Smoking guns that prove 'COVID-19' is a planned psyop and simulated pandemic

Sinister Dick Cheney

Active member

The data is clear: Getting vaccinated massively increases your risk of death

The data clearly shows that since August, the number of unvaccinated cases has been progressively declining. At the same time, the number of fully vaccinated cases has been spiking.

The overall trends show that the unvaccinated are staying healthier and better protected against the latest variants while the fully vaccinated are succumbing more and more to whatever it is that is being injected into their bodies.

As for hospitalizations, very few unvaccinated people ever even have to go to the hospital because their symptoms are mild or non-existent. The same cannot be said of the fully vaccinated, who are flooding hospitals at a growing rate.

The most shocking data point of all is the death toll between vaccinated and unvaccinated. The disparity is so dramatic that there is no longer any denying that the jabs are what is killing people, not some “virus” floating around in the air.

By a long shot, fully vaccinated people account for nearly all deaths attributed to “covid.” Conversely, there are almost no unvaccinated people dying from covid, even using official government metrics for calculation. (RELATED: Independent data analyses suggest that millions of fully vaccinated people have already died from their lethal injections.)

While the number of unvaccinated deaths has pretty much flatlined, the number of fully vaccinated deaths is going exponentially parabolic – and as time goes on, the growth curve will likely get even steeper.
 

Sinister Dick Cheney

Active member
COVID Operation is the story of how the COVID-19 Hoax began, who the major players are, and how the plan was executed. It's a disturbing account of how easy it is to take control of people who assume that they will continue to enjoy freedom without holding government, the media, and many others accountable.

The most consequential thing to happen in the world since World War II, this event has been perpetrated by a wide network of enemies of the people who have managed to disguise themselves as public servants, health professionals, and founders and heads of global non-profits. They are everywhere, they are incredibly rich, they are powerful, and they are intent on getting their way.

With knowledge comes power, and our hope is that the information in this book will motivate masses of people to reject what is often referred to as "the new normal," to do whatever is required to take back their lives, and to ensure that future generations will live free.

 

Sinister Dick Cheney

Active member
COVID-19 and the Global Predators is much more than an analysis of the current exploitation of humanity under cover of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. It discloses for the first time the actual blueprint and master plan that that was ten years in the making by global predators before the pandemic: a plan to reorganize the world in the name of public health.

Billionaires, government agencies, giant funds, and major industries collaborated years ahead of time to lay the groundwork for what would become Operation Warp Speed and the Great Reset in 2020. All this is disclosed, individuals and groups are named, and their plans for the future are documented. The book concludes with chapters on what America and the world must do in the coming weeks and months to save humanity's freedoms.

Many top medical and public health experts treating and examining COVID 19 agree this is the most comprehensive book about who and what is behind the draconian measures that are crushing individual freedoms and many of the societies and economies of the Western World including the United States, Canada, Great Britain, and Australia.

This book thoroughly documents solid answers to these tragic questions about the global predators who are reaping enormous benefits from COVID-19 suffering including wealth, power and the destruction of America as an opposition to globalism.

Who are the "they"-these Global Predators? What are their motives and their plans for us?

How can we defend against them?

Why did they:


■ Plan Warp Speed for a SARS-CoV pandemic years before it came?

■ Distribute mRNA and DNA vaccines that killed lab animals and now humans?

■ Collaborate with the Chinese making pandemic viruses & bioweapons?

■ Hide the origin of SARS-CoV-2 in the Wuhan Institute?

■ Let China spread the virus around the world on passenger planes?

■ Give so much power to Dr. Anthony Fauci?

Why do they continue to:

■ Prohibit cheap, available, safe and effective COVID-19 treatments?

■ Impose draconian closures on our society and economy?

■ Disproportionately harm or destroy small businesses and churches?

■ Make us wear masks and distance ourselves from each other?

■ Exaggerate the death rate from COVID-19 to frighten us?

■ Hide the high and growing vaccine death rate from all of us?

■ Make experimental "vaccines" that turn our bodies against ourselves?

 

Sinister Dick Cheney

Active member

Sinister Dick Cheney

Active member

Dude 111

Member
Thank you everyone,a very good thread!!

I am having a very hard time with some friends I dearly love because I will not get this poison.. They keep telling me "Nothing will happen,its all conspiracies your hearing" but I know it isnt!!

Now they have injected thier younger sons and I hope to God nothing happens to them,I love them with all my heart... The whole family were my best friends before a few months ago...
 
Last edited:
Thank you everyone,a very good thread!!

I am having a very hard time with some friends I dearly love because I will not get this poison.. They keep telling me "Nothing will happen,its akll conspiracies your hearing" but I know it isnt!!

Now the yhave injected thier younger sons and I hope to God nothing happens to them,I love them with all my heart... The whole family were my best friends before a few months ago...
Same here. Too bad for them, you can only do so much to help these sheep.
 

Sinister Dick Cheney

Active member
Gotta get tested! Gotta get vaccinated! Gotta get boostered! Don't want to infect Santa Claus!

Safe and Effective! You bet! -- Shave and a haircut! Two bits! -- Safe and Effective! You bet!
 

gl69m

Member
@ Dude 111 (post #129)
Thank you everyone,a very good thread!!

I am having a very hard time with some friends I dearly love because I will not get this poison.. They keep telling me "Nothing will happen,its akll conspiracies your hearing" but I know it isnt!!

Now the yhave injected thier younger sons and I hope to God nothing happens to them,I love them with all my heart... The whole family were my best friends before a few months ago...
I feel you man, several in my family, close friends I have, people I work with, have all been jabbed, some have even gotten "boosters" recently; so far none have suffered anything significant at all. I would strongly suspect that they are all in the placebo/saline group, hopefully throughout the whole clinical trial period (till April 2023, if I am correct what I have seen other people online state, I need to dig up a source for this) for that matter. I think most in the low dose experimental groups may get lucky, for now, who knows down the line though, autoimmune diseases and cancers would be my main concern and suspicion.

We don't know how many are in the higher dose brackets, or have anyway for us to hack the algorithms selecting who gets put into which group either, a crap shoot for anybody really. I wonder if most people considered "essential" workers (my company gave me a letter saying I was one of those employees back in the end of March 2020, never had to show it anyone anywhere though) are by default put into the placebo group. I'm not willing to take that fat chance, fuck their fucking jab, it's the principle of resistance to the whole agenda that matters also, not whether I would get lucky and not suffer anything from it, we know many millions are suffering from it and many are dying, way more than they are admitting to, and of course they are lying/disguising and covering it up.
Same here. Too bad for them, you can only do so much to help these sheep.
Have to agree with TTIS here (post #130) Dude, they took the jab on their own accord ill informed or not, no way to help them now if they did get a real jab dose, sorry man.
 

gl69m

Member
Time for a more legitimate smoking gun, no shade thrown at all the memes (Dick), as entertaining as they are but we need a lot more of this kind here:

Omicron spreading faster than Delta and vaccinated/recovered more likely to be infected - WHO chief
137,633 views
Dec 20, 2021

@~2:40 he states this "as we see, some countries are using to give boosters to kill children, which is not right.". Slow the audio down to 1/2 or 1/4 there is no mistaking the word kill there,
Video description:
Mandatory credit: WHO

The Omicron variant of the coronavirus is spreading at a quicker rate than Delta, World Health Organisation Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in Geneva on Monday.
"There is now consistent evidence that Omicron is spreading significantly faster than the Delta variant. And it's more likely that people who have been vaccinated or have recovered from COVID-19 could be infected or re-infected," Ghebreyesus said.
The WHO also called on people to cancel or delay events in the interest of slowing the spread of the virus and asked countries to focus on vaccinating the unvaccinated instead of putting all hope into booster vaccine campaigns as unvaccinated patients still take up more ICU beds globally.

SOT, Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organization: "More than 3.3 million people have lost their lives to COVID-19 this year. More deaths than from HIV, malaria and tuberculosis combined in 2020. And still, COVID-19 continues to claim around 50,000 lives every week."

SOT, Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organization: "There is now consistent evidence that Omicron is spreading significantly faster than the Delta variant. And it's more likely that people who have been vaccinated or have recovered from COVID-19 could be infected or re-infected."

SOT, Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organization: "All of us are sick of this pandemic. All of us want to spend time with friends and family. All of us want to get back to normal. The fastest way to do this is for all of us leaders and individuals to make the difficult decisions that must be made to protect ourselves and others. In some cases, that will mean canceling or delaying events, just as we have had to cancel the reception we planned to have with you today. But an event cancelled is better than a life cancelled. It's better to cancel now and celebrate later than to celebrate now and grieve later. None of us want to be here again in 12 months time."

SOT, Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organization: "If we are to end the pandemic in the coming year, we must end inequity by insuring 70 percent of the population of every country is vaccinated by the middle of next year."

SOT, Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organization: "There is new evidence emerging now of its [booster vaccine] benefits, especially with elderly groups, senior citizens, especially above 65 and above 60. So if it's going to be used, it's better to focus on those groups who have risk of severe disease and deaths rather than, as we see, some countries are using to give boosters to children, which is not right. Then the equity issue comes here. Instead of boosting a child in high income countries, it's better to vaccinate the elderly in countries who have the elders who have not been vaccinated, even the primary vaccines. So the equity issue should also come into into play."

#Omicron #COVID19 #WHO #Vaccines

Video ID: 20211221-002

Video on Demand: https://ruptly.tv/videos/20211221-002
Contact: cd@ruptly.tv

Twitter: http://twitter.com/Ruptly
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Ruptly

Here the transcript omits the word "kill" right before "children", which can clearly be heard in the audio.
"as we see, some countries are using to give boosters to "" children, which is not right."

Here is another Youtube channel that posted a clip of the above video, I made a comment responding to another comment on one of the threads,

He Just Said WHHAATTT?!​

155,414 views
Dec 23, 2021

Bev

1 day ago

It rolled of his tongue so easily didn't it he didn't even flinch

44 replies

The first absurd comment this WHO defender turd made,

Jonathan Michael

20 hours ago

because he said cure... not kill, many foreigners have trouble with enunciating "R"

The comment I replied to,

Jonathan Michael

20 hours ago

@DLM Try? It's a fairly easy observation to make. I don't support any shots, but everyone is getting worked up over nothing with this.

My reply to this comment,

gl69m Warren

6 minutes ago

@Jonathan Michael The claim he was intending to say "cure" and not "kill", because english isn't his first language is nothing but mental gymnastic excuses blah blah blah..., thankfully only one other commenter is buying that.

Another commenter claimed this video was kept in 360p highest quality in order to over dub it and the over dub not be detected. Is that possible? Regardless, even if they did that and he said "cure" or meant cure, he said it wasn't right meaning it is not right to give boosters (which "boosters" for 'covid' is being given in such an extremely short time span from original vacc. dose compared to any other vacc. I ever heard of, usually boosters are years later, from my recollection anyhow) to children but should only be used on vulnerable elderly sick populations: he alluded to high income countries as to where boosters should be used in that manner.

To me it sounds like he is saying the boosters should be used to genocide the vulnerable/sick/elderly in high income countries, even if kill was dubbed for cure he meant the same exact thing, surly everything he said there could not be dubbed and not be detected. If I'm right, then it seems he may mean they should go ahead and use boosters to kill children in low income countries? Longer clip from Ruptly,

https://youtu.be/NHgoeIdti-A

Here the transcript in the video description omits the word "kill" right before "children", which can clearly be heard in the audio.
"as we see, some countries are using to give boosters to "" children, which is not right." What are the odds of Ruptly dubbing in the word "kill" in the audio? Not f*cking likely considered Ruptly is mostly pro powers that be.



Another thing the WHO Chief talked about was the decepticron (omicron) variant, supposedly so much more infective than the delta (deltoid) variant, like he is reading a script from an Event 201 news briefing. He also talks about the "benefits" that the boosters are showing in the elderly population later in the clip: meanwhile at the beginning of the Ruptly clip he states that this year (2021)- he claims that 3.3M lives lost to 'covid', more than hiv/tuberculosis/malaria combined in 2020. That is the "benefits" of the boosters he's talking about, for the WHO/NWO that is, higher more efficient culling than the previous diseases (disease paradigms).
 
Last edited:

gl69m

Member
Adding onto post #135, found a video of the WHO Director General's remarks, this directly from the World Health Organization (WHO) Youtube channel;

WHO Director-General Dr Tedros opening remarks
39,543 views
Dec 21, 2021
12:25 minutes long video

video description:
WHO Director-General Dr Tedros opening remarks to the hybrid press conference with Geneva based Palais des Nations journalists held on 20 December 2021. The introduction by spokesperson Tarik Jasarevic was edited for this youtube posting. You can find the text of Dr Tedros speech here: https://www.who.int/director-general/... and the full audio of the entire press conference: https://www.who.int/multi-media/detai...

Text transcript of audio of conference:

WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing for Geneva-based journalists - 20 December 2021

from this table I will show the discrepancies in the transcript of this WHO video with the Ruptly video posted in post #135:

Syncing the relevant portion of these two transcripts of these two videos, we find that they are not identical, one or both have been altered, well I know the Ruptly video transcript was altered a bit and only selected portions of video/audio were shown obviously. The Who video does not include the red text portion video/audio, this was from the question/answer period after his opening remarks.
Ruptly video-



WHO video/transcript-
https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-for-geneva-based-journalists---20-december-2021
"All of us are sick of this pandemic. All of us want to spend time with friends and family. All of us want to get back to normal. The fastest way to do this is for all of us leaders and individuals to make the difficult decisions that must be made to protect ourselves and others. In some cases, that will mean canceling or delaying events, just as we have had to cancel the reception we planned to have with you today. But an event cancelled is better than a life cancelled. It's better to cancel now and celebrate later than to celebrate now and grieve later. None of us want to be here again in 12 months time."
"If we are to end the pandemic in the coming year, we must end inequity by insuring 70 percent of the population of every country is vaccinated by the middle of next year." (cut in video/audio)

"There is new evidence emerging now of its [booster vaccine] benefits, especially with elderly groups, senior citizens, especially above 65 and above 60. So if it's going to be used, it's better to focus on those groups who have risk of severe disease and deaths rather than,

as we see, some countries are using to give boosters to (the word “kill” in the audio was omitted in this transcript) children, which is not right.

Then the equity issue comes here. Instead of boosting a child in high income countries, it's better to vaccinate the elderly in countries who have the elders who have not been vaccinated, even the primary vaccines. So the equity issue should also come into into play."
All of us are sick of this pandemic. All of us want to spend time with friends and family. All of us want to get back to normal. The fastest way to do that is for all of us – leaders and individuals – to make the difficult decisions that must be made to protect ourselves and others. In some cases, that will mean cancelling or delaying events – just as we have had to cancel the reception we planned to have with you today. But an event cancelled is better than a life cancelled. It’s better to cancel now and celebrate later, than to celebrate now and grieve later.
None of us want to be here again in 12 months’ time, talking about missed opportunities, continued inequity, or new variants (this portion not present in the Ruptly transcript).

If we are to end the pandemic in the coming year, we must end inequity, by ensuring 70% of the population of every country is vaccinated by the middle of next year.

(Entire red section missing in WHO transcript compared to Ruptly transcript)

Last week, WHO issued Emergency Use Listing for a ninth vaccine, produced by the Serum Institute of India under license from Novavax.

This new vaccine is part of the COVAX portfolio, and we hope that it will play an important role in achieving our global vaccination targets.

As you know, COVID-19 is far from the only emergency to which WHO has responded this year.

The red portion in the Ruptly transcript is present in this text record of the WHO transcript at this link:
Full audio transcript WHO video (this only gives the "opening remarks" video in this link and not the full audio of the full text transcript).

we find it at this section here at the 26:44 minute mark, first I pasted a preceding question about "boosters":
00:15:26
So, as we finish the press conference, we ask you to remain at your seat or at your place, while our speakers leave the room.

CH Thank you, Tarik, for taking my question. It is directed to Dr Tedros. My question is about boosters. You argue continuously against booster programmes and you say there is no evidence that it helps against Omicron. And yet, eminent scientists in my own country, in Germany, in the host country of WHO, Switzerland, in the United States, say that is the way to go. Everyone should get boosters.

Are you not afraid to lose those governments and maybe even more, worryingly, the populations in those countries will just stop listening to WHO? Because this is just going totally against what they feel and think and are told is the right way to go. Thank you.

00:17:14​

00:24:18​

TJ Thank you, Dr Ryan. I think Dr Tedros would like to add something.

TAG Thank you. I think both wanted me to say something. vielen dank for the question. I will comment on both of them, they have already been addressed, but just a few things to add. On the boosters, as Bruce said, WHO is not against boosters. What we said was, at that time when I put the moratorium, it can be used immunocompromised persons, because there was evidence that it could help.

But on other groups, we need to get evidence before we started. There was, at that time, as you said, as Bruce said, and also, it will be the case in the future, we need to always put the equity issue into that factor. Because unless we try to vaccinate the unvaccinated, especially that we are missing because of equity problems, we may not get the desired outcome. It’s not just about booster issues. For instance, some countries are doing boosters very aggressively, while their hospitals are filled with people who are not vaccinated.

Many studies show that 80% of the hospitalised people are actually unvaccinated. So, the best would be for countries to hand those who are not vaccinated, head count, convince them to be vaccinated, and make sure that they are safe. Because even the two doses reduces severity and also, death. So, their energy should be spent on finding the unprotected and protect. Because the evidence is also showing that more than 80% of hospitalisations in many counties is because they are unvaccinated.

00:26:44​

It’s not because they are not boosted. That’s the reality. So, I think they should focus on something that should be focused on, that’s the issue. We had a meeting today and in the last few days. There is new evidence emerging now of its benefits, especially with elderly groups, senior citizens, especially above 65 and above 60. So, if it’s going to be used, it’s better to focus on those groups who have the risk of severe disease and death, rather than, as we see, some countries are using to give boosters to (the word “kill” that is clearly heard in the audio of Ruptly video is omitted from this text transcript) children, which is not right.

Then the equity issues comes in here. Instead of boosting a child in high income countries, it’s better to vaccinate the elderly in countries where the elders have not been vaccinated, even the primary vaccines. So, the equity issue should also come into play.

So did Ruptly dub the word "kill" into the audio (but then redacted it from their text transcript), or did they both simply redact "kill" from both text transcripts (where he clearly says "kill" in the video/audio)? while the question/answer session was not included the "opening remarks" WHO video. I opt for the latter in this case. I could not find any other videos on the WHO Youtube channel with further coverage of the question/answer period of the Dec 20th conference.
 
Last edited:

gl69m

Member
New proposed NY legislation that mirrors what was passed I believe in Australia:

#EpochTV

New Bill Allows for Indefinite Detention of Unvaccinated at Governor’s Whim | Facts Matter​

194,840 views
Premiered Dec 24, 2021

in video description:

Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov
708K subscribers




UPDATE: After heavy blowback (as well as failing to find a co-sponsor) New York Assembly Member Nick Perry released a statement saying he will remove bill A.416 from the legislative calendar. 🧶 Is the CCP orchestrating global lockdowns? 👉 https://ept.ms/33Oj6DP
I like Roman's presentation, well structured organized not too bombastic, but not wholly emotional maybe should be a little more, but overall pretty good. Hopefully he is credible, he may perhaps water down the dystopian aspects of this where he said it was (paraphrased) "a little bit dystopian in my opinion". I'd have to look at the legislation itself but I think he seems credible enough to me in his presentation that he is not misleading us as to what the portions of the document links he has reviewed, as to what the new proposed legislation is saying in it's wording. Him and his research team are spitting fire lately when it comes to showing this part of the 'covid' narrative trying to move the agenda forward.

This bill is worded to include just about anything not just 'covid' to use to detain pretty much anyone they want for potentially an indefinite period of time while they review endlessly and keep people locked up in 'health detainment' (concentration FEMA 'covid' camps) facilities. If this is what cov-idiots want this is what they will get; perhaps they don't realize that even the fully vaxxed/compliant can also be detained on a governor or 'health board's' whim here (selective interpretation and selective enforcement) for having been in "contact' with "infected' (or simply tested 'positive') individuals. Only complete braindead sheop will want to go along with this insanity.

This legislation is basically a furtherance of HR 6666, that while it did not go pass or go anywhere in the U.S. Congress, it became a default adopted practice in many areas, and so the new legislation here A.416 will undoubtedly be using the same type of practices (and more) particularly the "contact tracing'.
 
Top