gl69m
Member
from post #17 (from Sinister Dick Cheney)
post #13 from original thread (from gl69m)
I had this very similar thought last year, that people are chosen to be 'pos' or "neg" in the 'covid' tests (pcr mainly) based on their personal and demographic information, by the testing regime with their AI quantum computer algorithms (Al Gore rhythms haha), and I posted about that in post#13 of the original thread, so gonna post that one out of order from the original thread cause I think this of significance. I mean, if a patient voluntarily gets a test and the AI knows this persons info and political beliefs, those who believe the 'pandemic' is gonna kill us all and all are surly gonna come up 'pos' way nore often than a skeptic like me: after all I tested "negative" 4 times in a row, 2 back in April and two in June, in pursuit of the surgery I had in June in New Jersey for my chronic pelvic pain. And I go maskless and social dipshitless (no "social distancing" of 6 feet blah blah for me) wherever I can since probably July 2020, so is it possible the AI algorithm knows I would be demanding to see all the lab data including the pcr run data and demanding a retest etc.? cause I knew a 'pos' result was gonna fuck up my chances of seeing the surgeon in April and getting the surgery in June; they expected a "neg" test from IL in order to be seen in clinic in New Jersey but to have a procedure (injections like a nerve block) or surgery they required a "neg" test while in Jersey which takes 24-48 hours so it was tricky to schedule all those appointments around that and then it was a roll of the pcr dice to get the result that wasn't going to fuck up my plans of getting the nerve block in April and the surgery in June. Either I was lucky as hell or maybe their AI algore-rythm knows the fuck better to give a 'pos' result to people like me...
post #13 from original thread (from gl69m)
U.S. Census Bureau
I hate it when the comments are turned off, sometimes they are more entertaining and enlightening/educational(links sometimes too that take it further etc.) than the actual video or many times equal to that.
MIDAS = Models of Infectious Disease Agents Study, funded basically by NIH (of which fraudci is also part of https://www.oar.nih.gov/about/fauci). Long synopsis short here, MIDAS uses data from the U.S. Census Bureau (most recent Census data as in the 2010 census in this video) and the ACS (American Community Survey, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs), to create “synthetic populations”(based on real population data of course), then pandemic simulations are run by super computers to simulate the data to see who gets infected, who gets sick who doesn't et al. The data is very specific demographically and geographically, race/gender/age/socio-economic status/political affiliation/medical history-vital stats (I imagine) etc. etc., NSA edward snowden shit.
@~2:00 in, Wheaton states that no other database compered to the ACS combined with census data can provide the level of detail necessary to run these simulations; Eckstrand states that they can (and I'm sure they do) run thousands of these computer simulations in an afternoon (she says “this is synthesized, not your real data”, meaning it is not real infection data but it is real demographic information data being used to input into the pandemic simulation).
My suspicion is that this methodology is how the 'covid-19' “testing' infection/death numbers are generated, synthetically. I am not saying that they are not ever “testing” anybody at all (testing but for what in reality? if 'sars-cov-2' is not a real virus?, I couldn't answer that); but I've repeatedly stated that we really have no idea who is really tested or not, and no such evidence have I seen yet that anyone has really had such a test performed (PCR diagnostic test medical documentation specifically), but surely they are actually performing these tests on some people, but the number of “total tests performed” is far more than the number of total people (patients or prospective screenings for 'covid' etc.) actually tested, due to multiple specimens collected and multiple tests performed from each specimen et al.
Some kind of criteria must be being used (by AI super-computers) to determine who is chosen as 'positive' as opposed to negative, medical history (pre-existing conditions/diseases especially, lung diseases for sure, age, geography, race for sure {it is reported that black and hispanics are in higher proportion of infection and death rate etc.}); perhaps political affiliation, I would assume more democrats vs republicans (I wonder if there is data on this or not), liberals (and fake liberals) vs conservatives, those who would not really question the diagnosis based on the way the media has fed the lie to the public and so on and so on.
Then there was a report like this one almost a week ago,
600,000 people were told they had COVID-19 despite not being tested
https://thepostmillennial.com/600-000-people-were-told-they-had-covid-19-despite-not-being-tested
July 27, 2020 10:51 AM 2 mins reading
Now this may well get chalked up with plausible deniability as just some e-mailing carbon copy (cc) error of some sort and not taken seriously. But is this perhaps one part of the above method I was talking about to “synthesize” an infected “pandemic simulation population”? So these 600,000 people who were never tested for 'covid' at all were apologized to and explained it was an error, but we would never be given any evidence/assurance that these numbers are not still included in the 'covid' infection/case numbers now will we? I sure as hell don't think so.
I want to add here a couple of videos, documentaries about the original SARS pandemic, now I believe that pandemic was likely real but total truth not told, but it could be fictional too how the hell would I know: but I think the actual infection rate claimed and geographical spread was probably way under reported but it's lethality probably way over reported as well, perhaps that was true for MERS epidemic as well, and other emerging coronaviruses in last ten years.
I will also say I have sees in conspiracy circles this year floated certain ideas that viruses aren't real (I've seen that one a few years ago too) or that they are just waste excreted from cells (exosomes) etc., I don't really buy any of that, but I also don't buy that viruses really have no known biological function at all which seems to be kind of a prevailing sort of scientific consensus.
My personal thought that came to my mind recently is that viruses all originate from each individual species, are created by each species for a biological purpose in house; genetic signaling within the body (multi-cellular organisms) for repairing or some form of de-toxification etc. or some other function; but the excess excreted viral particles of each species a certain % remain viable in the environment for varying periods of time and can therefore rarely “infect” other differing organisms or/and including other individuals of the same multi-cellular organism of origin. So I see it possible that some influenza viruses, perhaps originating as a virus created by a swine or bird species that serves a positive function for them but excreted and can then occasionally (and probably very rarely, considering the number of viruses contacted per individual organisms and people here) be absorbed and “infect” people or other animals to create a negative function or illness (and occasionally death). That's my little virus hypothesis, I haven't attempted so far to follow up on that, it sounds logical to me anyways.
SARS Documentaries on Youtube: these could be smoking guns of a sort, 'covid-19' being a planned sequel to the SARS epidemic/pandemic.
Killer Bug - SARS Coronavirus
Dec 31, 2014
This last video is unavailable, channel account was terminated.
