The Convid vaccine thread (what is purpose of vax and what is in the vax?) plus 5G connection

alpha77

New member
To keep the vax question more out of GL69s thread who wants more proof that the C19 BS is all BS which it is - so here a thread for the vax itself.

I start with one of the examinations which meanwhile are forthcoming from incredients of the so called vax(xes):

Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines​

Updated: 6 days ago


2021, February 5th, Updated September 11th, 2021​



So this guy is already the 5 or 6th who found graphene oxid (aka GO) in the vx !!
There were at first Spanish guys and then someone from Chile and now many more!

I MYSELF identified already 3-4 month ago, when googling the addmitted incedients of Astra vax a link to "EDTA" just google it to find more info then the Wiki provides:


.... HOWEVER I later noted there is also a form of this chemcial named "EDTA-GO"!!! GO=Graphenoxid. And this are all official papers from chemical and/or pharma studies.... so not even science fiction or conspiray theory...

REMINDER: Note that the Japanese rejected 1.5 Mio. doses of Pfitzer vx ! Cause they found "metallic particles" that are magnetic in it. They said it should be a mistake that this stuff got in there - however this is no mistake it is a regular incredient only hidden. The theroy of mine is the vx need to be frozen before use. The GO is inactive when frozen or under a specific temperatue.

So it also cannot be seen as dark or black particles in vx vial which is still cold, but when it is exposed for longer time to eg. body temperatur it will be "activated" so to speak. Note: Graphene is black or very dark brown colour in nature. It is derived from coal/oil...

-... why would this vx be frozen at -60? Also the nano-GO is sooo small the colour would not even show anyways. Only when the particles are "assembled" so to speak. I write this, cause I saw a so called fact check article in the MSM, who said FALSE there is not GO in the vx, cause it is not black :)

Also ofc could be of the nano particles that contain the RNA compent - perhaps the RNA is "capsuled" in the GO somehow ? Another way to "protect" the RNA nanos is PEG (a form of plastics):


However it seems the metallic and GO findings so far seem not to point to PEG used... BUT this sounds like it could be used, from above link:

"Penetration enhancing effect​

The most important thing you need to know about PEGs is that they have a penetration enhancing effect, the magnitude of which is dependent upon a variety of variables. These include: both the structure and molecular weight of the PEG, other chemical constituents in the formula, and, most importantly, the overall health of the skin.

To note, independent of molecular size, PEGs of all sizes may penetrate through injured skin with compromised barrier function. So it is very important to avoid products with PEGs if your skin is not in tip top condition.

This penetration enhancing effect is important for three reasons: 1) If your skin care product contains a bunch of other undesirable ingredients, PEGs will make it easier for them to get down deep into your skin. 2) By altering the surface tension of the skin, PEGs may upset the natural moisture balance. 3) PEGs are not always pure, but often come contaminated with a host of toxic impurities.

Skin penetration enhancing effects have been shown with PEG-2 and PEG-9 stearate."


This can penetrate skin - so it could also penetrate body cells - were the RNA needs to be...remember the mRNA is supposed to "modify" or "cut" your DNA....it called "gene scissors" note this DNA/RNA stuff is now easy to make "thanks" to the "crispr/cas9" tech, see:

 
Last edited:

alpha77

New member
Here an article about crispr:


Note that it says the nobel prize was given to these 2 women (?) in Oct. 2020.. this is the official announcement so to speak re. this tech. But as most know the millitary/spooks have tech normally kept secret. And Darpa and co. are ofc big in such research along with the EU,Russians and Chinese. Some say when a tech is admitted publicly the "spooks" had them already 20 yrs ago. But even 5 yrs ago would be enough to have these vx´s or gene therapies ready for the big study probably around 2017-2019. So what could this BIG study be?


Edit, here a FOI request re. the above RNA/DNA stuff, which was denied:

MRNA SECRET​

 

alpha77

New member
We will concentrate on the Moderna and Biontech/Pfitzer products here. I have read credible thoughts in the "stolen history" forum that the Astra Z. vax was set up on purpose to fail. Some people noticed that if at all critical info about the vx was published in the MSM than it was about the Astra stuff. The idea behind this is that the sheep think ... oh man Astra seems to be a bad product luckily we have the better ones from Moderna and Pfitzer so I gonna get these. Do you get the psychology behind this ?

So here I upload the 2 "Beipackzettel" of the 2 (aka medical info sheets in English?).

"Spikevax" = Moderna
"Comirnaty" = Biontech/P.

So we use the S and C in the future for the 2 above.

Here are the admitted components from the sheets:

S:

2. QUALITATIVE UND QUANTITATIVE ZUSAMMENSETZUNG:
Dies ist eine Mehrdosen-Durchstechflasche, die 10 Dosen zu je 0,5 ml enthält. Eine Dosis (0,5 ml) enthält 100 Mikrogramm Messenger-RNA (mRNA) (eingebettet in SM-102- Lipid-Nanopartikel). Einzelsträngige mit 5’-gekappte Boten-RNA (messenger RNA, mRNA), die mit Hilfe einer zellfreien In-vitro-Transkription aus den entsprechenden DNA-Vorlagen hergestellt wird, den Code für das virale Spike(S)-Protein von SARS-CoV-2 kodiert und in Lipid-Nanopartikel eingebettet ist. Vollständige Auflistung der sonstigen Bestandteile, siehe Abschnitt 6.1

6.1 Liste der sonstigen Bestandteile:
Lipid SM-102 (Heptadecan-9-yl-8-((2-hydroxyethyl)-(6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy)-hexyl)-amino)-octanoat) Cholesterin 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphocholin (DSPC) 1,2-Dimyristoyl-rac-Glycero-3-Methoxypolyethylenglykol-2000 (DMG-PEG2000) Trometamol Trometamolhydrochlorid Essigsäure Natriumacetat-Trihydrat Sucrose Wasser für Injektionszwecke

C:

2. QUALITATIVE UND QUANTITATIVE ZUSAMMENSETZUNG:

Dies ist eine Mehrdosendurchstechflasche, deren Inhalt vor der Verwendung verdünnt werden muss.
Eine Durchstechflasche (0,45 ml) enthält nach dem Verdünnen 6 Dosen von je 0,3 ml, siehe
Abschnitte 4.2 und 6.6. 1 Dosis (0,3 ml) enthält 30 Mikrogramm COVID-19-mRNA-Impfstoff (eingebettet in Lipid- Nanopartikel). Einzelsträngige, 5'-gekappte Boten-RNA (mRNA), die unter Verwendung einer zellfreien in-vitro-Transkription aus den entsprechenden DNA-Vorlagen hergestellt wird und das virale Spike (S)-
Protein von SARS-CoV-2 kodiert.


Vollständige Auflistung der sonstigen Bestandteile, siehe Abschnitt 6.1.

6.1 Liste der sonstigen Bestandteile
((4-Hydroxybutyl)azandiyl)bis(hexan-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoat) (ALC-0315)
2-[(Polyethylenglykol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamid (ALC-0159)
Colfoscerilstearat (DSPC)
Cholesterol
Kaliumchlorid
Kaliumdihydrogenphosphat
Natriumchlorid
Natriummonohydrogenphosphat Dihydrat

Sucrose
Wasser für Injektionszwecke


As you can read the S contains in fact "PEG" !!
This is a "Nano plastic" component and should not be metallic / electric or magnetic...
The question is can we find eg. Iron, Titaniam or the "most famous" Graphen - oxid (GO) in these components or are they a "hidden trade secret" PEG could not explain the findings by the researchers also not (alledged" magnetic effect (you can look it up "magnet challenge" some of these may be hoaxes or fake anyways)

I googled already all incredients from the C vax 3 months ago and I believe the most alarming (except the mRNA) was a link to Ethylenoxid.:


GHS-pictogram-exclam.svg


So above is the warning sign for this chemical :eek::ROFLMAO: Should simmilar signs not also on the vax itself??

But if you are curious and have time you can look it up yourself...
 

Attachments

  • spikevax-previously-covid-19-vaccine-moderna-epar-product-information_de.pdf
    727.8 KB · Views: 0
  • comirnaty-epar-product-information_de.pdf
    795.3 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:

alpha77

New member
SO here just one of the many papers you can find regarding this "delivery system" w/nanoparticles for mRNA "gene therapies": Some of the authors of this study are from Moderna itself btw:

A Novel Amino Lipid Series for mRNA Delivery: Improved Endosomal Escape and Sustained Pharmacology and Safety in Non-human Primates

Here the first paragraph:

"The success of mRNA-based therapies depends on the availability of a safe and efficient delivery vehicle. Lipid nanoparticles have been identified as a viable option. However, there are concerns whether an acceptable tolerability profile for chronic dosing can be achieved. The efficiency and tolerability of lipid nanoparticles has been attributed to the amino lipid. Therefore, we developed a new series of amino lipids that address this concern. Clear structure-activity relationships were developed that resulted in a new amino lipid that affords efficient mRNA delivery in rodent and primate models with optimal pharmacokinetics. A 1-month toxicology evaluation in rat and non-human primate demonstrated no adverse events with the new lipid nanoparticle system. Mechanistic studies demonstrate that the improved efficiency can be attributed to increased endosomal escape. This effort has resulted in the first example of the ability to safely repeat dose mRNA-containing lipid nanoparticles in non-human primate at therapeutically relevant levels."

....mRNA-based therapies have the potential to revolutionize the way we treat diseases. The surging interest in mRNA as a drug modality stems from the potential to deliver transmembrane and intracellular proteins, targets that standard biologics are unable to access due to their inability to cross the cell membrane.1 One major challenge to making mRNA-based therapies a reality is the identification of an optimal delivery vehicle. Due to its large size, chemical instability, and potential immunogenicity, mRNA requires a delivery vehicle that can offer protection from endo- and exo-nucleases, as well as shield the cargo from immune sentinels. Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have been identified as a leading option in this regard.2 Moderna Therapeutics has recently validated this approach by demonstrating safe and effective delivery of an mRNA-based vaccine formulated in LNPs...."

 

Dude 111

New member
Almost everyone I know has been duped into taking this crap.... It scares me what might start happening to them...
 
Last edited:

alpha77

New member
Almost everyone I know has ben duped into taking this crap.... It scares me what might start happening to them...

Will (imho but mostly probably) depends not only how much poison they take but also how weak or strong their body is PLUS and how strong EMF/RF fields are near to them (here esp. 5G ofc. it is possible when mmwaves for 5G are enabled this will be a kind of "trigger"). Mostly 5G operates still in the below 8ghz range.. this is also dangerous like all other stronger fields, however the mmwaves might be the real danger and also can only be measured with very expensive meters.

I do not think that killing millions is the goal:
It is control, surveilance and influencing their thoughts.Remember the nerves and brain work with electric impulses, rGO has electric conducticity as well can be magnetized. In studies w/ mice it was already shown EMF at certain frequencies infuences their behaviour.
 
Last edited:

alpha77

New member

Snippet:
"...Some researchers have found that carbon nanotubes may even help with an awkward medical problem, and also have created a bio-sensor which could diagnose bacterial infections. These researchers declared that their device supplies a quicker diagnose than the current classic procedure in which, the cell sample taken and cultured in the laboratories to watch out for the presence of the Candid fungus. The scientists developed a transistor which has carbon nanotubes as well as antibodies incorporated to counter attack the yeast cells. Each time a sample cell is placed on the bio-sensor, the incorporation between the candid cells and the antibodies changes the electric energy of the gadget. The Carbon nanotubes are highly conductive and always records any change that happen for the researchers to measure the amount of yeast present in each cell. ..."

But this here is quite concerning:

"...Nanotubes are very much used in developing tips from the atomic force probes. Carbon nanotubes can also be used in various other engineering functions. Their mechanical property aids scientists be used in sports jackets, clothes and even on space elevators. Also, Carbon nanotubes are used in producing cables, paper battery and electrical circuit converters."

Edit, one more paper:

Note it also says these Nanotubes can be in masks..

Edit2 LOL:


Here the last sentence:

"...Therefore, long-term, high dose, and careful selection of administration route using different animal models are crucial before seeking any clinical application of this ‘wonder material’..."

I wonder if a real big "long-term, high dose" study is just ongoing...

1-s2.0-S2352940718302853-gr8.jpg
 
Last edited:

gl69m

Member
Good thread alpha, keep it coming:).

In response to one statement from post #1,
This can penetrate skin - so it could also penetrate body cells - were the RNA needs to be...remember the mRNA is supposed to "modify" or "cut" your DNA....it called "gene scissors" note this DNA/RNA stuff is now easy to make "thanks" to the "crispr/cas9" tech, see:
mRNA doesn't do any cutting, the mRNA gets transcribed into protein at the ribosomes, there is however guide RNAs that attach to certain proteins like the cas9 protein and the guide RNAs have a free strand end with a sequence that can match and attach to on open DNA strand (opened by the cas9 complex) and cut the DNA (at the chromosome point directed by the guide RNA) and insert another DNA strand into the genomic DNA. I think they have cas9 complexes that can simply excise whole DNA segments from a chromosome as well and create genetic deletions quick and easy. Cas9 and similar molecular tools represent a huge advancement in genetic engineering, unless it's all fiction maybe, but I tend to think it's real, the cas9 protein/guide RNA complex was derived from bacteria themselves, and one article I saw claimed that bacteria carry a large number of bacteriophage viruses in our bodies and cas9 (or similar) is a tool they use to combat viruses. The article also claimed we carry around 380 trillion viruses (mostly bacteriophages it said but I highly doubt most of them are probably not, but a huge number of bacteriophages could be in the gut where most bacteria [38 trillion in the body it said] are), which size wise that number hardly seems impossible to me. Micro RNAs also exist, and I am not familiar with those and their function right now, still learning some of this shit...

Meet the 380 trillion viruses inside your body​

https://www.freethink.com/science/meet-the-380-trillion-viruses-inside-your-body


The lipid nano-particles with PEG attached can cause allergic reactions, I think this presenter said about 30-40% of participants in one of the studies had antibodies to PEG, and that PEGs are added to a huge array of products in the medical drug delivery to being in foods as well.

The Risky Side of PEGylation of Nanomedicines and Biologicals: Immunogenicity and Immune Reactivity​

Oct 15, 2017


This guy seems to think that carbon nano-tubes are capable of doing a shitload of things in the body, he seems to imply he is on some team of nefarious nano-tech hackers trying to develop this technology for the possible purpose of using the nano-tech like nano-bots to control people, with some possible good medical uses but many nefarious purposes as well, like flat out killing people easily or maybe even mind control...

BSides Indy 06 Weaponizing Nanotechnology and hacking humans 2017 updates Chris Roberts.mp4​

185 views
Sep 18, 2017


Two die in Japan after shots from suspended Moderna vaccines - Japan govt​

https://www.reuters.com/business/he...ended-moderna-vaccines-japan-govt-2021-08-28/
Of course they downplay what the particles were that were found, just accidental contamination and no causality of these two deaths to the vaxxine yada yada yada. Moderna shot has 0.01% adverse effects reported, yeah we should all buy that malarky for a dollar:(.
Some youtube comments I saw said that likely the particles are not visible in the vials until thawed for over a half hour or one hour, and these are supposed to be used within 15 minutes after thawing since I've read that the lipid nano-particles do not stay stable at room temperature or higher for very long apparently.


Dr Been outlines a study that shows one mechanism of clotting caused by antibodies (that have killed people from the clotting as well) that were induced by one of the vaxxes, of course he downplays this as a rare event and is probably only occurs by the "rare' mechanism of course, most likely total bullshit that it's rare (clotting from the vax).

Vaccine Caused Clotting - Study Finds The Mechanism​

Streamed live on Jul 12, 2021
 

alpha77

New member
Cool keep it also coming... an effort by more guys who actually LOOK into and research this tech...


Here 3 vids in relation to the 5G:

Accidents near 5G antennas - La Quinta Columna​

La Quinta Columna continues its investigation related to the accidents and deaths resulting from the electronic excitation of graphene oxide in people’s bodies when near 5G antennas.

Although it may seem like a coincidence, it should not be ruled out that the possibility of more and more deaths near these antennas will increase as time goes by.:



Bad combo: Vaccines and Sports don’t mix well​

Dr. José Luis Sevillano explains how graphene oxide interferes with the electrical fields of the heart:

And here a bit more "rambling" however they tell you it is possible and can be used:

 
Last edited:

alpha77

New member
Some youtube comments I saw said that likely the particles are not visible in the vials until thawed for over a half hour or one hour, and these are supposed to be used within 15 minutes after thawing since I've read that the lipid nano-particles do not stay stable at room temperature or higher for very long apparently.

Yes, this is one of their secrets they hide, that random med. personal may find supicious stuff in the vial itself, this needs a certain temperature to form these "nanotubes" or "pores" and what was nano before might then be visible in colour at least ! I bet if we search for vax that was not used correctly eg. left alone 4 hours+ at room temperatur or exposed to sunlight.....the fluid might look darker and perhaps even particles could be seen with normal microscope

I believe these will be "activated" so to speak when it gets into the blood. It might re-act with the iron in there and is possible "tuned" to body temperatur (this is not proven but sounds right to me)...EDIT, this also might explain the magnetic phenomen at injection point, cause the iron from the blood will be "assembled" as soon the nano stuff reaches the blood (here the arm arteries, venes?). A somewhat bigger "iron" clot together with the nano BS could develope to which a strong but small magnet actually sticks :eek: However many of the magnet vids are for sure fake...but the phenomen is not totally false I believe.

Edit2: I also came to the info that the procedure of applying injections was changed in Germany around 2015. For the main reason it would be faster ! But commenters under the vid (prob. Arzthelferinnen - doctors assistants?) said that the old procedure was safer..the vid is gone now btw. Note how fast this injections are applied in videos of said procedure!
 
Last edited:

alpha77

New member
Whow, read this article, at the end he predicted exactly what happened (from end of 2009):


Same site, here you find a familiar name of today ("Dr." Faux) in 2011 OR is it coded for Goethes FAUST???



BTW: D/l the PDF for the C vax, even if you can´t read German, but you can find the "33" and "666" there a lot.

Edit2, has anyone noticed that sirens from ambulances / fire services have gotten more in the last 3-4 months ? Possibly the "V" effects now in the "flu seasons" will become more evident and they will say these people are the unvaxxed! The V weakens your imune system meaning you are much more in danger from other normal illnesses / infections. Not only that V also leads to brain fog and perhaps even unconcious states, imagine this happening while driving or climbing on the roof to repair something etc. This then can be filed as normal accidents.
 
Last edited:

alpha77

New member
It is coming like some already predicted 2-3 years ago!
Here a search for you (sorted for news), this patch has the "Luciferase" I am quite sure:


These are small needles in this patch moddeled from snake bites....anymore questions ?
They will also contain your "immunization" status which can be read out or even transmitted wirelessly.
 

gl69m

Member
from alpha77 (post #13)
It is coming like some already predicted 2-3 years ago!
Here a search for you (sorted for news), this patch has the "Luciferase" I am quite sure:


vaccination patch - Google Search

These are small needles in this patch moddeled from snake bites....anymore questions ?
They will also contain your "immunization" status which can be read out or even transmitted wirelessly.

Regarding the vaccination patch article,

Vaccine patches may replace injections for many people before long

news clip video that shows what the patch probably looks like,

from the article,
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says as many as a quarter of adults and most children have an aversion to needles. For some, it's so severe it keeps them from getting vaccines. But one day, needles, at least the ones people are used to, may not be necessary.

Dr. Joseph DeSimone worked at UNC for 30 years. He's at Stanford now, but he and his colleagues are still working with UNC researchers on a tiny patch that can deliver vaccines when applied to the skin.

"Our approach was to directly 3-D print the microneedles using a breakthrough in 3-D printing that we pioneered when I was in Chapel Hill," he told WNCN.

The microneedles on the patch are so small they can hardly be felt.

"It's pain-free and anxiety-free," DeSimone said, adding that the patch is also more effective than traditional shots. "We have 100 to 1,000 times more of the targeted immune cells in the dermis of our skin than we do in our muscle."

That means smaller amounts of vaccine would be required. It would also mean doses wouldn't need to be kept as cold as vaccines that are used in liquid form.

"When you think about global access, you are going to need things like that," DeSimone pointed out.

Right now, the patch is being tested on animals. DeSimone said the results are promising, and within five years, he expects people could be regularly using the patches.

"They can be self-administered. You wouldn't need a health care worker," he said. "They could be delivered by UPS or Amazon."
So they see fit to test the patch on animals first but not the initial co-vidity vaxxine huh??! They have been working on shit like this for probably at least a decade, likely it is ready now for all we know. Is it possible to 3D print micro or even nano-chips that can be delivered by such patches? Something akin to the "Quantum Dots"?

Last year I posted some information about the ID2020 Digital Identity campaign and the "Quantum Dots" developed by MIT that was funded by Gates and Koch, I posted that in the thread "AI and Trans-humanism, which one (or both) is a graver threat to humanity?". Gonna repost that post (#30 in the original thread) here for context of the possiblilty of these "dots" being used in 'covid' vaxxines or some future fake-demic invented pathogen.


Adding some more here about digital identity related to future NWO plans;

ID2020
We need to get
digital ID right

https://id2020.org/

ID2020 Launches Technical Certification Mark

Quote:



Following the completion of v1.0 of ID2020’s Technical Requirements, we are proud to announce the launch of the ID2020 Certification Mark. Both of these efforts reaffirm our mission to improve lives through digital identity by adhering to our core principles of portability, persistence, privacy, and user control.

Aiming higher

Digital identity is being defined now — and we need to get it right. Digital identity is a term that comprises a host of technologies, processes, and systems. The ID2020 Certification Mark is not a baseline certification; it isn’t an attempt to bound the complex, uneven, and ever-expanding landscape of digital identity. Instead, the Certification Mark is an opportunity to recognize technologies that we believe could form the basis of a “good” digital identity. Our Certification Mark deliberately sets a high bar. We want to incentivize companies and organizations to design with our principles and technical requirements in mind, and fully intend for our Certification Mark to play a market-shaping role.

Some notes on the process

We have deliberately designed a simple application form in order to incentivize participation. We’ll summarize the process below, but want to note that we are fully open to revising current workflow and criteria — this is a living effort designed to evolve over time.

-Company/organization fills out the ID2020 Certification Mark Application Form.
-Our experts review the answers and, if necessary, follow up for clarification.
-If after our initial review and follow-up the digital identity doesn’t meet our requirements, we don’t issue a Certification Mark.
-If, on the other hand, we are satisfied with our initial review and follow-up, then we award our Certification Mark.
-The content of the application form is published on ID2020.org, along with a unique ID for the assessed digital identity system that the company/organization can use in its communications.


Three very pertinent companies involved in ID2020:

Rockefeller Foundation
Since 1913, the Rockefeller Foundation has sought to improve the well-being of humanity around the world. The Rockefeller Foundation provided ID2020 with seed funding in in 2017 and has been an ongoing supporter of ID2020’s work.

Microsoft (gates of hell)
The American multinational technology company joined ID2020 in January 2018 as a founding partner. Members of the Microsoft team sit on ID2020’s Technical and Program Delivery Advisory Committees.

Gavi
The vaccine Alliance

Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance brings together public and private sectors with the shared goal of creating equal access to new and underused vaccines for children living in the world’s poorest countries. Dr. Seth Berkley, CEO of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, sits on our Executive Board.


Quote:



We Need to Get Digital ID Right
Since 2016, ID2020 has advocated for ethical, privacy-protecting approaches to digital ID.

We refer to the core requirements of that digital ID as the four P’s:

Private
Only you control your own identity, what data is shared and with whom
How exactly can they guarantee this, even if they actually intended to?


Portable
Accessible anywhere you happen to be through multiple methods

Persistent
Lives with you from life to death

Personal
Unique to you and you only

In September 2015, all United Nations member states adopted the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, including their commitment to “provide legal identity for all, including birth registration” by 2030.
exploring this next, I assume this is what's called Agenda 2030


Identity Management in 2030 - the United Nationshttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...chmentType=1&usg=AOvVaw3UnBqOqrP_IB4ZjR5PEpoW

unstats.un.org › unsd › vitalstatkb › Attachment1077
PDF
In 2030, roles and mandates regarding ID management are clarified. 14. - In 2030, there ... Governments have realized that identity management is crucial to their operations and that a ... the UN Security Council Resolution 2178 on 'threats to international ... and Reynolds D.. Sheep, Goats, Lambs and Wolves: A Statistical.


Quote:



page 5
Introduction

This paper is the outcome of a
two-day ‘Expert Meeting on Identity
Management 2030’ held on July 1st
and 2nd 2015. The meeting was
organised by the Dutch National Office
for Identity Data (RvIG) at The Hague
in The Netherlands and supported by
the International Civil Aviation
Organisation (ICAO). It involved the
active participation of 36 international
experts1 in the field of ID2 management.
Most of the participants were
representatives of public, national
and international organisations.
About a third of them came from the
Netherlands, a sixth from European
countries, a quarter from African,
American, Asian and Oceanian
countries and another quarter from
international organisations.

page 6
Concepts and infrastructures

In 2030, the concept of identification
is relative, quantitative and dynamic
In 2030, general acceptance has been reached on the fact
that identity can be approached but not completely
established, and that no conclusive proof of identity exists
[1-2]. As a result, evidence of identity is used to challenge
the hypothesis of identity during the core ID management
processes of creating, checking and ending identities,
rather than proving identity. The concept of absolute,
qualitative and static identification, promising binary and
error-free statements of identity independently of the
scenario, technology and circumstances, has given way to
a more realistic concept of identification as relative,
quantitative and dynamic.

5 Directions

In 2015, after the expert meeting, a series of directions were identified for the identity (ID) management
progressing towards 2030:

IDENTIFICATION
The concept of identification will evolve from an absolute,
qualitative and static definition of identification relying on a
proof of identity, towards a relative, quantitative and dynamic
definition of identification relying on evidence of identity

NCRA
In each country, a National Civil Registration Authority will
be created to develop efficient and trusted ID management
services based on a Unique Personal Number (UPN),
informative and integer data, and will comply at the same
time with the recommended practices of the IIMO and
data protection and privacy regulations

IIMO
The Identity Management Organisation will be created to
harmonize and coordinate ID management at a global level
and support the development of digital ID infrastructures
within the National Civil Registration Authorities (NCRAs)

TRUST
The IIMO will support the vision of a global identity chain
growing the trusted ID information of the NCRAs and no
longer based on the ill-trusted information of breeder
documents

DIGITAL
Digital ID infrastructures will replace paper-based processes
and allow for NCRAs to align their operational efficiencies
to the challenges arising from a rapidly-growing and more
mobile population and to cope with the amplification of
the migration phenomenon, desired or forced, for
personal, economical, political, religious, climatological
or other safety reasons

page 19

TOKEN
The tokens storing the personal and biometric data digitally
are designed to be multipurpose and cost-effective, and
their form factor is left to the discretion of their owners
I'm assuming these are small electronic portable data storage, to be held and possessed by the individual that holds all your "identity data"

Will they require micro-chip implants for all people in order to have the data secured on each person should all "tokens" or other devices or data(bases?) be lost or identity lost in system somehow?

according
to page 13
Particularly sighted users even choose to have several tokens,
each of them being a backup in case of loss, technical failure or
theft. Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) microchip
implantation is another mature technology, but its spread is
still limited in 2030 due to its invasiveness
for users as well as
its tagging aspect recalling some inglorious historical
precedents.
In this respect, biometric technology remains a
non-invasive solution for identification and a credible
alternative to the use of microchip implants.
still limited it says, for now? how about in the future? Perhaps only in prisoners or people who volunteer to get them? children perhaps too?


ID2020: What’s Needed For Digital Identity In 2020
Posted on March 27, 202


Quote:



A computerized version of identity may gain special urgency as COVID-19 continues to threaten public health. Tracking vaccines certainly will be important in ending pandemics, now and in the future. That’s part of the ID2020 Alliance, which launched late last year, and which has joint efforts in place with the government of Bangladesh and the vaccine alliance Gavi, among others.

In an announcement upon the launch, ID2020 Executive Director Dakota Gruener said, “Digital ID is being defined and implemented today, and we recognize the importance of swift action to close the identity gap.” As noted in this space, immunization is serving as a platform for digital IDs, tied to birth registration and vaccinations to provide newborns with biometrically-underpinned digital identity.

Gavi, for its part, said at the time of the ID2020 launch that 89 percent of children and adolescents who do not have identification live where that organization is active — indicating that public health may be the springboard to giving people, at birth, the records they need later in life to participate fully in the global economy.

So, if they desire to create technological platforms to identify every last living human being on earth by the year 2030, why do they keep putting out the 'conspiracy theory' 'debunks' about ID2020 being related to a 'covid-19' vaccine??

How a tech NGO got sucked into a COVID-19 conspiracy theory
15 April 2020


Quote:



The case of ID2020

A public-private coalition – members include representatives from Microsoft and Accenture as well as NGOs, academia, blockchain firms, and others – ID2020 is advising the government of Bangladesh on a vaccination records system.

The non-profit, which does not work on embedded microchips, is falsely accused of being part of fictitious plans that allege Bill Gates supports mandatory vaccination and the implantation of microchips or “quantum dot tattoos” into patients.

The claims about Gates have been debunked by fact-checkers at Reuters, but ID2020 is not listed in the leading database of COVID-19 debunks.

False claim: Bill Gates planning to use microchip implants to fight coronavirus
March 31, 2020


Quote:



VERDICT

False: Bill Gates foresees the use of “digital certificates” with health records, but did not say these would be in the form of microchip implants. (he didn't say they that microchip implants would not be used either) There are no plans (only according to them, with no evidence offered, just a dismissal) to use this future technology during the coronavirus outbreak.

“Q: What changes are we going to have to make to how businesses operate to maintain our economy while providing social distancing?

Bill Gates: The question of which businesses should keep going is tricky. Certainly, food supply and the health system. We still need water, electricity and the internet. Supply chains for critical things need to be maintained. Countries are still figuring out what to keep running. Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it.”
they fail to include any quote from where billdoe even says anything about how the "digital certificates" will be stored and on what or that he said that absolutely no implants (of any kind) will be used...

These 'debunkers' are pathetic, I fail to see how any of these so-called 'debunks' of digital identity linked to 'cv19' vaccine are valid whatsoever, with the available information that I just posted above these.

Related to the 'cv19' vaccine and at least partial identity based on vaccination records in "quantum dot" dye implants,


Storing medical information below the skin’s surface
Specialized dye, delivered along with a vaccine, could enable “on-patient” storage of vaccination history.
Anne Trafton | MIT News Office
December 18, 2019


Quote:

MIT researchers have now developed a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of dye, invisible to the naked eye, that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine.

The researchers showed that their new dye, which consists of nanocrystals called quantum dots, can remain for at least five years under the skin, where it emits near-infrared light that can be detected by a specially equipped smartphone.

An invisible record

Several years ago, the MIT team set out to devise a method for recording vaccination information in a way that doesn’t require a centralized database or other infrastructure. Many vaccines, such as the vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), require multiple doses spaced out at certain intervals; without accurate records, children may not receive all of the necessary doses.

To create an “on-patient,” decentralized medical record, the researchers developed a new type of copper-based quantum dots, which emit light in the near-infrared spectrum. The dots are only about 4 nanometers in diameter, but they are encapsulated in biocompatible microparticles that form spheres about 20 microns in diameter. This encapsulation allows the dye to remain in place, under the skin, after being injected.

The microneedles used in this study are made from a mixture of dissolvable sugar and a polymer called PVA, as well as the quantum-dot dye and the vaccine. When the patch is applied to the skin, the microneedles, which are 1.5 millimeters long, partially dissolve, releasing their payload within about two minutes.

By selectively loading microparticles into microneedles, the patches deliver a pattern in the skin that is invisible to the naked eye but can be scanned with a smartphone that has the infrared filter removed. The patch can be customized to imprint different patterns that correspond to the type of vaccine delivered.

“It’s possible someday that this ‘invisible’ approach could create new possibilities for data storage, biosensing, and vaccine applications that could improve how medical care is provided, particularly in the developing world,” Langer says.

The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute.

It is argued that the "quantum dots" are just a "dye" and not "implants"; however the "quantum dots" are composed of nanocrystals and those can be designed to be used as possible RFIDs, and these can be read like a barcode which is more or less a passive transponder anyhow. Plus they are encapsulated in biocompatible microparticles that form spheres about 20 microns in diameter. Why is this research funded several years ago by gates and koch but also why would these not be used to deliver a 'cv19' vaccine? unless it's still "experimental' by the time one is ready; which might be by October,
Pfizer CEO claims COVID-19 vaccine could be ready by October end, says report



Quote:



American pharmaceutical company Pfizer believes that a COVID-19 vaccine could be ready by the end of October 2020, reported The Times of Israel, citing Albert Bourla, the CEO of the firm.

He, however, said that “we are running against time". The deadly virus has killed over 358,000 people and infected more than 5 million worldwide so far.
The report also highlighted the warnings from experts saying the challenges could be "daunting" as the estimates show that about 15 billion doses would be required to stop the pandemic.
15 billion doses, but they don't intend to try and make 'covid' vaccine mandatory, really??!!

This patent application I found proposes implantable RFID body chip for animals and humans,

Body Chip


Quote:



Application US11/741,760 events
2007-04-29
Application filed by James Neil Rodgers

2007-04-29
Priority to US11/741,760

2008-10-30
Publication of US20080266107A1

2010-08-17
Application granted

2010-08-17
Publication of US7777631B2

Status
Expired - Fee Related

2028-07-20
Adjusted expiration

Abstract
This Invention contemplates a system and method to manufacture an active RFID integrated circuit as a system on a chip which is powered by enzymes located in mammalian bodies. According to this Invention the active integrated circuit system on a chip is manufactured of a glass capsule containing a porous membrane which allows the free flow of bodily fluids into and out of the capsule. The enzymes in the bodily fluids of mammals produce sufficient electrical charge to power an active RFID transponder.

This energy is stored in an enlarged capacitor of the active transponder for use when required. In spite of the enlarged capacitor the entire system on a chip integrated circuit will be less than the size of a grain of rice.
perhaps not micron size, but they probably getting smaller and smaller over time, and probably small enough to use? in the quantum dot capsule of 20 micron size, from 2007 till now in 2020-

Application 11683056 is a system of producing an RFID antenna using the silicon in an integrated circuit as the resonant antenna material for the purpose of reducing the cost of an RFID system and for the purpose of increasing the range and selectivity of the RFID system. According to this Application the base silicon sheets which make up the primary building material of the silicon chip (integrated circuit) is subjected to a laser ablation process. This creates three dimensional nano structures on the surface of the silicon thereby raising its absorption rate of electro magnetic signals. On the reverse side of the same silicon sheet a directional antenna is etched using standard photographic reduction techniques and standard semi conductor industry manufacturing methods. The two sides of the silicon are connected through doping aluminum or copper impurities into these same base silicon sheets causing conductivity within the sheet of silicon.

Designing a device which transmits electro magnetic signals from inside the body poses several difficulties. These include the size of the device, power consumption and the compatibility of materials with the body. Different body tissues, such as muscle, bone, or fat, have a different resistance to electro magnetic signals. Antennas for such devices must be extremely small and efficient to minimize signal loss and preserve power. Pursuant to this embodiment a doctor could monitor the pacemaker of a patient in her office and make adjustments wirelessly. This is as opposed to the current medical environment whereby a problematic pacemaker would have to be surgically removed and an adjusted pacemaker inserted.

The solution proposed by this Invention is to manufacture an active integrated circuit RFID transponder powered by the enzymes of the human body. The transponder would be read by low frequency interrogators. According to this medical embodiment the active integrated circuit would be manufactured of a capsule covered by a porous membrane which would allow the free flow of bodily fluids into and out of the capsule. The enzymes in the bodily fluids of the patient would produce sufficient electrical charge to power the active transponder. The electrical charge is generated through an anode and cathode manufactured into the capsule. The capsule would be of bio compatible silicon.

The antenna would be silicon, as outlined in Application 11683056, and tuned to a low frequency, as outlined in Application 11676304. The capsule would be embedded into the pacemaker, hearing aid or muscle stimulator. The result would be an active transponder.

6. The system and method of claim 1 whereby an integral part of the system on a chip integrated circuit is an anode and cathode constructed at a nano scale;
7
. The system and method of claim 1 whereby the casing or capsule for the system on a chip integrated circuit is coated with bio conducive material which promotes the bonding of mammalian bodily tissue
8. The system and method of claim 2 whereby the antenna of the system on a chip integrated circuit is tuned to a specific frequency in order to obviate the detuning effects of whatever mammalian bodily fluids and tissue are present in a given embodiment situation which may interfere with an effective electro magnetic signal to the RFID transponder and from RFID interrogator and vice versa.

All embodiments herein are used as examples only and do not represent limitations to the Claims of this Invention.

Could the capsule for the quantum dot vaccine patch of MIT's be like that in this patent application, glass but porous to allow ingress and egress of body fluids to power an RFID transponder? I don't see how that is impossible at all.
 

Dude 111

New member
I think once they pump someone full of this garbage they can do anything to them and its scary!!!!! (Thats why they are pushing it so hard)
 
Call them Vaccidents be careful driving if another driver passes out from the vaxx he or she can swerve into your lane and bang you are dead from a head-on collision it's very dangerous now.
 
Video of a likely Vaccident very possible the driver suffered a vaxx attack

 

gl69m

Member
@Dude 111 (post #16)
I think once they pump someone full of this garbage they can do anything to them and its scary!!!!! (Thats why they are pushing it so hard)
Yeah absolutely I think you're right, psychologically if people accept the vax without question than they won't question even worse things than the vax. It sets a huge precedence that it's 'science' (bio-tech science here mostly) to rescue to save us from everything; absolutely every fucking thing under the sun will be necessary to vaxx us to the death for our 'health', and will lead to nothing but more and more vaxxes being mandated, it will become nothing but "comply or die".

And there are huge a plethora of other bio-tech gene (therapy too, nano-medicine et al) products in the works now too to treat absolutely all 'health' related anything, they will probably ban all natural or holistic or traditional herbs and medicines/traditions within another year or two at this rate. Not to mention there's always another new 'pandemic' around the corner, two that I have seen as touted as possible next 'pandemics' are Nipah virus and Marburg virus, fake pandemics of course in terms of there being no real worldwide outbreak of these viruses just like any true substantial outbreak of 'covid' is a pure lie.


I had no idea that apparently Moderna changed their vaccine name to SpikeVax; have no idea when they changed it,

SpikeVax COVID-19 Vaccine (Moderna)​

Authored by
Staff

Updated October 20, 2021
Last reviewed
October 20, 2021

Somewhere down on that page they mention they have a facility name COVAX, you can't make this shit up. So I've been calling it a vax then quite correctly apparently.


Speaking of Moderna or Modern RNA, I recently saw this document from Moderna submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission I guess necessary for them to sell particular stocks I guess?

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under
The Securities Act of 1933
MODERNA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2018.

Registration No. 333-

In the section "Risk Factors", they say some very interesting things about the mRNA vaxxines they were developing,

from page 18
No mRNA drug has been approved in this new potential category of medicines, and may never be approved as a result of efforts by others or us. mRNA drug development has substantial clinical development and regulatory risks due to the novel and unprecedented nature of this new category of medicines.

As a potential new category of medicines, no mRNA medicines have been approved to date by the FDA or other regulatory agency. Successful discovery and development of mRNA medicines by either us or our strategic collaborators is highly uncertain and depends on numerous factors, many of which are beyond our or their control
from page 19
Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA. Unlike certain gene therapies that irreversibly alter cell DNA and could act as a source of side effects, mRNA based medicines are designed to not irreversibly change cell DNA; however, side effects observed in gene therapy could negatively impact the perception of mRNA medicines despite the differences in mechanism. In addition, because no product in which mRNA is the primary active ingredient has been approved, the regulatory pathway for approval is uncertain. The number and design of the clinical and preclinical studies required for the approval of these types of medicines have not been established, may be different from those required for gene therapy products or may require safety testing like gene therapy products. Moreover, the length of time necessary to complete clinical trials and to submit an application for marketing approval for a final decision by a regulatory authority varies significantly from one pharmaceutical product to the next, and may be difficult to predict.

We have incurred significant losses since our inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future.

We have incurred net losses in each year since our inception in 2009, including net losses of $216.2 million and $255.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $621.9 million. As of September 30, 2018, we had an accumulated deficit of $865.2 million.
I think this is proof positive that two people I know who argued with me on Facebook about the vaxxines not being "gene therapy" are wrong according to the FDA, well in 2018 anyway.

from page 27
Adverse events reported with respect to gene therapies or genome editing therapies could adversely impact one or more of our programs. Although our mRNA development candidates and investigational medicines are designed not to make any permanent changes to cell DNA, regulatory agencies or others could believe that adverse effects of gene therapies products caused by introducing new DNA and irreversibly changing the DNA in a cell could also be a risk for our mRNA investigational therapies, and as a result may delay one or more of our trials or impose additional testing for long-term side effects. Any new requirements and guidelines promulgated by regulatory review agencies may have a negative effect on our business by lengthening the regulatory review process, requiring us to perform additional or larger studies, or increasing our development costs, any of which could lead to changes in regulatory positions and interpretations, delay or prevent advancement or approval and commercialization of our investigational medicines or lead to significant post-approval studies, limitations, or restrictions. As we advance our investigational medicines, we will be required to consult with these regulatory agencies and advisory committees and comply with applicable requirements and guidelines. If we fail to do so, we may be required to delay or discontinue development of some or all of our investigational medicines.

A breakthrough therapy designation or fast track designation by the FDA for a drug may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process, and it would not increase the likelihood that the drug will receive marketing approval.
I'm sure they (regulatory or un-named "others") more than just "could believe" that mRNA therapy would be a risk for genomic cell alteration, I'd bet money that they "know for sure" that it could and most likely it does (even if rare).

more from page 27
We may seek a breakthrough therapy designation for one or more of our investigational medicines. A breakthrough therapy is defined as a drug that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. For drugs that have been designated as breakthrough therapies, interaction and communication between the FDA and the sponsor of the trial can help to identify the most efficient path for clinical development while minimizing the number of patients placed in ineffective control regimens. Drugs designated as breakthrough therapies by the FDA are also eligible for priority review if supported by clinical data at the time of the submission of the BLA.

Designation as a breakthrough therapy is at the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe that one of our investigational medicines meets the criteria for designation as a breakthrough therapy, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. In any event, the receipt of a breakthrough therapy designation for a drug may not result in a faster development process, review, or approval compared to drugs considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures and it would not assure ultimate approval by the FDA. In addition, even if one or more of our investigational medicines qualify as breakthrough therapies, the FDA may later decide that the investigational medicine no longer meets the conditions for qualification or it may decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened.
from page 28
We may seek Fast Track Designation for some of our investigational medicines. If a therapy is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition and the therapy demonstrates the potential to address significant unmet medical needs for this condition, the drug sponsor may apply for Fast Track Designation. The FDA has broad discretion whether or not to grant this designation, and even if we believe a particular investigational medicine is eligible for this designation, we cannot assure you that the FDA would decide to grant it. Even if we do receive Fast Track Designation, we may not experience a faster development process, review, or approval compared to conventional FDA procedures. The FDA may withdraw Fast Track Designation if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical development program. Fast Track Designation alone does not guarantee qualification for the FDA’s priority review procedures.
What a lucky break for Moderna and Pfizer and the other 17 or so companies producing the CoV-Vax, Fast Track with a guarantee they would have no trouble getting it to market with the oh so 'necessary' 'Emergency Use Authorization' to fight the COV-AIDS 'plague-demic (I borrowed the COV-AIDS term from a prominent Youtuber YoungRippa59, he has some good analysis of available media information that shows the glaring contradictions and absurdities of the 'Covid-19' official narratives). I guess these Pharma companies hit the tri-fecta for such development like George W did after 9/11; Fast Track, 'Break Through Therapy' and the all powerful ace card the 'Emergency Use Authorization' card.

There is probably a ton more of that document of interest and incriminating against Moderna, but moving on,

Next I will show that Moderna was basically built by taxpayer guvmint funding, and it should be exceedingly obvious Moderna's main purpose to even exist was to eventually produce the COV-VAX for 'Covid-19'. But no they aren't the only ones that made one, however Moderna's bio-tech platforms to produce more and more vaxxines and bio- (and probably nano-tech) medicines perhaps exceeds most of the other corporations, and had to be a huge impetus in the creation of Moderna.

Government-Funded Scientists Laid the Groundwork for Billion-Dollar Vaccines
November 18, 2020

Check out the picture on the article, I can't believe I missed who is pictured in this photo, trumpty and good ole fraudci (they didn't mention fraudci in the caption) along with Dr. Barney Graham.
Dr. Barney Graham, deputy director at the Vaccine Research Center at the National Institutes of Health, gives President Donald Trump a tour of the Viral Pathogenesis Laboratory at NIH on March 3 in Bethesda, Maryland. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
When he started researching a troublesome childhood infection nearly four decades ago, virologist Dr. Barney Graham, then at Vanderbilt University, had no inkling his federally funded work might be key to deliverance from a global pandemic.


Yet nearly all the vaccines advancing toward possible FDA approval this fall or winter are based on a design developed by Graham and his colleagues, a concept that emerged from a scientific quest to understand a disastrous 1966 vaccine trial.


Basic research conducted by Graham and others at the National Institutes of Health, Defense Department and federally funded academic laboratories has been the essential ingredient in the rapid development of vaccines in response to COVID-19. The government has poured an additional $10.5 billion into vaccine companies since the pandemic began to accelerate the delivery of their products.
Coronavirus vaccines are likely to be worth billions to the drug industry if they prove safe and effective. As many as 14 billion vaccines would be required to immunize everyone in the world against COVID-19. If, as many scientists anticipate, vaccine-produced immunity wanes, billions more doses could be sold as booster shots in years to come. And the technology and production laboratories seeded with the help of all this federal largesse could give rise to other profitable vaccines and drugs.
Yeah, all 7 billion people in the world really need to be jabbed or we're all gonna die from 'covid-19', this narrative is pathetically beyond fucking stupid.
The vaccines made by Pfizer and Moderna, which are likely to be the first to win FDA approval, in particular rely heavily on two fundamental discoveries that emerged from federally funded research: the viral protein designed by Graham and his colleagues, and the concept of RNA modification, first developed by Drew Weissman and Katalin Karikó at the University of Pennsylvania. In fact, Moderna’s founders in 2010 named the company after this concept: “Modified” + “RNA” = Moderna, according to co-founder Robert Langer.
There is a Dr. Robert Malone who's made some rounds in alternative media that he invented mRNA drug delivery and the mRNA vaccines, I don't know how valid his claim is, or a least he could claim to be one of the earliest discoverers.

Moderna, through spokesperson Ray Jordan, acknowledged its partnership with NIH throughout the COVID-19 development process and earlier. Pfizer spokesperson Jerica Pitts noted the company had not received development and manufacturing support from the U.S. government, unlike Moderna and other companies.
Another key element in the mRNA vaccine is the lipid nanoparticle — a tiny, ingeniously designed bit of fat that encloses the RNA in a sort of invisibility cloak, ferrying it safely through the blood and into cells and then dissolving, thereby allowing the RNA to do its work of coding a protein that will serve as the vaccine’s main active ingredient. The idea of enclosing drugs or vaccines in lipid nanoparticles arose first in the 1960s and was developed by Langer and others at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and various academic and industry laboratories.
the "pre-fusion" form of the spike protein
In addition to RNA modification and the lipid nanoparticle, the third key contribution to the mRNA vaccines — as well as those made by Novavax, Sanofi and Johnson & Johnson —- is the bioengineered protein developed by Graham and his collaborators. It has proved in tests so far to elicit an immune response that could prevent the virus from causing infections and disease.


The protein design was based on the observation that so-called fusion proteins — the pieces of the virus that enable it to invade a cell — are shape-shifters, presenting different surfaces to the immune system after the virus fuses with and infects cells. Graham and his colleagues learned that antibodies against the post-fusion protein are far less effective at stopping an infection.

active syringe shooter vaxxine drill
Graham’s NIH lab, meanwhile, had started working with Moderna in 2017 to design a rapid manufacturing system for vaccines. In January, they were preparing a demonstration project, a clinical trial to test whether Graham’s protein design and Moderna’s mRNA platform could be used to create a vaccine against Nipah, a deadly virus spread by bats in Asia.


Their plans changed rapidly when they learned on Jan. 7 that the epidemic of respiratory disease in China was being caused by a coronavirus.



“We agreed immediately that the demonstration project would focus on this virus” instead of Nipah,
Graham said. Moderna produced a vaccine within six weeks. The first patient was vaccinated in an NIH-led clinical study on March 16; early results from Moderna’s 30,000-volunteer late-stage trial showed it was nearly 95% effective at preventing COVID-19.
sounds just like a 'pandemic' drill gone 'live', just like 9/11 and 7/7, and various other 'mass shootings'. I'm sure they already had SpikeVax worked out well before this 6 week drill,
In 2016, Graham, McLellan and other scientists, including Andrew Ward at the Scripps Research Institute, advanced their concept further by publishing the prefusion structure of a coronavirus that causes the common cold and a patent was filed for its design by NIH, Scripps and Dartmouth
Yeah I'm sure it was only the spike for a common cold coronavirus, sure it was... I'll sell you that with some ocean front property in Arizona and throw the Golden Gate in free.


Want to explore just a little of this paper about vaxxine concerns of adverse events and side effects,

Copyright@ Alejandro Sousa | Biomed J Sci & Tech Res | BJSTR. MS.ID.005501.26444Research ArticleISSN: 2574 -1241
mRNA, Nanolipid Particles and PEG: A Triad Never Used in Clinical Vaccines is Going to Be Tested on Hundreds of Millions of People
Received: February 13, 2021
Published: February 22, 2021

ABSTRACT
Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech’s “pseudo-vaccines” for COVID-19 contain mRNA enveloped by lipid nanoparticles (LNP) and polyethylene glycol (PEG). None of these 3 components have been approved for vaccines or parenteral drugs. Research has shown that LNPs easily enter the brain and can trigger immune reactions, especially after the second dose. More than 70% of the American population is allergic to PEG, so these vaccines can cause allergic reactions and anaphylaxisThere are well-founded suspicions that these vaccines can insert themselves in our DNA, causing mutations whose impact is unknown and that could even be transmitted to our offspring. We explain how the mRNA existing in the cell cytosol can enter the nucleus both during cell division (mitosis and meiosis) and at rest (interphase). In addition, the possible routes of integration of DNA and RNA in our chromosomes through reverse transcripases (RT) are discussed, especially in sperm where a specific endogenous RT has been identified.
However, the most controversial issue about mRNA vaccines is whether or not said genetic material can be mixed with our DNA permanently and the possible complications doing this fact can produce. The manufacturers of these types of vaccines claim that,
after translation, the synthetic mRNA will be degraded by host enzymes and will not interact with the host genome. In this article we will show that this statement may be incorrect and that applying a vaccine without a total guarantee that it will not modify our own
genetic code is a clear error. Applying it to billions of people is utter
recklessness.
As if that were not enough, they also recognized that “Gene therapies and drugs based on mRNA can activate one or more immune responses against each and every one of the drug’s components ... leading to possible adverse events related to the immune reaction” [14,15]. And they go on to say: “Our LNPs could contribute, totally or partially, to one or more of the following: immune reactions, infusion reactions, complement reactions, opsonation reactions, antibody reactions that include IgA, IgM, IgE or IgG or some combination thereof, or reactions to the PEG of some lipids or PEG otherwise associated with LNP “ and “ As well as adverse reactions in the hepatic pathways” [14,15].

Attributed Characteristics and Types of mRNA Vaccines
Theoretically, once the messenger mRNA has penetrated the cytoplasm of a cell of the vaccinated patient, it is translated by the ribosomes, manufacturing the target protein that will then undergo a post-translational folding process that will allow the formation of a fully functional three-dimensional protein [4]. The mRNA vaccines from Moderna (mRNA-1273) and from Pfizer / BioNTech (BNT162b2) encode the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein responsible for binding to the ACE2 receptor ultimately responsible for the entry of the virus into cells.

There are two types of mRNA vaccines: Self-replicating -also called self-amplified- and non-replicating. The vaccines marketed by Pfizer and Moderna are of the non-replicating type. This is the simplest type and consists of a strand of mRNA, which is packaged and inoculated into the body, which will penetrate our cells to produce the antigen (SARS-CoV-2 spike protein) that will stimulate our immune system [17,18]. Self-replicating mRNA vaccines include not only the genetic sequence of the required antigen, but also the RNA replication machinery necessary for the mRNA to be amplified a greater number of times once it penetrates the cell cytoplasm, ensuring greater antigen production. by the affected cell. Such self-replicating RNA is called “Replicon”. This type of vaccine produces a greater amount of antigen that theoretically helps to achieve a greater immune response in the form of neutralizing antibodies. Although there are replicating mRNA vaccines, they have not yet completed the clinical trials phase [17,18].

(self replicating spike protein factories, just what the fuck we need for our monthly blood clot boosters after they ramp up some other bullshit variant next year, can't fucking wait... not)

Could mRNA Insert into Our DNA?
We know that retroviruses introduce their genetic material permanently into our DNA. In fact, 8% of our genetic code is of viral origin, known as “retroviral genes” [19].

The only “probative” arguments for this statement are: 1.- Impossibility of physical binding to DNA: mRNA cannot pass from the cytoplasm to the nucleus due to the barrier effect that the nuclear membrane supposes [20] and because the mRNA is naturally degraded after translation into proteins in the cytosol [21]. 2.- Absence of a reverse transcriptase (RT): They affirm that, even if it managed to enter the nucleus, it would not be able to become DNA and enter our genome as there is no RT that allows such conversion.

Until now, mRNA vaccines had never been used clinically, so these statements have not been reliably proven at the clinical level and many independent researchers raise the question of the high
likehood that said genetic material will end up forming part of our chromosomes.

Mechanisms of mRNA Entry into The Nucleus

During Cell Division:
Elementary biology teaches us that during cell division (Mitosis and Meiosis), there are phases in which the nuclear membrane disappears, and the chromosomes mix with the cytoplasm.

During the Interface (Outside of Cell Division)
Nuclear Pore Complex (NPC), Nuclear Localization Signals (NLS) And Lipid Coatings:


(polyethylene glycol coating over the lipid nano-particles)

Pegylation: To fulfill their function, LNP must reach their therapeutic target, without being recognized as foreign by the organism and then eliminated. To reduce this clearance process LNP may be joined to PEG, a technique known as “PEGylation”.

The percentage of people with anti-PEG antibodies, both IgG and IgM, has not stopped growing in recent years. While a few decades ago the incidence was 0.2% [48], this figure rose to 22-25% at the beginning of the last decade [40] and up to 72% in 2016 [41].

Mechanisms of Integration in Nuclear DNA
DNA Integration:


However, the discovery of endogenous RTs challenged the concept of unidirectionality of the flow of cellular genetic information and confirmed that this reverse direction was not only reserved for retroviruses and the like [66-68]. Initially it was thought that the endogenous RTs of eukaryotic cells did not have a specific function in the cells and that they originated from retrotransposons or viruses. However, it is currently known that this is not the case [66]. Telomerases are the most common example of endogenous RTs within these types of enzymes. Furthermore, we know that genes related to RT are relatively common and may have developed different functions through the acquisition of various N- and C-terminal extensions [67].

Specific endogenous RT activity has been identified in sperm, which can reverse the transcription of exogenous RNA directly and generate copies of cDNA. Such copies can be transferred as low copy extrachromosomal structures and passed on to progeny in a non-Mendelian manner. Furthermore, as they are transcriptionally competent, they can induce phenotypic variations in positive tissues [68]. However, it is even more important to be aware that undifferentiated cells and embryos express high levels of endogenous non-telomerase RT. In fact, endogenous RT can be considered as an epigenetic regulator of cell transformation and proliferation [69]. Although the above reasoning is basically theoretical, Zhang L et al [70] specifically studied the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was reverse transcribed and integrated into the human genome. They experimentally proved that their RNA can be reverse transcribed in human cells by RT of LINE-1 elements or by RT of HIV-1, and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently transcribed. Expression of endogenous human LINE-1 was induced after SARS-CoV-2 infection or by exposure to cytokines in cultured cells, suggesting a molecular mechanism for the retrointegration of SARS-CoV-2 in patients. This new feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and could be a pathway for vaccine mRNA to enter the cell nucleus.

The use of mRNA a vaccine may induce genetic alterations that can be transmitted to offspring through affected sperm, but its use especially in pregnant women could produce a mutagenesis of the growing cells of the fetus, altering the differentiation inherent in the formation of developing organs [71].


LNP + PEG + mRNA: A Dangerous Combination?
As we have seen, an mRNA vaccine can be easily destroyed by enzymes such as ribonucleases [72] and therefore must be wrapped in a protective capsule until they manage to reach the cell interior and, if necessary, penetrate into the nuclear compartment. An important fact to bear in mind is that the mRNA in the Pfizer vaccine has been modified by substituting methyl pseudouracil for uracil, since naturally occurring modified nucleosides such as pseudouridine or 1-methyl-3′-pseudouridine do not induce this. immunogenic response against RNA [73] and because, in addition to 1-methyl-3′-pseudouridine, in addition to all of the above, it also increased translation capacity [74], however, this makes it a foreign molecule at the enzymatic for cells which will take longer to metabolize [75].


Addendum
In view of the previously detailed information, the question we must ask ourselves is at what point should we place the new Pfizer mRNA vaccine and Moderna that contain mRNA wrapped in LNP and PEG. If there is verifiable data that this technology has been used to introduce genetic material into the nucleus, to treat cancer and other genetic diseases, we simply cannot accept that this vaccine will not do it, especially when no specific studies were carried out at the preclinical level to evaluate said effect. If we also know that eukaryotic cells have their own endogenous RTs and that they are capable of converting RNA into DNA, how can you ensure that this vaccine will not integrate into our genome? There are too many doubts in this regard to authorize the clinical use of vaccines of this type. Manufacturers of mRNA vaccines claim that since they do not use the entire virus, its use cannot infect those vaccinated. However, since vaccination in residences began, massive infections and deaths have been originating among the elderly in these residences. This is an undeniable clinical fact, and no one gives an adequate answer to why these infections originate shortly after vaccination [77,78]. In our opinion, its indiscriminate use in hundreds of millions of people around the world to prevent a disease with a mortality in the general population between 0.3 and 1% [79] is simply a reckless lack in ethical sense



Who wants some yummy spikevax now? This bullshit is absurd.
 
Top