WHY 2001 chosen......

Vengeance

Well-known member
One thing I always wanted an answer to, was why they choose the year 2001.....
For a long while I assumed it was because of the 10th anniversary of Bush Sr New World Order speech, but of course digging deeper, I've discovered this answer:

The term "Ground zero" in Hebrew gematria is 1016 (which is 9101 upside-down) hence those last 2 digits, 01 is short for 2001
Of course that's just one of many other number obsessions by these masons, stemming from the beginning of construction to opening date:


August 5, 1966

cryptic message
August 5th
= dirty deeds
1966 = where we begin


April 4th 1973
April 4th in Hebrew = gate keeper, in simple form is 93 (flight 93)
1973 = such a tragic waste of human life; which would be an idea pushed upon us 28 years later (28 is a wealth and power number, like the ones who took part in the sham)

And of course September 11 (illumination and enlightenment) falls during an esoteric cycle: 7 = death, 13 = rebirth, ending of old, beginning of new......
 

Admin

Administrator
Staff member
One thing I always wanted an answer to, was why they choose the year 2001.....
For a long while I assumed it was because of the 10th anniversary of Bush Sr New World Order speech, but of course digging deeper, I've discovered this answer:

The term "Ground zero" in Hebrew gematria is 1016 (which is 9101 upside-down) hence those last 2 digits, 01 is short for 2001
Of course that's just one of many other number obsessions by these masons, stemming from the beginning of construction to opening date:


August 5, 1966

cryptic message
August 5th = dirty deeds
1966 = where we begin


April 4th 1973
April 4th in Hebrew = gate keeper, in simple form is 93 (flight 93)
1973 = such a tragic waste of human life; which would be an idea pushed upon us 28 years later (28 is a wealth and power number, like the ones who took part in the sham)

And of course September 11 (illumination and enlightenment) falls during an esoteric cycle: 7 = death, 13 = rebirth, ending of old, beginning of new......

You probably might remember I hate this Gematria stuff. But I am always willing to change my mind. This is pretty interesting stuff you posted. This of course wouldn't be used to convince anyone of anything but it might be a part of how they think, and tied together with predictive programing might make a lot of sense. I do have something to consider that is simpler for part of the 911 broadcast. Not saying its true but it is worth considering. Imagine being a planner with a notebook and for years it was Flight 1,2,3,4 in the notebook. Then as it drew near they needed flight numbers for the 1-4 flights.

Flight 11 - 11
Flight 175 - 13
Flight 93 - 12
Flight 77 - 14

Flight 1
Flight 2
Flight 3
Flight 4

11 = 11
12 = 9+3
13 = 1+7+5
14 = 7+7

I noticed that pattern a long time ago but never really thought it proved anything or was a good enough tool to share 911 with. But for those that know the truth maybe it might be useful to gain insight, who knows? I'm still on the fence but it is interesting to ponder.

cheers
phil ;)
 
When you think about it, could there have been a better date.

Sept18th 2001 was the date of the Jewish New Year. So technically Sept 11th 2001 would be the equivalent of Xmas day. The real Millennium started in 2001 (2,000 years completed).
With Jesus being born into the Jewish calendar, Sept 11th 2001 was arguably the 2,000 year anniversary of the birth of Christ.
But having said all this, Jesus was likely a Roman construct, christianity being a form of controlled opposition.

 

Admin

Administrator
Staff member
When you think about it, could there have been a better date.

Sept18th 2001 was the date of the Jewish New Year. So technically Sept 11th 2001 would be the equivalent of Xmas day. The real Millennium started in 2001 (2,000 years completed).
With Jesus being born into the Jewish calendar, Sept 11th 2001 was arguably the 2,000 year anniversary of the birth of Christ.
But having said all this, Jesus was likely a Roman construct, christianity being a form of controlled opposition.


I will check this out sometime soon as time permits, but there are all sorts of reasons why I doubt this is true, Jesus being a Roman construct that is. Prophecy is a huge part of the problem for that theory. Jesus fulfilled over 300 prophecies, written in books that stretch far before the Roman empire. I mean far before. What are the odds of any one person fulfilling 300 prophecies concerning the Messiah scattered all throughout the old testament scriptures? Although I'm not a huge fan of Chuck Smith, this breakdown of Chucks, of the "odds" question should be heard by everyone in my opinion, who are Christians or not. Wait till you see what the mathematical odds are of Christ fulfilling one of these prophecies is, then 5, 10 and finally 300. It is literally mind boggling. Your xmas date theory is interesting, so let's take a look and see what we learn...



cheers-
phil ;)
 
What was interesting about Caesar's Messiah, was when it discussed how parables from the Old Testament were used as a possible blue print for those in the New Testament.

When it comes to self fulfilling prophecies it's hard to find anything better than this guy, who just happened to pass not long after 9/11. Here's a taste of his work, his sermons in South Auckland were laced with wit and insights.
 

Admin

Administrator
Staff member
This is very good AP! This is a very good, simple explanation of things which even for me is hard to fathom. He covers a huge broad range of deep subjects and simplifies it down to a small nutshell. This is also a great presentation that shows just why there are people such as Alex Jones, why they are funded. They take most of these truths, run them through the grinder, add gobbly gook and mix it together with 25 pounds of shit and present it through a Clown show (Alex and Alt media) and people are left helpless and paralyzed. But notice how the best parts and most important parts i.e. The rewiring of the world Y2Kare not ever covered. Yet he is more then like "spot on." But have never heard that idea before this video.

Did you get a chance to listen to What think ye of Christ? Chuck Smith is a scholar and this presentation is one of the best I have ever heard.

I used to have around 2000 of his cassettes, a closet full of them, and this is his best singular work. And I have to admit that Chuck Smiths voice is soothing, calm and fatherly. Very easy listening. But when he tells people what to do for salvation, he completely misses the boat, like most do. In Christianese he "preaches another gospel."

Cheers
phil ;)
 
Hi Phil, I've just now listened to the Chuck Smith video. Very thought provoking and compelling.
It actually raises more questions than answers. Especially someone such as myself who has never been a student of biblical studies.
Where in the bible does Jesus claim to be the Son of God? In that it became a central tenet for him to be put on trial, hence Mary being unable to say he was not (Conceived immaculately).
It's good that the issue of how Jesus was conceived is raised.
My whole problem with the immaculate conception is it's promotion of misogyny, in that women need to remain as virgins if they are to be pure, (Jesus never had a sibling).
Almost placing the act of sexual intercourse as being a sin similar to that of fornication. (Maybe Caesar's Messiah, was influenced by Roman debauchery).
In the New testament Mary Magdalene is demonized as being a prostitute, yet there are no parables about men fornicating with prostitutes.

I believe that TPTB carry out their agendas by design, using biblical prophecies as a form of blueprint as part of the mind fuck.
 

Phil Jayhan

Administrator
Staff member
Hi Phil, I've just now listened to the Chuck Smith video. Very thought provoking and compelling.
It actually raises more questions than answers. Especially someone such as myself who has never been a student of biblical studies.
Where in the bible does Jesus claim to be the Son of God? In that it became a central tenet for him to be put on trial, hence Mary being unable to say he was not (Conceived immaculately).
Jesus claimed that He said so (John 10:36). Jesus clearly implies it in John 11:4. The demons called Jesus the Son of God (Matthew 8:29; Luke 4:41; Mark 3:11). The charge against Jesus was that He claimed to be the Son of God (Matthew 27:43; John 19:7), a claim He never denied, and virtually admitted (Luke 22:70).

Moreover, Jesus is called God himself in numerous places, John 1:1 is the best example, written by John, the Apostle and Revelator; This verse shows the eternal nature of the Logo's,. i.e. The Word - Beginning, as in Creation, the Word or Logo's being the very catalyst of all that is seen. "From before the worlds foundations were laid, I AM..."

"In him dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead bodily." Colossians 2:6

8 Beware lest anyone [e] cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ. 9 For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead [f] bodily; 10 and you are complete in Him, who is the head of all [g] principality and power.


The Beginning

(Genesis 1:1-2)

"1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not."

The Witness of John
(Malachi 3:1-5)

The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

That verse lays out the pre-eminence of Christ, that he was with God "in the beginning" And that all things were made through him and nothing that was made was made apart from him. These words show beyond doubt that Jesus/Yeshua is God, manifest in the flesh.

It's good that the issue of how Jesus was conceived is raised.
My whole problem with the immaculate conception is it's promotion of misogyny, in that women need to remain as virgins if they are to be pure, (Jesus never had a sibling).
It's good that the issue of how Jesus was conceived is raised.
My whole problem with the immaculate conception is it's promotion of misogyny, in that women need to remain as virgins if they are to be pure, (Jesus never had a sibling).

I believe a thorough study of this subject will show you otherwise. I will post more on the conception idea. But in essence the world was condemned through Adam, not individual sins or state of sin. Romans 5 is a must for understanding this issue. Thus it was needful for God to provide the seed of the Messiah, for as you will see in Romans 5, "For in Adam all died, so in Christ all men will be made alive." Christ became the 2nd Adam to represent the New Creation. e.g. Galatians 6; I will also post it later showing Jesus/Yeshua did indeed have a family, one of his brothers was named James.

So to summarize, God had to provide the seed for the Messiah as he had to be born "apart from sin." This no doubt, at least for me, was done through divine fiat, creating Christ as God created the rest of Creation, through divine fiat and the Word, Logo's. e.g. And God spoke, and said, let there be light. and it was so." The idea of God rolling in the hay with Mary is repulsive and a myth created by critics. In him is no darkness at all." "God created all things by the Word of his Power."

I believe that TPTB carry out their agendas by design, using biblical prophecies as a form of blueprint as part of the mind fuck.

I believe this as well. But because they do this, it does not necessarily follow that the prophecies are false. My own theory on the "tribulation, the 7 year period which begins with the catching away of his congregation on earth unto himself, and terminates with God's Holy City coming down from the heavens and setting it's foundations in greater Israel, is the tribulation will be triggered by the leaders of the world in the second to last final chance of defeating YHWH and his armies of Heaven and will result in retribution from God. The great Rebellion! Then after he defeats the nations he will judge the nations. And after his judgements he will sit upon his throne as per prophecy to David; And one will take the throne of David and he shall reign 1000 years over the nations with an iron fist, but the end is not yet...

The world leaders will try and fake the tribulation, the "Time of Jacobs Trouble," (not Armageddon) using mass media control and every other tool at the disposal and that this hoax will actually be the "first shot fired." What they think is their "hoax of the tribulation" will in turn start the tribulation. And the 7 years which follow this "first shot" will be Gods retribution for this worlds rebellion against God and his Christ. That's my present theory and best guess. It might even include a fake alien invasion for many good reasons. When Gods begins his retribution against the Christ rejecting world and its leaders that led the rebellion, it will at that time be to the Jews first, and then to the Gentiles. "And they made war against he Lamb of God and his people..."

First to the Jews for rejecting him and not recognizing the day of his appearance, Christ first appearance as Son of Man. Son of God.," and then to the Gentile nations for rejecting his gospel/good news of reconciliation with God through Christ and the good news of his Grace. That God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself, not counting men's sins against them. 2 Corinthians 5:8 The Ministry of Reconciliation. In 1 Corinthians the Apostle Paul tells us exactly what the gospel/good news of Christ is and how simple it is to receive salvation freely offered during this present dispensation; To all men small and great, Jew or Gentile alike. For God has concluded all men under sin. For in Adam all died.


1 Moreover, brethren, I declare to you the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand, 2 by which also you are saved, if you hold fast that word which I preached to you—unless you believed in vain.

3 For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures,4 and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures,

The Risen Christ & the 2nd Adam; 1 Corinthians 15:42

42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption: 43 it is sown in dishonor; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power: 44 it is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body . 45 So also it is written, The first man Adam became a living soul. The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. 46 Howbeit that is not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; then that which is spiritual. 47 The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is of heaven. 48 As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly. 49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.

Where O Death is Your Victory? O Death where is Your Sting?

(Isaiah 57:1-2)


cheers
phil ;)
 
Last edited:

Vengeance

Well-known member
When you think about it, could there have been a better date.

Sept18th 2001 was the date of the Jewish New Year. So technically Sept 11th 2001 would be the equivalent of Xmas day. The real Millennium started in 2001 (2,000 years completed).
With Jesus being born into the Jewish calendar, Sept 11th 2001 was arguably the 2,000 year anniversary of the birth of Christ.
But having said all this, Jesus was likely a Roman construct, christianity being a form of controlled opposition.

Yes! The Jesus references are also why they chose it. I completely forgot about at the time of this posting (but I remember now) a video I came across years ago on bitchute showing the numerology tied with Jesus "mockery".

And yes Jesus was a Roman creation with plagiarized biography carried over from three other false deities: Krishna, Attis and Horus. Religion as an entirety started as a superstitious scam and has become a modern day managed hoax. Astronomy also aligns with it metaphorically: The Sun of God and "Satan" is just another word for Saturn.


You probably might remember I hate this Gematria stuff. But I am always willing to change my mind. This is pretty interesting stuff you posted. This of course wouldn't be used to convince anyone of anything but it might be a part of how they think, and tied together with predictive programing might make a lot of sense. I do have something to consider that is simpler for part of the 911 broadcast. Not saying its true but it is worth considering. Imagine being a planner with a notebook and for years it was Flight 1,2,3,4 in the notebook. Then as it drew near they needed flight numbers for the 1-4 flights.

Flight 11 - 11
Flight 175 - 13
Flight 93 - 12
Flight 77 - 14

Flight 1
Flight 2
Flight 3
Flight 4

11 = 11
12 = 9+3
13 = 1+7+5
14 = 7+7

I noticed that pattern a long time ago but never really thought it proved anything or was a good enough tool to share 911 with. But for those that know the truth maybe it might be useful to gain insight, who knows? I'm still on the fence but it is interesting to ponder.

cheers
phil ;)
Yes I ignored it for the most part but when it started showing up in other hoaxes, I realized these masons are obsessed with it. They purposely put it there to mock us. There most common one is 33, the highest degree. There has not been one real, unscripted event that I have come across that had that number associated with it.
 
Last edited:

Admin

Administrator
Staff member
And yes Jesus was a Roman creation with plagiarized biography carried over from three other false deities: Krishna, Attis and Horus. Religion as an entirety started as a superstitious scam and has become a modern day managed hoax. Astronomy also aligns with it metaphorically: The Sun of God and "Satan" is just another word for Saturn.

I would challenge you to a deeper study on that claim, you will find that there is no truth to it. There is a video below, taken from what most scholars believe is a good historical narrative, the bible, especially the old testament in this case. I can only speak from my own Christ centered world view but there are many proofs that a man named Yeshua of Nazareth was born. And for his parents, Mary and Joseph, they are in Roman census archives by various historians and written about in various texts such as The Works of Josephus. And there is no real question that this young man grew and did many miraculous signs and wonders, and was written about how he evaded the Sanhedrin who sat in Moses seat, the Authority of dispensing Moses Law as handed down by YWHW.

Now to the video.

What you need to know:

There are well over 300 prophecies scattered among the 44 books of the Old Testament concerning Christ, aka Yeshua, aka Jesus, aka Messiah,.etc..

Again, scripture is a reliable record. The books were written with many prophecies concerning one man. This is not in dispute. Those 44 books were written over thousands of years. The Apostle Peter, a lowly fisherman called those prophecies a "more sure light" to show the authenticity that although written by man it was also inspired of God. Whoever inspired Peter knew the future and the past. The prophet Daniel, predicted the coming of "the Holy One" 500 years before it happened, down to the day! This is why Yeshua wept and cried over Jerusalem, saying "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you should have known the day of my coming..." And they should have, because Daniel said and wrote that; "From the time goes out from King Artexerses to rebuild the city walls of Jerusalem to the time of the coming of the Holy one, there will be 483,880 days.

And then, 483,880 days after the command goes out from Artexerses to rebuild the city walls of Jerusalem, Jesus rides into Jerusalem, riding on the foal of a donkey, and weeping over Jerusalem, saying O Jerusalem you should have known the day of my coming..." And then to discover one of your 12 best friends, Judas, ratted you out to the Romans for 33 pieces of silver only to hang yourself with your guts splattering out smearing a potters field. What are the odds of all these thing being true? Find out by watching the video below. Inform yourself!

And there is the chap named Jesus. Yeshua, or Joshua. Oh yea, of Nazareth. Born of a virgin. Check. Self fulfilling? lol Self fulfilling? Sold for 30 pieces of silver and then commit suicide and buried in a potters field. Check. Yet this happened, over and over and over and over again, over 300 times with this fella named Joshua of Nazareth. This is why the Apostle Peter called this the "more sure word of prophecy. A light that shines in a dark place..."

And this goes on and on and on. Over 300 times. He fulfilled over 300 predictions, written before he was born. In many centuries, by many authors. When you get to the scuba diver in space, feel free to tell me he wasn't who he claimed to be and he didn't do the things written of him. Peter called this "the More Sure Word of Prophecy. Which shines in a dark place, lighting the path..." In other words, "so that you might believe in him and by believing be saved and become part of the New Creation!" :)


cheers
phil ;)
 
Last edited:
Top