just a phrase, we're all living in the stupid "rabbit hole"- the enormous web of "intel" all around us, everywhere; whether they know it or believe it or not.


Let's move on to a few more smoking guns or at least garden variety pandemic simulations and one pandemic written plan for Illinois

Completed Projects
SPARS Pandemic Scenario

John Hopkins Center For Health Security
Bloomberg School of Public Health
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity...mpleted-projects/spars-pandemic-scenario.html
Quote:

The Center’s SPARS Pandemic exercise narrative comprises a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future. Its purpose is to prompt users, both individually and in discussion with others, to imagine the dynamic and oftentimes conflicted circumstances in which communication around emergency MCM development, distribution, and uptake takes place. While engaged with a rigorous simulated health emergency, scenario readers have the opportunity to mentally “rehearse” responses while also weighing the implications of their actions. At the same time, readers have a chance to consider what potential measures implemented in today’s environment might avert comparable communication dilemmas or classes of dilemmas in the future.

The self-guided exercise scenario for public health communicators and risk communication researchers covers a raft of themes and associated dilemmas in risk communications, rumor control, interagency message coordination and consistency, issue management, proactive and reactive media relations, cultural competency, and ethical concerns. To ensure that the scenario accounts for rapid technological innovation and exceeds the expectations of participants, the Center’s project team gleaned information from subject matter experts, historical accounts of past medical countermeasure crises, contemporary media reports, and scholarly literature in sociology, emergency preparedness, health education, and risk and crisis communication.

The scenario is hypothetical; the infectious pathogen, medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, and government agency responses are entirely fictional.

THE SPARS PANDEMIC 2025 -2028 A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity...ve/pubs-pdfs/2017/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf
Quote:

Page 4
However, laboratory tests were negative for influenza. Unable to identify the causative agent, officials at the Minnesota Department of Health’s Public Health Labora-
Page 5
tory sent the patients’ clinical specimens to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), where scientists confirmed that the patients did not have influenza. One CDC scientist recalled reading a recent ProMed dispatch describing the emergence of a novel coronavirus in Southeast Asia, and ran a pancoronavirus RT-PCR test. A week later, the CDC team confirmed that the three patients were, in fact, infected with a novel coronavirus, which was dubbed the St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SPARS-CoV, or SPARS), after the city where the first cluster of cases had been identified.
Page 6
As a result, early case fatality estimates were inflated. By late November, the CDC reported an initial estimated SPARS case fatality rate of 4.7% (By contrast, WHO reported that the overall case fatality rate for SARS was 14-15% and over 50% for people over the age of 64. Later in the SPARS outbreak, data that included more accurate estimates of mild SPARS cases indicated a case fatality rate of only 0.6%).

Another SARS coronavirus, yippee...

More Flu chatter, many pandemic scares over a long period of time, seems like every few years or something,

Infectious Disease Preparedness: Reflections from CDC’s Pandemic Flu Exercise
Oct 05, 2018 https://www.naccho.org/blog/article...s-reflections-from-cdcs-pandemic-flu-exercise
Quote:
On September 12-14, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducted a pandemic influenza functional exercise in response to a fictional influenza pandemic with federal, state, local, and non-governmental partners. The National Association of County & City Health Officials (NACCHO) and local health departments were among those that participated in the exercise.


The CDC had also involved local health departments, NACCHO, and other partners in two meetings preceding the exercise to develop the injects and create and more realistic scenario. These injects made this fictional influenza pandemic more realistic and prompted the CDC to respond and act as they would during an actual pandemic.

What strategies were employed to contain the outbreak?



The strategies employed during the outbreak reflected those in the Community Mitigation Guidelines to Prevent Pandemic Influenza – United States, 2017. These strategies included non-pharmaceutical interventions such as school closures, social distancing, and using face masks. Other interventions included use of antivirals (in this scenario, the virus was resistant to some but not all drugs) and vaccines. While a vaccine for this pandemic virus was not yet available to the public at the time, there was supply of influenza vaccine in the Strategic National Stockpile. This vaccine was not matched to the pandemic virus but could be used as a priming dose.

During the exercise, some challenges specifically related to the fictional influenza pandemic were implementation of school closures and vaccination of priority groups. Several state and local participants expressed the consequences of implementing school closures such as increased congregation in other public settings, lack of access to free or reduce meals for children in greatest need, and challenges parents face in arranging childcare, particularly in low-income households. Similarly, participants recognized several practical challenges with vaccinating target populations, such as providing clear and consistent public communication regarding the decision and rationale for prioritizing certain groups, establishing closed points of dispensing, and managing individuals seeking vaccination but do not fall within the target groups. While the exercise was not intended to resolve these ongoing challenges, these takeaways offer important areas to for the CDC and partners to continue addressing in preparation for a future influenza pandemic.


Here is a memo style announcement like document for a county in Illinois,

DEKALB COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATE: July 23, 2019
https://health.dekalbcounty.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/5-Minutes-2019-07-23.pdf
interesting bits here
Quote:

Community Health and Prevention & Health Promotion and Emergency Preparedness – Cindy Graves Ms. Graves stated that we continue to plan to participate in the August 13-16 Crimson Contagion State EP Drill. (covered that in post #1) Limited information has been coming from the State. Rockford and Chicago Regions will primarily focus on Information Sharing which includes opening the Emergency Operations Center, Public Information, continued internal communication, requesting supplies, etc. This drill is a precursor to the Full-Scale Exercise in October 2020 with a Pandemic Flu scenario.

Is this last part their talking about, really just the second or more systemwide training and simulation exercises that we saw in the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board document, of which we know now that 'covid-19' is at least the first of this pandemic simulation exercises (still ongoing) to be carried out by Oct. 2020, or that one is simpy just the 'covid' exercise that began in December 2019 in Wuhan? Can't really say I'm sure right now.

Illinois pandemic and simulated pandemic operation plan manual (I'm sure there is probably one for each state I bet)
Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response Plan Version 5.1 March 2020

https://edgarcountywatchdogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/illinois-pandemic-influenza-plan-version-51march-2020.pd

lot to look at in this document, very long, 120 pages, try and select most relevant snips here: seems this document had to have been written before March 2020, perhaps not though if Illinois had yet to declare a state medical emergency, but if so why would it not have worded it with 'coronavirus' sars-cov-2?
Quote:

page i

Illinois Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response Plan March 2020Version 5.1i
FOREWORD
Influenza is an acute viral infection that spreads easily from person-to-person. It causes illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths every year in Illinois. Intermittently over the centuries, changes in the genetic makeup of influenza virus have resulted in new strains to which people have never been exposed. These new strains have the potential to cause a pandemic or worldwide outbreak of influenza, with potentially catastrophic consequences. In Illinois alone, a pandemic of even modest severity could result in thousands of deaths and the sickening of millions, even among previously healthy persons.

In 2009, a new strain of influenza virus, 2009A(H1N1)pdm, emerged. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) worked with manufacturers to develop a vaccine; however, the time it took to develop a vaccine caused a severe shortage in available vaccine

The Illinois Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response Plan was developed:
To identify steps that need to be taken by state government and its partners prior to a pandemic to improve the level of preparedness;and
To coordinate state government-wide response activities in the event a pandemic occurs.
These preparedness and response activities are organized according to the six pandemic phases identified by the World Health Organization (WHO).

This plan was developed through a collaborative process involving Illinois Department of Public Health offices and divisions and partner state agencies that have a pandemic response role.

well page ii, table shows version 5.10 was written in March 2020,

5.00 / 04/25/2014 / Executive Overview / Title changed to Executive Overview 5.10 / 03/02/2020 / All / Modified version of the plan
does this make any sense that this is written in late February 2020 with Influenza all over the document when the Sars-cov-2 health emergency had already been declared for the U.S. on Jan 31, 2020?? not to me, unless they are saying plan was modified with original influenza plan not redacted et al, lame excuse but maybe they would claim that.

page 15

Federal Government
The federal government has assumed primary responsibility for a number of key elements of the national plan,including:
Vaccine research and development.

Coordination of national and international surveillance.

Assessment and potential enhancement of the coordination of vaccine and antiviral capacity and coordination of public-sector procurement.
Assessment of the need for and scope of a suitable liability program for vaccine manufacturers and persons administering the vaccine.
Development of a national “clearinghouse” for vaccine availability information, vaccine distribution and redistribution.
always about the stupid fucking vaccine, as though that will save everybody...
whistle.gif


page 16

Influenza pandemic will place a substantial burden on inpatient and outpatient health care services. Because of the increased risk of exposure to pandemic virus in health care settings, illness and absentee ism among healthcare workers in the context of increased demand will further strain the ability to provide quality care.

In addition to a limited number of hospital beds and staff shortages, equipment and supplies may be in short supply. The disruptions in the health care system that result from a pandemic also may have an impact on blood donation and supply.

page 21 in table

Role and Responsibilities

Maintain a 24-hour communications center for communicating with emergency response personnel from all agencies and organizations.

Coordinate, integrate and manage over all state efforts involving the collection, analysis, planning, reporting and displaying of information.

Provide, direct and coordinate logistical/resource operations with the assistance of the designated support agencies. Allocate state response resources effectively and according to need; monitor their location when in use.

Request a Disaster Mortuary Operational Response Team (DMORT)2 through FEMA and/or the National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) when local jurisdictions are overwhelmed and have requested state assistance to implement mass fatality management activities. (planned mass graves here?)

Develop scripted emergency public information messages for broadcast over Emergency Alert System (EAS) following disaster.

Coordinate state monitoring and enforcement of community-based isolation and quarantine orders.

Maintain critical infrastructure and implement contingency plans in the absence or failure of such critical infrastructure.

Coordinate high volume public information hotlines and a mechanism for tracking call types for rumor control purposes
I'm sure they will argue "scripted" doesn't mean fake simulation, but combined with "rumor control", now come on wtf!..

Page 66
Restriction of Movement or Activities to Control Disease Spread Primary Agency:IDPH Support Agencies: Governor’s Office, AG, IEMA, ISP and IDCMS

PurposeThis annex outlines the state’s authorities and capabilities to impose restrictions on the movements or activities of persons for the purpose of preventing or controlling the spread of a dangerous infectious disease.

Scope

The restriction of movement and/or activities involves the ability of state and local jurisdictions to be prepared legally, procedurally and materially to contain and monitor: exposed individuals or those suspected of being exposed (term: quarantine); infected individuals (term: isolation); defined groups or locations, such as individual schools, workplaces, malls and public transit systems, as determined on a case by case basis (term: focused measures to increase social distance); and entire communities, ranging from voluntary widespread cancellation of most activities (term: snow days), eliminating large gatherings of people, such as sporting events, shutting down other places where people congregate, such as schools and places of employment, or enforced restriction of movement into and out of defined areas.

Key Terms

Isolation: Isolation is the separation of a person or a group of persons infected or believed to be infected with a contagious disease to prevent the spread of infection. Ill persons are usually isolated in a hospital, but they also may be isolated at home or in a designated community-based facility, depending on their medical needs.

Quarantine: Quarantine is the separation and restriction of movement or activities of persons who are not ill, but who are believed to have been exposed to infection, for the purpose of preventing transmission of diseases.



Modes of application include:•Persons are usually quarantined in their homes, but they also may be quarantined in community-based facilities.

Quarantine can be applied to an individual or to a group of persons who are exposed at a large public gathering or to persons believed exposed on a conveyance during international travel.

Quarantine also can be applied on a wider population or geographic-level basis (e.g., snow days) with the voluntary or enforced prohibition of movements or activities. This measure is usually not technically considered quarantine because it is not directly linked to a known or highly suspect exposure (at best, the basis might be some degree of likelihood of exposure due to circumstantial or indirect evidence, such as high disease prevalence in a particular town or neighborhood ). These options are described and compared in the attachment following this annex (Attachment8-1)

Page 67
Quarantine (a period of isolation to prevent disease spread) is not effective in controlling multiple influenza outbreaks in large, immunologically naïve populations, because the disease spreads too rapidly to identify and to control chains of transmission. Even if quarantine were somewhat effective in controlling influenza in large populations, it would not be feasible to implement and enforce with available resources, and would damage the economy by reducing the workforce. Most people will voluntarily quarantine themselves in their home.


Quarantine may be of limited use in slowing the spread of disease during the earliest stages of influenza outbreaks, only if special circumstances apply. For example, were a case of influenza-like illness to be identified in an isolated group, such as the passengers and crew of an airplane, public health officials could prevent or slow the spread of disease to other groups by:-Quarantining all passengers and crew members for several days-Transferring all who become ill to isolation wards for treatment-Treating all influenza-like illness in the wider community with suspicion

page 70 (siezure of public and private property for this exercise by the governor?)
Gain access to and utilize facilities and property Upon the declaration of a disaster pursuant to Section 7 of the IEMA Act (20 ILCS 3305/7), the governor may exercise, among other things, the following emergency powers: recommend the evacuation of all or part of the population from any stricken or threatened area within the state if the governor deems this action necessary (20 ILCS 3305/7(a)(6)); prescribe routes, modes of transportation, and destinations in connection with evacuation (20 ILCS 3305/7(a)(7)); and control ingress and egress to and from a disaster area, the movement of persons within the area, and the occupancy of premises therein (20 ILCS 3305/7(a)(
icon_cool.gif
).•Appropriate private property for public use Upon the declaration of a disaster pursuant to Section 7 of the IEMA Act (20 ILCS 3305/7), the governor may, on behalf of the state, take possession of, and acquire full title or a lesser specified interest in, any personal property as may be necessary to accomplish the objectives set forth in Section 2 of the act, including airplanes, automobiles, trucks, trailers, buses and other vehicles; coal, oils, gasoline and other fuels and means of propulsion; explosives, materials,

page 71
Impose isolation, quarantine, and closure

at no substantial danger to the public’s health any longer exists (20 ILCS 2305/2(b)). (they won't force this upon people, ...) No person may be ordered to be quarantined or isolated and no place may be ordered to be closed and made off limits to the public, (unless they have to of course, ha ha) however, except with the consent of the person or the owner of the place or upon the order of a court of competent jurisdiction (20 ILCS 2305/2(c)). In order to obtain a court order, IDPH must prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that the public’s health and welfare are significantly endangered and all other reasonable means of correcting the problem have been exhausted and no less restrictive alternative exists (20 ILCS 2305/2(c)).

page 77
Rumor Control
When widespread rumors, inaccuracies or misperceptions are identified, the JIC will be consulted so correct information can be promptly communicated to the public through the media. These miscommunications may be identified in media broadcasts, in print media or through public inquiries.

page 81
Planning Assumptions and Considerations
The 1918 Spanish flu pandemic killed approximately 40 million people. It is estimated that in the United States a “medium-level” pandemic could cause 89,000 to 207,000 deaths. Based on current modeling from CDC’s FluAid 2.0, projections of statewide fatalities range from 7,907 to 47,462 based on low-to-high severity flu deaths.

initially, in the event of an influenza outbreak, the responsibility of fatality management will reside at the local level. Planning and response may require the participation and cooperation of local agencies, such as, but not limited to:
1.County coroners/medicalexaminers2.Funeraldirectors3.Municipaloffic ials4.Emergency managementagencies5.Firedepartments6.Emergency medicalservices7.Rescueservices8.Hospitals9.Munici pal and state law enforcementagencies10.Ancillary volunteer agencies (e.g., American Red Cross)

page 83
Temporary Morgues
In a pandemic influenza outbreak, once local capabilities are exceeded, the state will assist local government in securing resources and assist with the establishment of temporary morgues.A temporary morgue should be established after determining that the expected number of cases will exceed the capacity of normal operations.

page 84-85
Documentation
Documentation refers to maintaining timely and accurate records concerning personnel involved and expenditures of time and money.Record all incoming personnel, equipment and time of arrival. Issue identification and a task description to people reporting to the staging area(s). As noted, preparing a method of identification before an incident will save time and help reduce confusion at the scene. Document all expenditures, ordered goods, services or equipment, to include the requestor, arrival and departure times.

Documentation is essential for:
a.Management of the crime scene
b.Effective handling of tasks during the incident
c.Reconstruction of incident events
d.Protection against lawsuits
e.Lessons Learned for future events and modification of existing plans
f.Financial reimbursement
Precautionary note: While it is important to document events and actions, consider that over-documentation can hinder the operations.
essential information for covering up the crime scene hoax, in this case the 'covid' murder hoax

DMORT Activation
Upon notification of a mass fatalities incident, IEMA may request that the U. S. Public Health Service (USPHS) provide a team of experts to assist the coroner/medical examiner in assessing the situation to determine if federal government assistance is required.


Dignity of the Deceased
The deceased must be treated with respect and dignity in all thoughts and actions.
but afterwards, just toss em'
A bioethics committee will be consulted before any decisions are made on the mass burial or disposal of victims.

page 89
7.0 Training and Exercise Schedule and Plan

Planning Assumptions and Considerations•All exercises will be designed and conducted in compliance with state exercise standards, as defined by the Illinois Terrorism Task Force.•Local health departments are funded to prepare and respond to all hazardous events including a pandemic in local communities.•Training and exercise requirements are outlined in annual preparedness grants to local health departments.•All public information is coordinated by the Office of the Governor’s communications staff.•All agencies and staff will be NIMS compliant, as required by executive order.•Staff need to be trained and exercises conducted in advance so staff are aware of the NIMS and ICS structure androles

page 90-91
Drill
A drill is a coordinated, supervised exercise activity, normally used to test a single specific operation or function. With a drill, there is no attempt to coordinate organizations or fully activate an emergency response plan and operating structure. Its role in a comprehensive exercise program is to practice and to perfect one small part of the response plan and to help prepare for more extensive exercises designed to coordinate and to test several functions and involve a wider spectrum of participants. Drills also are used to provide training with new equipment, to develop new policies or procedures, or to practice and to maintain current skills. The utility of a drill is its focus on a single, relatively limited portion of the overall emergency management system, thereby permitting a targeted, highly intensive look at a potential problem area.

Tabletop Exercise

A tabletop exercise is a facilitated analysis of an emergency situation in an informal, stress-free environment. It is designed to elicit constructive discussion as participants examine and resolve problems based on existing operational plans and identify where those plans need to be refined. The success of the exercise is largely determined by group participation in the identification of problem areas. There is minimal attempt at simulation in a tabletop exercise. Equipment is not used, resources are only deployed on paper, and time pressures are not introduced.

Functional Exercise

A functional exercise is an interactive, fully-simulated test of an organization’s ability to affect a coordinated response to a stressful situation under time-pressured and more-or-less realistic circumstances. This type of exercise gets its name from the fact it tests one or more functions of an organization’s operations plan. The range of suitable objectives for this type of undertaking is broad, and encompasses the coordination, integration and interaction of an organization’s policies, procedures, roles and responsibilities before, during or after an event.The intended audience for a functional exercise consists of policy, coordination and operations personnel who will practice responding in a realistic way to carefully planned and sequenced messages given to them by “simulators.”

Because these messages should reflect ongoing events and problems that might occur in a real emergency, they must be scripted in a manner likely to cause participants to make decisions and then act on them. This complexity makes the functional exercise more difficult and time-consuming to design than drills and tabletop exercises.Participants will be required to make on-the-spot decisions and then act on them. These actions can generate a variety of actual consequences, such as responses from other players and resource shortages. These secondary consequences can, in turn, further stimulate activity within the realm of the exercise environment.Functional exercises make it possible to test several functions and to include several agencies or departments within an agency without incurring the cost of a full-scale exercise (described below). Thus, in almost all cases, a functional exercise is a prerequisite to a full-scale exercise. In some instances, taking part in a functional exercise also may serve as a full-scale exercise for a participating organization (e.g., a hospital may conduct its own full-scale exercise as part of a community-wide functional exercise)

Full-scale Exercise
A full-scale exercise simulates a real event as closely as possible. It is designed to evaluate the operational capabilities of emergency management systems in a highly stressful environment, and attempts to simulate the full spectrum of conditions that those with a response role might face. (not all healthcare workers will really know it's all just an exercise, to see how they will respond, I would think here, not everybody is "in on it" anyhow, yada yada) To accomplish these things, a full-scale exercise must include the actual mobilization and movement of emergency personnel, equipment and resources. Ideally, a full-scale exercise should test and evaluate most of the functions provided for in the applicable emergency operations plan(s).

A full-scale exercise differs from a drill in that it coordinates the actions of several entities, tests several emergency functions and puts participants in actual v. simulated operating environments (e.g., state, state agency and/or local emergency operations centers;dispensing and vaccination centers; “on-scene” command posts.The requisite level of realism is achieved through a variety of techniques,including:•“On-scene” actions and decisions• Simulated victims•Search and rescue requirements•Use of actual emergency communication protocols, channels and devices•Actual v. “on paper only” allocation and deployment of personnel, equipment, supplies and other critical resources

Full-scale exercises are regarded as the ultimate in the test of response effectiveness “trial by fire” that is as close as practicable to an actual event. Because they are expensive and time consuming, it is advisable this form of exercise be reserved for the highest priority hazards and functions, and they be conducted only after the applicable emergency response plans and operational structure are well developed, widely understood and tested through one or more of the four less resource-intensive processes described elsewhere in this document
Is not all this basically the same as the EVENT 201 and Clade X scenarios???

There is a ton in this document to unpack, enough of that for now, will add more later.
 

gl69m

Member
Post #6 from original thread (from Viking911)

Gates $100B Deal For TRACING APP. 6 Months Before CV19 Even Started!

edit: that video apparently was removed, so I found a link that has podcasts pertaining to the same subject, hopefully good info and wasn't some pure rabbit hole..
 

Dude111

Well-known member
gl69m said:
Sad to hear that Dude, have you lost any of these friends due to this yet?

Yes they dont talk to me,they think im crazy...... I tried going over one day a few weeks ago and they werent that nice to me... They say im not taking it seriously...

YES I AM!!!!! -- I know its all crap... The guy said to me "Take your head out of your ass and do your research" and I said "I did my research and I dont like what im seeing"

Its very sad........
 

gl69m

Member
Post #8 from original thread (from gl69m) (note- old LRF links won't work)

Adding this one, not necessarily as a smoking gun per se, but certainly as a huge red flag;

from thread

Are the COVID-19 Test Kits Designed to Produce False Positives (Plandemic)?
from post #4, my list of biases built into the CDC 'covid-19' pcr test protocol, bias #17 (posted 10 Apr 2020),
http://letsrollforums.com//showpost....20&postcount=4
Quote:

DC-006-00019, Revision: 03 CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases Effective: 3/30/2020CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use OnlyInstructions for UseCatalog # 2019-nCoVEUA-01 1000 reactionsFor In-vitro Diagnostic (IVD) UseRx Only
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download


17- no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available (page 38 ),assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA. Is this a possible admission the virus is fake and that the '2019-nCoV' genome may be a mock (theoretical genome)? Well, I think it's possible: my tinfoil hat dunning-kreuger senses (not spidy senses
biggrin.gif
) are tingling, how about yours?

slighter longer excerpt and explanation from post #5 (posted 10 Apr 2020)
http://letsrollforums.com//showpost....21&postcount=5
Quote:

17- From page 38,
Quote:
Performance Characteristics
Analytical Performance:

Limit of Detection (LoD):

LoD studies determine the lowest detectable concentration of 2019-nCoV at which approximately 95% of all (true positive) replicates test positive. The LoD was determined by limiting dilution studies using characterized samples.

The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
I'm thinking that normally there is quantified virus isolates to validate test methods normally, here they did their fast-tracked validation with “transcribed” full length RNA of the N gene, from the genome published from this GenBank accession deposit MN908947.2. This is perhaps the second genome version of the original genome published by Chinese scientists (I think on Jan 5th 2020) for the alleged 2019-nCoV virus, subsequently renamed SARS-CoV2 virus.

Is it possible that no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were currently available, because they didn't (don't exist)? Is this genome perhaps a mock genome, and this transcribed RNA put into this test validation (and for the 2019-nCoV positive controls also in subsequent actual specimen testing?) was actually artificially printed nucleic acid? I have a hunch (
icon_think.gif
).

And to place in context, proof demonstrating that the CDC, according to their 'covid-19' pcr document, no "quantified" (therefore no "isolated" virus either) virus was used to test their method/protocol on, and further revision of the same document also shows that they did not add any further testing/results for any further validation of that particular method,

from post #30 (posted 13 Jul 2020)
http://letsrollforums.com//showpost....0&postcount=30
Quote:

Update to this document from above link (same link as in post #4, https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download, this time on page 39):
Quote:
CDC-006-00019, Revision: 04 CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases Effective: 6/12/2020

CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel
For Emergency Use Only
Instructions for Use
Catalog # 2019-nCoV
EUA-01 1000 reactions
For In-vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Use
Rx Only

Page 39

Performance Characteristics


Analytical Performance:

Limit of Detection (LoD):

LoD studies determine the lowest detectable concentration of 2019-nCoV at which approximately 95% of all (true positive) replicates test positive. The LoD was determined by limiting dilution studies using characterized samples.

The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. Samples were extracted using the QIAGEN EZ1 Advanced XL instrument and EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (Cat# 62724) and manually with the QIAGEN DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat# 61904). Real-Time RT-PCR assays were performed using the ThemoFisher Scientific TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (Cat# A15299) on the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument according to the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions for use.

from post #31 (posted 19 Jul 2020)
http://letsrollforums.com//showpost....7&postcount=31
Quote:

New revision (05) for the CDC 'covid' pcr protocol document:

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download



Quote:
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)

Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel

For Emergency Use Only
Instructions for Use
Catalog # 2019-nCoVEUA-01

1000 reactions
For In-vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Use
Rx Only

CDC-006-00019, Revision: 05 CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases Effective: 07/13/2020

from page 39

Performance Characteristics

Analytical Performance:

Limit of Detection (LoD):
LoD studies determine the lowest detectable concentration of 2019-nCoV at which approximately 95% of all (true positive) replicates test positive. The LoD was determined by limiting dilution studies using characterized samples.

The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. Samples were extracted using the QIAGEN EZ1 Advanced XL instrument and EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (Cat# 62724) and manually with the QIAGEN DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat# 61904). Real-Time RT-PCR assays were performed using the ThemoFisher Scientific TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (Cat# A15299) on the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument according to the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions for use.


the big piece the gargantuan pink elephant in the room is that they still don't mention using any "quantified" (and therefore not "isolated") virus stocks or in other words didn't use isolated/quantified 'sars-cov2' virus, why the fuck not??!! surely there has been plenty of time for them to generate these viral stocks, if this virus were real?? Seriously. To me this kind of feels like another smoking gun,
 
Top