9/11 Victim Edna Cintron standing, waving, burning from hole in the North Tower

Admin

Administrator
Staff member

The girl waving from the North Tower can be seen waving from the entrance hole of Flight 11. There are a few others in her near vicinity as well. While many think her end is a mystery, it isn't. What happens to Edna will be in the second video posted. Spoiler alert, she caught on fire. But her behavior after she caught on fire is rather bizarre and revealing. Apparently the person of Edna was replaced by a lookalike cardboard cutout and left tied to the beam to face the flames alone. Another spoiler alert, the cardboard cutout of Edna didn't make it. Notice how, even after fire engulfs the back of her body and head that she remains steadfast attached to the beam, not jumping around or doing anything a person on fire would normally do. She just gets blown back and forth by the winds until she finally catches fire. A poorly done B-roll, they didn't know when to stop the show with Edna and ruined the scene, revealing she was fake. (Real at first, replaced with a cardboard cutout at last. This is one victim of 9/11 that did literally turn to dust/ash) This 9/11 story of Edna, as you can see, went up in flames. There is a pdf screenshot of Edna Cintron's exif data from jimpl at the bottom if anyone wants to download it. The date on her exif data is March 9th, 2001. Six months prior to 9/11. I believe the reason her exif data is 6 months prior to 9/11 is because that is when they choreographed this Edna scene of The 9/11 Broadcast.

cintron.edna.cnn.memorial.12.12.2023.jpgcintron.edna.cnn.memorial.exif.data.3.9.2001.jpg
This is one of the few pictures with exif data prior to 9/11 that has no white 4-6 pixel white sidebar saying; "Family Photo/AP" - The day the picture was created or last edited was 03/09/2001. Six months prior to 9/11.The blue highlight shows her exif data as 03/09/2001. There is another screenshot from jimpl at the bottom if you want to view and download.



 

Attachments

  • cintro.edna.sc.exif.data.3.9.2001.pdf
    1.8 MB · Views: 3

Vengeance

Well-known member
When videos started surfacing on YT back in 2007 of the "jumpers/fallers", this is what got me digging deeper into this hoax. Her standing in the hole of the "impact" (detonation) zone debunks the official garbage story they gave us. As clearly seen,with HD pics now available, there was no 1,000 degree raging fire inside any of those buckled floors or near the core. For it to be that hot the flames would need to be raging non-stop the same as the initial explosion to mimic an oven type environment. This is not the case. Everyone wouldve either jumped or cooked to death. And the black smoke only further debunks that claim as indication of a cooler burning, oxygen restricted fire. The concrete slab/floor at the top of the hole shows no sign of damage, definitely proving no plane slammed into it at (a mythical claimed) 590 mph 😄😄 Also the str8 mockery at 2:41 of the first video of the fat guy in the window. Are we supposed to be convinced his shirt caught on fire? I alwayz found that comical
 

Admin

Administrator
Staff member
When videos started surfacing on YT back in 2007 of the "jumpers/fallers", this is what got me digging deeper into this hoax. Her standing in the hole of the "impact" (detonation) zone debunks the official garbage story they gave us. As clearly seen,with HD pics now available, there was no 1,000 degree raging fire inside any of those buckled floors or near the core. For it to be that hot the flames would need to be raging non-stop the same as the initial explosion to mimic an oven type environment. This is not the case. Everyone wouldve either jumped or cooked to death. And the black smoke only further debunks that claim as indication of a cooler burning, oxygen restricted fire. The concrete slab/floor at the top of the hole shows no sign of damage, definitely proving no plane slammed into it at (a mythical claimed) 590 mph 😄😄 Also the str8 mockery at 2:41 of the first video of the fat guy in the window. Are we supposed to be convinced his shirt caught on fire? I alwayz found that comical

I looked and watched it a few times and just can't see what your describing. I did an enlargement and cannot see he is on fire. Is this the man your talking about below? The frame stays the same from around 2:38 through to 2:43-4 or so...

911.man.in.window.north.tower.jpg

 

Phil Jayhan

Administrator
Staff member
Yes that is the one. back in 2016 i had a higher definition pic. That fat guy was definitely shirtless

I would love to see that picture if you still have it and can find it. Notice the size of the window in relation to the man. That is closer to correct but now it looks too tall. But he does appear to be standing on top of that 16" high heat register under the windows.


1704219805650.png
 
Top