My contribution to LoopDLoop's (and Robert Wagner's) analysis of the Claircom/GTE Airfone records.

[Vel]

I’m from Texas and I would like to post a possible theory about what I believe happened to the passengers of the flights. It’s sick but the only way it could have happened. We know there was no debris of any size at Shanksville, Pennsylvania, or the Pentagon. So let’s assume a missile of some sort was used at both locations. When do plane crashes result in no bodies or engine parts to small to identify? They don’t. A very important clue that Has been covered up is this: In 1998 Breitling watch company made a watch called the EMERGENCY, one for civil and the other was for military pilots. Should the pilot have an emergency, you can turn the crown on the watch and extend a antenna that is built into the watch. With a distinct click the watch will begin broadcasting an emergency signal so that rescue operations can begin. That signal is received in Canada by Breightling and authorities are immediately contacted. That day someone was waring one of those watches. The signal was traced to I believe Stewart AFB where they know the signal kept broadcasting, revealing the location. One of the seat back phones they claimed to have called from on one of those flights was not installed on that aircraft until later. Cell signals that high in that year moving that fast would not be able to connect. I believe the planes were diverted to the base, and passengers were pulled off the planes and they planned those calls. A son calls his own mother and introduces himself using his full name? Explaining his condition he ask her, you do believe me mom? That was clearly a man in distress giving his mom and others, clues that something was very wrong! So what happened to all of the passengers? Well it’s my belief that the passengers were told to make those calls, then afterward they were probably told they were going home and returned to the aircraft to prepare to leave. With all of them on board, I believe they introduced Carbon monoxide into the cabin of the aircraft and took them all out. Using special drones, they used those to hit the towers, Shanksville and the Pentagon, which would explain the lack of parts, debris, and human remains. Think about this, the skin of a jet is about 1/8 of an inch give or take of aluminum. They want us to believe that the jet hit building made of concrete, and reinforced steel columns, went in one side and out the other? I don’t think so. The Information about the Breightling distress call was removed for national security reasons. The signal continued to broadcast long after the passengers were reported to have crashed and were killed. There are also pics floating around that shows flight 11 with its tail numbers still in service long after the crash.

Holograms were used to ?smash? into the towers. As the planes that supposedly hit, left engine parts of planes on the ground that don't belong to the planes that hit.
That could also be why fighter jets weren't scrambled to intercept them as there was nothing physical to chase and target.

 

[Golden Angel]

I’m from Texas and I would like to post a possible theory about what I believe happened to the passengers of the flights. It’s sick but the only way it could have happened. We know there was no debris of any size at Shanksville, Pennsylvania, or the Pentagon. So let’s assume a missile of some sort was used at both locations. When do plane crashes result in no bodies or engine parts to small to identify? They don’t. A very important clue that Has been covered up is this: In 1998 Breitling watch company made a watch called the EMERGENCY, one for civil and the other was for military pilots. Should the pilot have an emergency, you can turn the crown on the watch and extend a antenna that is built into the watch. With a distinct click the watch will begin broadcasting an emergency signal so that rescue operations can begin. That signal is received in Canada by Breightling and authorities are immediately contacted. That day someone was waring one of those watches. The signal was traced to I believe Stewart AFB where they know the signal kept broadcasting, revealing the location. One of the seat back phones they claimed to have called from on one of those flights was not installed on that aircraft until later. Cell signals that high in that year moving that fast would not be able to connect. I believe the planes were diverted to the base, and passengers were pulled off the planes and they planned those calls. A son calls his own mother and introduces himself using his full name? Explaining his condition he ask her, you do believe me mom? That was clearly a man in distress giving his mom and others, clues that something was very wrong! So what happened to all of the passengers? Well it’s my belief that the passengers were told to make those calls, then afterward they were probably told they were going home and returned to the aircraft to prepare to leave. With all of them on board, I believe they introduced Carbon monoxide into the cabin of the aircraft and took them all out. Using special drones, they used those to hit the towers, Shanksville and the Pentagon, which would explain the lack of parts, debris, and human remains. Think about this, the skin of a jet is about 1/8 of an inch give or take of aluminum. They want us to believe that the jet hit building made of concrete, and reinforced steel columns, went in one side and out the other? I don’t think so. The Information about the Breightling distress call was removed for national security reasons. The signal continued to broadcast long after the passengers were reported to have crashed and were killed. There are also pics floating around that shows flight 11 with its tail numbers still in service long after the crash.

Very interesting Old Guy Texas, warm welcome to the forum by the way, nice to have another newbie join us

 

[Blue_Windows]

I'm happy to report I've made considerable progress since I posted this thread. I've shared stuff on Twitter, but I can re-post here. Namely, I found out about Claircom being sold to Iridium in 1999, which as we know, operates a network of 66 low-earth orbit satellites. The director of the Middle East division of Iridium was Hasan bin Laden, a half-brother of Osama bin Laden. He obtained 'power of attorney' over Irdium on September 11, 1998, according to official SEC documents. https://www.secinfo.com/dsvRq.736n.htm

On September 11, 1997, the satellite Iridium 38 (25043, 1997-069E) was launched. I've come to think that the sale of Claircom to Iridium doesn't only concern on-board picocells. I think it concerns the set-up of a private satellite + nation-wide network of ground stations to guide the remotely-controlled planes, through Saudi Arab cut-outs. At the level of wealth the Saudis/bin Ladin family has, it's often used to launder funds for covert operations. I think this is one such case.

I've come across a comment posted on a blog, which inadvertently sheds light on this. It was very technical. I'll just post an excerpt:

JPALS uses the precise positioning service only available to military users who have cryptographic keys and categorized NATO allies who employ managed crypto nets/keys. JPALS requires a 24 channel GPS receiver with a differential GPS algorithm and a Kalman filter to adapt to "noise" presented to the algorithms from the sensors (GPS & INS).

But JPALS doesn't work unless it has a ground station transmitting perfect position information up to the aircraft (stating exactly where the ground station is, the landing area, and the errors exhibited by the GPS satellites).

The aircraft must have a data-link to receive these ground station signals before the DGPS engine and Kalman filter can process course corrections. But, once these corrections are applied to the truth source in the aircraft, all you have is a position with respect to time. The aircraft must still be flown by someone or something.

If it's by "someone", the instrument panel will convey the correct course deviations to fly to the touch down point. If it's by "something", then an entirely separate flight director and auto pilot system must be coupled to the JPALS avionics (system) in the aircraft. There is no autonomous landing capability for JPALS without that separate system. It is not a fully CAT III-A replacement mechanism anyway--GPS doesn't support the integrity or availability.

The comment can be found here: https://frustratingfraud.blogspot.c...howComment=1209491400000#c1305159371839698503

The comment illustrates the importance of ground stations to transmit perfect position information up to the aircraft, and also to correct satellite GPS errors. It also establishes other interesting facts – how JPALS equipment (or similar) wouldn't be allowed on civilian aircraft, per FAA regulations. I think it's clear that what struck the Towers were not the real American 11 and United 175 (ACARS messages to the aircraft, received long after they allegedly crashed, indirectly prove this). Those planes weren't remotely hijacked civilian airliners. They were military drones, perhaps built at Pinal Air Park in Marana, Arizona according to Wayne Madsen.

Photo analysis of the second tower plane in particular, shows a 'pod' or some additional piece of equipment which doesn't belong on a commercial airliner. The plane in question appears to be a modified Boeing 767-300 tanker aircraft. On images of the second tower plane, you can see a hole in the tail section where the refueling boom would have been. The 'pod' is a radome for a SATNAV connection, like ones designed for the Boeing 737-NG series.

The plane was probably using JPALS (Joint Precision Automated Landing System), whose priority usage is for covert missions carried out by US special ops, as revealed by Kevin Ryan in his article "From Renovation to Revolution: Was the Pentagon attacked from within?". Tactical JPALS missions, which I believe the remote piloting of the planes was, involves, among other things, a GPS receiver the size of a camera tripod. This still doesn't cover the question of remote control, which is different from guidance/transmitting accurate real-time position information.

The Tower planes were likely remotely piloted from Hanscom AFB, located a couple miles outside of Boston Logan airport where AA 11 and United 175 departed from. Hanscom AFB specializes in electronic warfare and other missions. The remote pilot would have to be fairly close by to the target, because the signal latency adds up over distance.

EDIT: I meant to say Pinal Air Park, not Pirana.

 

[Ramjam]

I'm happy to report I've made considerable progress since I posted this thread. I've shared stuff on Twitter, but I can re-post here. Namely, I found out about Claircom being sold to Iridium in 1999, which as we know, operates a network of 66 low-earth orbit satellites. The director of the Middle East division of Iridium was Hasan bin Laden, a half-brother of Osama bin Laden. He obtained 'power of attorney' over Irdium on September 11, 1998, according to official SEC documents. https://www.secinfo.com/dsvRq.736n.htm

On September 11, 1997, the satellite Iridium 38 (25043, 1997-069E) was launched. I've come to think that the sale of Claircom to Iridium doesn't only concern on-board picocells. I think it concerns the set-up of a private satellite + nation-wide network of ground stations to guide the remotely-controlled planes, through Saudi Arab cut-outs. At the level of wealth the Saudis/bin Ladin family has, it's often used to launder funds for covert operations. I think this is one such case.

I've come across a comment posted on a blog, which inadvertently sheds light on this. It was very technical. I'll just post an excerpt:









The comment can be found here: https://frustratingfraud.blogspot.c...howComment=1209491400000#c1305159371839698503

The comment illustrates the importance of ground stations to transmit perfect position information up to the aircraft, and also to correct satellite GPS errors. It also establishes other interesting facts – how JPALS equipment (or similar) wouldn't be allowed on civilian aircraft, per FAA regulations. I think it's clear that what struck the Towers were not the real American 11 and United 175 (ACARS messages to the aircraft, received long after they allegedly crashed, indirectly prove this). Those planes weren't remotely hijacked civilian airliners. They were military drones, perhaps built at Pinal Air Park in Marana, Arizona according to Wayne Madsen.

Photo analysis of the second tower plane in particular, shows a 'pod' or some additional piece of equipment which doesn't belong on a commercial airliner. The plane in question appears to be a modified Boeing 767-300 tanker aircraft. On images of the second tower plane, you can see a hole in the tail section where the refueling boom would have been. The 'pod' is a radome for a SATNAV connection, like ones designed for the Boeing 737-NG series.

The plane was probably using JPALS (Joint Precision Automated Landing System), whose priority usage is for covert missions carried out by US special ops, as revealed by Kevin Ryan in his article "From Renovation to Revolution: Was the Pentagon attacked from within?". Tactical JPALS missions, which I believe the remote piloting of the planes was, involves, among other things, a GPS receiver the size of a camera tripod. This still doesn't cover the question of remote control, which is different from guidance/transmitting accurate real-time position information.

The Tower planes were likely remotely piloted from Hanscom AFB, located a couple miles outside of Boston Logan airport where AA 11 and United 175 departed from. Hanscom AFB specializes in electronic warfare and other missions. The remote pilot would have to be fairly close by to the target, because the signal latency adds up over distance.

EDIT: I meant to say Pinal Air Park, not Pirana.

Amazing. You always come out of the woodwork with truly astonishing facts. I think the idea that the aircraft were controlled at Hanscom AFB is very interesting and I will have to do some research into the facility and the possibility. If the signal latency added up over longer distances, would there be different facilities that it would need to pass over/near in order to maintain its course and controls ? If so, I’d like to take a bit and research all of the known facilities along the route to see if it lines up beyond a reasonable doubt. I think the information you’ve provided is quite groundbreaking and should warrant further research into that aspect of both flights 11 and 175. I know it doesn’t exist (at least not that I’ve found), but my brain craves an exact answer as to what occurred with those 2 flights in specific. Flight 93 is more cut and dry, as is 77 in my opinion. Both 11 and 175 have such unique aspects to them that it is the greatest mystery in my mind as to what EXACTLY occurred. What you laid out is a much more precise idea than what I had thought, but it fits the same specifications. I will post back in the near future after I review everything you posted. This is definitely going to reignite my interest over the next 2-4 months !

 

[Ramjam]

I’m from Texas and I would like to post a possible theory about what I believe happened to the passengers of the flights. It’s sick but the only way it could have happened. We know there was no debris of any size at Shanksville, Pennsylvania, or the Pentagon. So let’s assume a missile of some sort was used at both locations. When do plane crashes result in no bodies or engine parts to small to identify? They don’t. A very important clue that Has been covered up is this: In 1998 Breitling watch company made a watch called the EMERGENCY, one for civil and the other was for military pilots. Should the pilot have an emergency, you can turn the crown on the watch and extend an antenna that is built into the watch. With a distinct click the watch will begin broadcasting an emergency signal so that rescue operations can begin. That signal is received in Canada by Breightling and authorities are immediately contacted. That day someone was waring one of those watches. The signal was traced to I believe Stewart AFB where they know the signal kept broadcasting, revealing the location. One of the seat back phones they claimed to have called from on one of those flights was not installed on that aircraft until later. Cell signals that high in that year moving that fast would not be able to connect. I believe the planes were diverted to the base, and passengers were pulled off the planes and they planned those calls. A son calls his own mother and introduces himself using his full name? Explaining his condition he ask her, you do believe me mom? That was clearly a man in distress giving his mom and others, clues that something was very wrong! So what happened to all of the passengers? Well it’s my belief that the passengers were told to make those calls, then afterward they were probably told they were going home and returned to the aircraft to prepare to leave. With all of them on board, I believe they introduced Carbon monoxide into the cabin of the aircraft and took them all out. Using special drones, they used those to hit the towers, Shanksville and the Pentagon, which would explain the lack of parts, debris, and human remains. Think about this, the skin of a jet is about 1/8 of an inch give or take of aluminum. They want us to believe that the jet hit building made of concrete, and reinforced steel columns, went in one side and out the other? I don’t think so. The Information about the Breightling distress call was removed for national security reasons. The signal continued to broadcast long after the passengers were reported to have crashed and were killed. There are also pics floating around that shows flight 11 with its tail numbers still in service long after the crash.

I will do some digging into the watch. I have never heard of this model watch, and I hope I can find something…anything about it. That would be extremely interesting and would make for one of the most dramatic reveals in the entire subject. For me, Betty Ong and the like are such make or brake details about the case. Was she an actual person and did she truly exist as we were “told” ? Was she a person but the dossier was used to create a person ? Did she not exist at all and that entire dossier and character was created specifically for this event ? Putting all of that aside, what happened to that “person” known as Betty Ong ? That detail to me pulls me back into this case multiple times per year. Reviewing the high school year books in San Francisco and not seeing her, the phone call and multiple “flight 12” slip ups from her and Sweeney, the robotic “Flyghyt EEELVHUN” from her in the recording we were given, everything makes this case enamoring. I will take everything everyone posted and do what research I can. I’ll post back once I find something/anything for that matter. Love the info and it gives me more and more to research. Thanks