What are everyone’s opinions about Elias Davidson’s book “ Hijacking America's Mind on 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence” ?

Ramjam

Well-known member
It's possible one of the duplicate flights could've been swapped with a drone there but I doubt it. We don't see AA11 or UA 175 going off radar near Stewart ANG, iirc. If it went off radar then, it could've possibly flew to below radar coverage and landed there to swap with a drone. But we don't see that. I honestly think the duplicate flights were swapped with a drone while they were still airborne. But it would be after the duplicate turned off its transponder to let the drone masquerade as that flight. Those are my thoughts for now. I just think the Stewart thing is a red herring.
One of the links you shared has opened a gateway….I have access to ALL of the old stuff on the original forum. Thank you so much. I feel like I’m 18 again sitting through all of this stuff. Thank you again. I have been busy reading and didn’t reply to this thread. There is so much. Not all of it is good, there are some wacky ideas shared, but unique and thought provoking nonetheless. I remember the whole sign debacle….I love the video of the federal agent yelling at folks for getting too close to the clearly planted, improper engine in the middle of the street….a total prop ! (No pun intended)
 

Vel

Well-known member
A bit off topic, but does anyone remember the Anonymous (hackers) guys on YouTube. They had their finger on the pulse of many things, including 9/11. They stuffed up big time. Methodical and overcautious, one day they left open a gateway to their servers/PCs and the FBI found them. They had two choices, say & do nothing, then spend eternity in prison. They chose door #2. Work for them or some secretive alphabet security agency.

Purging the internet of the truth.
 

Ramjam

Well-known member
A bit off topic, but does anyone remember the Anonymous (hackers) guys on YouTube. They had their finger on the pulse of many things, including 9/11. They stuffed up big time. Methodical and overcautious, one day they left open a gateway to their servers/PCs and the FBI found them. They had two choices, say & do nothing, then spend eternity in prison. They chose door #2. Work for them or some secretive alphabet security agency.

Purging the internet of the truth.
No, I don’t remember this ! What year would this have been ?
 

Ramjam

Well-known member
It was recent. They were taken down prior to the COVID theatrics.
They are stripping videos of 9/11 based research off of YouTube daily, and there are MAYBE 3 dozen videos left that aren’t ABC news “9/11 survivor blah blah blah feel good story” nonsense. I did gain access to ALL of the old LRF content through web.archive.org (wayback). There is soooo much good, solid, truthful investigative work on there. My main area of interest lies in the phone calls, who made them and why, where were they made and when. I am also interested in flight 93’s “crash site”. I have no real research interest into Flight 77 really as there are so many accounts/witnesses/wacky theories that it’s not even worth getting into. I do find one thing interesting and it is the fact that the “bodies” shown in the ZM trial exhibits are actually photos shown from the WTC, which can be identified from the trusses in the one photo of the badly burned “body”. I think there is still a ton of rocks left unturned, and a wealth of knowledge and research that should be shared on here. I remember years and years ago when I was quite young digging through the original LRF early on in its existence, and some other areas of the internet that miraculously no longer exist. There was so much info then that I would probably still be reviewing it ! You’re lucky to find a single web result using google, as they’ve become such extreme censors that they’re blatantly saying “hey, we know you know the truth. We don’t need anyone else finding out the truth if they already haven’t”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vel
Top